EPTIBM Watson Computer Beats Jeopardy Pros - Page 4
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
Gescom
Canada3513 Posts
| ||
|
Hochmeister
United States16 Posts
| ||
|
Ludwigvan
Germany2371 Posts
i saw the episode here: http://www.youtube.com/user/aleitchvidz | ||
|
Endymion
United States3701 Posts
| ||
|
Sky
Jordan812 Posts
On February 15 2011 11:59 Endymion wrote: This is amazing, it's really breaking down the barrier between nerds and non-nerds. The ability to speak in free english to a computer and get a natural response that's actually accurate is so much more powerful than people think. What's next, getting into your car and saying "hey, drive me to the airport but take the scenic route. Also, hit a starbucks on the way" Amazing. I'm hoping for quick medical diagnosis and maybe chemical trouble-shooting for those dealing with possibly poisonous combinations. | ||
|
TealLurker
United States791 Posts
| ||
|
iMbc
United States55 Posts
 (watson tied at 5000 with brad)....CAN'T WAIT FOR TOMORROW | ||
|
durza
United States667 Posts
| ||
|
caelym
United States6429 Posts
| ||
|
rredtooth
5464 Posts
On February 15 2011 12:41 caelym wrote: read the OP. he wrote it before the actual match. he's talking about the 'practice round' where he was leading at the half.Watson didn't beat the pros yet... the title is very misleading. | ||
|
skuj
United States302 Posts
On February 15 2011 12:34 durza wrote: I think Jennings figured out the best strat to maybe beating watson, he began to just try and buzz in on every question and then figure it out, Rutters than began to follow his example. Should be interesting. thats how jennings did it for 75 episodes straight lol | ||
|
Gleve
United States206 Posts
Rutters came back and tied with Watson... Tomorrow should be awesome! Like someone said before me Jennings strat seems like its the way to go. Watson has proven to be a formidable opponent! | ||
|
Lucid90
Canada340 Posts
Step 1: upload some software that will understand human voice Step 2: google the question because it's a fucking computer. You can just stick a tiny usb stick that connects to the internet underneath all those layers of computers. Step 3: write the code that will make the computer pick the most likely answer congradulations IBM, you now have marketed your products to an even greater audience. | ||
|
Stratos_speAr
United States6959 Posts
On February 15 2011 13:39 Lucid90 wrote: I can make this program in 5 minutes. Step 1: upload some software that will understand human voice Step 2: google the question because it's a fucking computer. You can just stick a tiny usb stick that connects to the internet underneath all those layers of computers. Step 3: write the code that will make the computer pick the most likely answer congradulations IBM, you now have marketed your products to an even greater audience. You're completely failing to understand the process. The computer is actually understanding the use of the complexities of the English language. Software that recognizes voice commands is very primitive and can only understand basic statements. It can't do anything like understand the various language devices used to make Jeopardy questions. | ||
|
Noev
United States1105 Posts
On February 15 2011 13:39 Lucid90 wrote: I can make this program in 5 minutes. Step 1: upload some software that will understand human voice Step 2: google the question because it's a fucking computer. You can just stick a tiny usb stick that connects to the internet underneath all those layers of computers. Step 3: write the code that will make the computer pick the most likely answer congradulations IBM, you now have marketed your products to an even greater audience. Its funny that the real magic is in step 3, you make it sound so easy but its understanding what the question is and picking the correct answer thats hard. especially with the puns and word play that is often used on that show. Thought it was really cool to watch my GF really liked it were gonna watch tomorrow. | ||
Womwomwom
5930 Posts
Context is a big barrier for these programs, they actually talked about it on the show how a major hurdle is making it understand the difference between Usain Bolt running in a 100m race and McCain running for president; two phrases using one identical word but two whole different contexts and the program has to be able to make the distinction between the two words quickly and accurately. | ||
|
mytent
United States156 Posts
This Is just a normal computer on steroids. Thats it. It's not a true learning computer. Just a powerful, well programmer one. It's a big gimmick, that's all it can ever be. Skynet? Ha! Yeah right.. | ||
|
mytent
United States156 Posts
| ||
|
Eggm
United States152 Posts
| ||
|
muffley
United States280 Posts
On February 15 2011 14:33 mytent wrote: Programming it wouldn't have taken a genius. Just someone with a lot of time, it'd be tedious that's it. It's tedious to build a fancy new bridge. It's complicated and difficult to design a fancy new bridge. | ||
| ||
