IBM Watson Computer Beats Jeopardy Pros - Page 6
Forum Index > General Forum |
Souljah
United States423 Posts
| ||
mcc
Czech Republic4646 Posts
On February 16 2011 03:27 metaphoR wrote: The thing is, humans win this challenge no matter what. as said in the 20 minute video in the OP, all it takes is a tuna sandwich and a glass or water to power a human brain that can fit in a shoebox. compare that to what it takes Watson to compete, humans win every time. So a very muscular person loses by default to a non-muscular one ? The point of this game is to come up with the correct answer, weight and power requirements are not part of it yet | ||
Sanguinarius
United States3427 Posts
| ||
Bibdy
United States3481 Posts
| ||
UisTehSux
United States693 Posts
| ||
Nizaris
Belgium2230 Posts
On February 16 2011 04:03 Souljah wrote: Ive got my own Watson. Its called www.google.com I wish Google would return only 1 result ever, the one i was looking for. Which is precisely one of the applications of Watson. | ||
aeoliant
Canada361 Posts
| ||
metaphoR
United States199 Posts
On February 16 2011 04:36 Nizaris wrote: I wish Google would return only 1 result ever, the one i was looking for. Which is precisely one of the applications of Watson. its only right 70% of the time though https://spreadsheets.google.com/lv?hl=en&key=tth_jhM8vyBAuogqHllHmHQ&toomany=true | ||
michaelthe
United States359 Posts
| ||
Deleted User 3420
24492 Posts
On February 16 2011 06:04 michaelthe wrote: Does it instantly buzz in then get the 5 seconds to try and find an answer? Or find the answer then buzz in? it develops confidence in an answer based on a % it thinks it's correct. when confidence reaches a certain point it buzzes in. the percentage of confidence it needs to buzz in is based on it's current score compared to the score of it's opponents. On February 15 2011 14:51 catamorphist wrote: i know the secret to eternal life Step 1: don't get hit by a bus Step 2: eat fucking vegetables and shit Step 3: cure aging congradulations was it that hard?? y doesnt ibm do this wow this post is amazing lol | ||
EscPlan9
United States2777 Posts
On February 16 2011 06:04 michaelthe wrote: Does it instantly buzz in then get the 5 seconds to try and find an answer? Or find the answer then buzz in? Watson only "buzzes in" via robotic hand movement when it finds an answer that exceeds a specific certainty threshold that is programmed in. | ||
Kinky
United States4126 Posts
Nvm, they're showing 3 episodes between the 14th and the 16th. | ||
sob3k
United States7572 Posts
On February 16 2011 04:07 mcc wrote: So a very muscular person loses by default to a non-muscular one ? The point of this game is to come up with the correct answer, weight and power requirements are not part of it yet plus, humans take 20 years to boot up after putting them together | ||
EscPlan9
United States2777 Posts
On February 16 2011 04:52 metaphoR wrote: its only right 70% of the time though https://spreadsheets.google.com/lv?hl=en&key=tth_jhM8vyBAuogqHllHmHQ&toomany=true It should be noted that is based on an extremely small sample size, so it is not conclusive that Watson is "70% accurate" at producing the correct answer. Also, what many still fail to realize is how difficult it is to program a computer to understand the nuances of the english language into such a way to be able to discern the important information from the unimportant bits, and then also find the correct answer. For instance, you need to program the AI to understand the context of a sentence to understand the keywords and puns. To everyone critical of Watson: Read some articles and videos on how Watson operates before forming your opinions on whether or not it is an impressive feat. | ||
SweeTLemonS[TPR]
11739 Posts
On February 16 2011 06:32 EscPlan9 wrote: It should be noted that is based on an extremely small sample size, so it is not conclusive that Watson is "70% accurate" at producing the correct answer. Also, what many still fail to realize is how difficult it is to program a computer to understand the nuances of the english language into such a way to be able to discern the important information from the unimportant bits, and then also find the correct answer. For instance, you need to program the AI to understand the context of a sentence to understand the keywords and puns. To everyone critical of Watson: Read some articles and videos on how Watson operates before forming your opinions on whether or not it is an impressive feat. Assuming they are correct the posts saying the following things were enough to impress me: Instead of using specialised databases for Jeopardy, it uses alogarithms to break down text and attempts to find the subject matter, verbs, grammar, etc. From there correlates and interrelates words and phrases so it can make confidence percentages (Jeopardy displays this as the answer panel) and hypotheses. Basically it can "learn" by itself in a very primative way and if it gets something wrong it goes "oh I'm wrong, these sets of words can be used in this way!" and changes its confidences and construct possibly more accurate hypotheses. it develops confidence in an answer based on a % it thinks it's correct. when confidence reaches a certain point it buzzes in. the percentage of confidence it needs to buzz in is based on it's current score compared to the score of it's opponents. How is everyone else not impressed by that? That's very impressive for a computer, even if it is the simplest way for a human to learn. | ||
lixlix
United States482 Posts
For one, human helpdesks and tech support will be rendered obsolete and that is only the start. | ||
SweeTLemonS[TPR]
11739 Posts
On February 16 2011 07:56 lixlix wrote: The people relating this to Google are missing the point. The practical applications for something like Watson are super vast. For one, human helpdesks and tech support will be rendered obsolete and that is only the start. Hey, hey! Don't say that. . . I'll be out of a job then. I'll seriously kill myself if I'm still doing this bullshit when this technology becomes mainstream. | ||
Chill
Calgary25955 Posts
On February 16 2011 06:26 travis wrote: it develops confidence in an answer based on a % it thinks it's correct. when confidence reaches a certain point it buzzes in. the percentage of confidence it needs to buzz in is based on it's current score compared to the score of it's opponents. wow this post is amazing lol LOL that post is amazing haha | ||
AbstractVoid
United States127 Posts
| ||
555
56 Posts
However, after looking at the questions and videos, I am absolutely amazed and excited. Natural language processing is one of those things where humans outperforms computers. However, the technology used for Watson will eventually allow us to have actual conversations with computers. I look forward to being able to go up to my computer and ask "find me some build orders lulz" and it would go on the internet, google it up, read through all the forums and return with a bunch of build orders and arguments on which are good or bad. | ||
| ||