• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 07:42
CEST 13:42
KST 20:42
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL21] Ro8 Preview Pt2: Progenitors4Code S Season 1 - RO12 Group A: Rogue, Percival, Solar, Zoun13[ASL21] Ro8 Preview Pt1: Inheritors16[ASL21] Ro16 Preview Pt2: All Star10Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - The Finalists22
Community News
RSL Revival: Season 5 - Qualifiers and Main Event10Code S Season 1 (2026) - RO12 Results12026 GSL Season 1 Qualifiers25Maestros of the Game 2 announced92026 GSL Tour plans announced15
StarCraft 2
General
Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool Code S Season 1 (2026) - RO12 Results Code S Season 1 - RO12 Group A: Rogue, Percival, Solar, Zoun Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - The Finalists MaNa leaves Team Liquid
Tourneys
2026 GSL Season 2 Qualifiers Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament StarCraft Evolution League (SC Evo Biweekly) $1,400 SEL Season 3 Ladder Invitational RSL Revival: Season 5 - Qualifiers and Main Event
Strategy
Custom Maps
[D]RTS in all its shapes and glory <3 [A] Nemrods 1/4 players [M] (2) Frigid Storage
External Content
Mutation # 524 Death and Taxes The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 523 Firewall Mutation # 522 Flip My Base
Brood War
General
Why there arent any 256x256 pro maps? BW General Discussion ASL21 General Discussion [ASL21] Ro8 Preview Pt2: Progenitors BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
[ASL21] Ro8 Day 3 [ASL21] Ro8 Day 2 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Escore Tournament StarCraft Season 2
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Fighting Spirit mining rates What's the deal with APM & what's its true value Any training maps people recommend?
Other Games
General Games
Daigo vs Menard Best of 10 Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread OutLive 25 (RTS Game) Dawn of War IV Nintendo Switch Thread
Dota 2
The Story of Wings Gaming
League of Legends
G2 just beat GenG in First stand
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread Five o'clock TL Mafia
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread 3D technology/software discussion Canadian Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion McBoner: A hockey love story
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
streaming software Strange computer issues (software) [G] How to Block Livestream Ads
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Movie Stars In Video Games: …
TrAiDoS
ramps on octagon
StaticNine
Broowar part 2
qwaykee
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1555 users

IBM Watson Computer Beats Jeopardy Pros

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
1 2 3 4 5 10 11 12 Next All
SpoR
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States1542 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-02-19 05:13:16
January 20 2011 05:52 GMT
#1
In preliminary testing rounds.

                              [image loading]

http://www.tgdaily.com/sustainability-brief/53584-ibms-watson-computer-beats-human-players-in-jeopardy

After years of planning, IBM's learning, human-aware computer Watson was put to a competition like no other - a match of Jeopardy against quiz show heavyweights Ken Jennings and Brad Rutter. The result - Watson won. Barely.

The match, which Watson has been training for since 2009, was officially announced last year. At the end of last week, the multi-episode feature where Watson faces off against Jennings and Rutter was filmed.

But right before that, all three competed in a trial run at IBM's headquarters in New York State. The trial lasted as long as a normal game of Jeopardy would before its first commercial break - in other words, about enough time for the contestants to get through half of a round.

Right before the last clue of the round, Jennings and Watson were tied at $3,400. However, Watson chimed in to answer the final question and correctly identified the children's book Harold and the Purple Crayon. That set him ahead to $4,400. Rutter trailed at $1,200.

The full-length Jeopardy matches have been filmed, but no one is allowed to discuss the results. They'll be aired on TV next month, and at that time we'll really know who wins in the battle of man versus machine.

Should be interesting. I'm sure everyone is aware of the Deep Blue Project (also by IBM) which beat chess pro Kasparov decades ago.




IBM and the producers of quiz show Jeopardy announced Tuesday that an IBM computer known as "Watson" will compete against two of the show's most successful contestants in February 2011.

Watson, named after IBM founder Thomas J. Watson, will go up against Ken Jennings and Brad Rutter (left) on February 14, 15, and 16 in two matches over three days. Jennings won 74 games in a row during the 2004-2005 season, taking home more than $2.5 million. Rutter is Jeopardy's highest-earning player, winning more than $3.25 million during several appearances in 2002 and 2005.

The grand prize for the Watson-Jennings-Rutter matchup will be $1 million, with second place winnings of $300,000 and a $200,000 third prize. Jennings and Rutter will donate 50 percent of their winnings to charity, while IBM will donate 100 percent of Watson's cash.

Getting Watson to the Jeopardy stage has taken several years. Many clues in Jeopardy rely on subtle word play, irony, and riddles, something at which humans excel but that computers have difficulty understanding. Essentially, IBM had to figure out how to get Watson to think.

"After four years, our scientific team believes that Watson is ready for this challenge based on its ability to rapidly comprehend what the Jeopardy clue is asking, analyze the information it has access to, come up with precise answers, and develop an accurate confidence in its response," Dr. David Ferrucci, head of the Watson research team, said in a statement. "Beyond our excitement for the match itself, our team is very motivated by the possibilities that Watson's breakthrough computing capabilities hold for building a smarter planet and helping people in their business tasks and personal lives."

In a video about Watson's journey (below), Ferrucci said said the nature of Jeopardy is "going to drive the technology in the right direction."

"It's got the broad domain aspect, asks all kinds of things, which was one of the challenges we really wanted to take on," he said. "It had the confidence aspect; don't answer unless you think you're right. You also had to do it really quickly."

IBM said the technology used by Watson could be helpful in areas like healthcare, to help accurately diagnose patients, to improve online self-service help desks, to provide tourists and citizens with specific information regarding cities, or prompt customer support via phone.

To prepare, Watson played more than 50 "sparring games" against former Jeopardy champions. Watson also took and passed the same Jeopardy test administered to all potential contestants.

In the video, Harry Friedman, executive producer of Jeopardy, said when IBM first approached the show, producers were intrigued but were also concerned about it being viewed as a stunt or gimmick.

"But this was different. This was the notion of knowledge acquired by a computer against knowledge acquired and displayed by the best Jeopardy players," Friedman said. "This could be something important, and we want to be a part of it."

Friedman and other producers first watched Watson in action in December 2009, when it sparred against two other human contestants.

Watson is powered by an IBM POWER7 server, which is optimized to handle the massive number of tasks that Watson must perform at rapid speeds, IBM said. The machine also has a number of proprietary technologies that handle concurrent tasks and data while analyzing information in real time.


http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2374331,00.asp



There are also a ton more videos about Watson on YT

This is the most indepth video I found so far. It describes the algorithm and abilities of the computer.


UPDATE 2/15/11

+ Show Spoiler [Day 1 Episode] +





+ Show Spoiler [Day 2 Episode] +






+ Show Spoiler [Day 3 Episode] +





Nova special

dunno if a full upload to YT is up yet but you can watch on NOVA site here
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/tech/smartest-machine-on-earth.html

+ Show Spoiler [Tues Feb 14th] +
Watson $5,000 , Ken $2,000, Brad $5,000
WOW

+ Show Spoiler [Tues Feb 15th] +
Watson $35,734 , Ken $4,800, Brad $10,400
OMG!


+ Show Spoiler [Tues Feb 16th] +
Watson $41,413 , Ken $19,200, Brad $11,200
RAPE

http://www.jeopardy.com/showguide/whentowatch/
A man is what he thinks about all day long.
eLiE
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Canada1039 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-01-20 06:06:36
January 20 2011 05:59 GMT
#2
I'm not exactly sure how a human is supposed to beat the reflexes of a computer, unless it's forced to solve the question before answering. Even then, that's no time at all. This is shifty to me, that computer must be the heart of google or something (or this is set up, idk).

EDIT: I wonder how it solves actual puzzle questions, not just fill in the blank stuff.

Found another article. no interwebz allowed. Apparently what this thing does could take a normal computer 2 hours. I wanna play video games on that.

http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2375791,00.asp

Guys don't worry, I bet that AI can't answer a bullet (in the form of a question is the tricky part)!
How's the weather down there?
lyAsakura
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States1414 Posts
January 20 2011 06:01 GMT
#3
Doesn't even look like Watson tried, even if it is a computer. The entire video, it felt like Watson was giggling to himself and letting the other guys catch up.
WeMade FOX would be a deadly SC2 team.
Blisse
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Canada3710 Posts
January 20 2011 06:01 GMT
#4
I think the question needs to be processed in the computer, then searched and confirmed. Which will take some time to do.

A.I. is getting scarier guys.
There is no one like you in the universe.
Torte de Lini
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
Germany38463 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-01-20 06:04:25
January 20 2011 06:03 GMT
#5
Man will always beat machine because man created machine and its lengths of knowledge, capabilities and boundaries.

Somewhere... there's a movie with the exact same statement above.

To be honest, first the Chess-Playing computer, then the Micro-Beast AI, now this?
I'm scared ): Hold me.
https://twitter.com/#!/TorteDeLini (@TorteDeLini)
Roman
Profile Joined November 2002
United States2595 Posts
January 20 2011 06:04 GMT
#6
didnt deep blue have a grandmaster controlling it?
SpoR
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States1542 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-01-20 06:08:31
January 20 2011 06:05 GMT
#7
On January 20 2011 15:03 Torte de Lini wrote:
Man will always beat machine because man created machine and its lengths of knowledge, capabilities and boundaries.

Somewhere... there's a movie with the exact same statement above.

To be honest, first the Chess-Playing computer, then the Micro-Beast AI, now this?
I'm scared ): Hold me.


Last time some Israeli dudes made a computer called Deep Junior vs Kasparov which tied him 3-3, Kasparov offered a draw and the computer accepted and he said he didn't want to fuck up so he decided to offer.

On January 20 2011 15:01 whitelynx wrote:
Doesn't even look like Watson tried, even if it is a computer. The entire video, it felt like Watson was giggling to himself and letting the other guys catch up.


I got the feeling that the machine was more programmed with useful facts rather than children's storybook titles, etc.
Also kinda curious how the thing rings the buzzer. There has to be some inherent delay a human can actually squeeze the button that a computer can beat 100% of the time if they both think the answer and the exact same second. Also, can the computer buzz in before the question is over?
A man is what he thinks about all day long.
tomatriedes
Profile Blog Joined January 2007
New Zealand5356 Posts
January 20 2011 06:05 GMT
#8
One step closer to Skynet.
semantics
Profile Blog Joined November 2009
10040 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-01-20 06:12:04
January 20 2011 06:07 GMT
#9
Ken Jennings!!!!!!! NOOOOO
I love when IBM does something not so business oriented, although it does have underlying business reason that sort of AI can prove very useful in things like analysis.

Although one can't beat this machine in the style of an epic yarn like John Henry dieing in the end always makes it more legend worthy
sob3k
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
United States7572 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-01-20 06:13:07
January 20 2011 06:08 GMT
#10
On January 20 2011 15:04 Roman wrote:
didnt deep blue have a grandmaster controlling it?


No. What on earth would be the point of that?

This is actually EXTREMELY cool.

What Watson is doing is actually receiving the regular jeopard questions, interpreting what information is requested, and then finding it in realtime. Technology like this is what will lead to next level search technology where you can just load up google and say "gimme a restream of the GSL" and it'll just do it for you.
In Hungry Hungry Hippos there are no such constraints—one can constantly attempt to collect marbles with one’s hippo, limited only by one’s hippo-levering capabilities.
sob3k
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
United States7572 Posts
January 20 2011 06:10 GMT
#11
On January 20 2011 15:03 Torte de Lini wrote:
Man will always beat machine because man created machine and its lengths of knowledge, capabilities and boundaries.

Somewhere... there's a movie with the exact same statement above.

To be honest, first the Chess-Playing computer, then the Micro-Beast AI, now this?
I'm scared ): Hold me.



what? That makes no sense at all.

So a can outrun an airplane just because it was made by humans? I can win a fight with a robotic forklift?
In Hungry Hungry Hippos there are no such constraints—one can constantly attempt to collect marbles with one’s hippo, limited only by one’s hippo-levering capabilities.
hp.Shell
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States2527 Posts
January 20 2011 06:13 GMT
#12
On January 20 2011 15:05 SpoR wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 20 2011 15:03 Torte de Lini wrote:
Man will always beat machine because man created machine and its lengths of knowledge, capabilities and boundaries.

Somewhere... there's a movie with the exact same statement above.

To be honest, first the Chess-Playing computer, then the Micro-Beast AI, now this?
I'm scared ): Hold me.


Last time some Israeli dudes made a computer called Deep Junior vs Kasparov which tied him 3-3, Kasparov offered a draw and the computer accepted and he said he didn't want to fuck up so he decided to offer.

That's pretty cool, sounds like the computer was overjoyed that Kasparov acknowledged it as an equal.
Please PM me with any songs you like that you think I haven't heard before!
SpoR
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States1542 Posts
January 20 2011 06:15 GMT
#13
On January 20 2011 15:13 hp.Shell wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 20 2011 15:05 SpoR wrote:
On January 20 2011 15:03 Torte de Lini wrote:
Man will always beat machine because man created machine and its lengths of knowledge, capabilities and boundaries.

Somewhere... there's a movie with the exact same statement above.

To be honest, first the Chess-Playing computer, then the Micro-Beast AI, now this?
I'm scared ): Hold me.


Last time some Israeli dudes made a computer called Deep Junior vs Kasparov which tied him 3-3, Kasparov offered a draw and the computer accepted and he said he didn't want to fuck up so he decided to offer.

That's pretty cool, sounds like the computer was overjoyed that Kasparov acknowledged it as an equal.


This is a funny way to put it. I mean the computer doesn't have any emotions.
A man is what he thinks about all day long.
Ferrose
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
United States11378 Posts
January 20 2011 06:16 GMT
#14
Hopefully this isn't the future of AI/computers:

[image loading]
@113candlemagic Office lady by day, lonely woman at night. | Official lolicon of thread 94273
Lefnui
Profile Joined November 2008
United States753 Posts
January 20 2011 06:19 GMT
#15
On January 20 2011 15:08 sob3k wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 20 2011 15:04 Roman wrote:
didnt deep blue have a grandmaster controlling it?


No. What on earth would be the point of that?

He's referring to an allegation that Kasparov made after the match. And actually, there would be a very meaningful point to it. Computers, especially at that time, were a bit too greedy with material. A GM controlling what lines the computer considers would be extremely useful.
Spazer
Profile Blog Joined March 2009
Canada8033 Posts
January 20 2011 06:23 GMT
#16
On January 20 2011 15:05 SpoR wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 20 2011 15:03 Torte de Lini wrote:
Man will always beat machine because man created machine and its lengths of knowledge, capabilities and boundaries.

Somewhere... there's a movie with the exact same statement above.

To be honest, first the Chess-Playing computer, then the Micro-Beast AI, now this?
I'm scared ): Hold me.


Last time some Israeli dudes made a computer called Deep Junior vs Kasparov which tied him 3-3, Kasparov offered a draw and the computer accepted and he said he didn't want to fuck up so he decided to offer.

Show nested quote +
On January 20 2011 15:01 whitelynx wrote:
Doesn't even look like Watson tried, even if it is a computer. The entire video, it felt like Watson was giggling to himself and letting the other guys catch up.


I got the feeling that the machine was more programmed with useful facts rather than children's storybook titles, etc.
Also kinda curious how the thing rings the buzzer. There has to be some inherent delay a human can actually squeeze the button that a computer can beat 100% of the time if they both think the answer and the exact same second. Also, can the computer buzz in before the question is over?

Your reflexes are not as fast as the computer's, guaranteed. Once the computer knows the answer, it can spam the signal line. All the computer needs to do is know is the length of time the signal line must be high for in order for it to be detected. Since this is probably in the microseconds range, this means the computer could probably manage several thousand button pushes per second. You can't beat that.
Liquipedia
SpoR
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States1542 Posts
January 20 2011 06:25 GMT
#17
On January 20 2011 15:23 Spazer wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 20 2011 15:05 SpoR wrote:
On January 20 2011 15:03 Torte de Lini wrote:
Man will always beat machine because man created machine and its lengths of knowledge, capabilities and boundaries.

Somewhere... there's a movie with the exact same statement above.

To be honest, first the Chess-Playing computer, then the Micro-Beast AI, now this?
I'm scared ): Hold me.


Last time some Israeli dudes made a computer called Deep Junior vs Kasparov which tied him 3-3, Kasparov offered a draw and the computer accepted and he said he didn't want to fuck up so he decided to offer.

On January 20 2011 15:01 whitelynx wrote:
Doesn't even look like Watson tried, even if it is a computer. The entire video, it felt like Watson was giggling to himself and letting the other guys catch up.


I got the feeling that the machine was more programmed with useful facts rather than children's storybook titles, etc.
Also kinda curious how the thing rings the buzzer. There has to be some inherent delay a human can actually squeeze the button that a computer can beat 100% of the time if they both think the answer and the exact same second. Also, can the computer buzz in before the question is over?

Your reflexes are not as fast as the computer's, guaranteed. Once the computer knows the answer, it can spam the signal line. All the computer needs to do is know is the length of time the signal line must be high for in order for it to be detected. Since this is probably in the microseconds range, this means the computer could probably manage several thousand button pushes per second. You can't beat that.

Thanks for reaffirming what I said? I read in another article that it has some mechanism that mimics a human pressing a button to not be imba in this way.
A man is what he thinks about all day long.
mikeymoo
Profile Blog Joined October 2006
Canada7170 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-01-20 06:49:13
January 20 2011 06:27 GMT
#18
Very smart move by IBM.
If it was head to head vs Jennings, Watson would be less favoured than in a three-way format because when it can't answer a question, there wouldn't be two contestants to split the responses.
Also, I'm wondering what the algorithm is for Daily Doubles and Final Jeopardy. Should be interesting.
Edited out a typo.
o_x | Ow. | 1003 ESPORTS dollars | If you have any questions about bans please PM Kennigit
SpoR
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States1542 Posts
January 20 2011 06:28 GMT
#19
ok this is kind of chilling

A man is what he thinks about all day long.
SpoR
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States1542 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-01-20 06:39:58
January 20 2011 06:32 GMT
#20
On January 20 2011 15:08 sob3k wrote:


This is actually EXTREMELY cool.

What Watson is doing is actually receiving the regular jeopard questions, interpreting what information is requested, and then finding it in realtime. Technology like this is what will lead to next level search technology where you can just load up google and say "gimme a restream of the GSL" and it'll just do it for you.



yup


A man is what he thinks about all day long.
1 2 3 4 5 10 11 12 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Wardi Open
11:00
#85
IntoTheiNu 1065
WardiTV471
OGKoka 253
Rex88
Liquipedia
Afreeca Starleague
10:00
Ro8 Match 3
Jaedong vs Light
Afreeca ASL 26490
StarCastTV_EN700
Liquipedia
Replay Cast
09:00
WardiTV Mondays #80
CranKy Ducklings102
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Lowko330
OGKoka 253
Rex 92
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 22024
Bisu 11289
Sea 6888
BeSt 2129
EffOrt 1222
Soulkey 1065
Soma 776
Pusan 650
Zeus 457
Hyun 253
[ Show more ]
hero 220
Larva 162
PianO 127
Killer 120
ToSsGirL 108
ggaemo 93
Backho 81
Sharp 63
Barracks 48
Sexy 38
Hm[arnc] 29
soO 28
JulyZerg 26
Sacsri 23
Sea.KH 20
Terrorterran 17
GoRush 17
Icarus 15
IntoTheRainbow 12
ajuk12(nOOB) 10
Noble 9
Dota 2
monkeys_forever174
XcaliburYe98
ODPixel83
canceldota30
Counter-Strike
byalli445
x6flipin426
allub237
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox1158
Mew2King14
Other Games
singsing1825
B2W.Neo860
Livibee47
Organizations
StarCraft: Brood War
UltimateBattle 373
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream47
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• LUISG 37
• CranKy Ducklings SOOP30
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV314
League of Legends
• TFBlade494
Upcoming Events
Monday Night Weeklies
4h 18m
Replay Cast
12h 18m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
22h 18m
Afreeca Starleague
22h 18m
Snow vs Flash
WardiTV Invitational
23h 18m
SHIN vs Nicoract
Solar vs Nice
GSL
1d 21h
Classic vs Cure
Maru vs Rogue
GSL
2 days
SHIN vs Zoun
ByuN vs herO
OSC
2 days
OSC
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
[ Show More ]
Escore
3 days
The PondCast
3 days
WardiTV Invitational
3 days
Zoun vs Ryung
Lambo vs ShoWTimE
Replay Cast
4 days
CranKy Ducklings
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
SHIN vs Bunny
ByuN vs Shameless
WardiTV Invitational
4 days
Krystianer vs TriGGeR
Cure vs Rogue
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
5 days
BSL
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
RSL Revival
5 days
Cure vs Zoun
Clem vs Lambo
WardiTV Invitational
5 days
BSL
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Afreeca Starleague
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-05-02
WardiTV TLMC #16
Nations Cup 2026

Ongoing

BSL Season 22
ASL Season 21
CSL 2026 SPRING (S20)
IPSL Spring 2026
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 2
Acropolis #4
SCTL 2026 Spring
RSL Revival: Season 5
2026 GSL S1
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026

Upcoming

YSL S3
Escore Tournament S2: W6
KK 2v2 League Season 1
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
Escore Tournament S2: W7
Escore Tournament S2: W8
CSLAN 4
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
Maestros of the Game 2
2026 GSL S2
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.