Google's New Approach to China - Page 10
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
Energies
Australia3225 Posts
| ||
|
Athos
United States2484 Posts
On January 14 2010 16:49 pyrogenetix wrote: you're -Greatly- overestimating the intellect of chinese people. you're assuming that they are responsible, law abiding citizens that will think for themselves critically, be able to weed out the garbage and find the truth amongst a tidal wave of free information. I really dont think so, having just come back from a 3 week holiday in shanghai, and shanghai is supposed to be one of the three most developed cities in china. the average university student there thinks harry potter and twilight are high quality movies. i know because i talked with my cousin who is doing his masters now and his circle of friends think this. trust me when i say he and his friends are some of the brighter people in his school. chinese people's minds are empty like flowerpots. again, i cannot stress how different white people's perception and knowledge of china is from the truth. you give them way too much credit and benefit of the doubt that you cannot imagine what the result would be if the censorship of internet and media was removed. I know you mean well, and want to show how dumb Chinese people are. But calling your friends dumb for thinking Harry Potter and Twilight are high quality movies makes no fucking sense. Harry Potter and Twilight are high quality movies that have had high success internationally. Liking these movies doesn't make these kids "empty like flower pots," it makes them normal. This also does nothing to support your point that the Chinese people are not ready for the internet and only strengthens the idea that Chinese people want foreign, American content. | ||
|
old times sake
165 Posts
On January 14 2010 19:16 zatic wrote: Active : 3946 Logged in : 647 They are here. LOL I wonder how many | ||
|
Zexion
Sweden971 Posts
On January 14 2010 11:27 Boblion wrote: Well i read lot of different newspapers, ranging from the extreme left to the right and none are praising China. But eh you are right i'm sure that there is a giant conspiracy against this wonderful country. I mean those journalists MUST be spies or Chinese haters obviously. They are brain washing us of course. Just because media is often negative towards China doesn't mean there is a "giant conspiracy" against it. You're just taking my arguments and making them more extreme to your advantage... And yeah I also read a lot of bullshit in Swedish newspapers, and I don't think there's a very big difference between yours and mine. | ||
|
QuanticHawk
United States32130 Posts
On January 14 2010 16:49 pyrogenetix wrote: you're -Greatly- overestimating the intellect of chinese people. you're assuming that they are responsible, law abiding citizens that will think for themselves critically, be able to weed out the garbage and find the truth amongst a tidal wave of free information. I really dont think so, having just come back from a 3 week holiday in shanghai, and shanghai is supposed to be one of the three most developed cities in china. the average university student there thinks harry potter and twilight are high quality movies. i know because i talked with my cousin who is doing his masters now and his circle of friends think this. trust me when i say he and his friends are some of the brighter people in his school. chinese people's minds are empty like flowerpots. again, i cannot stress how different white people's perception and knowledge of china is from the truth. you give them way too much credit and benefit of the doubt that you cannot imagine what the result would be if the censorship of internet and media was removed. and sorry india isnt even on the same level as china so no india is not a contender with china. and to the other guy, no i firmly believe that economic development is the most important thing both for establishing china as the next global superpower for political leverage, trade etc and also for the development of quality of life. When quality of life is raised, along with it comes education, and then slowly the majority of people will be ready for free information. also, if the economy is going smoothly then everyone has money and can eat, thus everyone is happy and won't really cause problems. trust me when i say most people know that the news they watch on tv and hear on the radio is bullshit, but they dont really care because they have money. discussion about politics happen everywhere in bars, restaurants, amongst friends etc, just that the material isn't allowed to be published. People like you are fucking terrifying. If you allow free flow of information, people eventually become better for it. It is not some kind of overnight magical transformation. I can't believe people use the lack of intelligence of a group as an excuse for oppression. | ||
|
TheYango
United States47024 Posts
On January 14 2010 22:49 Hawk wrote: People like you are fucking terrifying. If you allow free flow of information, people eventually become better for it. It is not some kind of overnight magical transformation. I can't believe people use the lack of intelligence of a group as an excuse for oppression. Yes, eventually. Can the world handle the immediate destabilization that could occur in China, for the sake of eventual benefit? | ||
|
konadora
Singapore66358 Posts
On January 13 2010 10:02 Smorrie wrote: Sent the link to my friend in China.. his response: Can't see.. link is blocked. lmao hahaha | ||
|
QuanticHawk
United States32130 Posts
On January 14 2010 22:55 TheYango wrote: Yes, eventually. Can the world handle the immediate destabilization that could occur in China, for the sake of eventual benefit? Absolutely. What exactly do you think will be so grave about the change? People might *gasp* question what the fuck their leaders have been doing for the last 50 or 100 years? Forcefully throw their government out? None of this spells impending disaster for the world. | ||
|
TheYango
United States47024 Posts
On January 14 2010 23:19 Hawk wrote: Absolutely. What exactly do you think will be so grave about the change? People might *gasp* question what the fuck their leaders have been doing for the last 50 or 100 years? Forcefully throw their government out? None of this spells impending disaster for the world. The total collapse of the government in the country with the world's 2nd-3rd highest GDP doesn't trouble you in the least? You don't think that could have huge economic ramifications globally at all? | ||
|
Archerofaiur
United States4101 Posts
you're -Greatly- overestimating the intellect of chinese people. you're assuming that they are responsible, law abiding citizens that will think for themselves critically, be able to weed out the garbage and find the truth amongst a tidal wave of free information. I really dont think so, having just come back from a 3 week holiday in shanghai, and shanghai is supposed to be one of the three most developed cities in china. the average university student there thinks harry potter and twilight are high quality movies. i know because i talked with my cousin who is doing his masters now and his circle of friends think this. LOL let me get this straight. 1 billion Chinese people shouldnt be given free information because they are too stupid. And your evidence is your cousins friends who all think twilight is a good movie. Speaking of people with minds like a flower pot :p | ||
|
TheYango
United States47024 Posts
On January 14 2010 23:25 Archerofaiur wrote: LOL let me get this straight. 1 billion Chinese people shouldnt be given free information because they are too stupid. And your evidence is your cousins friends who all think twilight is a good movie. Thats rich! Go back 2 pages and read Pyrogenetix's longer assessment of why China isn't ready for freedom of information. The out-of-context passage you took was in response specifically to Durak's thoughts that freedom of information would produce innovation and invention in such a way that outweighs the more subversive uses towards destabilization and revolution. In a culture that doesn't cultivate ideas of entrepreneurship and free-thinking as much as the United States, this is not as likely of an outcome. | ||
|
QuanticHawk
United States32130 Posts
On January 14 2010 23:23 TheYango wrote: The total collapse of the government in the country with the world's 2nd-3rd highest GDP doesn't trouble you in the least? You don't think that could have huge economic ramifications globally at all? Soviet Russia was #2 in the world, and less than ten years later, most of those ex-USSR countries saw an improvement in their GDP. The world didn't end. The world economy didn't come to a crashing halt. People got their freedom (at least in formally escaping the government, since Russian influence is still seen all over) and things kept on chugging right along. | ||
|
Velr
Switzerland10873 Posts
| ||
|
TheYango
United States47024 Posts
On January 14 2010 23:39 Hawk wrote: Soviet Russia was #2 in the world, and less than ten years later, most of those ex-USSR countries saw an improvement in their GDP. The world didn't end. The world economy didn't come to a crashing halt. People got their freedom (at least in formally escaping the government, since Russian influence is still seen all over) and things kept on chugging right along. That's not really an apt comparison seeing as the economic climate of the Cold War meant that global trade relations with Soviet Russia could not be nearly as branching, and widespread as trade relations with China are now. Arguably political and economic collapse in China would have far more widespread effects now, given their far more diverse trade interests. I'd also discuss the fact that Russia underwent near-Depression (with a capital D) levels of economic decay in the 1990s, and that arguably the upper echelons of society are seeing most (if not all--by some measures such as average life expectancy, things are worse than pre-1990 levels) of the benefits of recovery, with a larger income disparity than ever, but I'm no expert on the subject, and I'll leave it to someone else. | ||
|
zatic
Zurich15365 Posts
On January 14 2010 23:39 Hawk wrote: Soviet Russia was #2 in the world, and less than ten years later, most of those ex-USSR countries saw an improvement in their GDP. The world didn't end. The world economy didn't come to a crashing halt. People got their freedom (at least in formally escaping the government, since Russian influence is still seen all over) and things kept on chugging right along. While I don't believe for a second the world's economy would collapse as soon as China is allowed to use Facebook you can't possibly compare that to Soviet Russia. In terms of GDP Russia was behind countries like Japan, Germany, France etc (the former G7). But, more importantly, it was not at all as woven into the global economy as China is now. The world's economy could do just fine without Soviet Russia but would indeed break down without China. | ||
|
Velr
Switzerland10873 Posts
| ||
|
Dracid
United States280 Posts
Can somebody explain to me why their lives are necessarily better than a Chinese citizen's? Freedom of press? Freedom of speech? How many of you have ever published controversial political statements? Fact is, most people don't care that much about politics. They're not going to take you out back and shoot you if you crack a joke about the government. That you can make such statements is nice, but it's also something that the vast majority of the population take for granted. I like the concept of freedom of speech and freedom of press, but it really doesn't really play out much in my day-to-day life. It'd be nice if the Chinese had more freedoms, but it's their government, and they run the country how they see fit. The thing is, their system works for the most part. The problem is that western media likes to paint this image of a China full of oppressed citizens living miserable lives just waiting for a chance to revolt, when in reality most people are pretty content with how things are going. | ||
|
Ivs
Australia139 Posts
The commentators do recognise that the chinese government censor internet content (to filter out bad things like porn, or any anti-govt inflammatory junk), and they agree that it is a good thing(!). But they think google isn't going about their aims in the right way. Instead of quietly negotiate something with the government and hope for a compromise, they chose to publicise the whole thing and essentially giving china the ultimatum. Well clearly the chinese goverment isn't going to budge against a corporation, (they wouldn't even budge against superpowers these days), it seems inevitable that google will have to exit the market, if they do follow up with their claims. Oh yeah of course there was no mention of hacking of any kind anywhere. | ||
|
ghostWriter
United States3302 Posts
Lmfao ironic | ||
|
Jibba
United States22883 Posts
I do think pyrogenetix and other Chinese expatriates totally underestimate the moral condition of the Chinese people. The "people aren't ready for it" excuse has been used for 90 years since Sun Yatsen, but the difference between China and many of the countries that really weren't ready for democracy is that China already has the economic base and plenty of FDI to support itself. You obviously shouldn't force democratizing, but trying to stifle it is even worse and eventually doomed to failure. | ||
| ||