EPTMediocre season if anything.
[TV] HBO Game of Thrones - Page 1419
| Forum Index > Media & Entertainment |
All book discussion in this thread is now allowed. | ||
|
Grettin
42416 Posts
Mediocre season if anything. | ||
|
Gorsameth
Netherlands22611 Posts
| ||
|
Dante08
Singapore4182 Posts
| ||
|
helpman177
56 Posts
Poll: Season 6 ★★★★ Good (32) ★★★★★ Awesome (19) ★★★ Average (19) ★★ Lame (11) ★ Gruesome (3) 84 total votes Your vote: Season 6 (Vote): ★★★★★ Awesome | ||
|
Redox
Germany24794 Posts
On June 16 2015 00:04 Gorsameth wrote: Cersei was a body double folks, if your that desperate for booty you know there is porn out there right? I did not think it was "hot" at all. Rather disgusting and I felt sorry for her. But I also thought that her body looked too "good" or young for someone her age. So I guess with the double they used it was at least kinda flattering to the actress.  | ||
|
Spaylz
Japan1743 Posts
On June 15 2015 23:27 Chimpalimp wrote: Sansa and Theon: LOL Theon is dead, there is only Reek now. Sansa is about to get royally screwed over. I love how everyone thinks "Theon" saved Sansa. Unless Brienne finds Sansa and kills Reek, Sansa is about to experience a whole new nightmare. Why would Reek kill or harm Sansa? He just freed her. | ||
|
Gorsameth
Netherlands22611 Posts
On June 16 2015 00:39 Spaylz wrote: Why would Reek kill or harm Sansa? He just freed her. He is probably drawing parallels to Theon's 'rescue' by Ramsey that was actually a trap. I don't agree it tho. I think the rescue is real. | ||
|
SpiZe
Canada3640 Posts
| ||
|
Chimpalimp
United States1135 Posts
On June 16 2015 00:59 SpiZe wrote: I don't think Ramsey would kill Myranda just to fuck with Sansa, Reek is gone. I don't think Ramsey cares about Myranda enough to spare her life if there is something for him to gain. Besides I don't think killing Myranda was a part of the plan. Reek thought if Myranda harmed Sansa, he would get punished for not protecting Ramsey's interest. The punishment Reek would receive for allowing Sansa to be harmed dwarfs anything Myranda related. | ||
|
c0ldfusion
United States8293 Posts
| ||
|
Dwelf
Netherlands365 Posts
| ||
|
Elizar
Germany431 Posts
That resurrection thing is too obvious. If most people want one thing in GoT, then GRRM will do the opposite. He even said that (see red wedding). Stannis is dead. Brienne is not the one to go back on her oaths. So what´s left? I´m in for team white walkers. Honestly, if you really think about it, it is what GRRM would do. Why? Because he already did so many comparable things. And right now I think he just likes to fuck up everyone´s hopes too much to stop. A white walker win would be consistent. | ||
|
Cloud9157
United States2968 Posts
Also, hardest death this season for me was Ser Barristan. We lost our greatest warrior this season. The ONE time we got him in a fight in any capacity, and he died in it. Made me so sad. | ||
|
SpiZe
Canada3640 Posts
On June 16 2015 01:47 Elizar wrote: That resurrection thing is too obvious. If most people want one thing in GoT, then GRRM will do the opposite. He even said that (see red wedding). I think you misinterpreted what GRRM meant. He didn't want ASOIAF to fall into a stereotype, so he killed Ned to show that no one was safe. Then he realised he had created another invulnerable character in Robb because he was fighting a war and was the son of the last main character, so the story becomes another about the prodigy son on a quest to avenge his father. Robb dies. Killing or resurecting Jon doesn't make the story go from a standard fantasy tale to Game of Thrones. Killing Ned and Robb did because of their status. Their death made GoT into what it is. If Robb hadn't died and Jon did, it wouldn't have the same impact because after all, Jon living or dying doesn't really matter in the grand scheme of thing. Maybe he's dead, maybe he's not. On one hand, Jon has served his purpose as a character by bringing the wildlings south of the wall, so his current character arc is, in a sense, complete and his death makes sense. On the other hand, one could argue showing Mel coming back to the wall is a giveaway. After all, GoT's directors have never been afraid of just making character disapear when they no longer have need of them for the moment being. (read : The ironborn, gendry, beric dondarrion etc..) ENTERTAINMENT WEEKLY: How early in the process of writing the book series did you know you were gonna kill off Robb and Catelyn? GEORGE R.R. MARTIN: I knew it almost from the beginning. Not the first day, but very soon. I’ve said in many interviews that I like my fiction to be unpredictable. I like there to be considerable suspense. I killed Ned in the first book and it shocked a lot of people. I killed Ned because everybody thinks he’s the hero and that, sure, he’s going to get into trouble, but then he’ll somehow get out of it. The next predictable thing is to think his eldest son is going to rise up and avenge his father. And everybody is going to expect that. So immediately [killing Robb] became the next thing I had to do. http://www.ew.com/article/2013/06/02/game-of-thrones-author-george-r-r-martin-why-he-wrote-the-red-wedding | ||
|
LaNague
Germany9118 Posts
| ||
|
Drazerk
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On June 16 2015 02:05 LaNague wrote: i am surprised cercei didnt tell the guards to just kill the priest people right there. She still has her trial if she did that then there would be no way for her survival | ||
|
Requizen
United States33802 Posts
| ||
|
Godwrath
Spain10165 Posts
Whitewalkers are going to have a field this winter. Merry fucking christmas Westeros. | ||
|
LaNague
Germany9118 Posts
On June 16 2015 02:07 Drazerk wrote: She still has her trial if she did that then there would be no way for her survival wtf would she go to that trial for | ||
|
Drazerk
United Kingdom31255 Posts
To prevent the death of her son by the common folk? | ||
| ||
