EPT[Movie] Inception - Page 31
| Forum Index > Media & Entertainment |
|
cava
United States1035 Posts
| ||
|
ShaperofDreams
Canada2492 Posts
virgins and who's comparing dark knight to inception, it wasn't that good except for heath ledger as joker. also dont trust your opinion it sucks  | ||
|
hyst.eric.al
United States2332 Posts
On August 01 2010 02:32 cava wrote: LOL the last part was hilarious.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vyK5V4lM-Kk "are you talking about a vagina within a vagina?" | ||
|
il0seonpurpose
Korea (South)5638 Posts
| ||
|
Offhand
United States1869 Posts
On July 31 2010 05:02 youngminii wrote: Ending was left ambiguous on purpose. The tabletop spinner starts wobbling at the end before the movie cuts. The spinner is meant to spin perfectly and endlessly if he's in a dream but the director chose to make it wobble to let the viewer decide on the ending themselves. It's a common trick used in all forms of entertainment and personally I thought it was kind of dirty to do that. Movie was fucking fantastic though. Yes, the ending was the only shitty moment of that movie. | ||
|
DannyJ
United States5110 Posts
On August 01 2010 05:19 Offhand wrote: Yes, the ending was the only shitty moment of that movie. The ending made people talk about the movie 100 times more than they would have any other way. GOod decision on their part. | ||
|
Alias-SC2
United States2 Posts
| ||
|
Nal_rAwr
United States2611 Posts
| ||
|
Avidkeystamper
United States8556 Posts
On July 31 2010 10:07 hyst.eric.al wrote: i'm actually curious. why do you think it was so bad? Shhh, you're not supposed to ask; that robs them of their coolness. | ||
|
Shauni
4077 Posts
| ||
intrigue
Washington, D.C9934 Posts
| ||
|
Dystisis
Norway713 Posts
| ||
|
Hidden_MotiveS
Canada2562 Posts
I felt I was promised more in the ethics department and the movie failed to deliver for me there. Expectations too high? The acting was spot on. I would have to watch it again though to know if I would recommend it to others. I'm not sure how entertaining I found it. On July 31 2010 10:43 squaremanhole wrote: + Show Spoiler + Oh, I'm aware that Mal died before the movie began. I'm talking about in his explaining what he did (spin the top in Mal's safe). It showed him opening the safe in Mal's childhood house in the world that Mal and Cobb were in during their fifty years in limbo. That's what confuses me. How does limbo work out? How come they both could design the place? I thought only the person whose subconscious they were in could do that. For example when Cobb and Ariadne were in Ariadne's subconscious for that "another five minutes", Ariadne could change the world at her own whim. My questions in the last spoiler were referring to the fifty years of limbo that they shared. I believe Cobb and Ariadne were in Cobb's subconscious, Ariadne is the architect so she can bend the environment of his dream. However when she does this, she is further interfering with the dream than she already is by being there. This causes Cobb's subconscious to try to expel her. [QUOTE]On August 01 2010 02:08 gyth wrote: [quote]+ Show Spoiler + Uhh what the fuck? No. All the levels belonged to Fischer, they were all his dreams. The idea of the whole movie was to plant an idea in his mind through his dreams, how the hell are you going to do that if it's not his dreams, genius? The dreamer controls the dream, the subject populates it. Fischer was the subject of all the dreams, but never the dreamer. I rather believe that gyth was right all along, every world was populated by Fischer's subconscious so everyone was entering his dreams. However Mal was strangely in all the worlds as well, and Saito is able to dream his own limbo within Fisher's limbo. I don't think the movie is supposed to make too much sense and I believe most of the other discussions are rather unimportant to the amount of pleasure you should get from watching the movie. Ending with the top was a kick below the belt. | ||
|
gyth
657 Posts
Why is so difficult for you guys to handle someone criticizing your favourite movie. “The fans are angry, because they love.” | ||
|
DannyJ
United States5110 Posts
On August 01 2010 09:09 Shauni wrote: Why is so difficult for you guys to handle someone criticizing your favourite movie. It doesn't take a genius to find flaws and manipulative patterns in the film. You notice that "someone" is only you, mainly because your criticism is extremely biased and/or useless. | ||
|
Avidkeystamper
United States8556 Posts
On August 01 2010 09:09 Shauni wrote: Why is so difficult for you guys to handle someone criticizing your favourite movie. It doesn't take a genius to find flaws and manipulative patterns in the film. Um, criticism generally explains what they find wrong with it. Why is it so difficult to differentiate between criticism and saying something sucks while insulting people who think otherwise? | ||
|
Dyllyn
Singapore670 Posts
On August 01 2010 09:09 Shauni wrote: Why is so difficult for you guys to handle someone criticizing your favourite movie. It doesn't take a genius to find flaws and manipulative patterns in the film. gentlemen... don't feed the troll. | ||
|
Fen
Australia1848 Posts
On July 25 2010 18:28 Bisu-Fan wrote: no idea about the no-gravity thing... i guess it's because the lair 2 people weren't being jerked in any specific direction like their bodies were in lair 1... The dreams were influenced by the dreamer's vestibular system (the part in the inner ear that is responsible for balance). When the dreamer was pushed around, the world that they were dreaming was consequently pushed (note: the world moves not the people inside). We can see this from when the car rolls, the entire world rolls as well. When the van is falling, the dreamer feels he is falling, therefore the world he is dreaming is falling as well. Because the world is falling at the same rate as gravity, the result is the same as weightlessness. This is why there appears to be no gravity in the second level. Now in the second level, the dreamer doesn't feel he is falling or moving at all. As such, the 3rd level doesn't move either. Gravity exists in all levels, but in the second level, its being countered by the fact that the entire world is falling at the same rate. | ||
|
StRyKeR
United States1739 Posts
On August 02 2010 01:07 Fen wrote: The dreams were influenced by the dreamer's vestibular system (the part in the inner ear that is responsible for balance). When the dreamer was pushed around, the world that they were dreaming was consequently pushed (note: the world moves not the people inside). We can see this from when the car rolls, the entire world rolls as well. When the van is falling, the dreamer feels he is falling, therefore the world he is dreaming is falling as well. Because the world is falling at the same rate as gravity, the result is the same as weightlessness. This is why there appears to be no gravity in the second level. Now in the second level, the dreamer doesn't feel he is falling or moving at all. As such, the 3rd level doesn't move either. Gravity exists in all levels, but in the second level, its being countered by the fact that the entire world is falling at the same rate. There probably is a difference between "world stays you fall" and "world falls with you", but if you look up "zero-gravity" you'll find that being weightless in space feels EXACTLY like falling. Because of this, I have yet to hear a good explanation for the 3rd level being normal gravity. | ||
739
Bearded Elder29904 Posts
| ||
| ||
