EPT[Movie] Inception - Page 29
| Forum Index > Media & Entertainment |
|
kassi
United States290 Posts
| ||
|
news
892 Posts
On July 29 2010 21:39 chongu wrote: zzzzz... Now i can't possibly pick my favourite movie anymore!!! Dark knight or Inception.... omg tuff call When you grow up you will laugh at even having the idea to compare Inception to something like Dark Knight hahaha | ||
|
news
892 Posts
On July 25 2010 03:16 OneOther wrote: What makes you think that people bought in to the PR? Why couldn't it be that people watched the movie, and genuinely liked as it was and thought it was an great movie? Because that's how it was for me. I could care less what those guys at Rotten Tomatoes say. It looked different and I went to go see it. And it was a really good movie in my eyes. So I came back and wrote some good things about it here. Can I go ahead and say that nobody really cares about how you didn't like this movie? People who praised it loved it, and thought the exact opposite of everything that you did. I thought it was original, creative, thought-provoking, and just good overall. Apparently a lot of other people did too. Get over it, man. Not really sure how you can even argue that "viewers disguise it" as something it's not. Praises are now disguised because you disagree with them? For the last time, everyone who thought it was great and awesome said it was great and awesome. I hope you realize there's a difference between offering criticism and what you're doing right now. You are entitled to your opinion. But don't shit on others' in the process. I went to see both Avatar and Inception randomly, I obviously knew they were new movies and I chose to see them (I watch movies all the time). I didn't see any advertisements for either of them, they weren't "fed" down my throat. Inception was my choice simply because DiCaprio was ridiculously good in Shutter Island. Shauni is just too pompous to even consider some of the movies that other people like. He posted his list before, I think 8 out of 10 were Asian flicks, some are obnoxiously bad. I love Asian movies with content but if you have this stupid fetish that doesn't allow you to expand your weak imagination and simply enjoy something - sucks for you. Sorry Shauni, but you should be banned from any discussion concerning movies. Not because you are stupid, you just can't be objective. | ||
|
instantcold
United States38 Posts
On July 30 2010 13:05 GunSlinger wrote: One of the worst movies I have ever seen. Finally someone with reason | ||
OneOther
United States10774 Posts
how cool do you feel man | ||
|
Ixas
930 Posts
maybe u jus didnt understand it | ||
|
erektion
Canada62 Posts
On July 30 2010 13:05 GunSlinger wrote: One of the worst movies I have ever seen. you probably mistook inception for eclipse. | ||
|
ReTr0[p.S]
Argentina1590 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + How can it be anybody's but his own dream if he sees Mal everywhere? He shouldn't be able to see them if he was in anybody else's dream. I think that's a dead giveaway that everything that happens in this own movie is inside his head | ||
|
OneOther
United States10774 Posts
On July 31 2010 03:42 ReTr0[p.S] wrote: One thing I noticed + Show Spoiler + How can it be anybody's but his own dream if he sees Mal everywhere? He shouldn't be able to see them if he was in anybody else's dream. I think that's a dead giveaway that everything that happens in this own movie is inside his head It happens because Mal is a projection that Cobb brings in to anyone's dream, which is exactly why it's a problem. | ||
|
ReTr0[p.S]
Argentina1590 Posts
On July 31 2010 03:44 OneOther wrote: It happens because Mal is a projection that Cobb brings in to anyone's dream, which is exactly why it's a problem. But how is that possible? Didn't they say only the subconscious of the dreamer could populate the place? | ||
|
Salv
Canada3083 Posts
On July 31 2010 03:52 ReTr0[p.S] wrote: But how is that possible? Didn't they say only the subconscious of the dreamer could populate the place? That's what I thought as well. When Cobb and the young architect girl are in his dream he says that the targets subconscious will create projections and that they will begin to notice something is awry when you begin to distort the dream too much. If that's the case, they were inside Fischer's dream and Cobb shouldn't have been able to project Mal at all. Maybe I misunderstood something. | ||
|
Offhand
United States1869 Posts
On July 29 2010 19:02 fearus wrote: Using same logic: In every scene where Cobb sees his children = he was in a dream. Therefore in the last scene he sees his children = a dream. Plot explains this though. He couldn't see his children because he fled the states due to being charged with his own wife's murder. You bring up a good point, but it's irrelevant in the context of story. | ||
|
koreasilver
9109 Posts
You so indie. | ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
On July 31 2010 04:22 Salv wrote: That's what I thought as well. When Cobb and the young architect girl are in his dream he says that the targets subconscious will create projections and that they will begin to notice something is awry when you begin to distort the dream too much. If that's the case, they were inside Fischer's dream and Cobb shouldn't have been able to project Mal at all. Maybe I misunderstood something. Nono, anyone can bring in objects (ie. freight train) into the dream, it's just that obviously no one wants to because it'll attract attention. It happens a lot in the movie but you just don't notice it, they pick up random objects seemingly out of nowhere ie. the Forger grabs a fucking grenade launcher when they're trying to fight the 'security'. On July 31 2010 04:32 Offhand wrote: Plot explains this though. He couldn't see his children because he fled the states due to being charged with his own wife's murder. You bring up a good point, but it's irrelevant in the context of story. Ending was left ambiguous on purpose. The tabletop spinner starts wobbling at the end before the movie cuts. The spinner is meant to spin perfectly and endlessly if he's in a dream but the director chose to make it wobble to let the viewer decide on the ending themselves. It's a common trick used in all forms of entertainment and personally I thought it was kind of dirty to do that. Movie was fucking fantastic though. | ||
|
gyth
657 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + The only time the kids are wearing different clothes is on the beach at the top of the elevator when ariadne visits cobb's dream. (james in stripes instead of plaid) Those could be the different aged actors in the credits. The set where Saito says he bought the airline seems to be the same as the 2nd layer hotel. Same concierge desk. Maybe they have meetings in dreams for privacy. It'd be interesting the run through this frame by frame looking for any error in the "real" world, not that there aren't errors in the real world.  One of the signs in his talks with eames has "CENTRE", but thats probably the right way to spell it in mombasa. | ||
|
MangoTango
United States3670 Posts
On July 30 2010 10:17 AhhBoxxah wrote: This is one of the dumbest posts I've read simply for saying "Everybody in this thread is wrong". If anything there is no ultimate answer, as the entire movie revolves around the human mind. This is what makes it so universal as to interpretation. If anything, there is nothing concrete about the human mind, thoughts are never linear, and as such there is no ultimate answer to what the movie's "true" message is about, but it is there to inspire these ideas, to stimulate the human mind, to stimulate ideas ^^! Dumbest posts you've read? Are you familiar with the Internets? Everybody is wrong, in that everybody's arguing about whether or not the top stops spinning, or if Di Caprio is awake, and what if his kids ever turn around or wear different clothes. The important question is, does Chris Nolan feel like he's ever woken up from creativity hell? Is he stuck in the ambiguous state between awake and dreaming, hence the ambiguity about the top? Why does he have this need-hate relationship with his inspiration? Why is she cast so negatively at times? Are his kids his movies? Does he get to see them grow up? Are they everything he wants them to be? These are the questions that we should be discussing. Not why 2 sets of kids were cast to play his children. The movie is autobiographical, if only metaphorically. | ||
|
HoT
United States69 Posts
 so that shud b a clue for the wether wut happen was real or not with the top | ||
|
.AbsoluTe
United States45 Posts
| ||
|
anTi_
United States499 Posts
I'd give it a 7.5/10. | ||
|
instantcold
United States38 Posts
Movie just sucked. Period, thats my opinion. And yes i did | ||
| ||
