|
On August 08 2013 11:17 myrmidon2537 wrote:
Black in some angles really reminds me of the janitor from scrubs
Oh god, this soooo much.
|
On August 08 2013 11:17 Sbrubbles wrote:
Black sounds like a really chill guy to drink a beer with
except he doesn't drink 
|
On August 08 2013 11:15 opterown wrote:Show nested quote +On August 08 2013 11:14 djaoni wrote:On August 08 2013 11:13 ForTehDarkseid wrote:On August 08 2013 11:10 Azarkon wrote:On August 08 2013 11:09 opterown wrote:On August 08 2013 11:07 Azarkon wrote:On August 08 2013 11:04 FateCypher wrote:On August 08 2013 11:01 Azarkon wrote:
Today has been within what I thought.
Fnatic losing to TF was simply a second-tier EU team losing to a first-tier Chinese team.
Na'Vi dropping a game to Orange... Meh, it's Na'Vi.
Dignitas winning RattleSnakes simply shows Western tier 2 teams are still > Chinese tier 2 teams.
IMO this bodes well for Na'Vi and Alliance finals. So Na'Vi and Alliance are the tier 1 teams? who else would you label as Tier 1 Westerns? There are no other. Presently Na'Vi and Alliance are the only Tier 1 Western teams. then LGD is the only chinese tier 1 team, the others are far too inconsistent LGD that went 6-6 in groups before Day 3 and narrowly avoided a loss to Dignitas in the tiebreakers? Okay. ... Yeah, because we label teams based on their TI performance. You even didn't get what opretown was implying. We rank them based on the last 30 minutes played. Rattlesnake is tier 6 eastern, Dignitas tier 1 western. Right? you are only as good as your last kill or death
your last last hit or deny
|
Synderen king of the lower brackets
|
On August 08 2013 11:11 FinestHour wrote:Show nested quote +On August 08 2013 11:10 sabaw wrote:On August 08 2013 11:01 Azarkon wrote:
Today has been within what I thought.
Fnatic losing to TF was simply a second-tier EU team losing to a first-tier Chinese team.
Na'Vi dropping a game to Orange... Meh, it's Na'Vi.
Dignitas winning RattleSnakes simply shows Western tier 2 teams are still > Chinese tier 2 teams.
IMO this bodes well for Na'Vi and Alliance finals. Then how do you explain RattleSnake>Quantic? QUANTIC BAD TIER 3 TEAM
Nah, Quantic was just damned by the TI wild card curse - the region that wins the wild card, loses the finals.
|
good guy Black, buys family a new house with TI3 winnings
|
These team intro's are so sexy
|
|
|
i like how the playstyle caption said nothing about their playstyle
|
On August 08 2013 11:17 ForTehDarkseid wrote:Show nested quote +On August 08 2013 11:14 djaoni wrote:On August 08 2013 11:13 ForTehDarkseid wrote:On August 08 2013 11:10 Azarkon wrote:On August 08 2013 11:09 opterown wrote:On August 08 2013 11:07 Azarkon wrote:On August 08 2013 11:04 FateCypher wrote:On August 08 2013 11:01 Azarkon wrote:
Today has been within what I thought.
Fnatic losing to TF was simply a second-tier EU team losing to a first-tier Chinese team.
Na'Vi dropping a game to Orange... Meh, it's Na'Vi.
Dignitas winning RattleSnakes simply shows Western tier 2 teams are still > Chinese tier 2 teams.
IMO this bodes well for Na'Vi and Alliance finals. So Na'Vi and Alliance are the tier 1 teams? who else would you label as Tier 1 Westerns? There are no other. Presently Na'Vi and Alliance are the only Tier 1 Western teams. then LGD is the only chinese tier 1 team, the others are far too inconsistent LGD that went 6-6 in groups before Day 3 and narrowly avoided a loss to Dignitas in the tiebreakers? Okay. ... Yeah, because we label teams based on their TI performance. You even didn't get what opretown was implying. We rank them based on the last 30 minutes played. Rattlesnake is tier 6 eastern, Dignitas tier 1 western. Right? Common, it shouldn't be that hard. opretown implied that Azarkon ranks Tier 1 Western team only those who have won Chinese teams in the international tournaments, not the win-lose distribution in their natural scene, so he gets instant right with his statement. Before TI3, mouz was at least 1.25 tier, go figure.
How is Na'Vi and Alliance not obviously ahead of other Western teams? Tier 1 exists to talk about the set of teams that are ahead of other teams in a region.
LGD isn't obviously ahead of TF so why are they Tier 1, but TF is Tier 2?
|
On August 08 2013 11:19 MaYuu wrote:
Hogwarts Denmark?
Haha I heard the exact same thing.
|
On August 08 2013 11:19 MaYuu wrote:
Hogwarts Denmark?
Hahaha!
Synderen's smooth accent transition from danish to english. So sexy (just don't look at the sandals)
|
On August 08 2013 11:16 FueledUpAndReadyToGo wrote:Show nested quote +On August 08 2013 11:15 fascistfromhell wrote:
Everything is so perfect so far.
What a tournament. Immediately sound issues. Jinxed it.
hahahaha, so true. xD
|
On August 08 2013 11:19 Azarkon wrote:Show nested quote +On August 08 2013 11:17 ForTehDarkseid wrote:On August 08 2013 11:14 djaoni wrote:On August 08 2013 11:13 ForTehDarkseid wrote:On August 08 2013 11:10 Azarkon wrote:On August 08 2013 11:09 opterown wrote:On August 08 2013 11:07 Azarkon wrote:On August 08 2013 11:04 FateCypher wrote:On August 08 2013 11:01 Azarkon wrote:
Today has been within what I thought.
Fnatic losing to TF was simply a second-tier EU team losing to a first-tier Chinese team.
Na'Vi dropping a game to Orange... Meh, it's Na'Vi.
Dignitas winning RattleSnakes simply shows Western tier 2 teams are still > Chinese tier 2 teams.
IMO this bodes well for Na'Vi and Alliance finals. So Na'Vi and Alliance are the tier 1 teams? who else would you label as Tier 1 Westerns? There are no other. Presently Na'Vi and Alliance are the only Tier 1 Western teams. then LGD is the only chinese tier 1 team, the others are far too inconsistent LGD that went 6-6 in groups before Day 3 and narrowly avoided a loss to Dignitas in the tiebreakers? Okay. ... Yeah, because we label teams based on their TI performance. You even didn't get what opretown was implying. We rank them based on the last 30 minutes played. Rattlesnake is tier 6 eastern, Dignitas tier 1 western. Right? Common, it shouldn't be that hard. opretown implied that Azarkon ranks Tier 1 Western team only those who have won Chinese teams in the international tournaments, not the win-lose distribution in their natural scene, so he gets instant right with his statement. Before TI3, mouz was at least 1.25 tier, go figure. How is Na'Vi and Alliance not obviously ahead of other Western teams? Tier 1 exists to talk about the set of teams that are ahead of other teams in a region. LGD isn't obviously ahead of TF so why are they Tier 1, but TF is Tier 2?
Tell me the last time TF have won against LGD.
|
On August 08 2013 11:18 Grettin wrote:Show nested quote +On August 08 2013 11:17 Sbrubbles wrote:
Black sounds like a really chill guy to drink a beer with except he doesn't drink
What is this nonsense? Really? Shame...
|
On August 08 2013 11:20 ForTehDarkseid wrote:Show nested quote +On August 08 2013 11:19 Azarkon wrote:On August 08 2013 11:17 ForTehDarkseid wrote:On August 08 2013 11:14 djaoni wrote:On August 08 2013 11:13 ForTehDarkseid wrote:On August 08 2013 11:10 Azarkon wrote:On August 08 2013 11:09 opterown wrote:On August 08 2013 11:07 Azarkon wrote:On August 08 2013 11:04 FateCypher wrote:On August 08 2013 11:01 Azarkon wrote:
Today has been within what I thought.
Fnatic losing to TF was simply a second-tier EU team losing to a first-tier Chinese team.
Na'Vi dropping a game to Orange... Meh, it's Na'Vi.
Dignitas winning RattleSnakes simply shows Western tier 2 teams are still > Chinese tier 2 teams.
IMO this bodes well for Na'Vi and Alliance finals. So Na'Vi and Alliance are the tier 1 teams? who else would you label as Tier 1 Westerns? There are no other. Presently Na'Vi and Alliance are the only Tier 1 Western teams. then LGD is the only chinese tier 1 team, the others are far too inconsistent LGD that went 6-6 in groups before Day 3 and narrowly avoided a loss to Dignitas in the tiebreakers? Okay. ... Yeah, because we label teams based on their TI performance. You even didn't get what opretown was implying. We rank them based on the last 30 minutes played. Rattlesnake is tier 6 eastern, Dignitas tier 1 western. Right? Common, it shouldn't be that hard. opretown implied that Azarkon ranks Tier 1 Western team only those who have won Chinese teams in the international tournaments, not the win-lose distribution in their natural scene, so he gets instant right with his statement. Before TI3, mouz was at least 1.25 tier, go figure. How is Na'Vi and Alliance not obviously ahead of other Western teams? Tier 1 exists to talk about the set of teams that are ahead of other teams in a region. LGD isn't obviously ahead of TF so why are they Tier 1, but TF is Tier 2? Tell me the last time TF have won against LGD.
Tell me the last time LGD has won a tournament.
|
|
|
So we can accept azarkons crazy theory about how all the complicated team workings rank everything. or we can just admit that NA dota is better than people give it credit for. and that simple fact explains most of the results we've seen throughout TI3
|
|
|
LGD.int going to win...they are the team on the left of the screen. So far, 100% win rate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
