• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 22:18
CEST 04:18
KST 11:18
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Serral wins Maestros of the Game 231ByuL, and the Limitations of Standard Play3Team Liquid Map Contest #22: Results and Winners7Code S Season 2 (2026): RO4 and Finals Preview12TL.net Map Contest #22 - Voting & Ladder Map Selection7
Community News
Weekly Cups (June 29-July 5): Solar Doubles0MC vs IdrA, Boxer vs Nal_rA to be Legacy Matches @ BlizzCon415.0.16 Hotfix (June 30) - Balance + Bug Fixes40Weekly Cups (June 22-28): Zergs thrive in new patch5[TLMC] Summer 2026 Ladder Map Rotation0
StarCraft 2
General
Serral wins Maestros of the Game 2 Is the larve respawn broken? 5.0.16 patch for SC2 goes live (8 worker start) 5.0.16 Hotfix (June 30) - Balance + Bug Fixes Weekly Cups (June 29-July 5): Solar Doubles
Tourneys
Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) Crank Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League GSL CK #5 Race War HomeStory Cup 29 RSL Revival: Season 6 - Qualifiers and Main Event
Strategy
[G] Having the right mentality to improve
Custom Maps
New Map Maker - Looking for Advice - Love or Hate Work In Progress Melee Maps [D]RTS in all its shapes and glory <3
External Content
Mutation # 533 Die Together The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 532 Nuclear Family Mutation # 531 Experimental Artillery
Brood War
General
ASL 22 Proposed Map Pool Snow On New ASL S22 Map, Zerg Nerf BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Starcraft vs Retro Category on Twitch
Tourneys
IPSL Spring 2026 Top 4! CSLAN 4 is Coming! Escore Tournament StarCraft Season 2 The Casual Games of the Week Thread
Strategy
Fighting Spirit mining rates Simple Questions, Simple Answers Creating a full chart of Zerg builds Relatively freeroll strategies
Other Games
General Games
Dawn of War IV Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Summer Games Done Quick 2026! ZeroSpace at Steam NextFest - Last free demo
Dota 2
Looking for a Dota Mentor Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
NeO.D_StephenKing vs This Guy From 1 Million Dance TL Mafia Community Thread TL Mafia Power Rank Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread UK Politics Mega-thread YouTube Thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The HerO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! Series you have seen recently... [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books [TV/BOOK] *SPOILERS* Game of Thrones Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread McBoner: A hockey love story Tennis[sport] Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
FPS when play League Of Legend on laptop How to clean a TTe Thermaltake keyboard? Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Major Shifts in the Gaming I…
TrAiDoS
An Exploration of th…
waywardstrategy
Gauntlet SC2: A Retrospectiv…
Ctone23
ramps on octagon
StaticNine
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Evil Gacha Games and the…
ffswowsucks
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 12030 users

OGN/MBCGame vs Blizzard, Second Session - Page 5

Forum Index > Community News and Headlines
255 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 11 12 13 Next All
teamsolid
Profile Joined October 2007
Canada3668 Posts
January 28 2011 13:31 GMT
#81
On January 28 2011 22:23 moopie wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 28 2011 22:13 teamsolid wrote:
On January 28 2011 21:42 moopie wrote:
I think Blizzard is digging itself deeper into the hole by pursuing this (and suing for damages??). Even if they win, they alienate a huge fanbase in the country that made their Starcraft franchise huge. They can also forget about ever getting their GSL on TV (at least without a 3rd channel from an independent company). Winning this still alienates them, and will (could) lead to the downfall of the SC2 community in Korea.

On January 28 2011 19:02 NHY wrote:
Actual wording according to the article:

Transition to StarCraft II: Wings of Liberty : Organizer will use its best efforts to make smooth transition from Starcraft I to Starcraft II: Wings of Liberty and its expansions("Starcraft2") and to make smooth transition of professional players from Starcraft 1 to Starcraft 2 from the time Starcraft 2 becoms [sic] available for play.

Wow... just wow.

It doesn't matter what they do at this point. When they did try to get GSL on TV, KeSPA pressured the broadcasting stations to pull out or suffer severe consequences.

Blizzard 'failed' in this regard only because of the way they went about it. Because the power they had (or thought they had) they went into the SC2 launch with both guns blazing, making demands of KeSPA and the broadcasting companies in a "my way or the highway" approach. Had they sought out to work with the existing korean scene on this instead of trying to capitalize on its succeess and try to smother it to get it out of the way there could have been a very civil co-existance and eventual transition.

As of now, staying in this fight is bad PR and hurts their playerbase. The best they could do is modify their unreasonable demands, stop trying to kill off the competition, and then get back to being a game developer which is what they are good at.

True, but it's difficult to tell whether or not they had already tried the co-existence approach in the beginning. At least from their side of the story, they claimed to have been trying to negotiate w/KeSPA for 3+ years and were met with hostility. It's also quite possible, that all of that is PR bullshit. No one really knows what happened, except it turned sour at one point or another and here we are.
lastreason
Profile Joined May 2010
Romania250 Posts
January 28 2011 13:40 GMT
#82
imo it's just corporation rules made by blizzard , and as i understood we have a proof now that they want to kill bw
maybenexttime
Profile Blog Joined November 2006
Poland5837 Posts
January 28 2011 13:43 GMT
#83
On January 28 2011 22:31 teamsolid wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 28 2011 22:23 moopie wrote:
On January 28 2011 22:13 teamsolid wrote:
On January 28 2011 21:42 moopie wrote:
I think Blizzard is digging itself deeper into the hole by pursuing this (and suing for damages??). Even if they win, they alienate a huge fanbase in the country that made their Starcraft franchise huge. They can also forget about ever getting their GSL on TV (at least without a 3rd channel from an independent company). Winning this still alienates them, and will (could) lead to the downfall of the SC2 community in Korea.

On January 28 2011 19:02 NHY wrote:
Actual wording according to the article:

Transition to StarCraft II: Wings of Liberty : Organizer will use its best efforts to make smooth transition from Starcraft I to Starcraft II: Wings of Liberty and its expansions("Starcraft2") and to make smooth transition of professional players from Starcraft 1 to Starcraft 2 from the time Starcraft 2 becoms [sic] available for play.

Wow... just wow.

It doesn't matter what they do at this point. When they did try to get GSL on TV, KeSPA pressured the broadcasting stations to pull out or suffer severe consequences.

Blizzard 'failed' in this regard only because of the way they went about it. Because the power they had (or thought they had) they went into the SC2 launch with both guns blazing, making demands of KeSPA and the broadcasting companies in a "my way or the highway" approach. Had they sought out to work with the existing korean scene on this instead of trying to capitalize on its succeess and try to smother it to get it out of the way there could have been a very civil co-existance and eventual transition.

As of now, staying in this fight is bad PR and hurts their playerbase. The best they could do is modify their unreasonable demands, stop trying to kill off the competition, and then get back to being a game developer which is what they are good at.

True, but it's difficult to tell whether or not they had already tried the co-existence approach in the beginning. At least from their side of the story, they claimed to have been trying to negotiate w/KeSPA for 3+ years and were met with hostility. It's also quite possible, that all of that is PR bullshit. No one really knows what happened, except it turned sour at one point or another and here we are.


KeSPA officials said that blizzard broke off the negotiations every time sc2 was being delayed because they wanted everything to coincide with the release of the game (which implies they wanted OGN/MBC to switch to sc2) and they also publish the ridiculous list of blizzard's demands.

Blizzard then made a conference to deal with KeSPA's breaking the NDA (the above), and they declined neither of the claims made by KeSPA.

If KeSPA lied to us, then blizzard would've certainly said so.
teamsolid
Profile Joined October 2007
Canada3668 Posts
January 28 2011 13:51 GMT
#84
On January 28 2011 22:43 maybenexttime wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 28 2011 22:31 teamsolid wrote:
On January 28 2011 22:23 moopie wrote:
On January 28 2011 22:13 teamsolid wrote:
On January 28 2011 21:42 moopie wrote:
I think Blizzard is digging itself deeper into the hole by pursuing this (and suing for damages??). Even if they win, they alienate a huge fanbase in the country that made their Starcraft franchise huge. They can also forget about ever getting their GSL on TV (at least without a 3rd channel from an independent company). Winning this still alienates them, and will (could) lead to the downfall of the SC2 community in Korea.

On January 28 2011 19:02 NHY wrote:
Actual wording according to the article:

Transition to StarCraft II: Wings of Liberty : Organizer will use its best efforts to make smooth transition from Starcraft I to Starcraft II: Wings of Liberty and its expansions("Starcraft2") and to make smooth transition of professional players from Starcraft 1 to Starcraft 2 from the time Starcraft 2 becoms [sic] available for play.

Wow... just wow.

It doesn't matter what they do at this point. When they did try to get GSL on TV, KeSPA pressured the broadcasting stations to pull out or suffer severe consequences.

Blizzard 'failed' in this regard only because of the way they went about it. Because the power they had (or thought they had) they went into the SC2 launch with both guns blazing, making demands of KeSPA and the broadcasting companies in a "my way or the highway" approach. Had they sought out to work with the existing korean scene on this instead of trying to capitalize on its succeess and try to smother it to get it out of the way there could have been a very civil co-existance and eventual transition.

As of now, staying in this fight is bad PR and hurts their playerbase. The best they could do is modify their unreasonable demands, stop trying to kill off the competition, and then get back to being a game developer which is what they are good at.

True, but it's difficult to tell whether or not they had already tried the co-existence approach in the beginning. At least from their side of the story, they claimed to have been trying to negotiate w/KeSPA for 3+ years and were met with hostility. It's also quite possible, that all of that is PR bullshit. No one really knows what happened, except it turned sour at one point or another and here we are.


KeSPA officials said that blizzard broke off the negotiations every time sc2 was being delayed because they wanted everything to coincide with the release of the game (which implies they wanted OGN/MBC to switch to sc2) and they also publish the ridiculous list of blizzard's demands.

Blizzard then made a conference to deal with KeSPA's breaking the NDA (the above), and they declined neither of the claims made by KeSPA.

If KeSPA lied to us, then blizzard would've certainly said so.

All of this is PR from both sides after the hostilities started. People make way too many inferences from incomplete information. I really have no comment to this, because I haven't seen a single non heavily anti-Bliz post from you in any of the threads on this topic. At this point however, I do agree that this lawsuit is pretty much worthless.
BobbyT
Profile Joined January 2011
United States48 Posts
January 28 2011 13:55 GMT
#85
If Blizzard can't collect royalties for the use of their product by Korean companies to generate revenue, then why would they care about (Korean) e-sports?

Blizzard is in the buisness of making money, not producing free content. Seems to me that if this ruling goes against Blizzard, they'll likely start focusing more on subscribtion based games. This case would make it extremely difficult for them to make a good return on their investments into the SC scene.

I guess i just don't really understand the additude that Blizzard should get absolutly nothing for the use of SC. If Blizzard gets a cut of the profits then that provides an incentive for Blizzard to continue to make and improve their games. Plus it seems to me that there is an element of fairness in a ruling for Blizzard.
Another unverified expert you must listen to.
maybenexttime
Profile Blog Joined November 2006
Poland5837 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-01-28 14:08:08
January 28 2011 14:06 GMT
#86
On January 28 2011 22:51 teamsolid wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 28 2011 22:43 maybenexttime wrote:
On January 28 2011 22:31 teamsolid wrote:
On January 28 2011 22:23 moopie wrote:
On January 28 2011 22:13 teamsolid wrote:
On January 28 2011 21:42 moopie wrote:
I think Blizzard is digging itself deeper into the hole by pursuing this (and suing for damages??). Even if they win, they alienate a huge fanbase in the country that made their Starcraft franchise huge. They can also forget about ever getting their GSL on TV (at least without a 3rd channel from an independent company). Winning this still alienates them, and will (could) lead to the downfall of the SC2 community in Korea.

On January 28 2011 19:02 NHY wrote:
Actual wording according to the article:

Transition to StarCraft II: Wings of Liberty : Organizer will use its best efforts to make smooth transition from Starcraft I to Starcraft II: Wings of Liberty and its expansions("Starcraft2") and to make smooth transition of professional players from Starcraft 1 to Starcraft 2 from the time Starcraft 2 becoms [sic] available for play.

Wow... just wow.

It doesn't matter what they do at this point. When they did try to get GSL on TV, KeSPA pressured the broadcasting stations to pull out or suffer severe consequences.

Blizzard 'failed' in this regard only because of the way they went about it. Because the power they had (or thought they had) they went into the SC2 launch with both guns blazing, making demands of KeSPA and the broadcasting companies in a "my way or the highway" approach. Had they sought out to work with the existing korean scene on this instead of trying to capitalize on its succeess and try to smother it to get it out of the way there could have been a very civil co-existance and eventual transition.

As of now, staying in this fight is bad PR and hurts their playerbase. The best they could do is modify their unreasonable demands, stop trying to kill off the competition, and then get back to being a game developer which is what they are good at.

True, but it's difficult to tell whether or not they had already tried the co-existence approach in the beginning. At least from their side of the story, they claimed to have been trying to negotiate w/KeSPA for 3+ years and were met with hostility. It's also quite possible, that all of that is PR bullshit. No one really knows what happened, except it turned sour at one point or another and here we are.


KeSPA officials said that blizzard broke off the negotiations every time sc2 was being delayed because they wanted everything to coincide with the release of the game (which implies they wanted OGN/MBC to switch to sc2) and they also publish the ridiculous list of blizzard's demands.

Blizzard then made a conference to deal with KeSPA's breaking the NDA (the above), and they declined neither of the claims made by KeSPA.

If KeSPA lied to us, then blizzard would've certainly said so.

All of this is PR from both sides after the hostilities started. People make way too many inferences from incomplete information. I really have no comment to this, because I haven't seen a single non heavily anti-Bliz post from you in any of the threads on this topic. At this point however, I do agree that this lawsuit is pretty much worthless.


How are my posts "anti-blizzard"? It's true that I hate blizzard for what they're doing and sc2 has been a large disappointment for me, but I have never made any baseless claims, so there's nothing "anti-blizzard" in my posts.

And like I said, blizzard made a media conference dedicated specifically to handle the NDA breaking. If anything KeSPA claimed regarding the negotiations was false, blizzard would've ripped it to shreds.


On January 28 2011 22:55 BobbyT wrote:
If Blizzard can't collect royalties for the use of their product by Korean companies to generate revenue, then why would they care about (Korean) e-sports?

Blizzard is in the buisness of making money, not producing free content. Seems to me that if this ruling goes against Blizzard, they'll likely start focusing more on subscribtion based games. This case would make it extremely difficult for them to make a good return on their investments into the SC scene.

I guess i just don't really understand the additude that Blizzard should get absolutly nothing for the use of SC. If Blizzard gets a cut of the profits then that provides an incentive for Blizzard to continue to make and improve their games. Plus it seems to me that there is an element of fairness in a ruling for Blizzard.


Blizzard didn't just want some royalties (which OGN/MBC agreed to pay). They demanded the control over the whole scene (teams, players, broadcasts, etc.).
Roggay
Profile Joined April 2010
Switzerland6320 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-01-28 14:28:41
January 28 2011 14:23 GMT
#87
On January 28 2011 16:37 GG_NO_RE wrote:
oh yeah, blizz sure loves sc1 and has no hopes of crushing it into oblivious.

give me a fuckin break


It's so sad to see so much people crying at a Blizzard conspiration to destroy BW. Common...

Blizzard doesnt want harm to any of their games, Im pretty sure they are very happy with BW succeeding. If there is an evil behind it, it should be Activision and Kotick.
Milkis
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
5003 Posts
January 28 2011 14:30 GMT
#88
Updated it with some bits from DES i found credible

loooooool blizzard, SO BAD
BLinD-RawR
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
ALLEYCAT BLUES51094 Posts
January 28 2011 14:42 GMT
#89
Seriously there has to be something not right?Could you really think that Gretech and Blizzard's law departments and the chaebol lawyers are so bad to miss something that big that could cause a PR outrage?

Something's not right.....
Brood War EICWoo Jung Ho, never forget.| Twitter: @BLinDRawR
aru
Profile Joined April 2010
183 Posts
January 28 2011 15:07 GMT
#90
On January 28 2011 23:42 BLinD-RawR wrote:
Seriously there has to be something not right?Could you really think that Gretech and Blizzard's law departments and the chaebol lawyers are so bad to miss something that big that could cause a PR outrage?

Something's not right.....


The terms of the contract were technically under NDA. They weren't supposed to become public in the first place.
AcOrP
Profile Joined November 2009
Bulgaria148 Posts
January 28 2011 15:21 GMT
#91
On January 28 2011 22:55 BobbyT wrote:
If Blizzard can't collect royalties for the use of their product by Korean companies to generate revenue, then why would they care about (Korean) e-sports?

Blizzard is in the buisness of making money, not producing free content. Seems to me that if this ruling goes against Blizzard, they'll likely start focusing more on subscribtion based games. This case would make it extremely difficult for them to make a good return on their investments into the SC scene.

I guess i just don't really understand the additude that Blizzard should get absolutly nothing for the use of SC. If Blizzard gets a cut of the profits then that provides an incentive for Blizzard to continue to make and improve their games. Plus it seems to me that there is an element of fairness in a ruling for Blizzard.

Blizzard didn't want to collect any royalties back in 2001 nor they sponsor any tournament or anything in korea. Just find statistic how many SC:BW copies were sold in korea(StarCraft sold over 9.5 million copies across the globe, with 4.5 million of these being sold in South Korea quote from wikipedia). This isn't royalties?

Blizzard get money for selling the game. Blizzard didn't develop anything for BW for alot of years.
Blizzard got paid for what they have done,and the price they asked for a copy of BW.

Why they should not get cut of the profits? Did they create the maps that are popular and being played and broadcasted?
Do Blizzard pay wages to the players,teams,tournament organisation teams,comentators and other people involved? Do they advertise this tournaments ?

Blizzard never care about esport they start to care after KeSPA,MBC,OGN developed this from scratch and Blizzard just want to take it over. I would be happy to see Blizzard developing esport scene back in 2001 outside korea and then claim IP rights back then. Not now when SC2 is released and they want to takeover all the player base and all the fan base.

Blizzard developed great game. This game made blizzard what it is now but, I feel they forgot where they start from, and what made Blizzard sucessfull.
XsebT
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Denmark2980 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-01-28 15:33:04
January 28 2011 15:32 GMT
#92
On January 28 2011 17:53 SmoKim wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 28 2011 17:47 aimaimaim wrote:
srsly .. what damages?


terrible terrible damage!

ROFLOL!

Thanks a lot for the translation, Milkis. <3

To me it kinda seems like OGN/MBC have Blizzard right by the balls. At the very least they certainly have their work cut out for them to win this court case.
화이팅
Antoine
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States7481 Posts
January 28 2011 15:43 GMT
#93
I actually feel like the DES bit makes Blizzard look better than the ambiguous wording that was there before. It doesn't look malicious, but that may just be the idealist in me speaking.
ModeratorFlash Sea Action Snow Midas | TheStC Ret Tyler MC | RIP 우정호
Holgerius
Profile Blog Joined January 2009
Sweden16951 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-01-28 16:02:40
January 28 2011 15:47 GMT
#94
Hahaha, Blizzard are failing here. Full-blown evidence that they are indeed trying to kill BW.

Let the games co-exist please!
I believe in the almighty Grötslev! -- I am never serious and you should never believe a thing I say. Including the previous sentence.
Milkis
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
5003 Posts
January 28 2011 15:49 GMT
#95
The DES bit makes it a bit more interesting, a very clarifying update to the OP was made

The contract that had that clause was between Blizzard and Gretech, an agreement that was signed in May. So this 100% confirms that Blizzard and Gretech wants a transition from Starcraft to Starcraft 2. MBC picked up on this and slammed Blizzard about it, asking why they would want their rights protected if they have no intention of doing anything with it.

Absolute revulsion, I definitely did not wish Blizzard would really be that greedy about this entire thing but honestly I'm not surprised judging by the fact that Blizzard suddenly brings this to court and forces Gretech to stop negotiating with KeSPA when the negotiations were going smoothly between Gretech and KeSPA. Absolutely retarded.
neooffs
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
Brazil34 Posts
January 28 2011 15:57 GMT
#96
I wonder what would happen if OGN/MBC simply decided to drop all BW tourneys...
I understand that Blizzard have rights to all the showing StarCraft had without compensation to them, but what would StarCraft actually be without the organization of those specific people that made it so?
I imagine it would still be popular, but not the same...
DayJP
Profile Joined November 2010
Brazil477 Posts
January 28 2011 16:05 GMT
#97
- The judge also ordered the prosecution to prove the fact that defendants had violated IP rights.


wait, what? isn't that the whole freaking case? el oh el
"Why did the Colossus fall over? Because it's imbalanced! :D" - Dan Artosis
BLinD-RawR
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
ALLEYCAT BLUES51094 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-01-28 16:31:57
January 28 2011 16:06 GMT
#98
On January 29 2011 00:49 Milkis wrote:
The DES bit makes it a bit more interesting, a very clarifying update to the OP was made

The contract that had that clause was between Blizzard and Gretech, an agreement that was signed in May. So this 100% confirms that Blizzard and Gretech wants a transition from Starcraft to Starcraft 2. MBC picked up on this and slammed Blizzard about it, asking why they would want their rights protected if they have no intention of doing anything with it.

Absolute revulsion, I definitely did not wish Blizzard would really be that greedy about this entire thing but honestly I'm not surprised judging by the fact that Blizzard suddenly brings this to court and forces Gretech to stop negotiating with KeSPA when the negotiations were going smoothly between Gretech and KeSPA. Absolutely retarded.


Well this pretty much means that the case from this point on is pretty much a slam dunk for KeSPA's side.

Do you guys know what's weird tomorrow is supposed to be a day when both BW fans and SC2 fans get together for a OSL and GSL grand finals party.
It's just sad and I hope both communities get along with each other because of this
Brood War EICWoo Jung Ho, never forget.| Twitter: @BLinDRawR
Turgid
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
United States1623 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-01-28 16:17:49
January 28 2011 16:13 GMT
#99
It's kind of strange to me if that argument works in Korean courts. It doesn't seem like "Well, you weren't using it..." would pass for an argument against someone claiming their IP in an American court.

It's also kind of strange to me that Blizzard said that they couldn't discuss it in the middle of a lawsuit when the language looks like it gives them plenty of leeway wrt what they mean by making a smooth transition, at least in the translation. The way I read it, it COULD mean that all they want is for the companies involved not to inhibit anyone from switching from SC1 to SC2, with an assumption that players would indeed switch over of their own accord. It could also mean "get your shit together for the SC2 league". I think Blizzard in the past has expressed specifically that they don't want to kill Brood War, and I'd rather not assume that they want to, but who knows?
(╬ ಠ益ಠ)
Djzapz
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
Canada10681 Posts
January 28 2011 17:17 GMT
#100
On January 28 2011 15:34 aru wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 28 2011 15:26 Milkis wrote:
- The defendants also pointed out that in the English contracts included an article saying that there be a transition from Starcraft to Starcraft 2, and requested that the prosecution explain themselves. The judges also ordered that this happen.


That's pretty hilarious.

Pretty sad if you ask me, seems like Blizzard is actively trying to kill off SCBW.... This is sickening.
"My incompetence with power tools had been increasing exponentially over the course of 20 years spent inhaling experimental oven cleaners"
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 11 12 13 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Replay Cast
00:00
Crank Gathers S4: Group Stage
CranKy Ducklings SOOP129
CranKy Ducklings117
LiquipediaDiscussion
OSC
17:00
Mid Season Playoffs
Krystianer vs IbaLIVE!
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RuFF_SC2 113
StarCraft: Brood War
Rain 3418
GuemChi 2856
Artosis 597
NaDa 54
Britney 0
Dota 2
NeuroSwarm144
LuMiX2
League of Legends
JimRising 580
Counter-Strike
summit1g9751
Coldzera 870
taco 286
minikerr42
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox401
Other Games
Day[9].tv1302
shahzam522
C9.Mang0332
ViBE199
Maynarde146
Mew2King45
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick36299
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 70
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota2994
League of Legends
• Lourlo336
Other Games
• Day9tv1302
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
7h 43m
CrankTV Team League
8h 43m
OSC
10h 43m
Big Brain Bouts
13h 43m
Replay Cast
21h 43m
RSL Revival
1d 6h
Serral vs Bunny
ByuN vs GgMaChine
CranKy Ducklings
1d 7h
Afreeca Starleague
1d 7h
Snow vs Jaedong
YSC vs hero
RSL Revival
2 days
Solar vs Rogue
Maru vs NightMare
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
[ Show More ]
GSL
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
WardiTV Weekly
4 days
The PondCast
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
CrankTV Team League
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Season 21: Qualifier 2
HSC XXIX
Eternal Conflict S2 E1

Ongoing

IPSL Spring 2026
Acropolis #4
YSL S3
CSL 2026 Summer (S21)
Escore Tournament S3: W2
CranK Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League
SCTL 2026 Spring
Heroes Pulsing #3
XSE Pro League 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026

Upcoming

ASL Season 22: Wild Card Qualifier
CSLAN 4
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Revival: Season 6
Light Tournament 2026
Eternal Conflict S2 Finale
Eternal Conflict S2 E3
Eternal Conflict S2 E2
Logitech G Connect 2026
StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #5
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.