• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 08:11
CEST 14:11
KST 21:11
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy6Code S RO8 Preview: herO, Zoun, Bunny, Classic7
Community News
Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form?10FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event14Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster14Weekly Cups (June 16-22): Clem strikes back1Weekly Cups (June 9-15): herO doubles on GSL week4
StarCraft 2
General
Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form? StarCraft Mass Recall: SC1 campaigns on SC2 thread The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation How does the number of casters affect your enjoyment of esports? Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster
Tourneys
FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event HomeStory Cup 27 (June 27-29) WardiTV Mondays SOOPer7s Showmatches 2025 $200 Biweekly - StarCraft Evolution League #1
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers [G] Darkgrid Layout
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ ASL20 Preliminary Maps BW General Discussion StarCraft & BroodWar Campaign Speedrun Quest Unit and Spell Similarities
Tourneys
[BSL20] GosuLeague RO16 - Tue & Wed 20:00+CET The Casual Games of the Week Thread [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] ProLeague LB Final - Saturday 20:00 CET
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games? Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Trading/Investing Thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
Blog #2
tankgirl
Game Sound vs. Music: The Im…
TrAiDoS
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 701 users

Blizzard sues OGN - Page 5

Forum Index > Community News and Headlines
586 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 28 29 30 Next All
mdb
Profile Blog Joined February 2003
Bulgaria4059 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-11-04 14:59:05
November 04 2010 14:58 GMT
#81
Do you really believe that there were one million people watching nada vs boxer over the internet?
251
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
United States1401 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-11-04 15:07:01
November 04 2010 14:59 GMT
#82
isn't this about Proleague solely, if they obtained the license to broadcast OSL?

From the way it sounds, this lawsuit, if a win for Blizzard's side, would shut down Proleague, but OSL could continue. Either way MBC would be f'ed in the a.

Also for all the people that are like OMG BLAME ACTIVISION SO EVIL, get a clue people. This is Blizzard's lawsuit in the end. They didn't whisper into Blizzard's ear "hey, want to make more money? Go sue the Korean broadcasting companies." Blizzard knows how to get filthy rich and became profit obsessed on their own (see: WoW).
"If you can chill..........then chill."
Zozo
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Brazil2579 Posts
November 04 2010 15:00 GMT
#83
Well, I'm really surprised by this. I can think of many reasons on why they would sue OGN also, but the one that jumps out is avoiding a legal loop by MBC on the other case. Let's hope it becomes clear as time goes by.
EGM guides me
simme123
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Sweden810 Posts
November 04 2010 15:02 GMT
#84
Activision has made blizzard into a monster they gain money by having this free advertisement but still they fuck it up and make all th fans mad.
konadora *
Profile Blog Joined February 2009
Singapore66156 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-11-04 15:22:03
November 04 2010 15:02 GMT
#85
Korean Netizen time!


- wtf... OGN too?

- now they're after OGN as well.

- holy...

- just seal the negotiation already, damn kespa

- fuck

- dog gretech

- now everything's being wrapped up one-by-one.

- i hope everything gets resolved TT

- OSL is illegal too? thought they negotiated that? looks like they're in cahoots with MBCGame kekeke

- even OGN.. no wonder there was only "happy money" (t/n: form of voucher giveaways) at the end credits in Ro36

- lol starcraft 1

- already expected, they said they already sent letters and if OGN/MBC proceeded, they will sue the companies.

- bye sc1

- this is driving me crazy, bring to international court maybe? keke

- stop saying "illegal, illegal", if the fans want it, they have all the rights to broadcast!

- both with dollar signs in their eyes... kespa helped esports to grow through extortion and now blizzard's extorting money back lol

- GG yo

- we might not know if OGN/MBC/KeSPA team up!

- just end it already.

POGGERS
RebirthOfLeGenD
Profile Blog Joined November 2008
USA5860 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-11-04 15:39:00
November 04 2010 15:02 GMT
#86
On November 04 2010 22:39 Katsuge wrote:
i hate it cos all blizz is talking is about their rights their rights...;/

User was temp banned for this post.

Err, I don't really see why this guy was banned for this post? Just the bad grammar? I would readily admit that the only thing blizzard has done is CTRLV "our rights" all over the place and blow smoke up our asses about them wanting bw/sc2 to run side by side and that they would run their own leagues and shit. Its just absurd.

Anyway, I don't see how the Korean Air OSL can even be shut down. I remember that MONTHS ago OGN agreed to terms with OGN and only MBC couldn't come to an agreement. I suppose this is over OGN broadcasting Proleague without purchasing the rights, but how can they shut down the OSL because of that when they actually have the rights to it?
Be a man, Become a Legend. TL Mafia Forum Ask for access!!
Ryo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
8787 Posts
November 04 2010 15:02 GMT
#87
On November 04 2010 23:54 McDonalds wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 04 2010 23:45 Heimatloser wrote:
gsl viewers on streams: 1.000.000 + koreans
proleague viewers on streams: 1.000 + koreans

thats not even 1%, still blizzard wants to shut down eventual rivalry

Can you even watch the GSL on TV at this point? I was under the impression that the GSL stream numbers included the Korean viewership.


Yes, that was my impression as well.
영원히 엠비씨게임 히어로 팬.
oneofthem
Profile Blog Joined November 2005
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-11-04 15:09:11
November 04 2010 15:06 GMT
#88
On November 04 2010 23:38 HeaDStrong wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 04 2010 23:29 oneofthem wrote:
people need to understand that by "protecting" their rights, it means "extract greatest revenue from" their rights. which may or may not involve killing sc1 and the way kespa does business, which is obviously a no go in a sc2 progaming scene that blizzard has a stake in. kespa sanctions tournaments by controlling the progamers. how can blizzard tolerate some other entity controlling the way their progaming scene is run?

whether the intent is to kill sc1 or not depends on how much money they are asking. if it is high enough to be uncollectible, then obviously they are trying to kill sc1. if it is a sum that still allows ogn etc to do business, then it's something else.




well in your post you jump to the conclusion that blizzard has the rights in the first place, in that case you are correct.

but what most of us are arguing about whether they actually do have those rights. Creating a computer game does not automatically create a huge scene with loads of sponsored teams, televised matches and high level play.

this is where the fight is right now. they haven't won the case so far and claimed the rights to be theirs. so your described situation becomes more like them suing a competitor because it hurts their revenue.

you seem to be implying that an organization like kespa has legitimacy because it exists apart from the effort blizzard put into bw. this is not the case legally speaking.

still, i was not talking about legitimacy at all, just the economic and business logic at work. the legal rights are a tool to be wielded for business ends. blizzard's legal situation did not change from 2000 to today, what has changed is that they have a stake in progaming now that they've devised a way to extract revenue from it.

now, kespa is not exactly your community cooperative sc league. they are quite aggressive in using the power of licensing as well, to the extent of coercing players. i don't have a horse in this race as far as the companies are concerned, i'm just not sure how the players and fans would be treated in the process.

We have fed the heart on fantasies, the heart's grown brutal from the fare, more substance in our enmities than in our love
JWD
Profile Blog Joined October 2007
United States12607 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-11-04 15:08:36
November 04 2010 15:07 GMT
#89
Guys, let's keep this thread civil please. I know that you are upset about this turn of events but that's not license to lash out with angry posts.
✌
snowdrift
Profile Blog Joined February 2009
France2061 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-11-04 15:10:22
November 04 2010 15:09 GMT
#90
OGN 화이팅

I hope KeSPA and the broadcasters stand shoulder-to-shoulder and crush Blizzard. I like how Blizz didn't sue them all at once, which would've showed their hand and made it too obvious they intend to kill BW. They're trying to pick them apart one by one. I don't think it'll work.
NaDa. Our Lord and sAviOr shall return. Learn to nydus you scrub
Weedk
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States507 Posts
November 04 2010 15:11 GMT
#91
On November 05 2010 00:02 konadora wrote:

- both with dollar signs in their eyes... kespa helped esports to grow through extortion and now blizzard's extorting money back lol


Pretty much this. I'm still leaning more towards KeSPA though. If KeSPA loses and the leagues go down, I'm worried that a lot of the players will get screwed. There's no league structure for SC2 and no guaranteed salaries. To think if none of this legal nasty stuff happened, KeSPA might actually be supporting SC2 in some way...
C.W.
Profile Joined August 2010
88 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-11-04 15:20:59
November 04 2010 15:18 GMT
#92
And Blizzard sure does the right thing - it's their damn property.
€dit:
"- stop saying "illegal, illegal", if they fans want it, they have all the rights to broadcast!"

This is ridiculous.
t(','t)
aru
Profile Joined April 2010
183 Posts
November 04 2010 15:19 GMT
#93
On November 05 2010 00:02 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote:
Anyway, I don't see how the Korean Air OSL can even be shut down. I remember that MONTHS ago OGN agreed to terms with OGN and only MBC couldn't come to an agreement. I suppose this is over OGN broadcasting Proleague without purchasing the rights, but how can they shut down the OSL because of that when they actually have the rights to it?


They bought the rights to "Korean Air OSL 2", not "2010 Bacchus OSL". Every tournament you run requires you to buy another license. It's just coincidence that since the GSL started, they couldn't come to another agreement!
HeaDStrong
Profile Blog Joined January 2009
Scotland785 Posts
November 04 2010 15:20 GMT
#94
On November 05 2010 00:06 oneofthem wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 04 2010 23:38 HeaDStrong wrote:
On November 04 2010 23:29 oneofthem wrote:
people need to understand that by "protecting" their rights, it means "extract greatest revenue from" their rights. which may or may not involve killing sc1 and the way kespa does business, which is obviously a no go in a sc2 progaming scene that blizzard has a stake in. kespa sanctions tournaments by controlling the progamers. how can blizzard tolerate some other entity controlling the way their progaming scene is run?

whether the intent is to kill sc1 or not depends on how much money they are asking. if it is high enough to be uncollectible, then obviously they are trying to kill sc1. if it is a sum that still allows ogn etc to do business, then it's something else.




well in your post you jump to the conclusion that blizzard has the rights in the first place, in that case you are correct.

but what most of us are arguing about whether they actually do have those rights. Creating a computer game does not automatically create a huge scene with loads of sponsored teams, televised matches and high level play.

this is where the fight is right now. they haven't won the case so far and claimed the rights to be theirs. so your described situation becomes more like them suing a competitor because it hurts their revenue.

you seem to be implying that an organization like kespa has legitimacy because it exists apart from the effort blizzard put into bw. this is not the case legally speaking.

still, i was not talking about legitimacy at all, just the economic and business logic at work. the legal rights are a tool to be wielded for business ends. blizzard's legal situation did not change from 2000 to today, what has changed is that they have a stake in progaming now that they've devised a way to extract revenue from it.

now, kespa is not exactly your community cooperative sc league. they are quite aggressive in using the power of licensing as well, to the extent of coercing players. i don't have a horse in this race as far as the companies are concerned, i'm just not sure how the players and fans would be treated in the process.



All I was saying is that I am not fully convinced that by creating a video game you automatically own everything that is created by it. I don't think blizzard gets much credit for all the fangirls going crazy and shouting when Flash used a d-matrixed dropship as an elevator to load Jaedongs base full with MnM and take out his tech. Or do you think all the fans turned up to that even because how awesomely Blizzard had designed all those sprites. You see what I mean? What OGN/MBC/KeSPA are selling is not quite what Blizzard had produced.

Sure Blizzard deserves a part of the cake, but from what I recall their requests in the negotiations wasn't a piece of the cake, it was the whole cake and also the knife and all the plates to serve it. In my view this is unreasonable from them and they are waaay in the wrong here.

I agree that KeSPA is a nasty organization, but KeSPA is a representative organization of all the pro teams involved. If KeSPA loses, the core of esports is gone and I am sure as hell Blizzard will not replace it. What happens from then is rather unpredictable but certainly not for good.
leonardus
Profile Joined December 2008
59 Posts
November 04 2010 15:20 GMT
#95
How much money get Blizz from today MLG-Dallas? I think something like 0 $. The conclusion are so simple from here.
Stranger in a strange land
leakingpear
Profile Joined March 2006
United Kingdom302 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-11-04 15:23:37
November 04 2010 15:21 GMT
#96
Why is it every single one of these threads consists of the same uninformed knee jerk reactionary titwank, then 20 pages of people trying to explain that neither sides actions can be equated to the pre-school esque logic that said knee jerk titwank attempts to correlate it to, while being rebuked by said reactionary titwankees?

I mean how were you all not expecting this one, they said they would if OGN continued unabated, it's clearly going to come under the same IP rights situation, in actuality it would be far more absurd if they didn't do this (provided there wasn't a change by OGN to fit to the previous negotiation's stipulations) as it would mean that Blizzard was unfairly targeting one corporation and would sink their entire protection of IP rights case due to the selectivism of it. Oh and i'm really not going to reply to anyone over this stuff as it just gives me headaches trying to deal with the starcraft equivalent of creationists and yes I realise how remarkably arrogant and superior that sounds.

edit: I don't really know how to tone this down JWD, i'm not making personal attacks on people but I guess it's somewhat inflammatory, it's just very much like arguing with a dining room table, to quote Barney Frank.
snowdrift
Profile Blog Joined February 2009
France2061 Posts
November 04 2010 15:23 GMT
#97
On November 05 2010 00:21 leakingpear wrote:
Why is it every single one of these threads consists of the same uninformed knee jerk reactionary titwank, then 20 pages of people trying to explain that neither sides actions can be equated to the pre-school esque logic that said knee jerk titwank attempts to correlate it to, while being rebuked by said reactionary titwankees?

I mean how were you all not expecting this one, they said they would if OGN continued unabated, it's clearly going to come under the same IP rights situation, in actuality it would be far more absurd if they didn't do this (provided there wasn't a change by OGN to fit to the previous negotiation's stipulations) as it would mean that Blizzard was unfairly targeting one corporation and would sink their entire protection of IP rights case due to the selectivism of it. Oh and i'm really not going to reply to anyone over this stuff as it just gives me headaches trying to deal with the starcraft equivalent of creationists and yes I realise how remarkably arrogant and superior that sounds.


Well don't let the door hit you on your way out of the thread.
NaDa. Our Lord and sAviOr shall return. Learn to nydus you scrub
leakingpear
Profile Joined March 2006
United Kingdom302 Posts
November 04 2010 15:25 GMT
#98
On November 05 2010 00:23 snowdrift wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 05 2010 00:21 leakingpear wrote:
Why is it every single one of these threads consists of the same uninformed knee jerk reactionary titwank, then 20 pages of people trying to explain that neither sides actions can be equated to the pre-school esque logic that said knee jerk titwank attempts to correlate it to, while being rebuked by said reactionary titwankees?

I mean how were you all not expecting this one, they said they would if OGN continued unabated, it's clearly going to come under the same IP rights situation, in actuality it would be far more absurd if they didn't do this (provided there wasn't a change by OGN to fit to the previous negotiation's stipulations) as it would mean that Blizzard was unfairly targeting one corporation and would sink their entire protection of IP rights case due to the selectivism of it. Oh and i'm really not going to reply to anyone over this stuff as it just gives me headaches trying to deal with the starcraft equivalent of creationists and yes I realise how remarkably arrogant and superior that sounds.


Well don't let the door hit you on your way out of the thread.


I implore you or anyone to look at my post history in these threads and then not understand where i'm coming from.
Xiphos
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
Canada7507 Posts
November 04 2010 15:25 GMT
#99
On November 05 2010 00:18 C.W. wrote:
And Blizzard sure does the right thing - it's their damn property.
€dit:
Show nested quote +
"- stop saying "illegal, illegal", if they fans want it, they have all the rights to broadcast!"

This is ridiculous.


No you are ridiculous. Basically ALL the games you play at the moment does NOT belong to you. It is still the game companies's properties. Would you really want that? Stop posting stuff that you have no clue about.
2014 - ᕙ( •̀ل͜•́) ϡ Raise your bows brood warriors! ᕙ( •̀ل͜•́) ϡ
C.W.
Profile Joined August 2010
88 Posts
November 04 2010 15:28 GMT
#100
On November 05 2010 00:20 HeaDStrong wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 05 2010 00:06 oneofthem wrote:
On November 04 2010 23:38 HeaDStrong wrote:
On November 04 2010 23:29 oneofthem wrote:
people need to understand that by "protecting" their rights, it means "extract greatest revenue from" their rights. which may or may not involve killing sc1 and the way kespa does business, which is obviously a no go in a sc2 progaming scene that blizzard has a stake in. kespa sanctions tournaments by controlling the progamers. how can blizzard tolerate some other entity controlling the way their progaming scene is run?

whether the intent is to kill sc1 or not depends on how much money they are asking. if it is high enough to be uncollectible, then obviously they are trying to kill sc1. if it is a sum that still allows ogn etc to do business, then it's something else.




well in your post you jump to the conclusion that blizzard has the rights in the first place, in that case you are correct.

but what most of us are arguing about whether they actually do have those rights. Creating a computer game does not automatically create a huge scene with loads of sponsored teams, televised matches and high level play.

this is where the fight is right now. they haven't won the case so far and claimed the rights to be theirs. so your described situation becomes more like them suing a competitor because it hurts their revenue.

you seem to be implying that an organization like kespa has legitimacy because it exists apart from the effort blizzard put into bw. this is not the case legally speaking.

still, i was not talking about legitimacy at all, just the economic and business logic at work. the legal rights are a tool to be wielded for business ends. blizzard's legal situation did not change from 2000 to today, what has changed is that they have a stake in progaming now that they've devised a way to extract revenue from it.

now, kespa is not exactly your community cooperative sc league. they are quite aggressive in using the power of licensing as well, to the extent of coercing players. i don't have a horse in this race as far as the companies are concerned, i'm just not sure how the players and fans would be treated in the process.



All I was saying is that I am not fully convinced that by creating a video game you automatically own everything that is created by it. I don't think blizzard gets much credit for all the fangirls going crazy and shouting when Flash used a d-matrixed dropship as an elevator to load Jaedongs base full with MnM and take out his tech. Or do you think all the fans turned up to that even because how awesomely Blizzard had designed all those sprites. You see what I mean? What OGN/MBC/KeSPA are selling is not quite what Blizzard had produced.

Sure Blizzard deserves a part of the cake, but from what I recall their requests in the negotiations wasn't a piece of the cake, it was the whole cake and also the knife and all the plates to serve it. In my view this is unreasonable from them and they are waaay in the wrong here.

I agree that KeSPA is a nasty organization, but KeSPA is a representative organization of all the pro teams involved. If KeSPA loses, the core of esports is gone and I am sure as hell Blizzard will not replace it. What happens from then is rather unpredictable but certainly not for good.


If you create something you are the IP holder.
It's your property and is handled like any other property as well.
And in case Blizzards wants the whole cake or just a part of it does not change anything.
It's their right.
StarCraft was successively selling even b4 the whole esports thing started - Kespa did not make the game successful - they just milked it to make good money for their own without respecting Blizzards rights.
Legally this case is clear.
t(','t)
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 28 29 30 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Wardi Open
11:00
#42
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Harstem 333
Lowko264
Rex 122
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 14651
Sea 3350
Flash 1641
Hyuk 553
Bisu 466
EffOrt 394
Soma 394
Stork 376
ToSsGirL 246
TY 216
[ Show more ]
Mini 211
Zeus 190
Light 178
ZerO 148
Pusan 137
Soulkey 130
Hyun 128
Snow 127
BeSt 124
hero 65
Sharp 62
Backho 50
Rush 47
Sea.KH 43
Mind 41
Aegong 39
Noble 21
sSak 18
Movie 18
Shinee 18
Yoon 17
Shine 17
Icarus 12
ajuk12(nOOB) 10
scan(afreeca) 9
sas.Sziky 9
Free 9
Barracks 6
Hm[arnc] 5
Bale 4
Britney 0
Stormgate
Nina2
Dota 2
qojqva1899
420jenkins944
XaKoH 564
BananaSlamJamma502
XcaliburYe472
League of Legends
singsing2582
Counter-Strike
x6flipin618
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King118
Westballz26
Other Games
B2W.Neo583
crisheroes328
Pyrionflax252
Fuzer 247
DeMusliM210
hiko71
QueenE18
ZerO(Twitch)10
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick658
StarCraft 2
WardiTV591
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• iopq 1
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV474
League of Legends
• Stunt736
Upcoming Events
PiGosaur Monday
11h 49m
The PondCast
21h 49m
Replay Cast
1d 11h
RSL Revival
1d 21h
ByuN vs Classic
Clem vs Cham
WardiTV European League
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
RSL Revival
2 days
herO vs SHIN
Reynor vs Cure
WardiTV European League
3 days
FEL
3 days
Korean StarCraft League
3 days
[ Show More ]
CranKy Ducklings
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
FEL
4 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
FEL
5 days
BSL: ProLeague
5 days
Dewalt vs Bonyth
Replay Cast
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-06-28
HSC XXVII
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.