• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 12:07
CET 18:07
KST 02:07
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Revival - 2025 Season Finals Preview8RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners12
Community News
Weekly Cups (Dec 15-21): Classic wins big, MaxPax & Clem take weeklies3ComeBackTV's documentary on Byun's Career !10Weekly Cups (Dec 8-14): MaxPax, Clem, Cure win4Weekly Cups (Dec 1-7): Clem doubles, Solar gets over the hump1Weekly Cups (Nov 24-30): MaxPax, Clem, herO win2
StarCraft 2
General
What's the best tug of war? The Grack before Christmas Weekly Cups (Dec 15-21): Classic wins big, MaxPax & Clem take weeklies ComeBackTV's documentary on Byun's Career ! Micro Lags When Playing SC2?
Tourneys
OSC Season 13 World Championship $5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship $100 Prize Pool - Winter Warp Gate Masters Showdow Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Winter Warp Gate Amateur Showdown #1
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 505 Rise From Ashes Mutation # 504 Retribution Mutation # 503 Fowl Play Mutation # 502 Negative Reinforcement
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Recommended FPV games (post-KeSPA) BW General Discussion FlaSh on: Biggest Problem With SnOw's Playstyle soO on: FanTaSy's Potential Return to StarCraft
Tourneys
Small VOD Thread 2.0 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL21] LB QuarterFinals - Sunday 21:00 CET [BSL21] WB SEMIFINALS - Saturday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Game Theory for Starcraft Current Meta Fighting Spirit mining rates
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Beyond All Reason Path of Exile General RTS Discussion Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas Survivor II: The Amazon Sengoku Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread The Games Industry And ATVI Russo-Ukrainian War Thread How Does UI/UX Design Influence User Trust? Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List TL+ Announced Where to ask questions and add stream?
Blogs
National Diversity: A Challe…
TrAiDoS
I decided to write a webnov…
DjKniteX
James Bond movies ranking - pa…
Topin
Thanks for the RSL
Hildegard
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 2044 users

Blizzard sues OGN - Page 5

Forum Index > Community News and Headlines
586 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 28 29 30 Next All
mdb
Profile Blog Joined February 2003
Bulgaria4059 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-11-04 14:59:05
November 04 2010 14:58 GMT
#81
Do you really believe that there were one million people watching nada vs boxer over the internet?
251
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
United States1401 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-11-04 15:07:01
November 04 2010 14:59 GMT
#82
isn't this about Proleague solely, if they obtained the license to broadcast OSL?

From the way it sounds, this lawsuit, if a win for Blizzard's side, would shut down Proleague, but OSL could continue. Either way MBC would be f'ed in the a.

Also for all the people that are like OMG BLAME ACTIVISION SO EVIL, get a clue people. This is Blizzard's lawsuit in the end. They didn't whisper into Blizzard's ear "hey, want to make more money? Go sue the Korean broadcasting companies." Blizzard knows how to get filthy rich and became profit obsessed on their own (see: WoW).
"If you can chill..........then chill."
Zozo
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Brazil2579 Posts
November 04 2010 15:00 GMT
#83
Well, I'm really surprised by this. I can think of many reasons on why they would sue OGN also, but the one that jumps out is avoiding a legal loop by MBC on the other case. Let's hope it becomes clear as time goes by.
EGM guides me
simme123
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Sweden810 Posts
November 04 2010 15:02 GMT
#84
Activision has made blizzard into a monster they gain money by having this free advertisement but still they fuck it up and make all th fans mad.
konadora *
Profile Blog Joined February 2009
Singapore66357 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-11-04 15:22:03
November 04 2010 15:02 GMT
#85
Korean Netizen time!


- wtf... OGN too?

- now they're after OGN as well.

- holy...

- just seal the negotiation already, damn kespa

- fuck

- dog gretech

- now everything's being wrapped up one-by-one.

- i hope everything gets resolved TT

- OSL is illegal too? thought they negotiated that? looks like they're in cahoots with MBCGame kekeke

- even OGN.. no wonder there was only "happy money" (t/n: form of voucher giveaways) at the end credits in Ro36

- lol starcraft 1

- already expected, they said they already sent letters and if OGN/MBC proceeded, they will sue the companies.

- bye sc1

- this is driving me crazy, bring to international court maybe? keke

- stop saying "illegal, illegal", if the fans want it, they have all the rights to broadcast!

- both with dollar signs in their eyes... kespa helped esports to grow through extortion and now blizzard's extorting money back lol

- GG yo

- we might not know if OGN/MBC/KeSPA team up!

- just end it already.

POGGERS
RebirthOfLeGenD
Profile Blog Joined November 2008
USA5860 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-11-04 15:39:00
November 04 2010 15:02 GMT
#86
On November 04 2010 22:39 Katsuge wrote:
i hate it cos all blizz is talking is about their rights their rights...;/

User was temp banned for this post.

Err, I don't really see why this guy was banned for this post? Just the bad grammar? I would readily admit that the only thing blizzard has done is CTRLV "our rights" all over the place and blow smoke up our asses about them wanting bw/sc2 to run side by side and that they would run their own leagues and shit. Its just absurd.

Anyway, I don't see how the Korean Air OSL can even be shut down. I remember that MONTHS ago OGN agreed to terms with OGN and only MBC couldn't come to an agreement. I suppose this is over OGN broadcasting Proleague without purchasing the rights, but how can they shut down the OSL because of that when they actually have the rights to it?
Be a man, Become a Legend. TL Mafia Forum Ask for access!!
Ryo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
8787 Posts
November 04 2010 15:02 GMT
#87
On November 04 2010 23:54 McDonalds wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 04 2010 23:45 Heimatloser wrote:
gsl viewers on streams: 1.000.000 + koreans
proleague viewers on streams: 1.000 + koreans

thats not even 1%, still blizzard wants to shut down eventual rivalry

Can you even watch the GSL on TV at this point? I was under the impression that the GSL stream numbers included the Korean viewership.


Yes, that was my impression as well.
영원히 엠비씨게임 히어로 팬.
oneofthem
Profile Blog Joined November 2005
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-11-04 15:09:11
November 04 2010 15:06 GMT
#88
On November 04 2010 23:38 HeaDStrong wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 04 2010 23:29 oneofthem wrote:
people need to understand that by "protecting" their rights, it means "extract greatest revenue from" their rights. which may or may not involve killing sc1 and the way kespa does business, which is obviously a no go in a sc2 progaming scene that blizzard has a stake in. kespa sanctions tournaments by controlling the progamers. how can blizzard tolerate some other entity controlling the way their progaming scene is run?

whether the intent is to kill sc1 or not depends on how much money they are asking. if it is high enough to be uncollectible, then obviously they are trying to kill sc1. if it is a sum that still allows ogn etc to do business, then it's something else.




well in your post you jump to the conclusion that blizzard has the rights in the first place, in that case you are correct.

but what most of us are arguing about whether they actually do have those rights. Creating a computer game does not automatically create a huge scene with loads of sponsored teams, televised matches and high level play.

this is where the fight is right now. they haven't won the case so far and claimed the rights to be theirs. so your described situation becomes more like them suing a competitor because it hurts their revenue.

you seem to be implying that an organization like kespa has legitimacy because it exists apart from the effort blizzard put into bw. this is not the case legally speaking.

still, i was not talking about legitimacy at all, just the economic and business logic at work. the legal rights are a tool to be wielded for business ends. blizzard's legal situation did not change from 2000 to today, what has changed is that they have a stake in progaming now that they've devised a way to extract revenue from it.

now, kespa is not exactly your community cooperative sc league. they are quite aggressive in using the power of licensing as well, to the extent of coercing players. i don't have a horse in this race as far as the companies are concerned, i'm just not sure how the players and fans would be treated in the process.

We have fed the heart on fantasies, the heart's grown brutal from the fare, more substance in our enmities than in our love
JWD
Profile Blog Joined October 2007
United States12607 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-11-04 15:08:36
November 04 2010 15:07 GMT
#89
Guys, let's keep this thread civil please. I know that you are upset about this turn of events but that's not license to lash out with angry posts.
✌
snowdrift
Profile Blog Joined February 2009
France2061 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-11-04 15:10:22
November 04 2010 15:09 GMT
#90
OGN 화이팅

I hope KeSPA and the broadcasters stand shoulder-to-shoulder and crush Blizzard. I like how Blizz didn't sue them all at once, which would've showed their hand and made it too obvious they intend to kill BW. They're trying to pick them apart one by one. I don't think it'll work.
NaDa. Our Lord and sAviOr shall return. Learn to nydus you scrub
Weedk
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States507 Posts
November 04 2010 15:11 GMT
#91
On November 05 2010 00:02 konadora wrote:

- both with dollar signs in their eyes... kespa helped esports to grow through extortion and now blizzard's extorting money back lol


Pretty much this. I'm still leaning more towards KeSPA though. If KeSPA loses and the leagues go down, I'm worried that a lot of the players will get screwed. There's no league structure for SC2 and no guaranteed salaries. To think if none of this legal nasty stuff happened, KeSPA might actually be supporting SC2 in some way...
C.W.
Profile Joined August 2010
88 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-11-04 15:20:59
November 04 2010 15:18 GMT
#92
And Blizzard sure does the right thing - it's their damn property.
€dit:
"- stop saying "illegal, illegal", if they fans want it, they have all the rights to broadcast!"

This is ridiculous.
t(','t)
aru
Profile Joined April 2010
183 Posts
November 04 2010 15:19 GMT
#93
On November 05 2010 00:02 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote:
Anyway, I don't see how the Korean Air OSL can even be shut down. I remember that MONTHS ago OGN agreed to terms with OGN and only MBC couldn't come to an agreement. I suppose this is over OGN broadcasting Proleague without purchasing the rights, but how can they shut down the OSL because of that when they actually have the rights to it?


They bought the rights to "Korean Air OSL 2", not "2010 Bacchus OSL". Every tournament you run requires you to buy another license. It's just coincidence that since the GSL started, they couldn't come to another agreement!
HeaDStrong
Profile Blog Joined January 2009
Scotland785 Posts
November 04 2010 15:20 GMT
#94
On November 05 2010 00:06 oneofthem wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 04 2010 23:38 HeaDStrong wrote:
On November 04 2010 23:29 oneofthem wrote:
people need to understand that by "protecting" their rights, it means "extract greatest revenue from" their rights. which may or may not involve killing sc1 and the way kespa does business, which is obviously a no go in a sc2 progaming scene that blizzard has a stake in. kespa sanctions tournaments by controlling the progamers. how can blizzard tolerate some other entity controlling the way their progaming scene is run?

whether the intent is to kill sc1 or not depends on how much money they are asking. if it is high enough to be uncollectible, then obviously they are trying to kill sc1. if it is a sum that still allows ogn etc to do business, then it's something else.




well in your post you jump to the conclusion that blizzard has the rights in the first place, in that case you are correct.

but what most of us are arguing about whether they actually do have those rights. Creating a computer game does not automatically create a huge scene with loads of sponsored teams, televised matches and high level play.

this is where the fight is right now. they haven't won the case so far and claimed the rights to be theirs. so your described situation becomes more like them suing a competitor because it hurts their revenue.

you seem to be implying that an organization like kespa has legitimacy because it exists apart from the effort blizzard put into bw. this is not the case legally speaking.

still, i was not talking about legitimacy at all, just the economic and business logic at work. the legal rights are a tool to be wielded for business ends. blizzard's legal situation did not change from 2000 to today, what has changed is that they have a stake in progaming now that they've devised a way to extract revenue from it.

now, kespa is not exactly your community cooperative sc league. they are quite aggressive in using the power of licensing as well, to the extent of coercing players. i don't have a horse in this race as far as the companies are concerned, i'm just not sure how the players and fans would be treated in the process.



All I was saying is that I am not fully convinced that by creating a video game you automatically own everything that is created by it. I don't think blizzard gets much credit for all the fangirls going crazy and shouting when Flash used a d-matrixed dropship as an elevator to load Jaedongs base full with MnM and take out his tech. Or do you think all the fans turned up to that even because how awesomely Blizzard had designed all those sprites. You see what I mean? What OGN/MBC/KeSPA are selling is not quite what Blizzard had produced.

Sure Blizzard deserves a part of the cake, but from what I recall their requests in the negotiations wasn't a piece of the cake, it was the whole cake and also the knife and all the plates to serve it. In my view this is unreasonable from them and they are waaay in the wrong here.

I agree that KeSPA is a nasty organization, but KeSPA is a representative organization of all the pro teams involved. If KeSPA loses, the core of esports is gone and I am sure as hell Blizzard will not replace it. What happens from then is rather unpredictable but certainly not for good.
leonardus
Profile Joined December 2008
59 Posts
November 04 2010 15:20 GMT
#95
How much money get Blizz from today MLG-Dallas? I think something like 0 $. The conclusion are so simple from here.
Stranger in a strange land
leakingpear
Profile Joined March 2006
United Kingdom302 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-11-04 15:23:37
November 04 2010 15:21 GMT
#96
Why is it every single one of these threads consists of the same uninformed knee jerk reactionary titwank, then 20 pages of people trying to explain that neither sides actions can be equated to the pre-school esque logic that said knee jerk titwank attempts to correlate it to, while being rebuked by said reactionary titwankees?

I mean how were you all not expecting this one, they said they would if OGN continued unabated, it's clearly going to come under the same IP rights situation, in actuality it would be far more absurd if they didn't do this (provided there wasn't a change by OGN to fit to the previous negotiation's stipulations) as it would mean that Blizzard was unfairly targeting one corporation and would sink their entire protection of IP rights case due to the selectivism of it. Oh and i'm really not going to reply to anyone over this stuff as it just gives me headaches trying to deal with the starcraft equivalent of creationists and yes I realise how remarkably arrogant and superior that sounds.

edit: I don't really know how to tone this down JWD, i'm not making personal attacks on people but I guess it's somewhat inflammatory, it's just very much like arguing with a dining room table, to quote Barney Frank.
snowdrift
Profile Blog Joined February 2009
France2061 Posts
November 04 2010 15:23 GMT
#97
On November 05 2010 00:21 leakingpear wrote:
Why is it every single one of these threads consists of the same uninformed knee jerk reactionary titwank, then 20 pages of people trying to explain that neither sides actions can be equated to the pre-school esque logic that said knee jerk titwank attempts to correlate it to, while being rebuked by said reactionary titwankees?

I mean how were you all not expecting this one, they said they would if OGN continued unabated, it's clearly going to come under the same IP rights situation, in actuality it would be far more absurd if they didn't do this (provided there wasn't a change by OGN to fit to the previous negotiation's stipulations) as it would mean that Blizzard was unfairly targeting one corporation and would sink their entire protection of IP rights case due to the selectivism of it. Oh and i'm really not going to reply to anyone over this stuff as it just gives me headaches trying to deal with the starcraft equivalent of creationists and yes I realise how remarkably arrogant and superior that sounds.


Well don't let the door hit you on your way out of the thread.
NaDa. Our Lord and sAviOr shall return. Learn to nydus you scrub
leakingpear
Profile Joined March 2006
United Kingdom302 Posts
November 04 2010 15:25 GMT
#98
On November 05 2010 00:23 snowdrift wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 05 2010 00:21 leakingpear wrote:
Why is it every single one of these threads consists of the same uninformed knee jerk reactionary titwank, then 20 pages of people trying to explain that neither sides actions can be equated to the pre-school esque logic that said knee jerk titwank attempts to correlate it to, while being rebuked by said reactionary titwankees?

I mean how were you all not expecting this one, they said they would if OGN continued unabated, it's clearly going to come under the same IP rights situation, in actuality it would be far more absurd if they didn't do this (provided there wasn't a change by OGN to fit to the previous negotiation's stipulations) as it would mean that Blizzard was unfairly targeting one corporation and would sink their entire protection of IP rights case due to the selectivism of it. Oh and i'm really not going to reply to anyone over this stuff as it just gives me headaches trying to deal with the starcraft equivalent of creationists and yes I realise how remarkably arrogant and superior that sounds.


Well don't let the door hit you on your way out of the thread.


I implore you or anyone to look at my post history in these threads and then not understand where i'm coming from.
Xiphos
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
Canada7507 Posts
November 04 2010 15:25 GMT
#99
On November 05 2010 00:18 C.W. wrote:
And Blizzard sure does the right thing - it's their damn property.
€dit:
Show nested quote +
"- stop saying "illegal, illegal", if they fans want it, they have all the rights to broadcast!"

This is ridiculous.


No you are ridiculous. Basically ALL the games you play at the moment does NOT belong to you. It is still the game companies's properties. Would you really want that? Stop posting stuff that you have no clue about.
2014 - ᕙ( •̀ل͜•́) ϡ Raise your bows brood warriors! ᕙ( •̀ل͜•́) ϡ
C.W.
Profile Joined August 2010
88 Posts
November 04 2010 15:28 GMT
#100
On November 05 2010 00:20 HeaDStrong wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 05 2010 00:06 oneofthem wrote:
On November 04 2010 23:38 HeaDStrong wrote:
On November 04 2010 23:29 oneofthem wrote:
people need to understand that by "protecting" their rights, it means "extract greatest revenue from" their rights. which may or may not involve killing sc1 and the way kespa does business, which is obviously a no go in a sc2 progaming scene that blizzard has a stake in. kespa sanctions tournaments by controlling the progamers. how can blizzard tolerate some other entity controlling the way their progaming scene is run?

whether the intent is to kill sc1 or not depends on how much money they are asking. if it is high enough to be uncollectible, then obviously they are trying to kill sc1. if it is a sum that still allows ogn etc to do business, then it's something else.




well in your post you jump to the conclusion that blizzard has the rights in the first place, in that case you are correct.

but what most of us are arguing about whether they actually do have those rights. Creating a computer game does not automatically create a huge scene with loads of sponsored teams, televised matches and high level play.

this is where the fight is right now. they haven't won the case so far and claimed the rights to be theirs. so your described situation becomes more like them suing a competitor because it hurts their revenue.

you seem to be implying that an organization like kespa has legitimacy because it exists apart from the effort blizzard put into bw. this is not the case legally speaking.

still, i was not talking about legitimacy at all, just the economic and business logic at work. the legal rights are a tool to be wielded for business ends. blizzard's legal situation did not change from 2000 to today, what has changed is that they have a stake in progaming now that they've devised a way to extract revenue from it.

now, kespa is not exactly your community cooperative sc league. they are quite aggressive in using the power of licensing as well, to the extent of coercing players. i don't have a horse in this race as far as the companies are concerned, i'm just not sure how the players and fans would be treated in the process.



All I was saying is that I am not fully convinced that by creating a video game you automatically own everything that is created by it. I don't think blizzard gets much credit for all the fangirls going crazy and shouting when Flash used a d-matrixed dropship as an elevator to load Jaedongs base full with MnM and take out his tech. Or do you think all the fans turned up to that even because how awesomely Blizzard had designed all those sprites. You see what I mean? What OGN/MBC/KeSPA are selling is not quite what Blizzard had produced.

Sure Blizzard deserves a part of the cake, but from what I recall their requests in the negotiations wasn't a piece of the cake, it was the whole cake and also the knife and all the plates to serve it. In my view this is unreasonable from them and they are waaay in the wrong here.

I agree that KeSPA is a nasty organization, but KeSPA is a representative organization of all the pro teams involved. If KeSPA loses, the core of esports is gone and I am sure as hell Blizzard will not replace it. What happens from then is rather unpredictable but certainly not for good.


If you create something you are the IP holder.
It's your property and is handled like any other property as well.
And in case Blizzards wants the whole cake or just a part of it does not change anything.
It's their right.
StarCraft was successively selling even b4 the whole esports thing started - Kespa did not make the game successful - they just milked it to make good money for their own without respecting Blizzards rights.
Legally this case is clear.
t(','t)
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 28 29 30 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Big Brain Bouts
17:00
#103
Elazer vs Nicoract
Reynor vs Scarlett
RotterdaM443
IndyStarCraft 0
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RotterdaM 443
SKillous 157
BRAT_OK 84
MindelVK 26
IndyStarCraft 0
StarCraft: Brood War
Rain 4933
Sea 4599
EffOrt 928
ggaemo 295
Shuttle 215
Mini 176
Sharp 164
Barracks 112
Snow 108
JYJ 74
[ Show more ]
Hyun 70
hero 68
PianO 36
Terrorterran 27
Sexy 20
yabsab 16
Shine 10
SilentControl 9
HiyA 9
Bale 8
JulyZerg 6
Dota 2
qojqva5284
XcaliburYe683
Fuzer 223
LuMiX1
League of Legends
Trikslyr39
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor229
Other Games
singsing2055
B2W.Neo1123
Mlord369
crisheroes357
DeMusliM295
XaKoH 112
Beastyqt77
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Light_VIP 52
• HeavenSC 23
• 3DClanTV 10
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• Michael_bg 10
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota2142
Other Games
• Shiphtur163
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
7h 53m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 16h
Krystianer vs TBD
TriGGeR vs SKillous
Percival vs TBD
ByuN vs Nicoract
OSC
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
Wardi Open
2 days
OSC
3 days
Solar vs MaxPax
ByuN vs Krystianer
Spirit vs TBD
OSC
6 days
Liquipedia Results
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.