• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 16:38
CEST 22:38
KST 05:38
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Team TLMC #5 - Finalists & Open Tournaments0[ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt2: Turbulence10Classic Games #3: Rogue vs Serral at BlizzCon9[ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt1: Ascent10Maestros of the Game: Week 1/Play-in Preview12
Community News
BSL 2025 Warsaw LAN + Legends Showmatch0Weekly Cups (Sept 8-14): herO & MaxPax split cups4WardiTV TL Team Map Contest #5 Tournaments1SC4ALL $6,000 Open LAN in Philadelphia8Weekly Cups (Sept 1-7): MaxPax rebounds & Clem saga continues29
StarCraft 2
General
StarCraft II 5.0.15 PTR Patch Notes #1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time Weekly Cups (Sept 8-14): herO & MaxPax split cups Team Liquid Map Contest #21 - Presented by Monster Energy SpeCial on The Tasteless Podcast
Tourneys
SC2's Safe House 2 - October 18 & 19 RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series Maestros of The Game—$20k event w/ live finals in Paris Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament SC4ALL $6,000 Open LAN in Philadelphia
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 491 Night Drive Mutation # 490 Masters of Midnight Mutation # 489 Bannable Offense Mutation # 488 What Goes Around
Brood War
General
ASL20 General Discussion Soulkey on ASL S20 BW General Discussion ASL TICKET LIVE help! :D NaDa's Body
Tourneys
[ASL20] Ro16 Group C Small VOD Thread 2.0 [ASL20] Ro16 Group D [Megathread] Daily Proleagues
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Muta micro map competition Fighting Spirit mining rates [G] Mineral Boosting
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Borderlands 3 Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread General RTS Discussion Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion LiquidDota to reintegrate into TL.net
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine UK Politics Mega-thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The Happy Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread High temperatures on bridge(s)
TL Community
BarCraft in Tokyo Japan for ASL Season5 Final The Automated Ban List
Blogs
i'm really bored guys
Peanutsc
I <=> 9
KrillinFromwales
The Personality of a Spender…
TrAiDoS
A very expensive lesson on ma…
Garnet
hello world
radishsoup
Lemme tell you a thing o…
JoinTheRain
RTS Design in Hypercoven
a11
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1690 users

What do you want from future RTS games?

Forum Index > General Games
Post a Reply
1 2 3 4 Next All
CicadaSC
Profile Joined January 2018
United States1772 Posts
Last Edited: 2025-06-07 11:25:59
May 01 2025 21:57 GMT
#1


timestamped video. 15:20 if it doesn't work.

TLDW: "By the way I'm going to call out all RTS games right now. I know this is a stormgate video but everybody does this weird thing where they're like, cuz I talked to all these publishers and ones for games that people don't even know about yet, they're a little bit too caught up with like new players, and then you go okay but you need to have hardcore players too."

This confirms there is another big RTS in development that no one knows about from one of the publishers he's spoken to. We know about Zerospace, Battle Aces, Stormgate and Tempest Rising, but what could this secret RTS be, and by who?

Will update this thread as we find out more information.

Update 5/17/2025: https://x.com/Narushio_wuwa/status/1899178803324498359 Could Chinese developers of "Wuthering Waves" be making an RTS? They have job postings citing they are making a "New Competitive Game" and one of job tag descriptions is "RTS Games."

Disclaimer: This title was supposed to be about a secret rts in development, but mods changed it. I do not care what people want in a new rts game i am just using this thread to update any new information i find out about this secret rts.

Update 06/06/2025:

Game of Thrones War for Westeros was announced. Not only is it an RTS, if you read the description it says it is a "Classic RTS." This is very inspiring to me I think there is a good shot it plays the way us old heads want it to. I think this is the more likely game considering it's prestige of IP and "classic RTS" that has been in contact with Tasteless.

https://x.com/GoTWFW/status/1931124099503567114 gameplay and deeper dive here.
Remember that we all come from a place of passion!!
CicadaSC
Profile Joined January 2018
United States1772 Posts
Last Edited: 2025-05-01 22:08:23
May 01 2025 22:00 GMT
#2
Personally, I am excited we have another RTS in the works since Stormgate, Battle Aces, And ZeroSpace seem to not have fully won over the StarCraft audience. If this company is talking with Tasteless, I think it being starcraft-like is not a far shot. Could it be from Mike Morhaime's company Dreamhaven? Secret Blizzard RTS? Warcraft 4? does anyone have any other thoughts?
Remember that we all come from a place of passion!!
Optimate
Profile Joined August 2020
249 Posts
May 02 2025 00:35 GMT
#3
Petroglyph games has an unannounced RTS in development. They are former ex-Westwood Studios Employees. The company that made Command and Conquer.
Hider
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Denmark9398 Posts
Last Edited: 2025-05-02 05:40:33
May 02 2025 05:40 GMT
#4
In general I agree with the notion that even though game studios say "more new player friendly", they don't really succeed in that. And they also just make the game less interesting from a high-skill cap perspective.

It would be a refreshing take if a studio admitted - we don't know how to make it easy but we know how to make something awesome for hardcore players.

Specifically on the Battle Aces. It makes sense to start with a lot of workers so action starts right away. However, it's unfortunately also quite stressful when you need to make decisions ASAP as a new player. So game-devs that try this approach need to think better around how to allow players to worry less about multiple different decisions and just focus on one part at the time.
ETisME
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
12477 Posts
May 02 2025 08:51 GMT
#5
I personally disagree with it.
There's no real need for cater to a hardcore community, maybe appealing to hardcore players is an issue.

I am looking at some tower defense games and there are consistent new game with new ideas with RTS elements, and some are doing fairly decent.

I am playing expedition 33, a genre (turn based combat) that even Final Fantasy was convinced it's a dead-end.
Turns out that's not necessarily true, it just needs to be a great game even if the hardcore turn based fans would be turned off by the necessity of QTE.
其疾如风,其徐如林,侵掠如火,不动如山,难知如阴,动如雷震。
Hider
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Denmark9398 Posts
Last Edited: 2025-05-02 15:08:41
May 02 2025 15:07 GMT
#6
I am looking at some tower defense games and there are consistent new game with new ideas with RTS elements, and some are doing fairly decent.


But they are sucecsful at making the game easy. Every single RTS that has tried to make the game easier hasn't succeeding in significantly reducing the skill floor, and yet they all managed to significantly reduce the micro-skill cap.

Now I do think the real issue is incompetence - it should be feasible to make the game significantly easier while raising the skill-cap, but I think we have to be realistic as well and acknowledge that a lot of game devs sucks and they probably have an easier time succeeding by narrowing down the target group.

I am playing expedition 33, a genre (turn based combat) that even Final Fantasy was convinced it's a dead-end.
Turns out that's not necessarily true, it just needs to be a great game even if the hardcore turn based fans would be turned off by the necessity of QTE.


You don't have to be the target group for this game. A game can do reasonably well if it's developed efficiently (so no Frostgiant money wasting) and has a clear idea for the game they want to develop and target group it tries to reach.
WombaT
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Northern Ireland25677 Posts
May 02 2025 22:09 GMT
#7
I’d just like to see someone really nail whatever they’re trying to do, and have that bit of vision.

Could be super hardcore, or super casual. If the former it might scratch that StarCraft itch for me. If the latter it could be an ideal game to get Minibat into the genre and play together.
'You'll always be the cuddly marsupial of my heart, despite the inherent flaws of your ancestry' - Squat
Gorsameth
Profile Joined April 2010
Netherlands21798 Posts
May 03 2025 09:56 GMT
#8
On May 02 2025 17:51 ETisME wrote:
I personally disagree with it.
There's no real need for cater to a hardcore community, maybe appealing to hardcore players is an issue.

I am looking at some tower defense games and there are consistent new game with new ideas with RTS elements, and some are doing fairly decent.

I am playing expedition 33, a genre (turn based combat) that even Final Fantasy was convinced it's a dead-end.
Turns out that's not necessarily true, it just needs to be a great game even if the hardcore turn based fans would be turned off by the necessity of QTE.
I think the big thing between hardcore and casual is longevity.

How many of those fun new tower defence games are still going to be talked about in a year?
I think if your trying to make a game that people will play for years to come you need that hardcore player element who will keep playing the game they like for years.

If you want to just make a good game that people will (hopefully) buy and then move on to the next project then I agree you don't 'need' the hardcore players.
It ignores such insignificant forces as time, entropy, and death
WombaT
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Northern Ireland25677 Posts
May 03 2025 12:26 GMT
#9
On May 03 2025 18:56 Gorsameth wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 02 2025 17:51 ETisME wrote:
I personally disagree with it.
There's no real need for cater to a hardcore community, maybe appealing to hardcore players is an issue.

I am looking at some tower defense games and there are consistent new game with new ideas with RTS elements, and some are doing fairly decent.

I am playing expedition 33, a genre (turn based combat) that even Final Fantasy was convinced it's a dead-end.
Turns out that's not necessarily true, it just needs to be a great game even if the hardcore turn based fans would be turned off by the necessity of QTE.
I think the big thing between hardcore and casual is longevity.

How many of those fun new tower defence games are still going to be talked about in a year?
I think if your trying to make a game that people will play for years to come you need that hardcore player element who will keep playing the game they like for years.

If you want to just make a good game that people will (hopefully) buy and then move on to the next project then I agree you don't 'need' the hardcore players.

Yeah, I already have more games on Gamepass alone than I can play. And I have a good time

But my habits have always really been I’ll have a ‘main’ game I’ll play for years and years, or follow too in the case of an SC2.

I think often the hardcore/casual framing is overly focused on hard/easy to play lines. At least for me it’s more a matter of ‘is this something I can have fun with for a few hours, or beat in a week and I’ve had my fun, versus it being something I could envision playing for 5+ years regularly.
'You'll always be the cuddly marsupial of my heart, despite the inherent flaws of your ancestry' - Squat
ETisME
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
12477 Posts
Last Edited: 2025-05-04 01:34:00
May 04 2025 01:33 GMT
#10
On May 03 2025 18:56 Gorsameth wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 02 2025 17:51 ETisME wrote:
I personally disagree with it.
There's no real need for cater to a hardcore community, maybe appealing to hardcore players is an issue.

I am looking at some tower defense games and there are consistent new game with new ideas with RTS elements, and some are doing fairly decent.

I am playing expedition 33, a genre (turn based combat) that even Final Fantasy was convinced it's a dead-end.
Turns out that's not necessarily true, it just needs to be a great game even if the hardcore turn based fans would be turned off by the necessity of QTE.
I think the big thing between hardcore and casual is longevity.

How many of those fun new tower defence games are still going to be talked about in a year?
I think if your trying to make a game that people will play for years to come you need that hardcore player element who will keep playing the game they like for years.

If you want to just make a good game that people will (hopefully) buy and then move on to the next project then I agree you don't 'need' the hardcore players.

Majority of them will fail, but that happens in all genres.
Hardcore players were all casual once. That goes for any games, including SC series.

Even the indie turn based 2d tower defence game, the last spell, has a concurrent 300 players. That's double/triple stormgate numbers.
oldie classic battle of middle earth 2 still got a fair number of players and interest. Titanfall 2 etc.

It doesn't really need to be catering to hardcore, players will grow to it if it's fun.
其疾如风,其徐如林,侵掠如火,不动如山,难知如阴,动如雷震。
RogerChillingworth
Profile Joined March 2010
3008 Posts
Last Edited: 2025-05-04 14:45:19
May 04 2025 01:38 GMT
#11
edit: ill just stop posting.
RvB
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
Netherlands6231 Posts
May 04 2025 09:39 GMT
#12
A game can appeal to hardcore and casual fans. Almost all games that we consider hardcore do so. Sc2 has the campaign, custom games, and coop. The reason it lost to competitors like LoL was due to an outdated business model. F2P games will always attract more gamers. Instead of focusing on appealing to casuals/hardcore gamers they should focus on creating a good game.
M4TAPhyS1cs
Profile Joined April 2025
13 Posts
Last Edited: 2025-05-04 10:20:59
May 04 2025 10:20 GMT
#13
--- Nuked ---
WGT-Baal
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
France3392 Posts
Last Edited: 2025-05-04 14:14:04
May 04 2025 14:13 GMT
#14
For me there are 3 key parts to a good rts:

1) unique race design. I don't want to play a sc-like or warcraft-like game since i could just go ahead and play those instead. I d like a truly new set of races with different mechanics. Granted it could be tricky to balance. Random example: we could have naval units, supply/resource convoys, communication infrastructure, whatever thing not directly combat related

2) a good solid campaign. The campaign also acts as a tutorial but it should be good as standalone. Warcraft amd starcraft did great that way.

3) a good non 1v1 multiplayer. It can be ums but also 2v2, 3v3 and more. Bw was ok at first with that, Warcraft not as great, sc2 terrible imho. (As standalone, all 3 were great with UMS)

Building "for esport" should just be the observer and replay functions, the rest of the game should just be good instead of shoehorning a bad game into esport
Horang2 fan
Yurie
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
11882 Posts
May 05 2025 17:59 GMT
#15
On May 04 2025 23:13 WGT-Baal wrote:
For me there are 3 key parts to a good rts:

1) unique race design. I don't want to play a sc-like or warcraft-like game since i could just go ahead and play those instead. I d like a truly new set of races with different mechanics. Granted it could be tricky to balance. Random example: we could have naval units, supply/resource convoys, communication infrastructure, whatever thing not directly combat related

2) a good solid campaign. The campaign also acts as a tutorial but it should be good as standalone. Warcraft amd starcraft did great that way.

3) a good non 1v1 multiplayer. It can be ums but also 2v2, 3v3 and more. Bw was ok at first with that, Warcraft not as great, sc2 terrible imho. (As standalone, all 3 were great with UMS)

Building "for esport" should just be the observer and replay functions, the rest of the game should just be good instead of shoehorning a bad game into esport


I agree with your 2 and 3. But I think a decent AI is important as well. Doing comp stomps with other people is another good way to get into more competitive modes. Perhaps even dedicated PvE modes such as SC2 coop.
MJG
Profile Joined May 2018
United Kingdom1217 Posts
May 06 2025 10:37 GMT
#16
On May 04 2025 23:13 WGT-Baal wrote:
For me there are 3 key parts to a good rts:

1) unique race design. I don't want to play a sc-like or warcraft-like game since i could just go ahead and play those instead. I d like a truly new set of races with different mechanics. Granted it could be tricky to balance. Random example: we could have naval units, supply/resource convoys, communication infrastructure, whatever thing not directly combat related.

This is definitely one of the reasons why I can't be bothered with Stormgate. That they have legally-distinct Terran, Zerg and Protoss factions is a turn-off rather than a turn-on.
"You have to play for yourself, you have to play to get better; you can't play to make other people happy, that's not gonna ever sustain you." - NonY
Latham
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
9563 Posts
Last Edited: 2025-05-07 15:35:17
May 07 2025 02:28 GMT
#17
On May 04 2025 23:13 WGT-Baal wrote:
For me there are 3 key parts to a good rts:

1) unique race design. I don't want to play a sc-like or warcraft-like game since i could just go ahead and play those instead. I d like a truly new set of races with different mechanics. Granted it could be tricky to balance. Random example: we could have naval units, supply/resource convoys, communication infrastructure, whatever thing not directly combat related

2) a good solid campaign. The campaign also acts as a tutorial but it should be good as standalone. Warcraft amd starcraft did great that way.

3) a good non 1v1 multiplayer. It can be ums but also 2v2, 3v3 and more. Bw was ok at first with that, Warcraft not as great, sc2 terrible imho. (As standalone, all 3 were great with UMS)

Building "for esport" should just be the observer and replay functions, the rest of the game should just be good instead of shoehorning a bad game into esport


For me its:
1) Base building and tiers/ages. In my opinion base building is as much a core part of an RTS as resource gathering.

2) Scope. I need to be able to field BIG ARMIES. OK, maybe not on the level of Supreme Commander, but definitely more than say Dawn of War 2 or Company of Heroes. The maps need to be big, open, with multiple paths to outmaneuver your enemy and launch surprise attacks. Game has to be macro-friendly. On that note, micro should be its own reward. Don't put in needless abilities on units just for the sake of clicking them so the player has something to do. I'm looking at you Red Alert 3...

3) "rule of cool" factions and something that makes them unique. I don't want to say "unique races" because that kind of disqualifies Age of Empires 2 (and 4?) right now, because the civilizations in that game are very copy/pasta of one another, but obviously have their own strengths and weaknesses and UNIQUE UNITS (from the castle). I think AoE2:DE is currently the best RTS on the market.
For the curse of life is the curse of want. PC = https://be.pcpartpicker.com/list/4JknvV
Yurie
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
11882 Posts
May 07 2025 18:34 GMT
#18
On May 07 2025 11:28 Latham wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 04 2025 23:13 WGT-Baal wrote:
For me there are 3 key parts to a good rts:

1) unique race design. I don't want to play a sc-like or warcraft-like game since i could just go ahead and play those instead. I d like a truly new set of races with different mechanics. Granted it could be tricky to balance. Random example: we could have naval units, supply/resource convoys, communication infrastructure, whatever thing not directly combat related

2) a good solid campaign. The campaign also acts as a tutorial but it should be good as standalone. Warcraft amd starcraft did great that way.

3) a good non 1v1 multiplayer. It can be ums but also 2v2, 3v3 and more. Bw was ok at first with that, Warcraft not as great, sc2 terrible imho. (As standalone, all 3 were great with UMS)

Building "for esport" should just be the observer and replay functions, the rest of the game should just be good instead of shoehorning a bad game into esport


For me its:
1) Base building and tiers/ages. In my opinion base building is as much a core part of an RTS as resource gathering.

2) Scope. I need to be able to field BIG ARMIES. OK, maybe not on the level of Supreme Commander, but definitely more than say Dawn of War 2 or Company of Heroes. The maps need to be big, open, with multiple paths to outmaneuver your enemy and launch surprise attacks. Game has to be macro-friendly. On that note, micro should be its own reward. Don't put in needless abilities on units just for the sake of clicking them so the player has something to do. I'm looking at you Red Alert 3...

3) "rule of cool" factions and something that makes them unique. I don't want to say "unique races" because that kind of disqualifies Age of Empires 2 (and 4?) right now, because the civilizations in that game are very copy/pasta of one another, but obviously have their own strengths and weaknesses and UNIQUE UNITS (from the castle). I think AoE2:DE is currently the best RTS on the market.


Don't you think supreme commander is a bit low? Isn't it like only 20k units per player with mods? Or like 8k units until it gets unplayable in multiplayer? Higher expectations here is a nice to have. Allows for 64vs64 players or very large armies in user generated scenarios.
ZeroByte13
Profile Joined March 2022
768 Posts
Last Edited: 2025-05-07 19:00:32
May 07 2025 19:00 GMT
#19
The most successful RTS series in history ever had pop limit at about 200 or lower.
- Starcraft 1-2, pop cap 200
- Warcraft 3, pop cap 100
- Age of Empires series, pop cap 200
- Command & Conquer series including Red Alert - don't have visible pop cap but players almost never have more than 100-150 units
- Company of Heroes / Dawn of War, about 15 squads or vehicles in total, maybe 20 max.

So maybe if you want your RTS to be really successful, you know what to do.
Latham
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
9563 Posts
May 08 2025 03:14 GMT
#20
On May 08 2025 04:00 ZeroByte13 wrote:
The most successful RTS series in history ever had pop limit at about 200 or lower.
- Starcraft 1-2, pop cap 200
- Warcraft 3, pop cap 100
- Age of Empires series, pop cap 200
- Command & Conquer series including Red Alert - don't have visible pop cap but players almost never have more than 100-150 units
- Company of Heroes / Dawn of War, about 15 squads or vehicles in total, maybe 20 max.

So maybe if you want your RTS to be really successful, you know what to do.


In Starcraft and Warcraft, units cost a varying amount of supply. A zergling costs 1/2 of pop, an Ultralisk 4. A peon costs 1, a grunt 3 and a tauren 5.
In AoE2 everything is uniform and costs 1 supply.
In CoH (I only have experience with CoH 2, didn't buy CoH3 and I've already forgotten CoH1) people would usually field 4-5 infantry squads and 3-4 vehicles. Also a King Tiger costs a lot more vehicle pop space than a clown car.
For the curse of life is the curse of want. PC = https://be.pcpartpicker.com/list/4JknvV
1 2 3 4 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 13h 22m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
mouzHeroMarine 517
UpATreeSC 214
SteadfastSC 180
IndyStarCraft 139
NeuroSwarm 129
ForJumy 18
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 16398
Dewaltoss 178
Shuttle 130
Larva 65
Aegong 31
Sexy 24
Dota 2
Fuzer 187
Counter-Strike
flusha314
Stewie2K82
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King43
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu456
Other Games
summit1g4421
FrodaN1461
Sick1294
fl0m913
Beastyqt599
mouzStarbuck282
ToD221
C9.Mang0165
Trikslyr44
PPMD36
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 19 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• davetesta24
• Reevou 6
• Kozan
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Migwel
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• intothetv
• IndyKCrew
StarCraft: Brood War
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 4946
• Noizen35
League of Legends
• Doublelift3482
• TFBlade867
Other Games
• imaqtpie838
• WagamamaTV438
• Shiphtur264
Upcoming Events
RSL Revival
13h 22m
Zoun vs Classic
Map Test Tournament
14h 22m
Korean StarCraft League
1d 6h
BSL Open LAN 2025 - War…
1d 11h
RSL Revival
1d 13h
Reynor vs Cure
BSL Open LAN 2025 - War…
2 days
RSL Revival
2 days
Online Event
2 days
Wardi Open
3 days
Monday Night Weeklies
3 days
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
LiuLi Cup
5 days
The PondCast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-09-10
Chzzk MurlocKing SC1 vs SC2 Cup #2
HCC Europe

Ongoing

BSL 20 Team Wars
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21 Points
ASL Season 20
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
LASL Season 20
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1

Upcoming

2025 Chongqing Offline CUP
BSL World Championship of Poland 2025
IPSL Winter 2025-26
BSL Season 21
SC4ALL: Brood War
BSL 21 Team A
Stellar Fest
SC4ALL: StarCraft II
EC S1
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.