• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 05:35
CEST 11:35
KST 18:35
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt2: News Flash8[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt1: New Chaos0Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - Presented by Monster Energy16ByuL: The Forgotten Master of ZvT30Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book20
Community News
Weekly Cups (March 23-29): herO takes triple6Aligulac acquired by REPLAYMAN.com/Stego Research8Weekly Cups (March 16-22): herO doubles, Cure surprises3Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool49Weekly Cups (March 9-15): herO, Clem, ByuN win4
StarCraft 2
General
https://open.firstory.me/story/cmnihx4sf0bav01wu91 Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - Presented by Monster Energy Aligulac acquired by REPLAYMAN.com/Stego Research Weekly Cups (March 23-29): herO takes triple What mix of new & old maps do you want in the next ladder pool? (SC2)
Tourneys
Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL Season 4 announced for March-April StarCraft Evolution League (SC Evo Biweekly) WardiTV Mondays World University TeamLeague (500$+) | Signups Open
Strategy
Custom Maps
[M] (2) Frigid Storage Publishing has been re-enabled! [Feb 24th 2026]
External Content
Mutation # 519 Inner Power The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 518 Radiation Zone Mutation # 517 Distant Threat
Brood War
General
ASL21 General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Behind the scenes footage of ASL21 Group E A cwal.gg Extension - Easily keep track of anyone BW General Discussion
Tourneys
[ASL21] Ro24 Group F [ASL21] Ro24 Group E Azhi's Colosseum - Foreign KCM 🌍 Weekly Foreign Showmatches
Strategy
Fighting Spirit mining rates What's the deal with APM & what's its true value Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Starcraft Tabletop Miniature Game General RTS Discussion Thread Darkest Dungeon
Dota 2
The Story of Wings Gaming Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
G2 just beat GenG in First stand
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread Five o'clock TL Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine The Games Industry And ATVI European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion Cricket [SPORT] Tokyo Olympics 2021 Thread General nutrition recommendations
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
[G] How to Block Livestream Ads
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Money Laundering In Video Ga…
TrAiDoS
Iranian anarchists: organize…
XenOsky
FS++
Kraekkling
Shocked by a laser…
Spydermine0240
ASL S21 English Commentary…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 14432 users

GSTL controversy [Spoiler alert] - Page 5

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next All
mrlie3
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
Canada350 Posts
April 08 2012 15:05 GMT
#81
Also, people say PartinG had zealots and HTs to finish MKP off, but as we have seen from that game as well as the regame, MKP's insane micro made him almost immune to this composition. Only reason PartinG was ahead at that point was that he had three aoe units (HT, Archon, Colossi) during the big fight in the middle, and this composition was gone by the time when mkp got dc'd. So given MKP's micro at the time, finishing him off with only pure zealots and HTs might be questionable.
Crimson @ Clan CORE | ESFI World Translator
ronpaul012
Profile Joined March 2011
United States769 Posts
April 08 2012 15:06 GMT
#82
I think the discussion is kind of being aimed in the wrong direction. I think most people can agree that Parting was at a huge advantage, and was probably going to win (except the op apparently). There's only a little controversy on that. The big controversy is when should the referee declare wins, and where they should declare rematches. Even if you say parting is going to win that 95% of the time, do you think that's enough to give him the game? Personally, I say yes. But there doesn't seem to be a solid answer in the community, and because of that I highly doubt this will be the last time such an event happens.

Had that been Huk or stephano who dc'd in that circumstance, would the community be in the same perspective? Maybe, maybe not, but I definitely think the rules and standards on when the games should be called should be a bit clearer.
I'm a gooner.
Akhee
Profile Joined January 2011
Brazil811 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-04-08 15:07:41
April 08 2012 15:07 GMT
#83
very biased op, i don't think you should take any part when explaining what you talking about

i support the regame, i mean, what to do in this horrible situation? everything would be bad, we can just blame blizzard and be glad they gave the most neutral decision
karpo
Profile Joined October 2010
Sweden1998 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-04-08 15:19:02
April 08 2012 15:07 GMT
#84
On April 09 2012 00:05 mrlie3 wrote:
Also, people say PartinG had zealots and HTs to finish MKP off, but as we have seen from that game as well as the regame, MKP's insane micro made him almost immune to this composition. Only reason PartinG was ahead at that point was that he had three aoe units (HT, Archon, Colossi) during the big fight in the middle, and this composition was gone by the time when mkp got dc'd. So given MKP's micro at the time, finishing him off with only pure zealots and HTs might be questionable.


First of all: Parting was only ahead because he used aoe units in, what i consider, the most common unit composition in TvP? What does that even mean?

MKP had medivacs, vikings, and ghosts in that fight and had practically none left after the engagement. He also had three more rax for marauder production that he was either going to lose or have to slowly fly over to his main while Parting's economy and production was fully intact.

Parting didn't need to just crush MKP right away but just poke while reinforcing and then just rolling MKP with faster reinforcements due to chrono'ed warpgates and the fact that MKP probably would have to pull workers to even survive at all.
Ucs
Profile Joined October 2010
264 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-04-08 15:31:20
April 08 2012 15:07 GMT
#85
I will never aknowledge Prime as winning this GSTL. They might have been able to win even if MKP got a default loss there but I don't care. This GSTL is null and void for me. I will erase this GSTL from my memory not because im butthurt over the decision but because the score and result was influenced dramaticly by a outside source(not players/game). The disconnect killed the whole atmostfere and intensity the GSTL had. After the disconnect I only watched the re-game and mkp vs bomber. I just turned it off after that since I just didn't care anymore.
TheTenthDoc
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
United States9561 Posts
April 08 2012 15:09 GMT
#86
On April 09 2012 00:02 Micket wrote:
All it would take for Marineking to come back would be to win 1 engagement, with a drop in the background doing lots of damage. Hardly impossible.


This seems more or less impossible if only because he didn't have any medivacs remaining and Parting was clearly going to force an engagement. MKP was going to have to have his next cycle of medivacs (probably his next two cycles) with his main army or it would be a complete walkover, so drops weren't coming for a while.

The only scenario where MKP would win would be Parting completely throwing the game, as far as I can tell. And that's always possible in any disconnect, so you might as well just regame everything then.
ckunkel1
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States181 Posts
April 08 2012 15:12 GMT
#87
yea what is done is done. Parting had a clear advantage though. It is impossible to tell what could of happened.
Slipspace
Profile Joined May 2010
United States381 Posts
April 08 2012 15:12 GMT
#88
[image loading]

you can do it Parting !! YES!! YES!! ..NOOO WTF!

User was warned for this post
Rowa
Profile Joined July 2010
Belgium962 Posts
April 08 2012 15:18 GMT
#89
mkp still could win, you saw what he can do, his micro is bonjwa.
♞ To obtain a bird's eyes is to turn a blizzard to a breeze ♞
Str1keFreedom
Profile Joined October 2010
United States112 Posts
April 08 2012 15:19 GMT
#90
Parting had advantage. That is clear. No one is doubting that fact, not even the ref.

But before a player enters a tournament, he/she agrees to accept decisions made by referees of the tournament.
According to the koeran cast of GSTL the ref made his decison for regame because he saw that the gateway waprin was used in Parting's main. There were also no proxy pylon to supplement the army faster.

Is that the correct decision? Everyone has a different opinion. But the fact is it is a decision made by ref and it is something the players and the viewers must accept. Do not take it out on the players, GSL, or the refs. Blame the internet connection issues, and leave it at that. The players, refs, and the organization did their best to accomodate the situation.
Dismay
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
United States1180 Posts
April 08 2012 15:24 GMT
#91
On April 09 2012 00:19 Str1keFreedom wrote:
There were also no proxy pylon to supplement the army faster.



There was a warp prism, though.
In every age, in every place, the deeds of men remain the same.
m0ck
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
4194 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-04-08 15:26:09
April 08 2012 15:24 GMT
#92
So, marineking has 110 supply in the picture. Withdraw from that the supply of 3 marauders, 6 vikings and 71 scvs: 110 - 89 supply = 21 supply. That is his current production. At most, mkp is building 10 maraudes and a marine. 2 of those marauders and the marine are being produced in the forward raxes and are dead on arrival (if they pop out at all).

When mkp's production hits, he will at best have 10 marauders/6 marauders&8 marines and 6 vikings (32food) against the 60 food of army that parting has right now, plus at least 1500/1000 resources put into warpins. Thats another 20-30 supply of cost effective army.

You don't understand TvP very well if you think that fighting 32 supply vs 80 supply, without medivacs, against a late game P army is in any way a winnable situation. MKP is done no matter what he did. He wasn't able to break parting when he was 170 vs 135 food and at the point of the lag-out, he was completely dead.

Oh, and to see a demonstration of how such a fight between P and T works out, go watch the final fight between parting and maru. Is maru in a winnable position on top of his ramp?
winthrop
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
Hong Kong956 Posts
April 08 2012 15:27 GMT
#93
On April 09 2012 00:19 Str1keFreedom wrote:
Parting had advantage. That is clear. No one is doubting that fact, not even the ref.

But before a player enters a tournament, he/she agrees to accept decisions made by referees of the tournament.
According to the koeran cast of GSTL the ref made his decison for regame because he saw that the gateway waprin was used in Parting's main. There were also no proxy pylon to supplement the army faster.

Is that the correct decision? Everyone has a different opinion. But the fact is it is a decision made by ref and it is something the players and the viewers must accept. Do not take it out on the players, GSL, or the refs. Blame the internet connection issues, and leave it at that. The players, refs, and the organization did their best to accomodate the situation.

can't agree more
Incredible Miracle
ffrozenfish
Profile Joined May 2011
820 Posts
April 08 2012 15:30 GMT
#94
did Gom release a statement or a reason for a regame?
Give us our snipe back - Ghost
karpo
Profile Joined October 2010
Sweden1998 Posts
April 08 2012 15:31 GMT
#95
I agree that it's up to the ref to judge and maybe they just prefer rematches unless one player doubles or triples the supply of the other. I'm mostly arguing with people that exaggerate MKP's chances in that game.
NonY
Profile Blog Joined June 2007
8751 Posts
April 08 2012 15:34 GMT
#96
On April 09 2012 00:19 Str1keFreedom wrote:
Parting had advantage. That is clear. No one is doubting that fact, not even the ref.

But before a player enters a tournament, he/she agrees to accept decisions made by referees of the tournament.
According to the koeran cast of GSTL the ref made his decison for regame because he saw that the gateway waprin was used in Parting's main. There were also no proxy pylon to supplement the army faster.

Is that the correct decision? Everyone has a different opinion. But the fact is it is a decision made by ref and it is something the players and the viewers must accept. Do not take it out on the players, GSL, or the refs. Blame the internet connection issues, and leave it at that. The players, refs, and the organization did their best to accomodate the situation.

Just because you think the ref did his best does not mean he could not have made the incorrect decision. The folks responsible for the Internet may have done their best too. There is always a chance that things will stop working and then the ref is responsible for making the correct decision. If he gave the game to MKP would we still not have any right to dispute it? If GOMTV is gonna continue to ruin every competition that has equipment failure then people ought to know.
"Fucking up is part of it. If you can't fail, you have to always win. And I don't think you can always win." Elliott Smith ---------- Yet no sudden rage darkened his face, and his eyes were calm as they studied her. Then he smiled. 'Witness.'
Doodsmack
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States7224 Posts
April 08 2012 15:35 GMT
#97
Here's a question to all those arguing that Parting had it won - if the MKP vs Bomber game had lagged out at the moment MKP was sieged at Bomber's natural, with Bomber's orbital lifted off and burning, would you have argued that MKP should be given the win? Of course you would, to deny it would be dishonest. However, despite all appearances Bomber came back and had a VERY legitimate shot at winning the game. Moreover, there were many back and forths in the MKP vs Parting game, and at any one of those points if the game had lagged out, people would probably have wanted it to be called for the player APPEARING to be at a disadvantage.

To claim that you know for certain that Parting had it won is simply unintelligent. Without being able to watch the replay, you don't know 1) how many units mkp had in production, 2) how close mkp's units in production were to finishing, 3) where mkp's rax were rallied, and how good he would be at pooling units, 4) the location of parting's nearest pylon, 5) how likely the warp prism was to get killed by vikes, 6) the saturation of each player's mining bases, 7) how many mules mkp had and thus how insanely high his mineral income may have been, or 8) the location of all parting's units (did he have 4 or 5 zealots sitting back at home from having dealt with a drop 5 mins earlier?).

Without having ANY of the above information, you would claim that you know for CERTAIN that Parting had it won? Smarten up.
NachiMe
Profile Joined November 2011
250 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-04-08 15:38:24
April 08 2012 15:36 GMT
#98
On April 09 2012 00:09 TheTenthDoc wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 09 2012 00:02 Micket wrote:
All it would take for Marineking to come back would be to win 1 engagement, with a drop in the background doing lots of damage. Hardly impossible.


This seems more or less impossible if only because he didn't have any medivacs remaining and Parting was clearly going to force an engagement. MKP was going to have to have his next cycle of medivacs (probably his next two cycles) with his main army or it would be a complete walkover, so drops weren't coming for a while.

The only scenario where MKP would win would be Parting completely throwing the game, as far as I can tell. And that's always possible in any disconnect, so you might as well just regame everything then.

he had 4 starports, instant medivac replenish won't be that unusual. If MKP grouped his reinforcements and put himself between his buildings with scvs in front on hold position (keep in mind MKP had a superior economy, he can afford to lose afew scvs, esp the ones in his main base), I think he might have held it. The HT's weren't at the battle, and his production wasn't being camped save the 3 rax outside his base. MKP had 6 vikings to deal with the warp prism, keep in mind that the stalkers were outside the base while the warp prism was over the production when MKP dced, I think the vikings could have taken it out (even if they didn't, Parting's warp gates were on cooldown and Parting only had 200 minerals). Either way, Parting would have a huge lead, but that's not enough to simply give Parting the win.
JinDesu
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States3990 Posts
April 08 2012 15:39 GMT
#99
Did Parting have a 4th in game 1? I know he built a 4th in game 2 a short bit after MKPs, but did he even have 4th in game 1?
Yargh
pPingu
Profile Joined September 2011
Switzerland2892 Posts
April 08 2012 15:40 GMT
#100
On April 09 2012 00:39 JinDesu wrote:
Did Parting have a 4th in game 1? I know he built a 4th in game 2 a short bit after MKPs, but did he even have 4th in game 1?


He had a 5th
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 25m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
mouzHeroMarine 287
Lowko235
ProTech135
Codebar 43
StarCraft: Brood War
Mini 344
Jaedong 331
Soma 264
Leta 182
BeSt 168
Stork 98
Sharp 78
EffOrt 56
Hm[arnc] 52
ggaemo 52
[ Show more ]
Backho 48
soO 16
zelot 15
Bale 13
sorry 13
yabsab 11
Sacsri 10
ajuk12(nOOB) 10
scan(afreeca) 8
Shinee 3
Dota 2
XaKoH 648
XcaliburYe454
League of Legends
JimRising 449
Reynor14
Counter-Strike
olofmeister4705
Stewie2K859
edward80
Other Games
gofns11040
ceh9643
Fuzer 168
NeuroSwarm96
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick777
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH296
• Dystopia_ 4
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• iopq 10
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Jankos1426
Upcoming Events
RSL Revival
25m
TriGGeR vs Cure
ByuN vs Rogue
Big Brain Bouts
6h 25m
Bly vs TBD
TriGGeR vs Lambo
Replay Cast
14h 25m
RSL Revival
1d
Maru vs MaxPax
BSL
1d 9h
RSL Revival
1d 21h
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
2 days
BSL
2 days
Afreeca Starleague
3 days
Wardi Open
3 days
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
3 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
The PondCast
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Season 20: Qualifier 1
WardiTV Winter 2026
NationLESS Cup

Ongoing

BSL Season 22
CSL Elite League 2026
ASL Season 21
CSL Season 20: Qualifier 2
Escore Tournament S2: W1
StarCraft2 Community Team League 2026 Spring
RSL Revival: Season 4
Nations Cup 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026

Upcoming

CSL 2026 SPRING (S20)
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
CSLAN 4
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
CCT Season 3 Global Finals
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.