• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 23:38
CEST 05:38
KST 12:38
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL21] Ro16 Preview Pt2: All Star10Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - The Finalists16[ASL21] Ro16 Preview Pt1: Fresh Flow9[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt2: News Flash10[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt1: New Chaos0
Community News
2026 GSL Season 1 Qualifiers19Maestros of the Game 2 announced92026 GSL Tour plans announced15Weekly Cups (April 6-12): herO doubles, "Villains" prevail1MaNa leaves Team Liquid24
StarCraft 2
General
Maestros of the Game 2 announced 2026 GSL Tour plans announced Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - The Finalists MaNa leaves Team Liquid Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool
Tourneys
2026 GSL Season 1 Qualifiers INu's Battles#14 <BO.9 2Matches> Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament GSL CK: More events planned pending crowdfunding RSL Revival: Season 5 - Qualifiers and Main Event
Strategy
Custom Maps
[D]RTS in all its shapes and glory <3 [A] Nemrods 1/4 players [M] (2) Frigid Storage
External Content
Mutation # 522 Flip My Base The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 521 Memorable Boss Mutation # 520 Moving Fees
Brood War
General
FlaSh: This Will Be My Final ASL【ASL S21 Ro.16】 BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ ASL21 General Discussion Data needed
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues Escore Tournament StarCraft Season 2 [ASL21] Ro16 Group C [ASL21] Ro16 Group D
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers What's the deal with APM & what's its true value Any training maps people recommend? Fighting Spirit mining rates
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Dawn of War IV Diablo IV Total Annihilation Server - TAForever Starcraft Tabletop Miniature Game
Dota 2
The Story of Wings Gaming
League of Legends
G2 just beat GenG in First stand
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread Five o'clock TL Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread YouTube Thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion McBoner: A hockey love story Cricket [SPORT]
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Strange computer issues (software) [G] How to Block Livestream Ads
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Sexual Health Of Gamers
TrAiDoS
lurker extra damage testi…
StaticNine
Broowar part 2
qwaykee
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Iranian anarchists: organize…
XenOsky
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 2077 users

Stalker Attack Delay - The Protoss Fix - Page 5

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 Next All
NormandyBoy
Profile Joined May 2010
France200 Posts
September 23 2011 21:26 GMT
#81
You know, stalkers can't be too smart or agile, they come from the dragoon, they can't shit on their roots...Everyone loves his family, even if it's a retarded family.
DNA61289
Profile Joined August 2010
United States665 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-09-23 21:27:19
September 23 2011 21:26 GMT
#82
This has always been my biggest problem with the stalker. This attack delay means that no matter how good your micro is you will always receive damage from marine and roaches. This change just makes stalkers more of a rewarding unit to use.

I would love to see this change implemented.
But yeah being a Korean gamer is very imba. If you're a non-korean gamer you have to balance your game playing with earning money and your real life. If you're Korean you just sit around playing games all day eating 2 cent ramyun and becoming gosu.
XenoX101
Profile Joined February 2011
Australia729 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-09-23 21:32:32
September 23 2011 21:28 GMT
#83
One problem I see with this is making stalkers too strong against zealots in PvP, nobody will build zealots if they are so easy to kite, and blink stalker builds will be infinitely more powerful as a result. It also means you can snipe immortals much better than you normally would as retreating is a lot easier.

Also it removes a bit of skill from the game, think back to the slowest, most unreliable unit in Brood War, the reaver. The reaver was awesome precisely because of how difficult it was to control/use, it made players work on their shuttle micro (shuttles themselves having terrible turning and acceleration) to incorporate reaver play. It does feel nicer to micro more nimble stalkers, but it is also a lot easier which lowers the skill needed to micro them properly.
Soulforged
Profile Blog Joined February 2007
Latvia943 Posts
September 23 2011 21:30 GMT
#84
I'd probably give away blink to have no attack delay and better turning speed / 360 degree attack
Buddhist
Profile Joined April 2010
United States658 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-09-23 21:33:18
September 23 2011 21:31 GMT
#85
I think it's extremely important and worth noting that focus firing with stalkers reduces their effectiveness due to attack delay.

This is obviously not true in all cases (in very small scale fights, e.g. less than 5 stalkers, it is not that case), but is true for any decent number of stalkers (8+).

Go into a unit tester (like unit_test_map_solo) and just try to focus fire one group of stalkers vs. another. The focus firing group ALWAYS LOSES (assuming no other micro), because of overkill and wasted attack-delay (if you tell a stalker to change target before it's able to fire, it has to do the attack delay all over again).

Seriously, go try it yourself, it's dumb.

On September 24 2011 06:28 XenoX101 wrote:
One problem I see with this is making stalkers too strong against zealots in PvP, nobody will build zealots if they are so easy to kite, and blink stalker builds will be infinitely more powerful as a result. It also means you can snipe immortals much better than you normally would as retreating is a lot easier.

Immortals have equal range now, so it shouldn't matter. It's true about zealots, but honestly that doesn't seem like such a huge problem. Stalkers already dominate early game PvP.

I feel like this change to stalkers simply puts more control into the hands of the player.
axellerate
Profile Joined October 2010
Canada179 Posts
September 23 2011 21:33 GMT
#86
On September 24 2011 06:28 XenoX101 wrote:
One problem I see with this is making stalkers too strong against zealots in PvP, nobody will build zealots if they are so easy to kite, and blink stalker builds will be infinitely more powerful as a result. It also means you can snipe immortals much better than you normally would as retreating is a lot easier.

Also it removes a bit of skill from the game, think back to the slowest, most unreliable unit in Brood War, the reaver. The reaver was awesome precisely because of how difficult it was to control/use, it made players work on their shuttle micro (shuttles themselves having terrible turning and acceleration) to incorporate reaver play. It does feel nicer to micro more nimble stalkers, but it is also a lot easier which lowers the skill needed to micro them properly.


To that I would say that stalkers already kite zealots very very easily.
branflakes14
Profile Joined July 2010
2082 Posts
September 23 2011 21:33 GMT
#87
I wish we could just have Dragoons back. Even if all stats remained the same and they had to have their size reduced a little. Dragoons just look so badass.
iokke
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States1179 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-09-23 21:34:11
September 23 2011 21:33 GMT
#88
Obviously I would love to see this change as a P, but I too think it may make Stalkers too strong during early game pressure (kiting/harassing marines and lings would be a lot easier), needs testing I guess..
Crop circles are Chuck Norris' way of telling the world that sometimes corn needs to lie the f*** down. rerereredit.. I never get it right the 1st time
FryktSkyene
Profile Joined December 2010
United States1327 Posts
September 23 2011 21:34 GMT
#89
On September 24 2011 06:28 XenoX101 wrote:
One problem I see with this is making stalkers too strong against zealots in PvP, nobody will build zealots if they are so easy to kite, and blink stalker builds will be infinitely more powerful as a result. It also means you can snipe immortals much better than you normally would as retreating is a lot easier.

Also it removes a bit of skill from the game, think back to the slowest, most unreliable unit in Brood War, the reaver. The reaver was awesome precisely because of how difficult it was to control/use, it made players work on their shuttle micro (shuttles themselves having terrible turning and acceleration) to incorporate reaver play. It does feel nicer to micro more nimble stalkers, but it is also a lot easier which lowers the skill needed to micro them properly.


Nobody builds zealots anyway in PvP unless your going for charge with almost negates blink as charge is so fast it hits you before you can blink away.
Snitches get stiches
Iamyournoob
Profile Joined August 2010
Germany595 Posts
September 23 2011 21:34 GMT
#90
I really believe that anything that rewards micro or skill is a great addition to SC2.

Microable units actually that you can get a lot out of, if you are good enough, is a mean to overcome balance issues. Terran units have great micro potential, so that good terrans can make them even more powerful than they already are.

Giving the stalker the possibility to profit more from skill is a good way to race the skill ceiling of SC2 which it badly needs.

Some say it might force speedling openers every game from zerg or kill certain terran openers... Why is this a bad thing???

When I watch BW, the basic builds in any match up are pretty much the same and still BW is the best competitive RTS ever created. It is the execution and the nuances that made BW what it is now - not the fact that you had a game of dice rolling at the start of each game which build players would go.
Buddhist
Profile Joined April 2010
United States658 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-09-23 21:37:34
September 23 2011 21:35 GMT
#91
IMO if it makes stalkers too strong, it should still go into the game and stalkers should just get a slight damage nerf or something. Giving more control to players is always desirable, makes the game MUCH more fun and more skill-based.
FryktSkyene
Profile Joined December 2010
United States1327 Posts
September 23 2011 21:35 GMT
#92
Is This link
http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/forum/topic/3229385061
(Which is supposded to be the unit tester/custom map thing) not working for anyone else? I'd like to try out these stalkers :>
Snitches get stiches
galivet
Profile Joined February 2011
288 Posts
September 23 2011 21:35 GMT
#93
I would trade a tiny bit of stalker movement speed for this (enough that slow lings will get hits in against kiting stalkers instead of marines).

It doesn't have to be a pure buff; I'd trade some other piece of stalker "goodness" for this because it would make the game more fun.
phiinix
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
United States1169 Posts
September 23 2011 21:39 GMT
#94
On September 24 2011 05:41 Fig wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 24 2011 05:38 coddan wrote:
Of all Protoss units, Stalkers is hardly the one that needs a buff. With 1.4 I doubt they're going to need anything for a foreseeable future.

Stalkers have the worst DPS/cost ratio of any unit in the game, I think making the micro for them more important would do wonders for them, and the race as a whole. I mean marines have this and they are the exact opposite, highest DPS/cost ratio unit in the game.


Actually motherships, archons, sentries and colossus all have lower dsp/cost ratios compared to the stalker. As do ghosts, hellions against not light, banelings against not light, ultralisks, and corruptors.
Anomandaris
Profile Joined July 2010
Afghanistan440 Posts
September 23 2011 21:40 GMT
#95
This could fix banshee tank marine allin.
Adding more skill to the game is definately a good idea. I am testing custom map right now.
lotrscwow
Profile Joined September 2011
Afghanistan27 Posts
September 23 2011 21:43 GMT
#96
i would be fine if they did this with stalkers if they also did it with roaches and hydras
RavenLoud
Profile Joined March 2011
Canada1100 Posts
September 23 2011 21:45 GMT
#97
You know, I would trade for any of these pro-micro gateway buffs for a colossus nerf anyday :D
a176
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
Canada6688 Posts
September 23 2011 21:45 GMT
#98
On September 24 2011 05:35 axellerate wrote:
Original Thread By Arch (http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/forum/topic/3229374433):

This is something interesting to consider for stalkers. I was experimenting with the galaxy editor and I decided to remove the attack delay that occurs between the time when an attack command is issued and a laser is fired. To avoid confusion, this has nothing to do with the time in between each attack. It is a measure of how quickly the unit responds to the attack command.

Then secondly as part of this particular experiment, I had increased the firing arc to 360 degrees. I figured this feature is what really made dragoons so badass, so I wanted to check out the stalkers with this feature.

The combined effect of these two tweaks was that the stalkers felt more smooth and responsive to commands, almost like driving a bmw compared to an old ford. The biggest consequence of the changes was that their "stutter step" capabilities were greatly improved. In the middle of a heated battle, I could move - shoot - move - shoot - move - shoot and maneuver around the battle pretty much without losing any dps. In my opinion the change gives the stalker the ability to use it's strong attributes (speed, mobility, and range) to their maximum potential in a way that is fun and demands micro.

Also, in my honest opinion, the change was not so extreme that the stalkers felt overpowered. It was still very tight to micro against marines, for example. But it made it doable. Stalkers vs marines currently, even with the 1 range differential, is near impossible to stutter-step micro because marines have 0 delay and a near immediate turning speed, meanwhile stalkers have a crippling attack delay, and a slower turning speed. I didn't take exact notes on the turning speed numbers, so you will have to forgive me on that one.

Also I should note that this change does not increase a stalkers dps. It decreases the *drop* in dps when stalkers are shooting on the move, and it does it in a way that scales with micro. IMO it's an awesome change.

So that was my experiment.

I think it would be cool if some of you out there could try out these settings in your editor and let me know what you think of it. Maybe it's the spark that stalkers needed to be appreciated.

Thanks for taking the time to read.


A dragoon that can fire as a fast a marine, brilliant.
starleague forever
hitpoint
Profile Joined October 2010
United States1511 Posts
September 23 2011 21:47 GMT
#99
If this is a problem, they should give the marine an attack delay. We don't need more broken units like the marine that can attack while moving. This change would be terrible.
It's spelled LOSE not LOOSE.
decaf
Profile Joined October 2010
Austria1797 Posts
September 23 2011 21:47 GMT
#100
this would make 2 stalker pressure against zerg who didn't open gas first overpowered.
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Replay Cast
00:00
StarCraft Evolution League #20
CranKy Ducklings107
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
NeuroSwarm 662
RuFF_SC2 194
ProTech132
Nina 79
PiLiPiLi 26
StarCraft: Brood War
Aegong 332
Icarus 7
League of Legends
JimRising 668
Counter-Strike
Fnx 1666
Other Games
summit1g9000
WinterStarcraft337
C9.Mang0222
ViBE62
amsayoshi34
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1309
StarCraft: Brood War
UltimateBattle 55
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• EnkiAlexander 37
• practicex 19
• CranKy Ducklings SOOP2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Upcoming Events
WardiTV Map Contest Tou…
7h 22m
Classic vs SHIN
MaxPax vs Percival
herO vs Clem
ByuN vs Rogue
Ladder Legends
11h 22m
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
11h 22m
BSL
15h 22m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 6h
WardiTV Map Contest Tou…
1d 7h
Ladder Legends
1d 11h
BSL
1d 15h
CranKy Ducklings
1d 20h
Replay Cast
2 days
[ Show More ]
Wardi Open
2 days
Afreeca Starleague
2 days
Soma vs hero
Monday Night Weeklies
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Afreeca Starleague
3 days
Leta vs YSC
Replay Cast
4 days
The PondCast
5 days
KCM Race Survival
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Escore
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Escore Tournament S2: W4
RSL Revival: Season 4
NationLESS Cup

Ongoing

BSL Season 22
ASL Season 21
CSL 2026 SPRING (S20)
IPSL Spring 2026
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 2
StarCraft2 Community Team League 2026 Spring
WardiTV TLMC #16
Nations Cup 2026
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S2: W5
Acropolis #4
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
CSLAN 4
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
Maestros of the Game 2
2026 GSL S2
RSL Revival: Season 5
2026 GSL S1
XSE Pro League 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.