On March 22 2017 22:24 shall_burn wrote:
what is MBS everyone keeps mentioning? I don't know this abbreviation,could anyone help with this please?

Multiple building selection.

hitthat

Poland2262 Posts

March 22 2017 13:36 GMT

#722

On March 22 2017 22:24 shall_burn wrote:
what is MBS everyone keeps mentioning? I don't know this abbreviation,could anyone help with this please?

Edit: as abowe

shall_burn

252 Posts

March 22 2017 13:59 GMT

#723

thanks a lot

JacktheTerr

United States97 Posts

March 22 2017 14:13 GMT

#724

starcraft macht frei lol BTTV plz sorry off topic i warned myself no need to make official

User was warned for this post

JacktheTerr

United States97 Posts

March 22 2017 15:00 GMT

#725

the TL mods are god nothing gets by them

Wrath

3174 Posts

March 22 2017 15:20 GMT

#726

On March 23 2017 00:00 JacktheTerr wrote:
the TL mods are god nothing gets by them

Someone just love reporting posts. So yeah, it is kinda hard to overlook something even when you try to.

JacktheTerr

United States97 Posts

March 22 2017 15:24 GMT

#727

it is hateful trash i just wanted to offend these safe space lovin panzies b4 their billon genders cloud their vision

User was temp banned for this post.

JacktheTerr

United States97 Posts

March 22 2017 15:24 GMT

#728

maybe i should stop posting lol

tofucake

Hyrule19029 Posts

March 22 2017 15:26 GMT

#729

On March 23 2017 00:20 Wrath wrote:

Show nested quote +

Someone just love reporting posts. So yeah, it is kinda hard to overlook something even when you try to.

It wasn't reported. We read threads too, you know.

fLyiNgDroNe

Belgium3999 Posts

March 22 2017 15:44 GMT

#730

Dear Santa, I wish 3 things for my BW:
1. proper window-fullscreen mode (like in sc2) to alt-tab instantly without all my colors go to shit.
2. proper network handling so anyone could create and join games and no noobs could set "extra high latency" and ask me to do the same too after that (LOL).
3. ladder auto matchmaking (but not bnet2.0).

Wrath

3174 Posts

March 22 2017 15:47 GMT

#731

On March 23 2017 00:26 tofucake wrote:

Show nested quote +

It wasn't reported. We read threads too, you know.

I know. But doesn't mean you read every single one of them too

kogeT

Poland2036 Posts

March 22 2017 16:16 GMT

#732

To all unlimited unit/buliding selection fans: You can only select one unit in Moba's and look how far it got them.

You may say im joking but there is something in forcing people to focus on less rather than more.

Jealous

10116 Posts

March 22 2017 16:40 GMT

#733

On March 22 2017 19:20 ZenithM wrote:

Show nested quote +

I asked what would change with resolution and nobody answered :D.

Edit: I'm sure you talked about it before so if you could point me to your post or just repeat your main points for why you think 16 : 9 would destroy the game, that would be great.

http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/brood-war/520049-starcraft-remastered-coming-in-may?page=27#527

http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/brood-war/520049-starcraft-remastered-coming-in-may?page=34#673

On March 23 2017 00:44 fLyiNgDroNe wrote:
Dear Santa, I wish 3 things for my BW:
1. proper window-fullscreen mode (like in sc2) to alt-tab instantly without all my colors go to shit.
2. proper network handling so anyone could create and join games and no noobs could set "extra high latency" and ask me to do the same too after that (LOL).
3. ladder auto matchmaking (but not bnet2.0).

I love that latency thing hahahaha. And when you tell them that one person can change it for the whole game and they don't believe you? One guy said, "Why don't you just change it? What does it hurt?" Hahahaha. Also the fact that most of them don't even understand what latency IS. Ah, good times.

Anyway, this is a very solid list of requests that I can get behind.

KameZerg

Sweden1761 Posts

March 22 2017 16:42 GMT

#734

On March 23 2017 01:16 kogeT wrote:
To all unlimited unit/buliding selection fans: You can only select one unit in Moba's and look how far it got them.

You may say im joking but there is something in forcing people to focus on less rather than more.

MBS fans are people who's most likely never played BW seriously and probably wont, they only plan to play it for 2-3 days when it comes out before moving on to the next game, it's the last group you should listen to.

onlystar

United States971 Posts

March 22 2017 16:52 GMT

#735

to everyone in favour of mbs and other sc2 features: it wlll NEVER happen and that is final.

simply because blizzard knows the korean BW community will not accept a bw version that is even slightly changed in gameplay from the original broodwar
if it would be changed in the slightest matter that would result in blizzard being lynched by the online community

[[Starlight]]

United States1578 Posts

March 22 2017 17:02 GMT

#736

On March 23 2017 00:24 JacktheTerr wrote:
maybe i should stop posting lol

Looks like the mods already took care of that.

Lorch

Germany3675 Posts

March 22 2017 17:03 GMT

#737

16 by 9 will happen no matter what, they won't release a game with only 4 by 3 in 2017.
The important part is how they do it, I made a mockup of proper 16 by 9 (imagine this with higher res sprites etc):
4 by 3:
+ Show Spoiler +

16 by 9:
+ Show Spoiler +

Now what would be a real issue is if they'd copy the current widescreen hack:
4 by 3:
+ Show Spoiler +

16 by 9:
+ Show Spoiler +

I think we can all agree that the second option would be an absolute no go. The first one would make macro slightly easier for p/t, but I'd say it's a compromise that'd have to be made. You could also do 16 by 9 by decreasing the field of view, but I don't think that's in anybody's interest.

Jealous

10116 Posts

March 22 2017 17:14 GMT

#738

Great post, Lorch. Really highlights what I've been talking about in regards to this issue, and I appreciate you conceding that this would have an effect on gameplay. I would like to add that even in the "optimal" 16 : 9 setting that you presented, this would give a defender's advantage to positions 1 and 7 on FS more than it does 5 and 11 because of the awareness of incoming aerial harass on the natural mineral lines and the facility of transferring probes with a wider screen. Although some people say this will not have a major impact on the game, I think that when considering that bases 1 and 7 already have a certain positional advantage in PvZ, we can conclude that even slight changes can definitely skew playstyles based on positions.

ZenithM

France15952 Posts

March 22 2017 17:18 GMT

#739

On March 23 2017 01:40 Jealous wrote:

Show nested quote +

http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/brood-war/520049-starcraft-remastered-coming-in-may?page=27#527

http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/brood-war/520049-starcraft-remastered-coming-in-may?page=34#673
[...]

I can't really argue much against your points. This is all pretty obvious stuff. Yes, you see more of the game, you see more buildings, you see more units.
Is it so impactful that you would say to potential buyers "fuck you and your standard 16 : 9 monitor", in 2017?
It's like hotkeys really. Yes, maybe some races, in some situations, will benefit more from having a more comfortable layout than BW's original one. Would this balance delta even matter against balance variations brought by... maps, for example?

If Blizzard really has BWHD in the works, and most BW players are like you and can't accept this kind of tradeoffs, then yes indeed, this release will not go well :D.

Edit: Also lol at thinking Blizzard would go for the screen-res hack kind of view. I'm sure they're like "yes, let's do a 4x zoom out, they'll like it!".

DracoMortuiVolantus

68 Posts

March 22 2017 17:19 GMT

#740

Flash had won Team battled I'd say nerf terran, but if blizzard did, we would never see such beautiful and unique struggle.