Just play without hotkey u'll be very surprised to manage to play it.
The way i did was that i've retired the 12345678 buttons to have at least 9 and 0 for scans / obs / ovi.
Playing like that won't give you a better micro but at least ur macro will be pretty decent.
Also it didn't mention that he wasn't playing without f2 f3 f4 keys which are very important for me.
Oh well just give it a try.

ManaBlue

Canada10458 Posts

August 21 2005 07:33 GMT

#82

I don't know if he used f keys. I don't know how to check for that.

Gurram

Sweden1 Post

August 21 2005 07:53 GMT

#83

no i dont think its so useful to use f keys but i maybe try use more and more hotkeys.. like i started to use 1 at probe to scout and 1 scann and 1 at flyarmy (corsair,mutta) for a while ago and i think its good. but cant do all this hotkeys take so mutch time to do it.

rel

Guam3521 Posts

August 21 2005 08:14 GMT

#84

Just play like you do gurram, its impressive. ;D

rel

Guam3521 Posts

August 21 2005 08:54 GMT

#85

Also I took a month off of using hotkeys ,cause I thought I was just making to many useless actions, and in that time, with pure 0 Hotkeys, at the end I got up to 180 apm with just pure accurate moves, then I started using hotkeys in conjuction and now am at 250 or so usually a little below, with around 20%(Each) of move hotkey and select actions.

ZpuX

Sweden1230 Posts

August 21 2005 14:17 GMT

#86

does a hotkey include attackmove command?

ROOTCatZ

Peru1226 Posts

August 21 2005 15:23 GMT

#87

Gurram is all art, FOR SURE TOP 5 TOSS IN EUROPE ! haha i'd say even top 3, and ZpuX, he belongs to iG. and will always belong to iG. because he's too cool for any other team

GurramXor <3 btw Gurram/KaaZ are easily top 2 SWE in my opinion, they are VERY underrated, talking about gurram, If I had 2000000 minerals, I would've blindly put em all in the gosubet, but I only had like 100

still I got a pretty good amount, and I was 100% sure he'd win, not for him being in my team or anything like that... but I know how good of a player he is, and of course trek being inactive and such, just made me 100% (dont get me wrong, even if trek WAS active, I would've bet in gurram)

TreK

Sweden2089 Posts

August 21 2005 15:27 GMT

#88

hehe whats the big deal with not using hotkeys? i dont recon i use too many hotkeys myself unless i have a speed shuttle or muttas or something like that, stinger doesnt use hotkeys eiter afaik, maybe in tvz ... zvt only... but then u have to :<

anywayz... good gamz0r ! it was indeed just a for fun koth that ive been playing for a looooooooong long time like was koth for 4 seaons maybe then i retired and then i grabbed it again for like 4 rounds so i finally lost it now which means i can lay most bw things aside too ... it has been nice but i cant say i feel an urge to play or practise for anything anymore.

Gurram is defniatly a good player and im glad that i lost to him and not some other random player :p If i would have been top of my game then maybe i would i have or maybe i would have lost too, who knows :p

i had imba high apm tho...like 270 apm in a 10 min game :D
i never have that high :<

fanta[Rn]

Japan2465 Posts

August 21 2005 15:28 GMT

#89

crazy, i wonder how good he would be with shortcuts^^

ArCNeON(TE)

Finland134 Posts

August 21 2005 15:29 GMT

#90

"Now fine, the games weren't great, and they didn't mean anything since it was only a showmatch, and Trek is addicted to WoW"

That's totaly bullshit, what is important games then, is tournament games all that matters? (Offline) Trek lost this SHOWmatch and thats the way it is, Gurram won with a clear record of
4 to 1, which pretty clearly shows who played better.

If you dont like to face the facts, atleast you could leave them out of the topic, and yes I concider the whole post of the poster as the whole topic, not only the so called 'main subject' as many of you people seems to think is most important.

Gurram pretty much owned the games and I'd say atm Gurram is better player than TreK.
I dont see any reason you taking away the glory of the winning from Gurram.
S H O W M A T C H 4 - 1 G _ G ? :/

Liquid`Daaman

Sweden1225 Posts

August 21 2005 15:29 GMT

#91

surprise surprise you're iG --v

ROOTCatZ

Peru1226 Posts

August 21 2005 15:39 GMT

#92

wow cant believe so many posts its 2:30 here, just finished reading, well gurramxor rules Gg Trek, Daaman, u'd be #3 Swe if u want to know my opinion :D! but that's mainly cuz Mirre's always saying ur so amazing and such, SWE is my favorite national team

after Perú of course not that I think its the best, cuz then I would HAVE to say china/germany/poland/russia but I like to see SWE winning and surprising cuz I find it really nice, besides poland I cant think of a nation with such a nice 'B' team, there's so much competition in SWE... BUT!... GURRAM AND KAAZLE PWN IT! <3 hahaha

littlechava

United States7218 Posts

August 21 2005 15:40 GMT

#93

On August 22 2005 00:29 Liquid`Daaman wrote:
surprise surprise you're iG --v

he's in uT)

ROOTCatZ

Peru1226 Posts

August 21 2005 15:41 GMT

#94

that's only my opinion please dont be mean to me

btw Matti, that 'San Francisco here I come' quote u got

... is it from 2004 ? just curious, <3 u panda

spanner

United States72 Posts

August 21 2005 15:48 GMT

#95

yep, its faster to select and d/z

TreK

Sweden2089 Posts

August 21 2005 15:51 GMT

#96

On August 22 2005 00:29 ArCNeON(TE) wrote:
"Now fine, the games weren't great, and they didn't mean anything since it was only a showmatch, and Trek is addicted to WoW"

That's totaly bullshit, what is important games then, is tournament games all that matters? (Offline) Trek lost this SHOWmatch and thats the way it is, Gurram won with a clear record of
4 to 1, which pretty clearly shows who played better.

If you dont like to face the facts, atleast you could leave them out of the topic, and yes I concider the whole post of the poster as the whole topic, not only the so called 'main subject' as many of you people seems to think is most important.

Gurram pretty much owned the games and I'd say atm Gurram is better player than TreK.
I dont see any reason you taking away the glory of the winning from Gurram.
S H O W M A T C H 4 - 1 G _ G ? :/

Good one einstein, who said he didnt play better ? who said he wasnt better ? why state obvious facts like its some kind of revolution.

if u dont think activity > inactivity then u should get a clue ... no ?
dont even know how many times ive touched bw this year.

Maybe u should take a look at yourself clawson and think why nobody wanted u in pG, or maybe u can tell yourself that u "left"

Nice way of turning this neutral koth thread into a flamethread, doubt gurram even wanted u to speak since i know him from quite a while back and irl.

If u havent got anything nice to say, dont say anything at all.

BrutalMenace

United States1237 Posts

August 21 2005 16:05 GMT

#97

oh the controversity.

ParasitJonte

Sweden1768 Posts

August 21 2005 21:33 GMT

#98

hm trek;

I too think clawsons response was a bit overkill cuz the main poster really said that he was impressed by gurrams play and he enver said that he thinks trek is better or something. However, clawson did certainly not attack you in anyway and so your response is pretty much an overkill also ^^.

If you re-read both posts you'd see that he overreacted regarding some ppl claiming it wasn't serious or that it "doesnt count" and that you vastly overreacted to his post with statements like: "Maybe u should take a look at yourself clawson and think why nobody wanted u in pG, or maybe u can tell yourself that u "left"" just taken out of the air-_-?

Now, if you have some sort of feud going on mby I shouldn't even try to get involved, but jesus, take a good look on your post again and read mine and try to get a little perspective on them xD