EPTDreamHack vs MLG Columbus - Page 13
| Forum Index > Polls & Liquibet |
|
KangaRuthless
United States304 Posts
| ||
|
Zevah
Argentina187 Posts
mlg just seemed better for me | ||
|
elsrickle
Canada53 Posts
| ||
|
zul
Germany5427 Posts
 ) | ||
|
Jandos
Czech Republic928 Posts
 | ||
|
oDieN[Siege]
United States2904 Posts
The only times we got to see player cams was at the finals. | ||
|
Fanta_Rules
Sweden669 Posts
On June 22 2011 00:34 Karakaxe wrote: Things Dreamhack needs to fix in no particular order: 1. Player + audience interaction (you can't cast an entire event without actually showing us any players except in the finals, that's really bad) 2. Semi finals can't be bo3, should be bo5 3. Finals can't be bo5, should be bo7 4. Have a real host (aka 2GD at the invitational) 5. Needs to use Dream Arena Extreme ALOT more (it's perfect, why don't they use it more? When they cast SC2 there, there are actually more people outside who wants to get in than there are people inside watching.) This. | ||
|
BertiliO
Sweden134 Posts
On June 23 2011 01:24 Centorian wrote: How is Dreamhack beating MLG? Don't get me wrong, Dreamhack was great, but MLG was better in every aspect except stream quality. If MLG continues to improve at the rate they are improving it will become THE foreign tournament. I think people are still riding off the excitement of the Huk win (which was awesome btw). I don't know why some people feel like they need to force their opinions on others. The majority of people obviously don't agree with you that mlg was better in every aspect except for stream quality, yet you speak like your representing the whole comunity. | ||
|
FenneK
France1231 Posts
| ||
|
EtR Gravity
United States37 Posts
On June 21 2011 06:34 MrMotionPicture wrote: Both seemed pretty cool to me. I feel differently. They were actually quite a few games in both tourneys that I wanted to see but weren't streamed. Both were great IMO. | ||
|
forsooth
United States3648 Posts
| ||
|
TroubL
Lithuania126 Posts
| ||
|
Excelle
Sweden200 Posts
MLG had to many ad breaks, and always the same.. there was ad breaks here to but didt fall asleep. | ||
|
Vectoor
Sweden62 Posts
 | ||
|
koksnuss
Germany2 Posts
DAY9! | ||
|
Dissonance23
United States259 Posts
| ||
|
Weson
Iceland1032 Posts
Dreamhack could have had better production with player interviewes. On the other hand Dreamhacks streams were much better and HD were free. So i ended up voting that they were equal. | ||
|
MorroW
Sweden3522 Posts
| ||
|
mholden02
387 Posts
MLG has many tech and scheduling problems to still iron out, but at the end of Dreamhack i felt pleased with a well run tournament and a satisfying winner - At the end of MLG I felt like I'd come off a 3 DAY ****ING EMOTIONAL ROLLER COASTER from all the drama, memorable moments, and amazing crowd - I was worn out from the ups and downs. I was totally emotionally invested in MLG in a way that I was not with Dreamhack. I felt like I was at MLG, but watching Dreamhack on my computer - that sums it up. So MLG gets the nod. Ideally MLG will learn how to run a tournament as smoothly as Dreamhack, and Dreamhack will learn how to create the MLG atmosphere through player cams, interviews, more crowd interaction ect ... Either way they're both great for E-Sports. | ||
|
vnlegend
United States1389 Posts
Sure 5 streams is nice, but who's really gonna be able to watch all 5. Sometimes, I don't mind not having a choice. It's up to the content broadcaster to bring me good games, I don't mind missing less interesting games. Overall MLG had more energetic crowd, more player/community interactions, no final on Monday, and overall more epicness. Dreamhack is only the more recent event, which is why it has decent votes. | ||
| ||
