|
+ Show Spoiler +On June 09 2011 02:01 amazingxkcd wrote:Show nested quote +On June 09 2011 01:48 aprudds wrote:
I wake in the morning and I come back to giant walls of text. Oh boy, fun.
First off Drazerk, I still want to hear a response.
Next, can you guys please, make your analysis more readable? This is more directed towards Kurumi, Sprungjeezy and to a lesser extent Treadmill.
Kurumi: It takes every ounce of mental strength to even read through your posts without skipping them over. Please structure your thoughts and lay them out in a constructive manner instead of trying to barf whatever you were thinking on the page and hoping people will read it. Your posts have no coherent flow and with 5 of them in a row it just makes me want to ignore you for the rest of the game. I told you this before at the beginning but if your going to continue to defecate on the page I'm just going to ignore everything you write.
I'm not trying to be a dick but your posts make my eyes and brain hurt. It's worse than trying to read Shakespeare.
Treadmill: Giant quote walls hurt. They hurt alot. I am VERY THANKFUL though that you managed to at least have the courtesy of structuring it. Jackal was right on when he said to break it up so people can try and digest the information better.
Sprungjeezy: No your formatting isn't attractive at all. It's downright confusing. If you want people to actually read what you write without getting lost next time make it coherent. I literally cannot see what point your trying to make other than "he's suspicious vote for him". I apologize if you think that I'm stupid but can you make it clear what new information your bringing to the table? Because I just don't see it.
Lastly it's very disturbing that everyone seemed to have already forgotten the first lynch. We lynched the doctor and instead of looking at the votes to find scum, people are playing WIFOM.
People on my FOS:
Kurumi-The voting fiasco
Senj-The voting fiasco
amazingxkcd-The voting fiasco and reasons outlined by treadmill
Jimbooo-I have already outlined my reasoning
Drazerk-I have already outlined my reasoning
xkcd, Jimboo and Drazerk care to justify yourselves?
This is for you, aprudds, you only referenced treadmill's posts but what is your thoughts? You want me to defend myself against you when you got nothing to say about me. ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/tymQB.png)
I apologize if I didn't make things clear.
Like Treadmill said your being completely wishy washy and NEVER express your own thoughts. Even this post you refuse to even say anything.
I want you to properly address the allegations against you.
I will assume you have a proper defense by the end of the day.
|
On June 09 2011 02:08 amazingxkcd wrote:Show nested quote +On June 09 2011 02:04 aprudds wrote:On June 09 2011 01:58 amazingxkcd wrote:On June 09 2011 01:54 Kurumi wrote:
Why is everyone forgetting about Jackal and listing everyone who voted on rookie besides him,this is confuses me a lot,lol.
Also ask questions. I try to improve as much as I can. Can't deduce something out of my posts? Ask,I'll straighten them up and make them "readable". I dislike being ignored when I am not mafia,really. I loved it in PYPI,but here it is unnecessary. That is the statement i am trying to push for. I voted for rookie with similar evidence as jackal, while not knowing about his posts, then later people started to push for me. Notice the people who voted for rookie on jackal's posts then switched over to vote for me when one of the scums said i was suspicious. The problem is that jackal started the bandwagon with not so strong reasons. it looked like he was trying to get some more information out of rookie and see the reaction rather than the full out lynch. For you, an observer, to completely blindly agree with Jackal's reasoning (which isn't that strong in the first place) and then vote in a seemingly organized manner with 2 others is where the suspicions come in. Your less than stellar post history doesn't help you at all either. If Jackal's reasoning wasn't strong enough and if he just wanted information, then why did he vote for rookie right away after his analysis of rookie as detailed below? Show nested quote +On June 07 2011 06:01 Jackal58 wrote:On June 07 2011 05:47 TranceStorm wrote:On June 07 2011 05:38 Jackal58 wrote:You guys want to vote for scum? Vote this guy - rookie44: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=9611408Has played before so he has an idea how it works. Very subtle in his fishing for blues. Only scum fish for blues. Wants to know what methods and tactics are used to catch scum. Wants us to share them with everybody. Claims it will help derail scum tactics. When it will obviously do the opposite. Has all but disappeared since this post. I'm sure he'll show up momentarily to tell me how full of shit I am. That's where my vote is going. I would recommend you all do the same. Would you mind doing a post-by-post analysis of rookie44's posts? (There are only 3) Right now I can't really see how subtly he is fishing for blues. After all, we don't know how experienced he really is, so I would like a little more clarification as to your accusation. We'll start with the post I linked: On June 06 2011 04:22 rookie44 wrote:
Hey guys,
This is all getting a bit out of hand, we seem to already be getting in each others faces over perceived (and real) sleights. I have only played mafia on battle.net, and this is going to be quite a different game to that.
Only real difference is timing. Tactics are the same
What i believe is the crucial difference is that we have large amounts of time for discussion. This also gives us the time to create a solid plan for using whatever roles we have effectively (it would seem that way).
This is role fishing. He's wanting people to post their roles and tell him how they intend to use them. At the very least he's hoping a noob would post something along the lines of I'm a DT. Who should I check
Maybe some of the more experienced players could expand on what investigative stratagies they have used; their pitfalls, and how we may evade those pitfalls.
This is saying "I am scum. How are you guys going to catch me? It's called a scum slip
Perhaps an added benifit will be that it will be very tricky for a mafia to come up with a generalized stratagy that is grounded in reason, so maybe there will be some suspiciously quiet people. (I assume it will be difficult for a generalized stratagy becasue i can only see the mafia being able to take advantage of a specific stratagy by getting their peolpe in the right places).
This is just bullshit trying to provide a townie reason for asking.
My analysis in red. This guy is scum.
That's how you put pressure.
|
On June 09 2011 02:01 grush57 wrote:Show nested quote +On June 09 2011 01:02 Kurumi wrote:On June 09 2011 00:58 grush57 wrote:
Alright, I'm going to say that amazingxcd is scum, for he is not responding to any accusations and lynched a medic and had no clear evidence that rookie was scum. This is an amazing case,I can't agree more! Not. You're a terrible poster and horrible scum. You haven't made any case against him Yourself. You're just active lurking and joining on any potential bandwagon. There was clear evidence on rookie44:blue fishing,though it can go either way(confused blue or scum). People who backed off and defended rookie44 hardcore are most likely scum. Treadmill is scum. iGrok is highly likely the GF. Fine, Ill just lurk like the other 30 people and jump on bandwagons like the other 30 people, otherwise every time I try to say something everybody else tries to jump on me.
You said absolutely nothing and brought nothing to discussion. I won't leave You alone.
|
+ Show Spoiler +On June 09 2011 02:01 grush57 wrote:Show nested quote +On June 09 2011 01:02 Kurumi wrote:On June 09 2011 00:58 grush57 wrote:
Alright, I'm going to say that amazingxcd is scum, for he is not responding to any accusations and lynched a medic and had no clear evidence that rookie was scum. This is an amazing case,I can't agree more! Not. You're a terrible poster and horrible scum. You haven't made any case against him Yourself. You're just active lurking and joining on any potential bandwagon. There was clear evidence on rookie44:blue fishing,though it can go either way(confused blue or scum). People who backed off and defended rookie44 hardcore are most likely scum. Treadmill is scum. iGrok is highly likely the GF. Fine, Ill just lurk like the other 30 people and jump on bandwagons like the other 30 people, otherwise every time I try to say something everybody else tries to jump on me.
This is a terrible attitude to have. Please stop it. People want deeper justifications instead of a 2 liner. Something tangible to actually discuss.
|
On June 09 2011 02:08 Kurumi wrote:Show nested quote +On June 09 2011 02:07 Jackal58 wrote:On June 09 2011 01:54 Kurumi wrote:
Why is everyone forgetting about Jackal and listing everyone who voted on rookie besides him,this is confuses me a lot,lol.
Also ask questions. I try to improve as much as I can. Can't deduce something out of my posts? Ask,I'll straighten them up and make them "readable". I dislike being ignored when I am not mafia,really. I loved it in PYPI,but here it is unnecessary. If we lynched a person every time they are wrong we'd have to lynch you 35 or 40 times today. Not saying that You're scum,just that's an interesting observation that they blame everyone besides You.
I cannot control who anybody blames for anything. I was wrong. I'm over it. Move on.
If you wish to call me scum because I blew an analysis fine. It wasn't the first nor will it be the last time I fuck up.
On June 07 2011 09:30 Jackal58 wrote:
I want to encourage all of you to think critically and independently.I have seen to many games where town herp derps themselves into oblivion by following one individual. If you have misgivings and doubts about my analysis on rookie by all means bring it up for discussion. If you believe you have found a better alternative by all means bring it forward.
I still stand by that.
|
+ Show Spoiler +On June 09 2011 02:21 Jackal58 wrote:Show nested quote +On June 09 2011 02:08 Kurumi wrote:On June 09 2011 02:07 Jackal58 wrote:On June 09 2011 01:54 Kurumi wrote:
Why is everyone forgetting about Jackal and listing everyone who voted on rookie besides him,this is confuses me a lot,lol.
Also ask questions. I try to improve as much as I can. Can't deduce something out of my posts? Ask,I'll straighten them up and make them "readable". I dislike being ignored when I am not mafia,really. I loved it in PYPI,but here it is unnecessary. If we lynched a person every time they are wrong we'd have to lynch you 35 or 40 times today. Not saying that You're scum,just that's an interesting observation that they blame everyone besides You. I cannot control who anybody blames for anything. I was wrong. I'm over it. Move on. If you wish to call me scum because I blew an analysis fine. It wasn't the first nor will it be the last time I fuck up. Show nested quote +On June 07 2011 09:30 Jackal58 wrote:
I want to encourage all of you to think critically and independently.I have seen to many games where town herp derps themselves into oblivion by following one individual. If you have misgivings and doubts about my analysis on rookie by all means bring it up for discussion. If you believe you have found a better alternative by all means bring it forward. I still stand by that.
Yes, people should take responsibility for their own actions instead of blaming it on someone else. It is very sickening.
|
On June 09 2011 02:21 Jackal58 wrote:Show nested quote +On June 09 2011 02:08 Kurumi wrote:On June 09 2011 02:07 Jackal58 wrote:On June 09 2011 01:54 Kurumi wrote:
Why is everyone forgetting about Jackal and listing everyone who voted on rookie besides him,this is confuses me a lot,lol.
Also ask questions. I try to improve as much as I can. Can't deduce something out of my posts? Ask,I'll straighten them up and make them "readable". I dislike being ignored when I am not mafia,really. I loved it in PYPI,but here it is unnecessary. If we lynched a person every time they are wrong we'd have to lynch you 35 or 40 times today. Not saying that You're scum,just that's an interesting observation that they blame everyone besides You. I cannot control who anybody blames for anything. I was wrong. I'm over it. Move on. If you wish to call me scum because I blew an analysis fine. It wasn't the first nor will it be the last time I fuck up. Show nested quote +On June 07 2011 09:30 Jackal58 wrote:
I want to encourage all of you to think critically and independently.I have seen to many games where town herp derps themselves into oblivion by following one individual. If you have misgivings and doubts about my analysis on rookie by all means bring it up for discussion. If you believe you have found a better alternative by all means bring it forward. I still stand by that.
When I was changing my vote on rookie44 I stated that it was the strongest case made on Day1. The evidence was valid enough for me to go after that lynch. I won't call You scum because there is nothing to back this off. Townies are prone to make mistakes - unless they stop discussing, everything is valuable.
|
+ Show Spoiler +On June 09 2011 02:26 Kurumi wrote:Show nested quote +On June 09 2011 02:21 Jackal58 wrote:On June 09 2011 02:08 Kurumi wrote:On June 09 2011 02:07 Jackal58 wrote:On June 09 2011 01:54 Kurumi wrote:
Why is everyone forgetting about Jackal and listing everyone who voted on rookie besides him,this is confuses me a lot,lol.
Also ask questions. I try to improve as much as I can. Can't deduce something out of my posts? Ask,I'll straighten them up and make them "readable". I dislike being ignored when I am not mafia,really. I loved it in PYPI,but here it is unnecessary. If we lynched a person every time they are wrong we'd have to lynch you 35 or 40 times today. Not saying that You're scum,just that's an interesting observation that they blame everyone besides You. I cannot control who anybody blames for anything. I was wrong. I'm over it. Move on. If you wish to call me scum because I blew an analysis fine. It wasn't the first nor will it be the last time I fuck up. On June 07 2011 09:30 Jackal58 wrote:
I want to encourage all of you to think critically and independently.I have seen to many games where town herp derps themselves into oblivion by following one individual. If you have misgivings and doubts about my analysis on rookie by all means bring it up for discussion. If you believe you have found a better alternative by all means bring it forward. I still stand by that. When I was changing my vote on rookie44 I stated that it was the strongest case made on Day1. The evidence was valid enough for me to go after that lynch. I won't call You scum because there is nothing to back this off. Townies are prone to make mistakes - unless they stop discussing, everything is valuable.
Thank you, that's alot more readable. I hope you can keep it up.
|
On June 09 2011 02:11 amazingxkcd wrote:+ Show Spoiler +On June 09 2011 02:08 Kurumi wrote:Show nested quote +On June 09 2011 02:07 Jackal58 wrote:On June 09 2011 01:54 Kurumi wrote:
Why is everyone forgetting about Jackal and listing everyone who voted on rookie besides him,this is confuses me a lot,lol.
Also ask questions. I try to improve as much as I can. Can't deduce something out of my posts? Ask,I'll straighten them up and make them "readable". I dislike being ignored when I am not mafia,really. I loved it in PYPI,but here it is unnecessary. If we lynched a person every time they are wrong we'd have to lynch you 35 or 40 times today. Not saying that You're scum,just that's an interesting observation that they blame everyone besides You. I agree with this, and started to discuss this, but the main townies besides you aren't helping me with this. ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/lVa9l.png)
xkcd grasping at straws in an attempt to divert attention away from himself?
The reason people are more or less forgiving jackal for initiating the voting on rookie is that (1) he isn't really coming off as scum in any of his other posts. (2) scum isn't likely to be the initiator of a lynch in day 1 - there's no need given there are sure to be so many innocents being accused (3) jackal is experience, but isn't really pushing anyone really hard or trying hard to make others follow him. Even if he is mafia, he isn't explicitly trying to influence town like iGrok is, for example. Therefore even if he is mafia, he isn't as big a threat as some of the other suspected mafia for whom we have more evidence against. In other words, he can - maybe should, i don't really know - be DT checked.
|
We need to either lynch iGrok today, or a vig needs to shoot him tonight. He is the biggest threat right now.
As for the "I can't understand you formatting" bullshit. It's pretty straightforward, I spoilered the posts he made, and wrote what it meant outside of the spoiler. 4 quotes were broken and the rest is clear. Honestly only scum would dismiss analysis as "QQ can't read" when its written in plain english.
|
Xkcd,As for I don't think Your lynch is proper,but if You could please do something? I am thinking about contributing. You know, many people accused You of being inactive in discussion and not expressed Your opinions freely. I'd like You to bring Your points on some people again - a quick, but informative summary would help a lot. Including opinion on iGrok lynch(or save) is something I'd like to hear too.
|
On June 09 2011 03:09 Sprungjeezy wrote:
We need to either lynch iGrok today, or a vig needs to shoot him tonight. He is the biggest threat right now.
As for the "I can't understand you formatting" bullshit. It's pretty straightforward, I spoilered the posts he made, and wrote what it meant outside of the spoiler. 4 quotes were broken and the rest is clear. Honestly only scum would dismiss analysis as "QQ can't read" when its written in plain english.
No it's bad. Please have some common curtsy instead of shoving your head up your ass. Thank You.
Sorry if I'm harsh but I can't respect this post.
|
On June 09 2011 03:13 aprudds wrote:Show nested quote +On June 09 2011 03:09 Sprungjeezy wrote:
We need to either lynch iGrok today, or a vig needs to shoot him tonight. He is the biggest threat right now.
As for the "I can't understand you formatting" bullshit. It's pretty straightforward, I spoilered the posts he made, and wrote what it meant outside of the spoiler. 4 quotes were broken and the rest is clear. Honestly only scum would dismiss analysis as "QQ can't read" when its written in plain english. No it's bad. Please have some common curtsy instead of shoving your head up your ass. Thank You. Sorry if I'm harsh but I can't respect this post.
Common curtesy? Sir, I spent quite some time (2+ hours) on that post, but inside of Microsoft Word all of the code blends together and I could not find the error, meanwhile you spend 30 seconds covering up for your scum buddy and tell me to correct my post.
|
On June 09 2011 00:13 iGrok wrote:Show nested quote +So far we have learned that iGrok first day has been utterly passive and is following his statement that he will not post anything worthwhile until after day 1, but has instead been using his time to get in our good graces by not stepping on any one's shoes as he wants to be liked by everyone. Currently (at the time of the above posts) I am kind of annoyed by him, but he seems like a very good player (even though he hasn't actually posted anything). I stopped here. So you completely skipped me fighting with Kurumi? Back to reading.
You know what, I'm done. I'm sick of defending myself against ridiculous tunnels. I'm sick of not being given credit for helping out newbies and pointing them towards good town play. And, I'm sick of being accused of being GF every time I defend myself. Cya.
The problem I have with you iGrok is that I agree with the assessment that you have been quite passive on the first day. I defended you against some of the accusations made by gtrsrs (which weren't particularly strong at the time), but GGQ's analysis and Sprungjeezy's attacks has opened my eyes to how passive you have been. Obviously you've spent alot of time defending yourself and certain other players, however, you did not accuse a single other person of being mafia with the exception of a "let the DT investigate Kurumi" and also your throwaway vote for Drazerk:
On June 07 2011 03:08 iGrok wrote:Show nested quote +On June 07 2011 02:56 Alderan wrote:On June 07 2011 02:53 iGrok wrote:On June 07 2011 02:43 Vain wrote:On June 07 2011 02:31 iGrok wrote:On June 07 2011 02:11 Vain wrote:
Ok, i finally finished reading. Man, sleeping is bad for keeping up with a mafia game.
First off: Kurumi is probably town if he also spammed this much in a previous game where he was scum. I don't know his style very good but he is drawing way too much attention to be a comfortable mafia.
I don't quite understand this. So Kurumi is probably town because he's acting the same way he did when he was mafia before? Euh, i meant town. Jackal stated that when he was town he's just as hard to analyze. Iirc he was not scum the other games Jackal played with him. + Show Spoiler +On June 07 2011 00:19 Jackal58 wrote:Show nested quote +On June 07 2011 00:15 amazingxkcd wrote:On June 06 2011 10:47 Alderan wrote:Here's a list of a couple people who seem to be acting a little scummy. (Not saying for sure scum, just people that might not be) Lets get some meaningful conversation going. AmazingxkcdI've already kind of voiced this opinion but I'm going to expound upon my earlier analysis. Let's look at his posts.
It is quite clear that it can be seen who are the main talkers for both side. The only question is now how to distinguish between the two sides and how to act upon it
This post, obviously vague, of little help to the town, and posted directly after he appeared on TheAwesomeAll's “Lurker List”. When I pointed out this was a fishy post he responded with this:
interesting first post there, all ready trying to set up accustation upon me for supposedly making a scummy post when in reality i am only simply making observation. You already got into my list of suspicious people by derailing a innocent first post when we still have around 30+ hours left to figure out each other.
Obviously immediately went on the defensive, turned and pointed a finger at me, and suggest that the town take its time “figuring each other out” instead of having discussion that is inherently pro-town. In fact his only “contribution” to town discussion was this post:
Please refer to these guides on playing TL mafia.
For town: aidnai, GMarshal
For mafia: bumatlarge, chaos13
LSB's Newbie Guide
Mafiascum Newbie Guide
Introduction to Mafia (Flash)
Ver's town guide
Ace's Mafia Manifesto
Qatol's Town Guide
So his only contribution to the town is copying and pasting something that is in the third post of this thread? Interesting. On June 06 2011 23:10 Alderan wrote:
Also, I'm going to ahead and voting for amazingxkcd, just in case something happens to me at work today and I won't be able to get a vote in.
@ amazingkcd, I'm really just waiting on you to refute the analysis I did earlier.
You are discriminating against me and you just voted for me right now just off the basis of my first post, which i made after i finished watching MLG. You do not provide evidence that i am a scum nor do you back it up should you have given any evidence. It seems that you want me to be lynched when i am trying to win for the town. @iGrok and @Jackal58; I can't analyze Kurumi either, since i take that he's acting as if he has multiple personalities disorder. He should be watched for sure. Also, @Jackal58, you stated that he had the same behavior in the previous games you played with him, what were his roles? That should at least help to give us a direction on him. I am not trying to label you two as complete scum, but i was just concerned about iGrok's request for help from Jackal58. About freeloader, I am currently leaning towards the scummy side as for the reasons others have put up front already, but i need more time to see if i do want to lynch him. There are others here who seem suspicious based on their posts and the tone of their post, but i am not ready right now to make a final desicion. Kurumi was town in XXXIX. Lynched day one for posting nonsensically for the first half of the day. He has improved significantly from that game believe it or not. He is also still playing in PTP mafia and is a self proclaimed SK. Ok, yeah that makes a lot more sense. Yeah, I'm starting to see how Kurumi could be a townie, but I could also see him as a scum who felt the pressure and is trying to change his tune. I still don't thing he should be lynched today. I'm trying to think of who should be, but I really don't know :/ But you agree that it shouldn't be freeloader? Actually, looking back, I'm going to put my vote on Drazerk, for twice voting without saying shit. (He might've posted once or twice, but absolutely no substance, only bandwagonning).
Of course, its very easy to focus on someone who only voted twice - but remember that focus was being thrown other lurker ways as well (Jimbooo). But other than that, iGrok has been very timid in putting his head on the chopping block and accusing someone. Today, after some of the attacks from other people, you accuse gtrsrs who has been conveniently attacking you all game (whom you know is already dead-set against you) and so is a very easy target for you to alienate. Otherwise, you have been generally very afraid to alienate people and very afraid to make solid accusations against other people: especially those that voted for Rookie.
I want to hear your analysis of amazingxkcd and i want to hear your current verdict as to whether he is scum or not.
|
On June 09 2011 03:24 Sprungjeezy wrote:Show nested quote +On June 09 2011 03:13 aprudds wrote:On June 09 2011 03:09 Sprungjeezy wrote:
We need to either lynch iGrok today, or a vig needs to shoot him tonight. He is the biggest threat right now.
As for the "I can't understand you formatting" bullshit. It's pretty straightforward, I spoilered the posts he made, and wrote what it meant outside of the spoiler. 4 quotes were broken and the rest is clear. Honestly only scum would dismiss analysis as "QQ can't read" when its written in plain english. No it's bad. Please have some common curtsy instead of shoving your head up your ass. Thank You. Sorry if I'm harsh but I can't respect this post. Common curt esy? Sir, I spent quite some time (2+ hours) on that post, but inside of Microsoft Word all of the code blends together and I could not find the error, meanwhile you spend 30 seconds covering up for your scum buddy and tell me to correct my post.
Then what's another 30 seconds to hit the preview button and look it over? Your being stubborn and you know it.
|
On June 09 2011 03:31 aprudds wrote:Show nested quote +On June 09 2011 03:24 Sprungjeezy wrote:On June 09 2011 03:13 aprudds wrote:On June 09 2011 03:09 Sprungjeezy wrote:
We need to either lynch iGrok today, or a vig needs to shoot him tonight. He is the biggest threat right now.
As for the "I can't understand you formatting" bullshit. It's pretty straightforward, I spoilered the posts he made, and wrote what it meant outside of the spoiler. 4 quotes were broken and the rest is clear. Honestly only scum would dismiss analysis as "QQ can't read" when its written in plain english. No it's bad. Please have some common curtsy instead of shoving your head up your ass. Thank You. Sorry if I'm harsh but I can't respect this post. Common curt esy? Sir, I spent quite some time (2+ hours) on that post, but inside of Microsoft Word all of the code blends together and I could not find the error, meanwhile you spend 30 seconds covering up for your scum buddy and tell me to correct my post. Then what's another 30 seconds to hit the preview button and look it over? Your being stubborn and you know it.
Are we having argument about broken quote tags? Really? Lawl. Sprung,just quote Your post and "fix" it,lol.
|
+ Show Spoiler +On June 09 2011 03:36 Kurumi wrote:Show nested quote +On June 09 2011 03:31 aprudds wrote:On June 09 2011 03:24 Sprungjeezy wrote:On June 09 2011 03:13 aprudds wrote:On June 09 2011 03:09 Sprungjeezy wrote:
We need to either lynch iGrok today, or a vig needs to shoot him tonight. He is the biggest threat right now.
As for the "I can't understand you formatting" bullshit. It's pretty straightforward, I spoilered the posts he made, and wrote what it meant outside of the spoiler. 4 quotes were broken and the rest is clear. Honestly only scum would dismiss analysis as "QQ can't read" when its written in plain english. No it's bad. Please have some common curtsy instead of shoving your head up your ass. Thank You. Sorry if I'm harsh but I can't respect this post. Common curt esy? Sir, I spent quite some time (2+ hours) on that post, but inside of Microsoft Word all of the code blends together and I could not find the error, meanwhile you spend 30 seconds covering up for your scum buddy and tell me to correct my post. Then what's another 30 seconds to hit the preview button and look it over? Your being stubborn and you know it. Are we having argument about broken quote tags? Really? Lawl. Sprung,just quote Your post and "fix" it,lol.
I agree, the logical thing here would be to just fix it up and make things more readable in the future instead of getting ultra aggressive and retaliating.
The first helps everyone, the second helps noone.
|
yo yo chillax guys, no need to get in a kurflufle over formating
|
On June 08 2011 21:42 iGrok wrote:
Haven't read it yet, but I'm going to go ahead and nominate Treadmill for the "Best Rookie (no pun intended) Award".
Hats off to you, doing analysis like a boss, standing up for what you think, and making really good reads on people (like the aforementioned Rookie).
Seconded. Holy crap man. I expected some good things from you, but this is definitely above and beyond. Whether right or wrong, that's one hell of an analysis.
Ok, so, just in case some of you missed it, I'd like to quote myself.
On June 08 2011 13:12 Impervious wrote:
Ok, so, now that it's daytime, I'd like to ask everyone to do something simple for me, before we start discussing anything more serious.
I'd like to know what guides/games you have read, as well as what games you have played. Just take like 10 seconds to post a quick list plz.
If you've played in a few already, I know you're well exposed to TL Mafia. I'm asking for this information I want to get a feeling for how well adjusted our "newbie" players will be. I'm pretty sure that this may prove useful to us in the future. I wanted to ask it during the previous day, but I showed up pretty late for the party.
And thanks to those of you who have answered already.
|
Don't mention guides You read to Impervious,they'll try to avoid errors based on what You've read.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
