|
@Mataza
Just wanted to make it clear that I was being dramatic/sarcastic, so later someone doesn't quote me and say "OMG Karshe admitted to being mafia!" Also, since sarcasm does not always translate online.
But I'm guessing you already knew that and you're just trying to get a rise out of me. =P
|
gonna stay with my line of logic, and vote skrammen. I cant believe more people are not on him given his VERY little content, and insta bandwagon vote.
Best case scenario: town votes GiygaS, and he flips scum. We got reason to trust one another and the hunt is in full swing.
worst case: GiygaS flips green, and we have lots of suspicions. Very good chance of Mafia breaking up trust and getting us to turn on one another.
good no mater what: voting Skrammen. we get ride of a terrible player, and we get a possible read on Mataza. I chose this one.
Eather way, Im happy with day one.
##Vote: Skrammen
|
United Kingdom2950 Posts
Hey guys! Sorry I've been so inactive, didn't know the game moved so fast I'm reading through the pages now, so I will edit this post to cast my vote.
|
|
Welcome, Wunder. You may come across it while reading, but do not edit your post--just make a new one.
Happy reading!
|
On May 17 2011 12:39 Varpulis wrote:Editing is not allowed for any reason. If you have more to say or want to correct a mistake, post again with the statement EBWOP(Edit By Way Of Posting). example:
On May 17 2011 12:44 Varpulis wrote: EBWOP: the reason for this is that editing allows players to alter the information that the rest of the town can use to analyze you.
For example, Imagine that I'm one of the mafia, and I post a scumlist, then check through the thread again and see that nobody else thinks that Node is scum, If i were allowed to edit, I could delete Node from my scumlist and fit in better with the town, and nobody will be able to point out later that I was suspicious of Node.
Do you understand why we don't allow editing?
|
Oh my...
Talk about dramatic last minute appearance.
|
United Kingdom2950 Posts
Wow, looks like I got in just under the clock. Whew.
I haven't played forum mafia before, and I've only played the SC2 mod of it, but that seems to take a few rules from F11's version and adds some new roles in it too. But I generally dislike having a lynch day one, although it seems to be mandatory, so I'm going to go with the safer option here and vote for
##Vote: Skrammen
|
Wow - a lot of posting in short time - read through it all, trying to make some thoughts about some of us seems to be playing "the blame game" as never before!
My vote is based on thoughts around that and what other people have been saying.
short time to voting end? - im in eu timezone and a bit confused
##Vote Giygas
|
##Vote Giygas
since its no editing
|
United Kingdom2950 Posts
I think there's one hour? Good thing I woke up early today.
|
I noticed ive been under suspicion, and even got a vote which also was removed - nice of you to do this!
After reading all the conversation going on in this town today it seems like a lot of assumptions are based on very weak clues and 'quotes' from one day work - I myself find it a bit hard to draw grande conclusions about whos being who as for now - I have really no good idea of how to make myself 'cleared' of suspicion right now, except from trying to post something about how I think right now
|
oh my, waking up and checking mafia thread as the 1st thing was a good choice :D by skimming the last 4 new pages quick i find hiro's lynch logic the most appelling. as im lacking a big analysis right now, ill jump the bandwagon for the inactives - skrammen slightly more suspicious as after his 1st post there will still 8 hours to go and he didnt post again, even after being asked to.
##vote Skrammen
modkill avoided, suspicion raised - see you on day2 :3
|
While we are at people flying under the radar.
6. Skrammen 7. stefftastiq 8. DeepBlu2
11. Wunder 12. nard
To me lynching inactives doesn´t look that safe. Maybe you´re right.
But I, right now, can´t be arsed to care for anything else, since my cred falls and rises with giygas alignment.
|
Damn sheep.
I am convinced Giygas is the safest lynch. After accusation he had a total change of behaviour. He never explained why he doesn´t think I am the maf anymore. And he votes Skrammen.
By that logic alone I am sure, no, even convinced that skrammen will flip town.
Right now 6 people vote Skrammen. It might be ballsy to lynch the 3rd most active person of the first half of day 1. One doesn´t win by going the safe route all the time. Sooner or later we have to lynch someone "important"
Dammit. Get your own opinion and don´t just recycle one that looks good and safe.
|
|
Never mind that the two who butted heads the hardest the first part of day 1 are in total agreement on this matter...that's not important. What IS important is that someone is inactive. And that guy's gotta DIE.
|
@Wunder
Did you just read all 8 pages of posts ...... in 6 minutes? (the time from your first post to your vote)
|
United States22154 Posts
Vote count
DeepBlu2 (1) Palmar
stefftastiq (0)
VisceraEyes
GiygaS(5) DeepBlu2 Mataza Skrammen VisceraEyes stefftastiq
Skrammen(6) GiygaS prplhz Karshe hiro protagonist Wunder nard
prplhz(0)
VisceraEyes
Skrammen Leading with six votes,GiygaS in second with six votes. day ends in a little under 17 min. Everyone has voted ^_^
|
Yea this may be a huge mistake but if I'm gonna make it, it is going to be in the first game.
##Unvote Skrammen ##Vote GiygaS
My rationale:
The whole "vote for skrammen" thing was never about him being scum, it was about him being inactive and voting out of the blue. I think that we are going to have a lot better read on VisceraEyes, Mataza and Skrammen if we flip GiygaS, while flipping Skrammen will really give us nothing. Inactive players have hopefully learned their lesson.
Also I think it is very awesome that everybody voted, but it would be more awesome if everybody posted regularly too!
If he does not flip red I think the VisceraEyes is the best bid for a scum next time.
I'll probably be unavailable for the next 24 hours by way, and also for the first part of day1 but I will be here to answer questions just not to provide analysis.
|
|
|
|