|
When using this resource, please read FragKrag's opening post. The Tech Support forum regulars have helped create countless of desktop systems without any compensation. The least you can do is provide all of the information required for them to help you properly. |
|
Anyone have any thoughts on this deal?
I'm thinking about taking the plunge with this to make myself invested and to force myself to get started on actually building a computer.
|
Well, the Cooler Master GX650 is not worth more than about $50 in relation to other units, considering the build quality, efficiency, and performance that starts to go out of spec at about 500W. This is a situation where the $90 original price of the GX650 is a joke, so you're maybe not getting as much out of the combo as you think.
http://hardocp.com/article/2010/11/22/cooler_master_gx_650w_power_supply_review/1
|
Thanks Myrmidon.
Well, after doing a couple hours of research, I think I might as well just take the plunge. Here's what I came up with, but after what you've said about the power supply, I'm reconsidering, and I'm hoping someone more knowledgeable in these matters can help me.
Intel Core i5-2500K - $304.98 Asrock H67M - $94.99 XFX Radeon HD 6850 - $154.99 2x4GB 1600MHz - Included with CPU Samsung Spinpoint F3 - $54.99 Cooler Master RS650 - $29.99 Cooler Master HAF 912 - $49.99
Total Cost: $766.19
Can anyone beat that with better stuff or with comparable stuff and a cheaper price? I know next to nothing so I'd appreciate any help I can get.
|
you cant utilise the k chip on the h67 motherboard chipset, are you planning on upgrading later? by that i mean you cant overclock and its a waste of money
|
|
On April 20 2011 11:24 Myrmidon wrote:It's feasible but much more annoying, since parts are less available and tend to be less compatible. I think the savings are less as well. Some people do it, though I've never tried. Is your old laptop HDD PATA or SATA? A low-clocked AMD dual core with no L3 cache should struggle late game with big armies, though the integrated Radeon HD 4200 or HD 4250 on those is good enough for low at those lower resolutions. If think people are saying that it's playable under those circumstances. If you want to maintain decent fps, you'll probably need better hardware. If you can manage, there are some laptops around $550 with a Core i3-2310M (with Intel HD Graphics 3000). Maybe a deal will put one around $500. That would be a pretty big upgrade both in the CPU and the integrated GPU, so that should play 1v1 smoothly.
Is that much better? The gfx card benchmarks show it playing SC2 at 100+ FPS on low, although only 27 FPS on medium.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16834220866
|
I bought the parts and build my computer. + Show Spoiler +Intel i5-2500K Gigabyte P67A-UD3-B3 MSI R6950 2GB Samsung Spinpoint T3 - 1TB 2 x 2GB Muskin Silverline @ 1333 Mhz, 1.5v PSU: Corsair CX500
I installed Windows 7 and the Chipset and Graphic Card drivers. Updated the Windows 7 to last updates...
But my systems has a lot of instabilities.
I tried a lot of solutions from the Internet. Reinstalled Windows 7. Used several versions, several settings. And I'm without solution.
1. Tried to install SC2 (from DVD - which is totally fine - worked on Windows XP and Vista). a) I get this error, almost every time, with different files (this case ..\TerranSC2-05.ogg), at different completion levels:
The file "C:\Program Files (x86)\StarCraft II\Mods\Liberty.SC2Mod\base.SC2Assets : Assets\Music\TerranSC2-05.ogg" could not be written. If this problem persists, please contact Blizzard Technical Support. (MPQTarget::Write/SFileWriteFile)
b) I managed once to install it right after defragmenting the disc. And I got the same error many many times while updating it.
c) Some times the computer freezes. Some times I get the Blue Memory Dump screen and I need to restart.
d) I run it in compatibly mode with Windows Vista. It tells me it needs 1.5 GB System Memory and apparently I don't have it. Which is weird since I have 4 GB. Could some not be active? The W7 tells me I have 4.00 GB installed, 3.49 usable. Done a memory test, told me the RAM is fine.
Anyway, in Vista SP2 compatibility mode gives me same problems.
2. If I unpack a file from lots of .r0x files some times it tells me one of the files is corrupt and fails. After several tries it works.
3. Tried to install other games from .iso's saved on HDD and mounted with Power ISO (also tried Daemon Tools). Go some similar error message with error code 1335 -> corrupt file -> corupt disc.
4. Tried on other hard disc, the whole installation from the beginning. Got the same errors and problems but a little toned down. Then finally, in compatibility mode I managed to install SC2 and updat it. But now I can't replicate on main HDD.
5. Also, some times the computer freezes or the Display Drivers fail for no reason.
What solutions should I try and What should I do to test that all the components work properly and well with each other?
Also, should I upload the BIOS or do something fancy with it? Now it has the default values on and seems ok.
|
|
|
I am going to do all you say with the most rigor I am capable a little later tonight.
Question 1: Could it be the motherboard? If it is how would I know? Question 2: If all the components are fine, could it be they don't work well with each other?
|
On April 21 2011 04:03 ForgottenOne wrote:Question 1: Could it be the motherboard? If it is how would I know?
Yes, it could be the motherboard but there is no way to know if it is unless you have another motherboard to test with.
Question 2: If all the components are fine, could it be they don't work well with each other?
It's possible but highly unlikely.
|
if anyone's interested in getting an intel core i5-2500k CPU and lives near a MicroCenter, they currently have it on sale for $179.99, that's $45 cheaper than NewEgg, insane!
MicroCenter page - you have to add it to your cart to see the price; pick a specific store in order to add it to your cart
|
Very often the screen flicks, the system freezes for a couple of seconds then I get the message: Display drivers stopped responding and recovered successful. Then it seems everything works ok (some times the system freezes for good and I need to restart).
Like a couple minutes ago when I clicked the utorrent icon in the tray.
|
On April 21 2011 04:15 BlasiuS wrote:if anyone's interested in getting an intel core i5-2500k CPU and lives near a MicroCenter, they currently have it on sale for $179.99, that's $45 cheaper than NewEgg, insane! MicroCenter page - you have to add it to your cart to see the price; pick a specific store in order to add it to your cart
It's been like that since launch. Microcenter's processor prices are usually always less expensive by a decent margin than Newegg.
|
On April 21 2011 02:52 FabledIntegral wrote:Show nested quote +On April 20 2011 11:24 Myrmidon wrote:On April 20 2011 08:52 FabledIntegral wrote:After having a very positive experience building my own computer after visiting this thread, I am going to ask, is it feasible to build your own laptop? I only have a budget of ~$500, and I'd like to have something that could minimally game such as SC2 on low. I've run into this one on newegg I'm considering if I can't build my own http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16834157545&nm_mc=EMC-IGNEFL041911&cm_mmc=EMC-IGNEFL041911-_-EMC-041911-Index-_-LaptopsNotebooks-_-34157545-L016Asupposedly people have said in reviews it can run SC2 on low with 200/200 armies (1v1) without any issue. Current laptop has a broken screen, not worth fixing it as it's a POS anyways. I think I can get Windows 7 64 bit for free. Could I somehow salvage the HD from my existing Toshiba Satellite C655 (or anything else, for that matter?). It's feasible but much more annoying, since parts are less available and tend to be less compatible. I think the savings are less as well. Some people do it, though I've never tried. Is your old laptop HDD PATA or SATA? A low-clocked AMD dual core with no L3 cache should struggle late game with big armies, though the integrated Radeon HD 4200 or HD 4250 on those is good enough for low at those lower resolutions. If think people are saying that it's playable under those circumstances. If you want to maintain decent fps, you'll probably need better hardware. If you can manage, there are some laptops around $550 with a Core i3-2310M (with Intel HD Graphics 3000). Maybe a deal will put one around $500. That would be a pretty big upgrade both in the CPU and the integrated GPU, so that should play 1v1 smoothly. Is that much better? The gfx card benchmarks show it playing SC2 at 100+ FPS on low, although only 27 FPS on medium. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16834220866
A Pentium dual core is about the same as a one of the later AMD dual cores, though the mobility HD 5470 there should be a decent step up from the HD 4200/4250 (though still a little worse than Intel HD 3000 I think). It should be better than the other laptop you linked.
You're just going to have to figure out if the difference between okay/good fps lategame on low (like i3-2310M) and playable fps lategame on low is worth ~$100. There don't seem to be definitive benchmarks on these CPUs and GPUs for SC2, so if you've done all the searching around and research, you probably know better than us (or at least me). Under $500, you're probably not going to do better,.
|
On April 21 2011 04:38 Myrmidon wrote:Show nested quote +On April 21 2011 02:52 FabledIntegral wrote:On April 20 2011 11:24 Myrmidon wrote:On April 20 2011 08:52 FabledIntegral wrote:After having a very positive experience building my own computer after visiting this thread, I am going to ask, is it feasible to build your own laptop? I only have a budget of ~$500, and I'd like to have something that could minimally game such as SC2 on low. I've run into this one on newegg I'm considering if I can't build my own http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16834157545&nm_mc=EMC-IGNEFL041911&cm_mmc=EMC-IGNEFL041911-_-EMC-041911-Index-_-LaptopsNotebooks-_-34157545-L016Asupposedly people have said in reviews it can run SC2 on low with 200/200 armies (1v1) without any issue. Current laptop has a broken screen, not worth fixing it as it's a POS anyways. I think I can get Windows 7 64 bit for free. Could I somehow salvage the HD from my existing Toshiba Satellite C655 (or anything else, for that matter?). It's feasible but much more annoying, since parts are less available and tend to be less compatible. I think the savings are less as well. Some people do it, though I've never tried. Is your old laptop HDD PATA or SATA? A low-clocked AMD dual core with no L3 cache should struggle late game with big armies, though the integrated Radeon HD 4200 or HD 4250 on those is good enough for low at those lower resolutions. If think people are saying that it's playable under those circumstances. If you want to maintain decent fps, you'll probably need better hardware. If you can manage, there are some laptops around $550 with a Core i3-2310M (with Intel HD Graphics 3000). Maybe a deal will put one around $500. That would be a pretty big upgrade both in the CPU and the integrated GPU, so that should play 1v1 smoothly. Is that much better? The gfx card benchmarks show it playing SC2 at 100+ FPS on low, although only 27 FPS on medium. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16834220866 A Pentium dual core is about the same as a one of the later AMD dual cores, though the mobility HD 5470 there should be a decent step up from the HD 4200/4250 (though still a little worse than Intel HD 3000 I think). It should be better than the other laptop you linked. You're just going to have to figure out if the difference between okay/good fps lategame on low (like i3-2310M) and playable fps lategame on low is worth ~$100. There don't seem to be definitive benchmarks on these CPUs and GPUs for SC2, so if you've done all the searching around and research, you probably know better than us (or at least me). Under $500, you're probably not going to do better,.
All mobile graphic cards and respective FPS for Starcraft 2 can be found here: http://www.notebookcheck.net/Computer-Games-on-Laptop-Graphic-Cards.13849.0.html
And yes, the difference would be worth it for any sane person >.>
|
I'm not always sure if I trust results on notebookcheck, since they don't list how and under which circumstances the fps is logged. (or do they?)
|
United States1654 Posts
|
|
|
|
|