|
Why are we attacking Bum?
First of all. Just because Radfield accused him, doesn't mean that Radfield is right. In Mafia XXX, I sent a PM to Bum, saying that I was going to get killed (And I was killed) and I thought Foolishness was mafia. I was wrong.
Give me a better reason than "hasn't made any good posts". Seriously, it's hard finding something to talk about. I have difficulty at the start of every game because it's too early to analyze incentives. Give him a few days.
##Support bumatlarge
|
On September 07 2010 11:06 LSB wrote: Why are we attacking Bum?
First of all. Just because Radfield accused him, doesn't mean that Radfield is right. In Mafia XXX, I sent a PM to Bum, saying that I was going to get killed (And I was killed) and I thought Foolishness was mafia. I was wrong.
Give me a better reason than "hasn't made any good posts". Seriously, it's hard finding something to talk about. I have difficulty at the start of every game because it's too early to analyze incentives. Give him a few days.
##Support bumatlarge
You have to remember, three people died last night. And there's no telling if three more will die the next night. We have to start lynching people, and Bum seems like the most viable person to. In addition to being suspected by Radfield( and the opinion of a confirmed Radfield is one I value the most), he has been useless this game and different from when he plays as town(take last game, much more contributive and active.) His posts entirely consist of one liners and is generally the epitome of either typical mafia or the useless townie. Either way, the safest lynch. What do you suggest? We don't lynch anyone?
Unless you propose a new lynch, I'm sticking with Bumatlarge.
|
On September 07 2010 11:10 Pandain wrote:Show nested quote +On September 07 2010 11:06 LSB wrote: Why are we attacking Bum?
First of all. Just because Radfield accused him, doesn't mean that Radfield is right. In Mafia XXX, I sent a PM to Bum, saying that I was going to get killed (And I was killed) and I thought Foolishness was mafia. I was wrong.
Give me a better reason than "hasn't made any good posts". Seriously, it's hard finding something to talk about. I have difficulty at the start of every game because it's too early to analyze incentives. Give him a few days.
##Support bumatlarge You have to remember, three people died last night. And there's no telling if three more will die the next night. We have to start lynching people, and Bum seems like the most viable person to. In addition to being suspected by Radfield( and the opinion of a confirmed Radfield is one I value the most), he has been useless this game and different from when he plays as town(take last game, much more contributive and active.) His posts entirely consist of one liners and is generally the epitome of either typical mafia or the useless townie. Either way, the safest lynch. What do you suggest? We don't lynch anyone? Unless you propose a new lynch, I'm sticking with Bumatlarge. I suggest that we discuss this for a while, I'll start an accusation before the day is over, giving us another 12 hours as we discuss the person that I will accuse
|
well the only way to really get anything going is to accuse people soooo yeah.
i hope everyone is aware that once an accusation goes up, you PM caller your vote on that accusation
|
On September 07 2010 10:52 bumatlarge wrote: Oh I apologize for not contributing as much as you pandain. How about we kill myself pandain and divinek. Id be ok with that.
##Accuse Divinek
hey look an omgus reaction. Of course we have nothing to go on, how are we supposed to have anything? Our only power like role that we know of just died, so we have no idea if we'll ever have anything to go on. So we might as well start generating some discussion.
Sitting back quietly and saying nothing is exactly what those capitalist scum want to happen
|
The other 'safe' lynching option is Xelin.
|
Whoa whoa whoa! Guys, be careful this is the last thing we want. Accusations flying everywhere is just great for the scum.
A few things so far:
-How many people were PMing Radfield, and what were his opinions? I was talking to him a fair bit and he never mentioned to me that bum was being scummy. I'm not saying Pandain is lying, I just want to know if he mentioned his suspicions of bum to anyone else.
-Pandain is tunnelling pretty hard.
-Bum suggested we kill Pandain, divinek AND himself. Why?
-We don't know exactly what role south was. Was he, as someone suggested, a weak medic role of some sort?
I've got to go to work, but I'll be back to talk a bit more on some of the accusations.
|
since when am I a safe lynching option? other than being slightly inactive in the early stages.
don't get me wrong im not suggesting there is better candidates but explain why im the "safe" option.
Also pandain why the no PM respond!
|
From the op, SR was a red army officer (vanilla town)
|
On September 07 2010 13:29 XeliN wrote: since when am I a safe lynching option? other than being slightly inactive in the early stages.
don't get me wrong im not suggesting there is better candidates but explain why im the "safe" option.
Also pandain why the no PM respond!
im reminded of a game where you were a suicide bomber. And now you only start to talk AFTER someone says 'hmm good lynch option'
|
why are people not publically voting on this accusation. Or are they waiting but dont realize days are rather short
|
On September 07 2010 14:01 LSB wrote: From the op, SR was a red army officer (vanilla town)
Oh I missed that. So we have no idea how he died still.
We know there are 3 killing roles or 3KP maf or a combination of the two. Hopefully at least one death was as a result of a town sided role, or we could be in big trouble.
We need to be extremely careful and prolong this day as much as possible, nights seem to be lethal. Hopefully there won't be 3 deaths every night, but if that is the case, we are looking at:
Day 1 15 alive Day 2 12 alive Day 3 less than 9 alive if we lynch. If there are 4 maf (unlikely, probably 3) then game is over at this point if no maf are dead.
Day 4 less than 6 alive if we lynch. Almost certainly game over now.
|
The key is to keep on extending the day, comerads, we must save our accusations to give us time!
|
On September 07 2010 13:24 deconduo wrote: -How many people were PMing Radfield, and what were his opinions? I was talking to him a fair bit and he never mentioned to me that bum was being scummy. I'm not saying Pandain is lying, I just want to know if he mentioned his suspicions of bum to anyone else.
Reading back over I see that ~Opz~ got a message from Radfield too about bum.
|
On September 07 2010 13:29 XeliN wrote: since when am I a safe lynching option? other than being slightly inactive in the early stages.
don't get me wrong im not suggesting there is better candidates but explain why im the "safe" option.
Also pandain why the no PM respond!
"Slightly" inactive?
You had 1 post since Day 1 began, this is your second post all game. You have basically said and done nothing for almost 72 hours, and that is why it's safe to lynch you.
|
On September 07 2010 14:06 Divinek wrote: why are people not publically voting on this accusation. Or are they waiting but dont realize days are rather short
From what I can see Pandain wants to lynch bum but LSB is defending him.
I'm going to vote no on Divinek and yes on bumatlarge.
|
Oh also how much time do we have left in Day 1? 12 hours-ish?
|
ugh i keep forgetting to consolidate my thoughts.
The following posters have yet to make an appearance during Day 2: zeks (most inactive player in the game) Hesmyrr lakrismamma rastaban
You guys all need to start speaking up.
I know it's Labor Day weekend so some people probably have a valid excuse for being afk, but cmon now
|
On September 07 2010 14:05 Divinek wrote:Show nested quote +On September 07 2010 13:29 XeliN wrote: since when am I a safe lynching option? other than being slightly inactive in the early stages.
don't get me wrong im not suggesting there is better candidates but explain why im the "safe" option.
Also pandain why the no PM respond! im reminded of a game where you were a suicide bomber. And now you only start to talk AFTER someone says 'hmm good lynch option'
lol yes how suspicious my act of asking "why am i a safe lynch option" to someone who has just suggested I am is, it really is reminiscient of someone with a mafia agenda, it just isn't plausible that a town aligned player would decide to post in the thread once someone has called them out on inactivity to the extent where they suggest you as a safe lynch.
I haven't posted much because there seemed hardly anything to say.
I was contemplating writing a post about Southrawrea. his lynch seemed unusual to me, he doesn't seem the type of player that would be first killed by mafia, but it just seems to likely that the reason he was killed was because the manner in which he was posting made it seem like he might have a power role. Still would be worthwhile anaylsing his posts for anything that might inspire his killing, but i am almost set on him being lynched purely on power role suspicion (although it could easily be a combination of the two so going over his posts would be prudent)
Im posting this after just finishing an epic gaming session of almost wowesque nerdism so going to go over this thread properly either now or after i wake up. The idea there might be clues is cool and if so I think we should be paying alot of attention to them. That is only if it is true there are clues however, afaik caller hasn't confirmed and nothing has been written on it in the OP.
|
I will be voting to lynch bumatlarge....
Atleast it will give us something.
And yes, Radfield was pming me suspicion of bumatlarge, although I don't feel there was much to go on. It reminds me of TL Mafia XXX when I suggested lynching bum to the circle I was in. Bum is posting, but look at last game, and XXX, he is posting similarly to XXX and not to last game. I feel he is a good lynch. Also, townies should not throw accusations out just because they have been accused. Plead your cases, don't just throw at an accusation at your accuser.
Depending on what he flips, we will need to evaluate our decision. If day comes near ending, I will night mind accusing someone, or being accused.
|
|
|
|