Smuft's Team Battle Tourney - Page 51
Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
Artosis
United States2138 Posts
| ||
meeple
Canada10211 Posts
On April 07 2010 13:13 duckhunt wrote: hey artosis... rekrul is a hero, pls do not even try to argue with him Artosis is a hero too... | ||
TheMango
United States1966 Posts
| ||
iNcontroL
USA29055 Posts
On April 07 2010 13:14 Artosis wrote: inc what the fuck is ur problem u want to start this shit again? Calling it like it is bro o_O And it isn't like this is some invention of my own it is pretty widely accepted.. | ||
Artosis
United States2138 Posts
but when i run a tournament or anything like that, i am the most legit admin ever. THAT is what everyone agrees on. | ||
Xxio
Canada5565 Posts
On April 07 2010 13:12 {88}iNcontroL wrote: also anyone who remembers gosi[terran] -> TSL disagrees Artosis clearly said gosi was his darkhorse of the tournament, and he did pretty damn well. p.s. unless you've been living under a rock you should know Artosis is more of a hero than rekrul lol how is that even a comparison | ||
Rekrul
Korea (South)17174 Posts
even if your judgement was perfectly clear, it's just not standard practice to let someone betting on a match referee it, no matter how honorable they are, and as of this afternoon you have a 179.99$ + 20,000 korean won bet on the match vs me so that rules you out buddy! | ||
Artosis
United States2138 Posts
| ||
Maynard
United States889 Posts
| ||
Artosis
United States2138 Posts
| ||
Rekrul
Korea (South)17174 Posts
On April 07 2010 13:31 Artosis wrote: thats fine obviously, i dont care, but dont try and act like im not a legit motherfucker when it comes to the integrity of a game ive given 12 full years of my life to. sc2 hasn't been out 12 years new game, new slate i don't even know you anymore | ||
Irrelevant
United States2364 Posts
| ||
Artosis
United States2138 Posts
| ||
iNcontroL
USA29055 Posts
| ||
StarcraftMaster
United States84 Posts
Ninja edit: Nominee for epic thread of 2010? | ||
HuK
Canada1591 Posts
| ||
Ruthless
United States492 Posts
| ||
Irrelevant
United States2364 Posts
On April 07 2010 13:53 _rdm_ wrote: Perhaps you could allow very leanient backing out rules, worst case the money gets returned to its owners and smuft loses a week of poker money which apparently isnt much to him at all. This way noone will be able to say that the rules were the cause of the loss 25% backing out fee | ||
StarcraftMaster
United States84 Posts
On April 07 2010 13:53 _rdm_ wrote: Perhaps you could allow very leanient backing out rules, worst case the money gets returned to its owners and smuft loses a week of poker money which apparently isnt much to him at all. This way noone will be able to say that the rules were the cause of the loss all the more reason to play it in 6-7 days (Before the 14th) so we wont get any patch day jitters. | ||
rei
United States3593 Posts
On April 07 2010 12:25 Rekrul wrote: imo either player should have the right to cancel the bet if it gets patched, and that seems pretty obvious discing they should create a panel of 5 players (as unbiased but with good sc2 knowledge (in other words not someone like artosis)) who can vote on regame or awarding a win I think artosis missed something here. Rekrul actually didn't just said you are bias, but he also accused you lacking in sc2 knowledge. are you going to take that ??? | ||
| ||