APM difference between sc2 and sc1 - Page 4
Forum Index > Closed |
phrexis
United States12 Posts
| ||
billyX333
United States1360 Posts
every time we spam "S" to select larvae when there is no larvae left then we have a null action which was counted in bw charts (but was noted as a null action) this is with the 1.38 multiplier BW: 240 sc2: 200 | ||
Skyze
Canada2324 Posts
Ive only played about 5 protoss 1v1s so far, but my APM hovers around 100-120.. where on BW it was like 130-150. Interesting. I still dont see how people are getting 200+, esp earlygame waiting for your drones to finish (in both games).. Must be really spamming hardcore. My apm is dead at the beginning, like 50, then doubles in the mid/lategame where theres actually stuff to do. | ||
bendez
Canada283 Posts
Step 1: Assign one of your worker to hotkey #1, and the command center to hotkey #2. Step 2: Repeatedly press 1,2,1,2,1,2 etc Step 3: ??? Step 4: Profit! Congratz, your APM should now be over 200, and you're a pro now. | ||
leejas
United States440 Posts
| ||
madjerry
China60 Posts
SC1:220. SC2: 190. Small difference I guess it's something to do with the EAPM (just a guess). I have a mediocre SC1 APM of 220, but the EAPM is above 150 mostly, meaning I do not earn APM by repeatedly clicking the ground or hotkey selecting, but rather necessary micros and alot macros. To my best knowledge, many players who easily have over 300 apm, do not pass 120 in EAPM, and their APM drop greatly from SC1 to SC2. So I'm thinking of the EAPM theory. Anyone? | ||
eNoq
Netherlands502 Posts
SC2: 190-230 / 262-317 w/ 1.38 multi O_O feels like i'm faster in sc2. | ||
TwilightStar
United States649 Posts
Sc2: 100ish This is based on the built in APM by blizzard... Also, this is just from one day of playing the beta. I have a long way to go | ||
No_eL
Chile1438 Posts
On April 04 2010 11:24 madjerry wrote: mine goes like SC1:220. SC2: 190. Small difference I guess it's something to do with the EAPM (just a guess). I have a mediocre SC1 APM of 220, but the EAPM is above 150 mostly, meaning I do not earn APM by repeatedly clicking the ground or hotkey selecting, but rather necessary micros and alot macros. To my best knowledge, many players who easily have over 300 apm, do not pass 120 in EAPM, and their APM drop greatly from SC1 to SC2. So I'm thinking of the EAPM theory. Anyone? yes, i really think that the apm its calculated in a different way by blizzard, but for the common of the people, the apm in sc2 its nearly 1,5-2,0 times slower than SC1 | ||
wdge
60 Posts
SC2: 100 As Zerg. Was pretty slow in SC1, a long time ago though, but are certainly quite a bit faster in SC2. | ||
-orb-
United States5770 Posts
| ||
KumquatExpress
United States344 Posts
SC2: 110 | ||
G3nXsiS
United States656 Posts
SC2: 120-150 WC3:140-160 I really don't like my apm in sc2. It feels like Im doing everything but still my apm is really low. | ||
Suspected
United States9 Posts
On April 04 2010 14:44 G3nXsiS wrote: SC1: 220-240 SC2: 120-150 WC3:140-160 I really don't like my apm in sc2. It feels like Im doing everything but still my apm is really low. You're clearly not spamming enough. Remember, why use one click when seven will produce the same result. Anyway... SC1: ~423 SC2: ~316 | ||
amanet
Croatia334 Posts
sc2 ~ 120 | ||
Opi
China1 Post
On April 04 2010 06:11 Jlab wrote: Isn't it going on a lower speed. Meaning the APM is measured at a lower speed setting than you are playing at. So technically its not APM in actual minuets but in game minuets. Yea, I think it has something to do with game seconds vs. real seconds APM is calculated on game seconds, which is equal to real time only on the "fast" speed setting. But since all league games are played on "faster", i think your in game APM actually turns out to be Actions Per 45 seconds (ish) ? | ||
cartoon]x
United States606 Posts
| ||
eXNewB
Canada291 Posts
On April 04 2010 07:24 synapse wrote: Your graph clearly does not pass the vertical line test. HAW HAW I love math jokes :D:D | ||
Radiomouse
Netherlands209 Posts
warcraft3:180-210 sc2:160-180(without multiplier, so that would make it 210-240) | ||
ArtemisKnives
United States210 Posts
Different game. Different animal. | ||
| ||