EPTyeah bout half, then again I haven't played beta much, ran through placements, got silver, played about 3 more games.
I like sc1 atm more.
I'm relatively new to all this though, been playing sc1 for about 1.5 months
APM difference between sc2 and sc1 - Page 6
| Forum Index > Closed |
|
slowmanrunning
Canada285 Posts
yeah bout half, then again I haven't played beta much, ran through placements, got silver, played about 3 more games. I like sc1 atm more. I'm relatively new to all this though, been playing sc1 for about 1.5 months | ||
|
dangots0ul
United States919 Posts
sc2: 80 (LOL) | ||
|
Lobo2me
Norway1213 Posts
How much SC2 APM is needed to do the same things that BW APM would require? Or what your displayed SC2 APM would be in BW with the exact same amount of actions? If it's the latter then that seems to just be the factor between game time and play speed, 1,4. Just did a test where I clicked a counter and right clicked rally point at the beat of a 200 BPM metronome while timing it. In 1:00.14 I had done 200 clicks and the game showed me at 140-143 APM the entire time. | ||
|
rAize
Germany135 Posts
| ||
|
SiDX
New Zealand1975 Posts
On May 11 2010 18:06 rAize wrote: man who gives a flying fuck? People are too focused on APM, play the god damn game and enjoy it. jesus christ. Agree. | ||
|
Zexion
Sweden971 Posts
 So does anyone know how to fix that replay bug? But I guess it's around 100 or less (definitely not higher). | ||
|
link0
United States1071 Posts
sc2: 70 | ||
|
Hasudk
Denmark78 Posts
On May 11 2010 17:56 Lobo2me wrote: What are you trying to find out? How much SC2 APM is needed to do the same things that BW APM would require? Or what your displayed SC2 APM would be in BW with the exact same amount of actions? If it's the latter then that seems to just be the factor between game time and play speed, 1,4. Just did a test where I clicked a counter and right clicked rally point at the beat of a 200 BPM metronome while timing it. In 1:00.14 I had done 200 clicks and the game showed me at 140-143 APM the entire time. This is APM-discussion the true TL-way, with graphs and excessive theorycrafting, and its AWESOME. I love that you actually did that with a metronome. | ||
|
FishNChips
United Kingdom107 Posts
| ||
|
Rokit5
236 Posts
SC2 50-70............. | ||
|
Angra
United States2652 Posts
As a side note, I think playing SC2 has somehow increased my SC1 apm. Normally my peak is like 200 at the end of a game, but I played a match the other day and it was 230 instead. HMMMM. | ||
|
Cu(oCo)
Italy358 Posts
sc2 150 | ||
|
Tropics
United Kingdom1132 Posts
| ||
|
Issor
United States870 Posts
So with that in mind, my avg apm in BW was ~ 140, and it's about 150-160 in SC2. edit: and I spam a lot. I imagine if I had to individually macro from several buildings/hatcheries rather than hotkey them all to the same key it would be higher and if I had to use multiple control groups for movement (though I do so for attacking), it would definitely be higher. | ||
|
Kambo_Rambo
Australia79 Posts
which is a starcraft 2 parser+analyser. So far it graphs/looks at apm, hotkeys and build order. | ||
|
ejac
United States1195 Posts
sc2 - 140 (after multiplier) | ||
|
StarStruck
25339 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + Yeah right. I would like to know how they calculate it too. | ||
|
QuothTheRaven
United States5524 Posts
SC1: ~225 SC2: ~220 in some of the recent games I've checked (is there an easy way to just look at the APM of a game without having to watch the replay to the end?) Edit: This is without doing any multiplication on my end, just looking at the in-game SC2 apm meter. | ||
|
Khenra
Netherlands885 Posts
In SC1, high effective APM is not achieved by just clicking wildly, but by knowing the game so well that you always know where to click within a split second. People are just not that familiar with SC2 yet. I predict that given some time, people will be just as fast in S2 as they are now in SC1. This APM will go to sick multitasking instead of clicking mass gateways. | ||
|
CryGirl1921
Poland78 Posts
SC2: 140 after multipilier its the same  | ||
| ||
