machinehead coaching for free/donations - Page 3
Blogs > machinehead.. |
machinehead..
412 Posts
| ||
lIlIlIlIlIlI
Korea (South)3851 Posts
| ||
machinehead..
412 Posts
I'm new to tl.net, I didn't realize you could ban; if there was a kill option in real life, I would have used that for sure. Can't fit in with a Korean community because you are a noob/annoying as fuck there, so you come here to feel like a big man? Grow the fuck up. | ||
PanN
United States2828 Posts
On January 23 2010 08:26 machinehead.. wrote: I'm new to tl.net, I didn't realize you could ban; if there was a kill option in real life, I would have used that for sure. Damn, you hard. | ||
machinehead..
412 Posts
Not as hard as your boyfriends erection at the chance to troll. When you get done sucking him off some more, perhaps you could think about making your first post on tl.net with any substance. In other words, get someone else to post for you. Thanks. | ||
HeavOnEarth
United States7087 Posts
.. typical TL bandwagon imo | ||
Nevuk
United States16280 Posts
On January 22 2010 23:02 CTStalker wrote: emp defilers? seriously? it takes like 3-4 seconds to consume two zerglings to throw up a swarm. you're wayyyy better off irradiating On July 19 2009 16:28 IdrA wrote: situations where emp is more useful are not rare at all, whenever you're going 2-3 port and they arent doing a ridiculously good job of killing vessels its well worth it to get emp. theres so many times when that extra 2 seconds consume takes is the difference between having a swarm up in your natural or not, or killing their expo or not. how many times do you see a 3 group mm army charging an expo to have 2 lurkers under a last second swarm hold them off until reinforcements are there? with emp thats a dead expo. | ||
sassy
240 Posts
On January 23 2010 14:15 HeavOnEarth wrote: why are u guys shitting on him? sure he started off on a bad note but i see nothing wrong with this thread .. typical TL bandwagon imo agreed he might tick some people off with his straightforward attitude but at least he says things that i can comprehend and use, some really interesting advice so far whereas people like "random_korean" just not bearable at all. Lmao i would even question that guys sanity, he posts batshit insane walls of retarded text like some 13 year old idiot | ||
machinehead..
412 Posts
I would love to fold Ace King and think nothing of it when out of position, but I feel like I'm breaking some poker commandment and thus will be ridiculed and miss out on money. Any insights on Ace King in general would be appreciated. Also, is it too passive to play QQ as a hand that is basically relying on a set? Ie., you have an overpair to the board; you raise and then you get re-raised, so you fold. If that is standard, is that erroing on the side of caution going to be minus EV? If anyone has insights on those questions and wants help on SC, I can trade some info. | ||
Chrispy
Canada5878 Posts
I think you should get to know him. | ||
machinehead..
412 Posts
89 off suit in a 9 man ring game from first position. Everything about what transpired tilts me and never again will I take another "shot" at anything. Could have at least been suited. I saw someone that had played over a million hands without being able to move up to the next level, or make any money for that matter, so I guess life could be worse. | ||
Wotans_Fire
United Kingdom294 Posts
| ||
machinehead..
412 Posts
On February 03 2010 21:43 Wotans_Fire wrote: No folding AK is pretty bad play! Only fold AK if you are getting raised by an extreme nit... even then I don't know if I could fold. Are you playing 6max or full table? it sounds like you are playing weak tight poker and any decent player will see your low % and will result in no action. You might as well just play short stack since your not playing poker at all. This doesn't mean however that you shouldn't play tight at lower stakes and no you should play QQ aggressively post flop. I prefer playing full table. I play tight-aggressive, I simply respect re-raises until I have a reason not to. And I think ace king is too over-rated to care much about it when out of position. I'd rather play an ace suited hand and have a chance at an unforeseeable 2 pair, or simply a mathematical-based decision on what to do next. Not saying I play ace suited hands out of position when facing a raise, but it would probably be more preferable. Since I don't bluff much, if at all, if a regular re-raises me, I simply can't fathom QQ being better than a marginal decision. Reverse psychology, not at this level, lols. | ||
| ||