|
Oh, a vote on me! Well, my entrance was terrible, I do admit, but I did address why I did not follow up on Onegu (I just voted to see if he was here, apparently not). I also admit that I am not the most active right now, that's just due to real life. Just read my post here, but the TLDR is REAL LIFE limits my weekday activity.
|
On January 07 2017 07:32 B0stonSC wrote:
Okay, so after catching up, I have a few things to respond on.
First, as to why I am not more active, is that I have not a whole lot of time to play mafia during the week, so what I am doing is catching up, responding to everything I feel needs a response, giving my reads, then getting back off. You may flame me for this, but unless it's the weekend this will be how I play. I do have a life you know, but mafia is a lot of fun (which is why I wanted to play it).
As to why I voted Onegu (asked three times, by my count), he has made a claim (with the first post of the game) and then posted a non informative post. That's all he has done. I wanted to see what happens if he gets a bit of pressure on him, but after this amount of time I feel that he is just inactive.
On to my reads, Kmatt feels very much a scummy player to me becuase he is posting quite a bit now, but it doesn't feel like he is accomplishing anything. DarthFoley seems waaaay too defensive, so that seems odd, but I'll keep looking at him so I can get a more solid read. Vivax and MichaelEhrmantraut seem a bit off. Nothing suspicious, but just a bit not quite correct to me. This is more of a gut read than anything else, so I'll be doing a reread (probably today) for just them to see what's up.
Good timing.
I am dubious of you calling the Onegu vote a pressure vote since you didn't give him anything to respond to nor did you try to convince other people about it.
Assuming you're being truthful, are you considering switching your vote or are you wanting to continue this 'pressure' and why?
I'll await the better reads then. You get points for not rambling on about a bunch of town reads - newb!scum would be more likely to TMI there or just scum-read their partners.
|
On January 07 2017 07:17 Calix wrote:
Given the new content he provided, I decided to read kmatt's posts because he's pretty hard to read and he keeps pinging me because his posts are obviously polished (which isn't AI in this context but I have to keep telling myself that because it bugs me every time he posts) and well different from his other games. His reads in his list were also confusing and weren't transparent at all. But even with that in mind, I think he fared well when he came out of his shell a bit and started interacting more since he seemed to be posting more off-the-cuff/ naturally compared to posting a list and popping off again.
Wait, just realised. So he has that reads list. Why would he say "I'm focusing on one (scum) read, no point making excess calls" or whatever in the same breath that he makes reads on everyone when he could have been doing the focusing on that scum-read? That doesn't mesh together.
But then he also agrees with me that Boston is scummy so I'm not so sure. But he got two of his reads mixed up (I think) so I'm not sure if he means Boston or if he's just not paying attention there. Man he is a mess.
So he's back at null, not because he's done nothing AI but because I don't know whether the scum aspects outweigh the potential town motivations.
SW, what's your take on him? (also goes to anyone else popping in)
I don't know anything about how he usually plays but I do like his follow up answers to your questioning about his reads. He did a good job of explaining them and his thought process seems transparent enough. I would lean town on him.
I also like darthfoley's latest posts and re-reading him I would lean town as well. This is more tone and gut.
Still have ika, Calix, KelsierSC as town as well for previous stated reasons.
Vivax I explained what I don't like. I also don't care for B0stonSC but that's because he is not answering any questions, just posting filler type posts and then leaves, doing nothing to advance the gamestate or scumhunt. ME-same thing. He pops in, gives the minimal answers to ika's questions, then complains things are too confusing and leaves. I consider them both nervous and unsure about themselves and scummier than the other null people as a result.
reps, grack, btdt, Onegu are all null and I'd like them to post more
|
I don't give a fuck about how many times someone posts or if they're inactive. It's what you said and did when you weren't inactive that's scummy.
|
My above post was before B0stonSC's latest post.
|
Oh I'm definately going to switch my vote, I'm just torn as to who. As soon as I can finish my read throughs, I'll post again about my reads. One more note, tommorrow I won't be online until about 2 hours before the deadline. I am sorry about this, but real life takes up a lot of my time.
|
On January 07 2017 06:39 SilverWolf77 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 07 2017 04:56 reps)squishy wrote:On January 06 2017 23:37 SilverWolf77 wrote:On January 06 2017 23:33 Vivax wrote:On January 06 2017 23:32 SilverWolf77 wrote:On January 06 2017 23:10 Vivax wrote:On January 06 2017 23:07 ika42 wrote:On January 06 2017 22:56 Vivax wrote:On January 06 2017 22:28 ika42 wrote:On January 06 2017 15:42 Vivax wrote:
[quote]
But you have seen ikas meta yes? how come you are acting like i am town? How does that question have anything to do with your alignment? On January 06 2017 22:35 darthfoley wrote:On January 06 2017 17:30 Vivax wrote:
[quote]
It's always easy to call out someone for being trolly or not contributive. And I don't see how that applies to him in particular. Even for yourself it's such a weak argument that you call it not a real read.
So I find it unusual that asked whether you saw something worth picking up, you do it over something that you didn't feel strongly about, and for something that is imo NAI (not alignment indicative for who doesn't know) at this stage.
So one possibility is you were simply being casual as town and throwing that out there even though for your play it will have little impact as you don't want to pursue that further. Then again that would mean that your answer to Calix "did you see something worthwhile" still wasn't answered and that you didn't find an avenue for finding scum there.
Or you are scum with the pressure that comes to post something looking useful well knowing that as long as you post something that you don't have to commit to, you're fine. And that post also falls in this category, too.
Now from this ambiguity why do I think that it makes you more likely mafia?
Scum that doesn't have a trolly town meta by default will be under pressure to look useful. Your filter apart from one or two posts seems like you are trying to look useful.
That post isn't something I believe you think to be useful.
Otherwise tell me why you believe it's useful. Achieves something for yourself besides satisfying a request that you would grant only to enhance your standing with the town, which is mafia play. Yea scum try to appear useful. This is why I focused on ika compared to someone like Onegu. Ika started the game with this useful looking questionnaire thing that everyone agrees is NAI for everyone-- but it gets people talking! Since that post it's basically been chummy with KSC and SW. I just feel like everything else in this game could've happened without using the questionnaire, which reminds me of the "appearance of utility" meta point. Do you have any opinion of Grack or Calix atm? Grack no opinion yet, as for calix I just let her do her thing as she's active and keeps delivering her view of the game. Right now I'm mostly waiting for you and Kelsier to post more as your posts are what I'm concentrating the most on at the moment. So do you actually believe you have something on ika or not? That he tried to appear useful with the questionnaire is I think not an argument you mentioned earlier. i asked you a question, i do not expect a question in return. I expect an answer. If you have a question after that then you can ask. Your question already implies that I guessed your alignment, which is wrong, so it can't be answered. On January 06 2017 23:07 SilverWolf77 wrote:On January 06 2017 14:13 Vivax wrote:Is there anyone here who actually didn't play mafia before, or just very very little? On January 06 2017 11:31 darthfoley wrote:On January 06 2017 10:43 Calix wrote:
I sense I'll have an aneurysm at this rate.
DF, you seem sensible. What else have you noticed so far? I actually feel weird about ika. Asked the kinda useless questionnaire and has basically been bs'ing a bit since. Not a real read but I find his opening a little off This read looks forced. I mean, you will say it isn't a read I know, but we both know it kind of is. And to me it just looks like you were looking for someone to make look guilty easily to fulfill Calix demand. Fend yourself, Foley. Vivax-Why are you defending ika so early in the game? Suspecting someone doesn't mean I'm defending his scumreads, which you are assuming I do. When you are interjecting yourself into a person's suspicion of someone else, without letting him scumhunt ika, then that means you think ika is town. Otherwise, you would want ika to respond first to get a read on him. I get going after someone for having what you think is a bad read on someone else, but this is spending too much time defending a person who you have not even given an opinion on yet but are acting like he's town. I would like your read on ika. Is he town or not and why? So right now you're interjecting in my suspicion on foley and hence townreading him? You should have realized by now that it's not how this is going to work. And you should realize by now that your constant deflection and this kind of attitude doesn't work with me at all. I don't see how you can be town so I'm gonna go ahead and place my vote here. You don't see how he can be town? I see you did vote for him. Can you elaborate what makes you feel this way for a more oblivious individual such as myself. I made a few posts after this explaining it more. Here let me get them for you. Show nested quote +On January 07 2017 00:02 SilverWolf77 wrote:On January 06 2017 23:40 Vivax wrote:
I don't have a read on ika so far and I don't need to have one to question darthfoley's read on him. No, you don't have to have a read on ika to say darthfoley's read on him is bad. I agree. The problem I have is the way you are doing it. Basically, ika no longer has to answer the suspicion because you interjected. Not only interjected but also defended ika by asking if darthfoley has his meta and implying that ika's questions are not scummy. You have a right to have an opinion on ika's questioning but the way you are doing it is very protective of ika. If you have no read of ika, this doesn't make much sense. I guess my gut just pinged hard off of that and also I think you interjected when someone was questioning someone else-I think Calix pointed this out already. Anyway, from my experience, scum like to do this because they get towncred for defending people they know are town. It's way too early to have a super strong opinion on someone's alignment, unless you know that alignment. Doesn't mean we can't have reads. We certainly can. But when I would of preferred to see ika answer the suspicion and engage with darth rather than have you interject. Sorry if I'm not explaining myself well. I'm tired and rambling right now. Be back in a little bit. Show nested quote +On January 07 2017 01:12 SilverWolf77 wrote:
No, it isn't that I think darthfoley's suspicion of ika is worth it.
It's more that I saw you defending two people who you don't have a townread on. By saying B0stonSC just does things that way is a defense of him before he can even answer the question directed at him. You asking darth if he has ika's meta looked like a defense of ika.
Also, In response to my suspicion, you deflected or tried to discredit rather than just explaining yourself further.
That said, giving your own opinion of B0stonSC's opening or your own opinion of darth's read on ika as fake is totally valid and not scummy to me at all.
It was a combination of what looked like defending people he didn't have a read on by interjecting and answering for them and also acting like he knew they were town with the way he was talking about them (mentioning ika's meta, B0ston SC's playstyle when he knows nothing about these things) plus deflecting/discrediting of any suspicion. There are a few posts of Vivax's which don't look as bad but I tend to aggressively persue what pings me as scummy because we don't have a lot to go on d1.
@SW
I can see the defense people with out a read being suspicious. Let the player defend themselves, they have their own voice. Defending players without a read looks like they are backing up their scum-mates or trying hard to get town-cred.
@KMatt I still want to hear your stance on Kelsier's logic
On January 07 2017 05:13 reps)squishy wrote:
Kelsier's logic was based on Ika's questionnaire people who responded early would be town. Then I think it was SW said maybe to opposite mafia would want to respond quickly. So Kelsier "perfectly fused the two theories to make the 4th person who respond mafia. Grack just unfortunately posted 4th which Kelsier humorously then voted for him. So do you also believe in the post too early or too late you are possible scum so the in between is where it is at? If you don't believe Kelsier's hypothesis then this statement "I can see why Kelsier wouldn't like him." is not all that true
I am not out to lynch Kelsier, just his lynch vote is not based on any logic or read I would find compelling.
|
On January 07 2017 07:40 SilverWolf77 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 07 2017 07:17 Calix wrote:
Given the new content he provided, I decided to read kmatt's posts because he's pretty hard to read and he keeps pinging me because his posts are obviously polished (which isn't AI in this context but I have to keep telling myself that because it bugs me every time he posts) and well different from his other games. His reads in his list were also confusing and weren't transparent at all. But even with that in mind, I think he fared well when he came out of his shell a bit and started interacting more since he seemed to be posting more off-the-cuff/ naturally compared to posting a list and popping off again.
Wait, just realised. So he has that reads list. Why would he say "I'm focusing on one (scum) read, no point making excess calls" or whatever in the same breath that he makes reads on everyone when he could have been doing the focusing on that scum-read? That doesn't mesh together.
But then he also agrees with me that Boston is scummy so I'm not so sure. But he got two of his reads mixed up (I think) so I'm not sure if he means Boston or if he's just not paying attention there. Man he is a mess.
So he's back at null, not because he's done nothing AI but because I don't know whether the scum aspects outweigh the potential town motivations.
SW, what's your take on him? (also goes to anyone else popping in) I don't know anything about how he usually plays but I do like his follow up answers to your questioning about his reads. He did a good job of explaining them and his thought process seems transparent enough. I would lean town on him. I also like darthfoley's latest posts and re-reading him I would lean town as well. This is more tone and gut. Still have ika, Calix, KelsierSC as town as well for previous stated reasons. Vivax I explained what I don't like. I also don't care for B0stonSC but that's because he is not answering any questions, just posting filler type posts and then leaves, doing nothing to advance the gamestate or scumhunt. ME-same thing. He pops in, gives the minimal answers to ika's questions, then complains things are too confusing and leaves. I consider them both nervous and unsure about themselves and scummier than the other null people as a result. reps, grack, btdt, Onegu are all null and I'd like them to post more
I don't have a lot of strong reads because I only really started to filter-dive now but this is where I'm at:
Town-lean: SW, DF, ika
Null: BTDT (hasn't posted), kmatt (see previous posts), Onegu (done nothing AI)
Need to read: Grack (don't remember anything he's posted), reps (I remember thinking that he's one of the least-worst newbs), KSC (need to reread/ evaluate)
Scum-lean: Vivax (poor reactions to SW/ ika/ Vivax debacle + discrepancy with reads vs actions around them), Boston (bad entrance + detached from thread + Onegu vote), ME (bad entrance, then popped in later to do nothing. Not as sure here though)
|
I think Vivax's posts have been really townie.
Of the active players I think that DF is the most likely one to be scum.
Parts of his opening seem awkward to me like he is trying too hard.
On January 06 2017 10:04 darthfoley wrote:
Salutations friends! May the odds be ever in our favor because we have such wonderful mods!
On January 06 2017 10:19 darthfoley wrote:Show nested quote +On January 06 2017 10:16 KelsierSC wrote:On January 06 2017 10:13 Calix wrote:On January 06 2017 10:11 KelsierSC wrote:On January 06 2017 10:10 Calix wrote:On January 06 2017 10:07 KelsierSC wrote:On January 06 2017 10:02 Calix wrote:On January 06 2017 10:01 KelsierSC wrote:On January 06 2017 09:53 Calix wrote:On January 06 2017 09:37 MichaelEhrmantraut wrote:
Checking In.
[quote]
1. no
2. back in the day
3. no
4. ?
5. ?
6. nope
obligatory qeustion : why the vote ?
I'm flagging up this post because I think it's a possible example of an inexperienced scum player struggling to enter the thread. I didn't even notice this dude had posted. - Using an easy way of entering the thread (via questionnaire thing) to make a post which doesn't tell us anything - Adds a completely useless question about the vote (the 'obligatory' part pings me here) - Does nothing afterwards he was one of the first questionnaire responses though , want to look at all the late answers who thought they had best fill one out so they didnt stick out. It was the first one that stuck out to me as awkward/ forced. However I'm interested in your take on 'blendy' answers. well im not making a ground breaking finding but mafia generally try to blend in and make non commital or mimic posts right so they might have thought answering a list of questions which everyone else was doing is a good idea. probably not relevant here as the questionnaire was hardly insightful and i dont want to start a circle jerk with, well you posted 5th so you are scum. the whole exercise got me some good reads so not entirely pointless and now the the game is moving. Nothing is going to be ground-breaking at this point so that qualifier (from DF too in the post above) is 100% unnecessary. I didn't approach the questionnaires like that. The VCA-style "X voter/ poster is scum" thing is useless as a metric. What "good" reads do you have? yo just calm down alright My emotional state is irrelevant to the question. You claim to have reads, I'm asking for them. What's the point of saying "I have reads" and then be stubborn about sharing them? so what I did is I checked the order in which people responded to the questionnaire and the first ones to respond are clear town until we get to the people who were like 4th and onwards who are likely scum. 100% accurate So what does that mean in terms of practicality? Name, give the me wretched name! Obligatory + Show Spoiler +
I also think that Vivax may have a point that he could have been trying to push out a read on ika to impress since he said that he didn't like ika making trolly posts and then proceeded to make a few of his own.
On January 06 2017 15:11 darthfoley wrote:Show nested quote +On January 06 2017 10:52 Calix wrote:
I am too tired to bang my head against the wall since it's 2am.
I won't be very active until late afternoon/ evening or so but that doesn't matter. My low-activity play is ten times better than most people's normal play.
Goodnight! Great excuse for OMGUS (omg u suck) later on if you're scum!
On January 06 2017 15:13 darthfoley wrote:Show nested quote +On January 06 2017 11:16 Grackaroni wrote:On January 06 2017 10:04 darthfoley wrote:
Salutations friends! May the odds be ever in our favor because we have such wonderful mods! This isn't a bastard game silly. You should have offered favors in the pregame like I did. Favors, you say? $5 for an hj $10 for a bj $15 for a zj
|
Where does DF say that he doesn't like ika making troll posts? I found him saying "ika's play is more trolly than I prefer" which isn't the same thing.
I don't consider troll openings to be AI on this site, sadly, so I'm not sure I follow on your first point. Is it the exclamation marks that rub you the wrong way or something?
|
On January 07 2017 08:08 Calix wrote:
Where does DF say that he doesn't like ika making troll posts? I found him saying "ika's play is more trolly than I prefer" which isn't the same thing.
I don't consider troll openings to be AI on this site, sadly, so I'm not sure I follow on your first point. Is it the exclamation marks that rub you the wrong way or something?
Perhaps. It just doesn't feel like natural posting to me.
|
On January 07 2017 07:58 Grackaroni wrote:I think Vivax's posts have been really townie. Of the active players I think that DF is the most likely one to be scum. Parts of his opening seem awkward to me like he is trying too hard. Show nested quote +On January 06 2017 10:04 darthfoley wrote:
Salutations friends! May the odds be ever in our favor because we have such wonderful mods! Show nested quote +On January 06 2017 10:19 darthfoley wrote:On January 06 2017 10:16 KelsierSC wrote:On January 06 2017 10:13 Calix wrote:On January 06 2017 10:11 KelsierSC wrote:On January 06 2017 10:10 Calix wrote:On January 06 2017 10:07 KelsierSC wrote:On January 06 2017 10:02 Calix wrote:On January 06 2017 10:01 KelsierSC wrote:On January 06 2017 09:53 Calix wrote:
[quote]
I'm flagging up this post because I think it's a possible example of an inexperienced scum player struggling to enter the thread. I didn't even notice this dude had posted.
- Using an easy way of entering the thread (via questionnaire thing) to make a post which doesn't tell us anything
- Adds a completely useless question about the vote (the 'obligatory' part pings me here)
- Does nothing afterwards he was one of the first questionnaire responses though , want to look at all the late answers who thought they had best fill one out so they didnt stick out. It was the first one that stuck out to me as awkward/ forced. However I'm interested in your take on 'blendy' answers. well im not making a ground breaking finding but mafia generally try to blend in and make non commital or mimic posts right so they might have thought answering a list of questions which everyone else was doing is a good idea. probably not relevant here as the questionnaire was hardly insightful and i dont want to start a circle jerk with, well you posted 5th so you are scum. the whole exercise got me some good reads so not entirely pointless and now the the game is moving. Nothing is going to be ground-breaking at this point so that qualifier (from DF too in the post above) is 100% unnecessary. I didn't approach the questionnaires like that. The VCA-style "X voter/ poster is scum" thing is useless as a metric. What "good" reads do you have? yo just calm down alright My emotional state is irrelevant to the question. You claim to have reads, I'm asking for them. What's the point of saying "I have reads" and then be stubborn about sharing them? so what I did is I checked the order in which people responded to the questionnaire and the first ones to respond are clear town until we get to the people who were like 4th and onwards who are likely scum. 100% accurate So what does that mean in terms of practicality? Name, give the me wretched name! Obligatory + Show Spoiler +https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cC_jddH_0MI I also think that Vivax may have a point that he could have been trying to push out a read on ika to impress since he said that he didn't like ika making trolly posts and then proceeded to make a few of his own. Show nested quote +On January 06 2017 15:11 darthfoley wrote:On January 06 2017 10:52 Calix wrote:
I am too tired to bang my head against the wall since it's 2am.
I won't be very active until late afternoon/ evening or so but that doesn't matter. My low-activity play is ten times better than most people's normal play.
Goodnight! Great excuse for OMGUS (omg u suck) later on if you're scum! Show nested quote +On January 06 2017 15:13 darthfoley wrote:On January 06 2017 11:16 Grackaroni wrote:On January 06 2017 10:04 darthfoley wrote:
Salutations friends! May the odds be ever in our favor because we have such wonderful mods! This isn't a bastard game silly. You should have offered favors in the pregame like I did. Favors, you say? $5 for an hj $10 for a bj $15 for a zj
My response about the OMGUS Calix post wasn't trolling or supposed to be humorous. I don't like when people preface low activity early on especially by saying "I'm better than you even if I barely play."
|
On January 07 2017 08:09 Grackaroni wrote:Show nested quote +On January 07 2017 08:08 Calix wrote:
Where does DF say that he doesn't like ika making troll posts? I found him saying "ika's play is more trolly than I prefer" which isn't the same thing.
I don't consider troll openings to be AI on this site, sadly, so I'm not sure I follow on your first point. Is it the exclamation marks that rub you the wrong way or something? Perhaps. It just doesn't feel like natural posting to me.
Not everyone will enjoy a good Barty Crouch Jr. reference. I accept this.
You mentioned town reads of Kelsier/Ika earlier. Have those evolved? And what do you make of Kmatt's second entrance/follow up?
|
On January 07 2017 08:17 darthfoley wrote:Show nested quote +On January 07 2017 08:09 Grackaroni wrote:On January 07 2017 08:08 Calix wrote:
Where does DF say that he doesn't like ika making troll posts? I found him saying "ika's play is more trolly than I prefer" which isn't the same thing.
I don't consider troll openings to be AI on this site, sadly, so I'm not sure I follow on your first point. Is it the exclamation marks that rub you the wrong way or something? Perhaps. It just doesn't feel like natural posting to me. Not everyone will enjoy a good Barty Crouch Jr. reference. I accept this. You mentioned town reads of Kelsier/Ika earlier. Have those evolved? And what do you make of Kmatt's second entrance/follow up?
I don't think Kelsier has been around since then. I like his tone a lot. Kmatt seems fine to me. His reads post doesn't look great but that's pretty much to be expected when all of the reads are still really shallow.
I'd be more curious on watching how Ika and SW read each other since they have an idea of each other's normal play. Right now I assume they're both town. Definitely not a day 1 lynch at the very least.
|
On January 07 2017 07:28 Calix wrote:
Boston is just in his own little world, detached from the thread and floating by without a single fuck given for all the other stuff going on. His entrance was terrible and his follow-up just reinforces my read. He is too hung up on a player who hasn't DONE anything and is relatively inactive with no reason given and doesn't talk about anything else. Furthermore, he's not actually following through on his Onegu read or vote with anything substantial or trying to convince people or caring much. He's just there.
If we're going for someone low-activity then this is the most likely to hit scum atm.
##vote B0stonSC
I thought you agreed with my point that B0ston's entrance, albeit awkward, was more likely to come from town!newb than scum!newb?
I don't understand why this post is super uber aggressive when nothing really had changed.
I know you said you're waiting on his reads but I disagree with your conclusion that he's most likely scum out of the low activity posters. Why not make the same argument against Onegu, for example?
|
On January 07 2017 08:25 Grackaroni wrote:Show nested quote +On January 07 2017 08:17 darthfoley wrote:On January 07 2017 08:09 Grackaroni wrote:On January 07 2017 08:08 Calix wrote:
Where does DF say that he doesn't like ika making troll posts? I found him saying "ika's play is more trolly than I prefer" which isn't the same thing.
I don't consider troll openings to be AI on this site, sadly, so I'm not sure I follow on your first point. Is it the exclamation marks that rub you the wrong way or something? Perhaps. It just doesn't feel like natural posting to me. Not everyone will enjoy a good Barty Crouch Jr. reference. I accept this. You mentioned town reads of Kelsier/Ika earlier. Have those evolved? And what do you make of Kmatt's second entrance/follow up? I don't think Kelsier has been around since then. I like his tone a lot. Kmatt seems fine to me. His reads post doesn't look great but that's pretty much to be expected when all of the reads are still really shallow. I'd be more curious on watching how Ika and SW read each other since they have an idea of each other's normal play. Right now I assume they're both town. Definitely not a day 1 lynch at the very least.
Yea neither Ika or SW should be a D1 lynch atm.
still so many question marks on squishy ME onegu and btdt sigh
|
@Calix Like do you really expect every player who goes AFK for a period of time to provide a reason why? If so, I can wait for the impending doom for btdt and Onegu lol
|
On January 07 2017 08:26 darthfoley wrote:Show nested quote +On January 07 2017 07:28 Calix wrote:
Boston is just in his own little world, detached from the thread and floating by without a single fuck given for all the other stuff going on. His entrance was terrible and his follow-up just reinforces my read. He is too hung up on a player who hasn't DONE anything and is relatively inactive with no reason given and doesn't talk about anything else. Furthermore, he's not actually following through on his Onegu read or vote with anything substantial or trying to convince people or caring much. He's just there.
If we're going for someone low-activity then this is the most likely to hit scum atm.
##vote B0stonSC I thought you agreed with my point that B0ston's entrance, albeit awkward, was more likely to come from town!newb than scum!newb? I don't understand why this post is super uber aggressive when nothing really had changed. I know you said you're waiting on his reads but I disagree with your conclusion that he's most likely scum out of the low activity posters. Why not make the same argument against Onegu, for example?
I did but that reasoning isn't strong enough to excuse the rest of my case.
I read Boston's filter just before making that post and realised how awful it is.
Onegu has not done anything AI at all. Claiming a role at the start of the game means nothing.
|
On January 07 2017 08:31 darthfoley wrote:
@Calix Like do you really expect every player who goes AFK for a period of time to provide a reason why? If so, I can wait for the impending doom for btdt and Onegu lol
I don't know what you're referring to here since I explicitly said that I didn't care about AFKing on its own.
Who exactly do you want lynched if not Boston or what have you?
|
Vote Count
Grackaroni (1) : KelsierSC
KelsierSC (1) : ika42
Vivax (1) : SilverWolf77
B0stonSC (1) : Calix
Not voting (9) : B0stonSC, beentheredonethat, darthfoley, Grackaroni, Kmatt, MichaelEhrmantraut, Onegu, reps)squishy, Vivax
Currently, Grackaroni is set to be lynched!
The day phase will end at Sunday, Jan 08 12:00am GMT (GMT+00:00), about 24+ hours from this post.
remain as you are reading this.
Remember, voting is mandatory! Place your votes in the voting thread.
If you see any vote out of place, let us know!
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
