|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On September 11 2016 03:08 Skynx wrote: Man p34 is way too long but I'm kinda liking Gracks defence.
HF you seem to be pretty convinced both Grack n TT are mafia which one are we lynching today? And what about the other one if todays lynch flips town?
Catch up next time.
|
Damdred, who would you lynch if not TT?
|
You are again avoiding answering the initial questions and trying to call me terrible for the truth is laughable to say the least
|
On September 11 2016 03:22 Grackaroni wrote: Damdred, who would you lynch if not TT?
Shape log (trademark pending)
|
On September 11 2016 03:16 Calix wrote:Show nested quote +On September 11 2016 03:13 Damdred wrote: Why would scum defend scum when that scum isn't trying? Why would scum not hop onto,the tt wagon and solidify it when he's a easy lynch and no,real reprocussions? Both questions are wifom but both have to be answered for your position calix If both questions are WIFOM then how am I supposed to answer them exactly...? We don't KNOW what the scum are thinking. I am just going to the simplest conclusion of "TT is town and the scum are allowing him to get MLed" My theory only assumes that TT is town and the scum are not trying to defend him. Any other theories assume he is scum and that scum are using WIFOM in their strategies.
Back to scum-reading Calix.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On September 11 2016 03:10 Calix wrote:Show nested quote +On September 11 2016 03:07 Holyflare wrote: Calix you're either mafia or you don't know when you're wifoming.
Mafia can do anything they want at any point in the game and you don't know our meta. If anyone was throwing suspicions away from tt for no valid reason it would be you.
Tt has three votes, tt has not come back to post, people ARE defending tt etc etc.
Stop talking around people's posts and what THEY have done and talking about wifom scenarios it's bad play regardless of your alignment.
You should pick a person to mafia read and post why they are mafia for reasons rhey have done. I know I am town. Why would I say "oh yeah I am defending TT so he must be mafia being defended"? No, I don't know the meta. That doesn't make my point invalid. What are you even arguing here, that since nobody is defending him that he is still scum that the scum aren't trying to defend? Otherwise what is your point with WIFOM? No idea what you are even calling me out for here with 'talking around posts'.
If you are defending him and are town then it goes to say that your entire point about mafia should be defending him if he's mafia is irrelevant because town can also defend him.
Wifom seems to be the entirety of your argument for not voting a scummy guy.
Everyone should look at my logic and say if it's right and sheep it because tt is mafia or wrong and he's not and PROVE why.
Also vivax why have you let damdred be there saying tt's mafia meta is to afk when you just saw him afk as town?
|
On September 11 2016 03:22 Damdred wrote: You are again avoiding answering the initial questions and trying to call me terrible for the truth is laughable to say the least
I answered your questions. Make better ones next time that don't require abstract answers.
Your attempt at painting my response as evasive has been noted.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
This Calix person is as dumb as two planks.
"why should i answer your wifom questions, here is my wifom! "
|
You did not answer either of my questions you just threw your previous theory in and discounted,Ted both by saying yours is the easiest.
Which btw is avoiding my questions you can try to play word games all you want but refusing to see or talk about any other possibility than what you believe is bad and pig headed.
|
On September 11 2016 03:24 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On September 11 2016 03:10 Calix wrote:On September 11 2016 03:07 Holyflare wrote: Calix you're either mafia or you don't know when you're wifoming.
Mafia can do anything they want at any point in the game and you don't know our meta. If anyone was throwing suspicions away from tt for no valid reason it would be you.
Tt has three votes, tt has not come back to post, people ARE defending tt etc etc.
Stop talking around people's posts and what THEY have done and talking about wifom scenarios it's bad play regardless of your alignment.
You should pick a person to mafia read and post why they are mafia for reasons rhey have done. I know I am town. Why would I say "oh yeah I am defending TT so he must be mafia being defended"? No, I don't know the meta. That doesn't make my point invalid. What are you even arguing here, that since nobody is defending him that he is still scum that the scum aren't trying to defend? Otherwise what is your point with WIFOM? No idea what you are even calling me out for here with 'talking around posts'. If you are defending him and are town then it goes to say that your entire point about mafia should be defending him if he's mafia is irrelevant because town can also defend him. Wifom seems to be the entirety of your argument for not voting a scummy guy. Everyone should look at my logic and say if it's right and sheep it because tt is mafia or wrong and he's not and PROVE why. Also vivax why have you let damdred be there saying tt's mafia meta is to afk when you just saw him afk as town?
Mafia are not going to stand by and let one of their own die on Day 1. Several people have said "oh I don't find the TT case convincing" so it's not like the case is so airtight that the scum will give up if TT is scum. So the utter lack of scum defending him or pushing for a different train doesn't make sense.
|
On September 11 2016 03:27 Calix wrote:Show nested quote +On September 11 2016 03:24 Holyflare wrote:On September 11 2016 03:10 Calix wrote:On September 11 2016 03:07 Holyflare wrote: Calix you're either mafia or you don't know when you're wifoming.
Mafia can do anything they want at any point in the game and you don't know our meta. If anyone was throwing suspicions away from tt for no valid reason it would be you.
Tt has three votes, tt has not come back to post, people ARE defending tt etc etc.
Stop talking around people's posts and what THEY have done and talking about wifom scenarios it's bad play regardless of your alignment.
You should pick a person to mafia read and post why they are mafia for reasons rhey have done. I know I am town. Why would I say "oh yeah I am defending TT so he must be mafia being defended"? No, I don't know the meta. That doesn't make my point invalid. What are you even arguing here, that since nobody is defending him that he is still scum that the scum aren't trying to defend? Otherwise what is your point with WIFOM? No idea what you are even calling me out for here with 'talking around posts'. If you are defending him and are town then it goes to say that your entire point about mafia should be defending him if he's mafia is irrelevant because town can also defend him. Wifom seems to be the entirety of your argument for not voting a scummy guy. Everyone should look at my logic and say if it's right and sheep it because tt is mafia or wrong and he's not and PROVE why. Also vivax why have you let damdred be there saying tt's mafia meta is to afk when you just saw him afk as town? Mafia are not going to stand by and let one of their own die on Day 1. Several people have said "oh I don't find the TT case convincing" so it's not like the case is so airtight that the scum will give up if TT is scum. So the utter lack of scum defending him or pushing for a different train doesn't make sense.
Mafia stand by and let there own die all the time,
Like I said why would scum defend scum when the scum in question isn't even doing anything?
The answer is simple,they won't and will see what the thread does.
|
On September 11 2016 03:27 Damdred wrote: You did not answer either of my questions you just threw your previous theory in and discounted,Ted both by saying yours is the easiest.
Which btw is avoiding my questions you can try to play word games all you want but refusing to see or talk about any other possibility than what you believe is bad and pig headed.
That isn't avoiding your questions. I have answered by saying that they are WIFOM so answering the specific questions is fruitless.
It does not make sense for scum to let one of their own die on Day 1 because that directly works against their win condition.
The other argument so far is "scum are bussing" (for 'town cred' which is overrated and you hardly get any town cred from lynching a lurker)
|
On September 11 2016 03:30 Damdred wrote:Show nested quote +On September 11 2016 03:27 Calix wrote:On September 11 2016 03:24 Holyflare wrote:On September 11 2016 03:10 Calix wrote:On September 11 2016 03:07 Holyflare wrote: Calix you're either mafia or you don't know when you're wifoming.
Mafia can do anything they want at any point in the game and you don't know our meta. If anyone was throwing suspicions away from tt for no valid reason it would be you.
Tt has three votes, tt has not come back to post, people ARE defending tt etc etc.
Stop talking around people's posts and what THEY have done and talking about wifom scenarios it's bad play regardless of your alignment.
You should pick a person to mafia read and post why they are mafia for reasons rhey have done. I know I am town. Why would I say "oh yeah I am defending TT so he must be mafia being defended"? No, I don't know the meta. That doesn't make my point invalid. What are you even arguing here, that since nobody is defending him that he is still scum that the scum aren't trying to defend? Otherwise what is your point with WIFOM? No idea what you are even calling me out for here with 'talking around posts'. If you are defending him and are town then it goes to say that your entire point about mafia should be defending him if he's mafia is irrelevant because town can also defend him. Wifom seems to be the entirety of your argument for not voting a scummy guy. Everyone should look at my logic and say if it's right and sheep it because tt is mafia or wrong and he's not and PROVE why. Also vivax why have you let damdred be there saying tt's mafia meta is to afk when you just saw him afk as town? Mafia are not going to stand by and let one of their own die on Day 1. Several people have said "oh I don't find the TT case convincing" so it's not like the case is so airtight that the scum will give up if TT is scum. So the utter lack of scum defending him or pushing for a different train doesn't make sense. Mafia stand by and let there own die all the time, Like I said why would scum defend scum when the scum in question isn't even doing anything? The answer is simple,they won't and will see what the thread does.
[citation needed]
Why would scum not try to divert the lynch onto another lurker if that was the case then?
See, I can ask dumb abstract questions about what the scum might hypothetically do too!
|
Calix, what did you get from your filter of HF?
And DDD is right, mafia let their teammates die all the time.
|
So TT is afk. HF sr's TT cuz according to meta TT should defend when pressured. Grack defends TT cuz HF's points is weak. HF sr's Grack cuz of defending an afk. Tumble sr's HF cuz his points are invalid. HF asks everyone to follow him cuz his reads are flawless.
While Shapelog, Super, Palmar are all MIA and posted no content. fuba, calix and NU are fighting eachother for no reason. Damdred and Vivax are kinda in and out.
game is hard.
|
lol HF I've just been reading through that old survivor game where I failed to lynch you for inspiration.
Let the record show that 2 years ago-Grackaroni was a baller.
|
On September 11 2016 03:33 NeverUnlucky wrote: Calix, what did you get from your filter of HF?
And DDD is right, mafia let their teammates die all the time.
Haven't finished reading it yet because the WIFOM discussion is distracting me.
The fact that HF is pushing this dumb idea alongside Damdred is just making me want to vote for him though. Given that I am someone who has not voted for TT/ HF yet, it's possible that the two of them are trying to sway me into voting for TT via the power of convoluted scum tactics.
I just don't see two townies trying to persuade me into voting for TT (why else would they be discussing this?) via abstract hypothetical scenarios.
|
On September 11 2016 03:32 Calix wrote:Show nested quote +On September 11 2016 03:30 Damdred wrote:On September 11 2016 03:27 Calix wrote:On September 11 2016 03:24 Holyflare wrote:On September 11 2016 03:10 Calix wrote:On September 11 2016 03:07 Holyflare wrote: Calix you're either mafia or you don't know when you're wifoming.
Mafia can do anything they want at any point in the game and you don't know our meta. If anyone was throwing suspicions away from tt for no valid reason it would be you.
Tt has three votes, tt has not come back to post, people ARE defending tt etc etc.
Stop talking around people's posts and what THEY have done and talking about wifom scenarios it's bad play regardless of your alignment.
You should pick a person to mafia read and post why they are mafia for reasons rhey have done. I know I am town. Why would I say "oh yeah I am defending TT so he must be mafia being defended"? No, I don't know the meta. That doesn't make my point invalid. What are you even arguing here, that since nobody is defending him that he is still scum that the scum aren't trying to defend? Otherwise what is your point with WIFOM? No idea what you are even calling me out for here with 'talking around posts'. If you are defending him and are town then it goes to say that your entire point about mafia should be defending him if he's mafia is irrelevant because town can also defend him. Wifom seems to be the entirety of your argument for not voting a scummy guy. Everyone should look at my logic and say if it's right and sheep it because tt is mafia or wrong and he's not and PROVE why. Also vivax why have you let damdred be there saying tt's mafia meta is to afk when you just saw him afk as town? Mafia are not going to stand by and let one of their own die on Day 1. Several people have said "oh I don't find the TT case convincing" so it's not like the case is so airtight that the scum will give up if TT is scum. So the utter lack of scum defending him or pushing for a different train doesn't make sense. Mafia stand by and let there own die all the time, Like I said why would scum defend scum when the scum in question isn't even doing anything? The answer is simple,they won't and will see what the thread does. [citation needed] Why would scum not try to divert the lynch onto another lurker if that was the case then? See, I can ask dumb abstract questions about what the scum might hypothetically do too!
Actually this is a good question, the simplest answer is the strongest player in the thread teamed up with the second strongest and scum can't yell over him.
Another thing is hf is bussing his partner in tt.
Or hf is the scum leading a ml.
I sort of think hf is town right now so two and,three I am not considering until I see a flip. Part one is pretty likely and certain players are hard to push against.
Espe rally when tt isn't trying.
|
I can support a Damdred vote too because he's pushing this idea too and he's focusing too much on hypothetical scenarios of scum!TT and debates over actually discussing players.
|
Never lynching me d1, get over it move on
|
|
|
|