|
On January 22 2016 01:24 Rels wrote: GB I really would like to know why you didn't follow Palmar's plan, and what did you mean saying "I followed Palmar's list"
I did see the list, I didn't see the plan. I saw the list, sent the hosts one of the roles in that list, and got to work.
|
I don't even know what the plan is
|
|
Okay Kita time. Well most of his filter so far is planning and setup/roles/number/mechanics stuff. So not too impressed. That being said a lot of his suggestions made kinda sense to me, so I am not sure why you are scumreading him for that. If I go ahead and say that all the setup/roles/number/mechanics stuff ared NAI his filter is not the most exciting, but TBH we have tons of ppl with a bad/empty/unexciting filters so far, so I'd prefer to lynch someone who didn't give a flower during the organization phase.
So then there was this vivax thing.
On January 20 2016 03:36 kitaman27 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 20 2016 03:15 Palmar wrote:On January 20 2016 00:55 Vivax wrote: Picking 1 1, obviously a lie.
Obviously the truth.
Pretty much sums up why this shitty number claiming strat won't do jack. Vivax is mafia. Not simply because he refuses to cooperate but because he refuses to cooperate AND that is everything he brings to the table. Vivax was the first person that I picked out as mafia too. Shows up to complain about something, but doesn't do anything about it. Agreeing on a scum read on a dude, after he has asked him a question and the answer was not great doesn't look wrong to me. The wording with the "first" may be a bit off, but I am not seeing how this makes kita like slamdunk scum.
Maybe I missed something in his filter or Palmar's point cause tired as flower, but I don't think we should lynch kita based of these things. Like slightest townlean when compared to the dudes and dudettes who didn't even care about that organization part. Also:+ Show Spoiler +
|
On January 22 2016 01:48 Superbia wrote: What's your role GB?
Why?
|
On January 22 2016 02:05 GlowingBear wrote:Why?
Didn't have it remembered. Flowey = you?
|
Wait no. You never claimed. Why? Why do you think. I don't think your role is important because all strong town roles have been taken. You are not target for kp or rb or whatever. I want to know whether you check-picked someone and if not, what you picked.
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On January 22 2016 01:43 Keirathi wrote: @kita:
If you're so sure that Palmar is scum (which seems like your strongest read except maybe Vivax?), why aren't you trying to convince people to vote for him? Or Vivax for that matter? Or anyone, really?
I already answered that. Afraid I can't take a day off to play mafia
On January 21 2016 23:56 kitaman27 wrote: When I'm not so busy at work, I'll take a closer look at the peeps on my mafia list and outline why I think those are the baddies.
|
Kita do you still think Palmar is scum?
|
On January 22 2016 02:07 Superbia wrote: Wait no. You never claimed. Why? Why do you think. I don't think your role is important because all strong town roles have been taken. You are not target for kp or rb or whatever. I want to know whether you check-picked someone and if not, what you picked.
Fair enough. I won't claim the role I've got, but I'll claim the role I chose.
I chose professor moriarty for a couple of reasons. The first one was because as I'm not fully engaged in the thread I shouldn't pick dreamflower because I'll probably fail shooting a Mafia. Second one was that if I'm inactive and can't have accurate reads on my own, I'd rather rely on mechanics and know who Sherlock is checking and work with him. Third one was because I thought Mafia could get the role and if I didn't get it, it was because someone got moriarty. And that's the case. Moriarty is actually a strong role for a Mafia player because he knows who Sherlock is checking and can check an opposite faction and make Sherlock lead a lynch on the guy.
|
And you didn't get moriarity right?
|
Like this is important, because if you did get moriarty FF is scum.
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On January 22 2016 02:15 Superbia wrote: Kita do you still think Palmar is scum?
I've asked three or four times now for a response while being ignored, which probably points to yes. Out reads are pretty close though, so maybe I'm focusing too much on the single "undermined my plan" post from him. If he is town, he will probably be dead soon anyways so ideally it gets fixed by itself, but there is a high percentage chance that I alignment check him tonight.
|
Well, someone has moriarity cause I got his sanity (or lack thereof).
|
On January 22 2016 02:19 Superbia wrote: And you didn't get moriarity right?
I didn't
|
Hmm, I thought Fecalfeast was taking moriarty?
On January 21 2016 08:56 Fecalfeast wrote: So we're clear, I'm still moriarty and everyone is ok with that?
On January 21 2016 08:56 ObiWanShinobi wrote:Show nested quote +On January 21 2016 08:56 Fecalfeast wrote: So we're clear, I'm still moriarty and everyone is ok with that? Yes.
On January 21 2016 09:20 disformation wrote:It appears to be that Mr. Holmes judgment has been become clouded due to increased stress during the previous days. + Show Spoiler +Should I reveal my medical notes on Professor Moriarty as, well?
On January 21 2016 09:25 Fecalfeast wrote: Aw but I wanna know if I'm crazy
See, this is why claiming is important. Now we know that one of you is lying.
|
On January 22 2016 02:22 disformation wrote: Well, someone has moriarity cause I got his sanity (or lack thereof).
No, you get sanity from both regardless whether they are in the game.
|
Oh, you didn't get moriarty. Nevermind I'm dumb.
|
On January 22 2016 02:22 GlowingBear wrote:I didn't
Keir? Maybe wait for the answer? :S
|
On January 22 2016 02:24 Superbia wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2016 02:22 GlowingBear wrote:On January 22 2016 02:19 Superbia wrote: And you didn't get moriarity right? I didn't Keir? Maybe wait for the answer? :S Yea yea, I read his first post wrong as him saying he got moriarty, not that he chose it but got osmething else.
|
|
|
|