|
On September 16 2015 17:56 Rels wrote:Show nested quote +On September 16 2015 17:55 raynpelikoneet wrote:On September 16 2015 17:54 Rels wrote:On September 16 2015 17:45 raynpelikoneet wrote: we should 100% lynch Damdred. ##DeadlineVote Damdred Is activity the only reaon for your vote ? I saw your meta read earlier that was basically "inactive Damdred == mafia". Again: 1 - meta =X 2 - he had this level of activity the first few days in Newbie XI, and he was also a role in that game yes. and the way he posts. being a role here doesn't mean shit regarding activity because everyone is a role and Damdred has played this before. Do you know if Damdred's meta read of Shining is fake ? no i don't. his reads here however are super non-detailed in comparison to his towngames. like the only read that makes sense for him to do as he does it is on Shining and i believe that is crap anyways because Shining looks really really townie.
|
On September 16 2015 17:52 Rels wrote: TT, rayn: what is your read of FF ?
I'm leaning town on FF. His earlier assessment of Damdred made a lot of sense to me, plus the way he interacted with Vivax seemed townie to me. He's still somewhat null but I see some similarities to what I saw him so as town in both Personality and Cannons.
Actually speaking of Vivax, where has he run off to?
|
On September 16 2015 17:56 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On September 16 2015 06:09 Fecalfeast wrote: I said I don't like tictock and damdred rayn, I won't provide reads I don't have and my scumread right now are shaky at best
I'd lynch a damdred that asks for mayor and then fucks off ezpz this post. mm OK I think the problem I have is that he posts a few lines with reads or questions like that every few hours then disappears and the Damdred thing is repeating what Shining said, unless it was posted before. Let me check. Yeah Shining's post was before this one
|
James is another candidate for mafia imo. I think he is not thinking the game properly. Like the post about LS and people's reads on him (mainly my and geript's) shows that he is not processing the information properly.
|
On September 16 2015 17:58 Tictock wrote: Actually speaking of Vivax, where has he run off to? Like these kinda posts make me think this guy is mafia. What is the point?
|
On September 15 2015 15:13 Tictock wrote: And does it seems like maybe rayn didn't have a reason to scumread LS then just agreed with your read?
And this.
|
On September 16 2015 18:00 raynpelikoneet wrote: James is another candidate for mafia imo. I think he is not thinking the game properly. Like the post about LS and people's reads on him (mainly my and geript's) shows that he is not processing the information properly. I agree his analysis of the LS' push is bad. But think about his point of view: he wasn't here when people started suspecting LS' first posts. He saw LS' genuine posts and lots of people pushing LS. Outside of this and his TT's read, I agreed with all of this post. And even what I didn't agree with was super logical
|
On September 16 2015 18:02 Rels wrote:Show nested quote +On September 16 2015 18:00 raynpelikoneet wrote: James is another candidate for mafia imo. I think he is not thinking the game properly. Like the post about LS and people's reads on him (mainly my and geript's) shows that he is not processing the information properly. I agree his analysis of the LS' push is bad. But think about his point of view: he wasn't here when people started suspecting LS' first posts. He saw LS' genuine posts and lots of people pushing LS. Outside of this and his TT's read, I agreed with all of this post. And even what I didn't agree with was super logical I mean, that's why you were scumreading HTS yesterday; you didn't agree with what she said, even though it was logical.
|
On September 16 2015 18:01 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On September 16 2015 17:58 Tictock wrote: Actually speaking of Vivax, where has he run off to? Like these kinda posts make me think this guy is mafia. What is the point? meh. That's exactly for posts like that he was lynched in personality. Because sometimes he will question his confirmed townies, even if it doesn't make sense. I know I scumread him for a night in the obs QT for that; but that also shows he's re evaluating constantly.
|
Rayn I'm not playing to please you.
I post what I think.
Writing that post reminded me that Vivax has been pretty absent since after he claimed. So I mentioned him.
Maybe talking about him will bring him back and get him playing. Who knows.
|
On September 16 2015 17:11 Tictock wrote:What makes you so sure? dunno how good his meta shit is (but geript disagreed so it's probably solid) but he knows about the shine, which is more than i can say about anybody else this game.
|
On September 16 2015 18:02 Rels wrote:Show nested quote +On September 16 2015 18:00 raynpelikoneet wrote: James is another candidate for mafia imo. I think he is not thinking the game properly. Like the post about LS and people's reads on him (mainly my and geript's) shows that he is not processing the information properly. I agree his analysis of the LS' push is bad. But think about his point of view: he wasn't here when people started suspecting LS' first posts. He saw LS' genuine posts and lots of people pushing LS. Outside of this and his TT's read, I agreed with all of this post. And even what I didn't agree with was super logical
On September 16 2015 18:03 Rels wrote:Show nested quote +On September 16 2015 18:02 Rels wrote:On September 16 2015 18:00 raynpelikoneet wrote: James is another candidate for mafia imo. I think he is not thinking the game properly. Like the post about LS and people's reads on him (mainly my and geript's) shows that he is not processing the information properly. I agree his analysis of the LS' push is bad. But think about his point of view: he wasn't here when people started suspecting LS' first posts. He saw LS' genuine posts and lots of people pushing LS. Outside of this and his TT's read, I agreed with all of this post. And even what I didn't agree with was super logical I mean, that's why you were scumreading HTS yesterday; you didn't agree with what she said, even though it was logical. I generally think people who do not think things through properly before posting are mafia. I understand regarding James and HtS what you say could be the case here, but on the other hand it's really easy to come in when you are mafia and just trash on people on their read when the dude they were scumreading starts to look town (regarding to James and LS here). At the time me and geript were scumreading LS the read was really logical and made the most sense in the game (yes it really did). Both of them didn't even go into the reasons - they just said something i find out to be nonsense, especially considering LS is likely to be town here. It's easy to defend a townie when you are scum, and in neither of these cases (James & HtS) there was no reason to post what they did.
Regarding TT. The second post i quoted jsut a while ago; I have a really hard time believing that is what the dude actually believes could be true. He has played with me, he knows how i do present my reads. I don't lay out everything at the start because it pushes out reactions. I have NEVER made a read, not explain it, and then NOT have reasons behind the read. Every single person who has ever played with me knows that. Like the dude has seen me make posts like this:
On July 24 2015 22:35 raynpelikoneet wrote: Barakos i would like you to elaborate onto your read on Barakos. ...and then he somehow believes it could be true i didn't have reasoning behind my read on LS at the start of the game. It is just bullshit.
|
On September 16 2015 18:10 Dandel Ion wrote:Show nested quote +On September 16 2015 17:11 Tictock wrote:On September 16 2015 08:45 Dandel Ion wrote: damdred is town What makes you so sure? dunno how good his meta shit is ( but geript disagreed so it's probably solid) but he knows about the shine, which is more than i can say about anybody else this game.
Ok you made me smile D1.
I wont join Rels in Policy lynching you.
Sorry Rels, this is how i read the trolls.
|
not even trolling tho absolutely 100% no idea why ppl keep saying that
|
On September 16 2015 18:12 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On September 16 2015 18:02 Rels wrote:On September 16 2015 18:00 raynpelikoneet wrote: James is another candidate for mafia imo. I think he is not thinking the game properly. Like the post about LS and people's reads on him (mainly my and geript's) shows that he is not processing the information properly. I agree his analysis of the LS' push is bad. But think about his point of view: he wasn't here when people started suspecting LS' first posts. He saw LS' genuine posts and lots of people pushing LS. Outside of this and his TT's read, I agreed with all of this post. And even what I didn't agree with was super logical Show nested quote +On September 16 2015 18:03 Rels wrote:On September 16 2015 18:02 Rels wrote:On September 16 2015 18:00 raynpelikoneet wrote: James is another candidate for mafia imo. I think he is not thinking the game properly. Like the post about LS and people's reads on him (mainly my and geript's) shows that he is not processing the information properly. I agree his analysis of the LS' push is bad. But think about his point of view: he wasn't here when people started suspecting LS' first posts. He saw LS' genuine posts and lots of people pushing LS. Outside of this and his TT's read, I agreed with all of this post. And even what I didn't agree with was super logical I mean, that's why you were scumreading HTS yesterday; you didn't agree with what she said, even though it was logical. I generally think people who do not think things through properly before posting are mafia. I understand regarding James and HtS what you say could be the case here, but on the other hand it's really easy to come in when you are mafia and just trash on people on their read when the dude they were scumreading starts to look town (regarding to James and LS here). At the time me and geript were scumreading LS the read was really logical and made the most sense in the game (yes it really did). Both of them didn't even go into the reasons - they just said something i find out to be nonsense, especially considering LS is likely to be town here. It's easy to defend a townie when you are scum, and in neither of these cases (James & HtS) there was no reason to post what they did. Regarding TT. The second post i quoted jsut a while ago; I have a really hard time believing that is what the dude actually believes could be true. He has played with me, he knows how i do present my reads. I don't lay out everything at the start because it pushes out reactions. I have NEVER made a read, not explain it, and then NOT have reasons behind the read. Every single person who has ever played with me knows that. Like the dude has seen me make posts like this: Show nested quote +On July 24 2015 22:35 raynpelikoneet wrote: Barakos i would like you to elaborate onto your read on Barakos. ...and then he somehow believes it could be true i didn't have reasoning behind my read on LS at the start of the game. It is just bullshit. YOU had good reasons to scumread LS. But you didn't tell them right away. geript's reason was a supposedly fake meta read on LS. I understand both HTS and fidei for finding LS' push weak when geript's reason was weird:
On September 15 2015 10:46 geript wrote:Show nested quote +On September 15 2015 07:20 LightningStrike wrote: So rayn since you want the martyr to claim do you see any benefit of them not claiming at all? When he's town he'll still follow the leader, but he'll generally over talk about a random reason he's thought against it. A less than LS question. And I understand TT's post about you when you agreed with this weird meta:
On September 15 2015 10:51 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On September 15 2015 10:46 geript wrote:On September 15 2015 07:20 LightningStrike wrote: So rayn since you want the martyr to claim do you see any benefit of them not claiming at all? When he's town he'll still follow the leader, but he'll generally over talk about a random reason he's thought against it. A less than LS question. okay then we have the same reason
|
On September 16 2015 18:14 Tictock wrote:Show nested quote +On September 16 2015 18:10 Dandel Ion wrote:On September 16 2015 17:11 Tictock wrote:On September 16 2015 08:45 Dandel Ion wrote: damdred is town What makes you so sure? dunno how good his meta shit is ( but geript disagreed so it's probably solid) but he knows about the shine, which is more than i can say about anybody else this game. Ok you made me smile D1. I wont join Rels in Policy lynching you. Sorry Rels, this is how i read the trolls. I don't care if he's trolling or not. And it made me laugh too (= But actively lurking and poping out every few hours is scum indicative, and that's why I'm voting him
|
On September 16 2015 18:19 Rels wrote:Show nested quote +On September 16 2015 18:12 raynpelikoneet wrote:On September 16 2015 18:02 Rels wrote:On September 16 2015 18:00 raynpelikoneet wrote: James is another candidate for mafia imo. I think he is not thinking the game properly. Like the post about LS and people's reads on him (mainly my and geript's) shows that he is not processing the information properly. I agree his analysis of the LS' push is bad. But think about his point of view: he wasn't here when people started suspecting LS' first posts. He saw LS' genuine posts and lots of people pushing LS. Outside of this and his TT's read, I agreed with all of this post. And even what I didn't agree with was super logical On September 16 2015 18:03 Rels wrote:On September 16 2015 18:02 Rels wrote:On September 16 2015 18:00 raynpelikoneet wrote: James is another candidate for mafia imo. I think he is not thinking the game properly. Like the post about LS and people's reads on him (mainly my and geript's) shows that he is not processing the information properly. I agree his analysis of the LS' push is bad. But think about his point of view: he wasn't here when people started suspecting LS' first posts. He saw LS' genuine posts and lots of people pushing LS. Outside of this and his TT's read, I agreed with all of this post. And even what I didn't agree with was super logical I mean, that's why you were scumreading HTS yesterday; you didn't agree with what she said, even though it was logical. I generally think people who do not think things through properly before posting are mafia. I understand regarding James and HtS what you say could be the case here, but on the other hand it's really easy to come in when you are mafia and just trash on people on their read when the dude they were scumreading starts to look town (regarding to James and LS here). At the time me and geript were scumreading LS the read was really logical and made the most sense in the game (yes it really did). Both of them didn't even go into the reasons - they just said something i find out to be nonsense, especially considering LS is likely to be town here. It's easy to defend a townie when you are scum, and in neither of these cases (James & HtS) there was no reason to post what they did. Regarding TT. The second post i quoted jsut a while ago; I have a really hard time believing that is what the dude actually believes could be true. He has played with me, he knows how i do present my reads. I don't lay out everything at the start because it pushes out reactions. I have NEVER made a read, not explain it, and then NOT have reasons behind the read. Every single person who has ever played with me knows that. Like the dude has seen me make posts like this: On July 24 2015 22:35 raynpelikoneet wrote: Barakos i would like you to elaborate onto your read on Barakos. ...and then he somehow believes it could be true i didn't have reasoning behind my read on LS at the start of the game. It is just bullshit. YOU had good reasons to scumread LS. But you didn't tell them right away. geript's reason was a supposedly fake meta read on LS. I understand both HTS and fidei for finding LS' push weak when geript's reason was weird: Show nested quote +On September 15 2015 10:46 geript wrote:On September 15 2015 07:20 LightningStrike wrote: So rayn since you want the martyr to claim do you see any benefit of them not claiming at all? When he's town he'll still follow the leader, but he'll generally over talk about a random reason he's thought against it. A less than LS question. And I understand TT's post about you when you agreed with this weird meta: Show nested quote +On September 15 2015 10:51 raynpelikoneet wrote:On September 15 2015 10:46 geript wrote:On September 15 2015 07:20 LightningStrike wrote: So rayn since you want the martyr to claim do you see any benefit of them not claiming at all? When he's town he'll still follow the leader, but he'll generally over talk about a random reason he's thought against it. A less than LS question. okay then we have the same reason Now about this whole situation: I'm waiting for LS to answer my question about how geript's meta read is fabricated to push it further. It won't happen until he wakes up I suppose.
|
On September 16 2015 18:12 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Regarding TT. The second post i quoted jsut a while ago; I have a really hard time believing that is what the dude actually believes could be true. He has played with me, he knows how i do present my reads. I don't lay out everything at the start because it pushes out reactions. I have NEVER made a read, not explain it, and then NOT have reasons behind the read. Every single person who has ever played with me knows that. Like the dude has seen me make posts like this:
So that quote you are talking about here Rayn?
I was literally talking about the bolded.
As I was reading through the game I saw this interaction
On September 15 2015 09:29 geript wrote: ##deadline vote Lightning strike Rayn I can't hold being in character, but do you know why?
On September 15 2015 10:44 raynpelikoneet wrote: not really, no.
On September 15 2015 10:46 geript wrote:Show nested quote +On September 15 2015 07:20 LightningStrike wrote: So rayn since you want the martyr to claim do you see any benefit of them not claiming at all? When he's town he'll still follow the leader, but he'll generally over talk about a random reason he's thought against it. A less than LS question.
On September 15 2015 10:51 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On September 15 2015 10:46 geript wrote:On September 15 2015 07:20 LightningStrike wrote: So rayn since you want the martyr to claim do you see any benefit of them not claiming at all? When he's town he'll still follow the leader, but he'll generally over talk about a random reason he's thought against it. A less than LS question. okay then we have the same reason
You had thrown out a couple posts about LS in between there as well, but I would have expected you to be more clear about your reasons. I'd also sorta expect you to respond to geript's question by stating your reason first.
So it kinda looked like you were giving a read, not explaining, then agreeing with geripts read.
|
On September 16 2015 18:18 Dandel Ion wrote: not even trolling tho absolutely 100% no idea why ppl keep saying that
How would you describe your posting then?
|
|
|
|
|