GOM switches free quality of GSL back to low - Page 2
Forum Index > SC2 General |
duyhotan2000
Vietnam39 Posts
| ||
Shuffleblade
Sweden1903 Posts
On June 10 2015 15:58 doihy wrote: Why are people disappointed in GSL for doing this? If viewership wasn't so low they wouldn't have to do this. And the reason viewership is so low because of blizzard's design. If anything it is blizzards fault for making GSL do this. Sometimes it feels that people who watch GSL only watch because they are fan of Starcraft- not as an esport. But if you took away the starcraft name and look at the gameplay itself even less viewers would be watching. If its viewership they want lowering the free stream quality is the stupidest thing they can do. Pretty sure they want money not viewership. Yeah totally agree that Blizzard has intentionally designed Sc2 so that few people would want to watch it. Also approve that most people only watch because of the starcraft name, if call of duty was named starcraft I'm sure everyone would watch that instead without noticing a difference. Clever guy | ||
Scribble (anonyme)
France1 Post
| ||
digmouse
China6323 Posts
| ||
NInoff
Bulgaria1105 Posts
| ||
Pontius Pirate
United States1557 Posts
| ||
Noocta
France12578 Posts
| ||
nkr
Sweden5451 Posts
| ||
showstealer1829
Australia3123 Posts
| ||
ZigguratOfUr
Iraq16955 Posts
| ||
loft
United States344 Posts
Other games stream HQ for free. For pete's sake! | ||
nkr
Sweden5451 Posts
On June 10 2015 16:13 ZigguratOfUr wrote: I don't see how they can possibly think that'll help their profits in any significant capacity. Considering they've had a period with free medium and one without, I'm sure they're sitting on the facts here. Not us. | ||
str10_hurts
Netherlands12 Posts
Lets be honest, the GSL is by far the best SC2 show out there. (and probably the most expensive to produce) Yes other shows have good stuff, but really the GSL is were it is. | ||
SetGuitarsToKill
Canada28396 Posts
On June 10 2015 16:15 str10_hurts wrote: I am ok with that. When I was a student I watched it on low. I got free entertainment! Now that I work I pay for the stream, I save money by not investing in crap programmes on tv. Lets be honest, the GSL is by far the best SC2 show out there. Yes other shows have good stuff, but really the GSL is were it is. I prefer Proleague, GSL has 2 casters who wish they were casting other games and is equal in game quality to S2SL, so there's really no reason to watch anymore is there? | ||
ThunderBum
Australia192 Posts
I think it is disappointing that butchering the experience is their way of encouraging people to subscribe to them. And even then, you have to pay even more if you want the best quality.. As if it's somehow significantly more costly for them if I use the source quality stream from the twitch server? | ||
NEEDZMOAR
Sweden1277 Posts
On June 10 2015 16:15 str10_hurts wrote: I am ok with that. When I was a student I watched it on low. I got free entertainment! Now that I work I pay for the stream, I save money by not investing in crap programmes on tv. Lets be honest, the GSL is by far the best SC2 show out there. (and probably the most expensive to produce) Yes other shows have good stuff, but really the GSL is were it is. the casting is really bad compared to proleague though and this shitting on foreigner fans thing is getting really annoying really quickly. | ||
Cricketer12
United States13948 Posts
| ||
Topdoller
United Kingdom3860 Posts
| ||
ZigguratOfUr
Iraq16955 Posts
On June 10 2015 16:14 nkr wrote: Considering they've had a period with free medium and one without, I'm sure they're sitting on the facts here. Not us. You mean the fact that having an English GSL stream isn't profitable to GOM with or without medium free? | ||
gkts
Germany56 Posts
| ||
| ||