That's how champions sleep, gloriously.
Greatest Players of All Time: Part 2 - Page 22
Forum Index > SC2 General |
The_Masked_Shrimp
425 Posts
That's how champions sleep, gloriously. | ||
nimdil
Poland3746 Posts
On April 20 2015 08:17 PartyBiscuit wrote: I'd have sacked Leenock at 15 for Stephano or Polt, if either of those two make Top 5 it seems extremely soft. The Top 4 is already clear that it's going to include Taeja/MC/Life/Mvp I don't think any of TaeJa's championships counts as "Tier 1" by Stuchiu's standards - so it's possible that TaeJa won't be in top 5. | ||
Dodgin
Canada39254 Posts
On April 20 2015 08:23 nimdil wrote: I don't think any of TaeJa's championships counts as "Tier 1" by Stuchiu's standards - so it's possible that TaeJa won't be in top 5. He's in the picture though, picture clue too strong. | ||
nimdil
Poland3746 Posts
On April 20 2015 08:25 Dodgin wrote: He's in the picture though, picture clue too strong. True. | ||
FrostedMiniWheats
United States30730 Posts
On April 20 2015 08:23 nimdil wrote: I don't think any of TaeJa's championships counts as "Tier 1" by Stuchiu's standards - so it's possible that TaeJa won't be in top 5. Sure they do based on what he's counted so far from other players. both ro4 code S appearances 2013 WCS Season 2 finals 3-4th 2013 DH Bucharest 1st 2013 DH Winter 1st 2014 Blizzcon 3-4th 2014 IEM Shenzhen 1st 2014 IEM World Championship 3-4th 2014 DH Winter 3rd should all be tier-1. Especially since Rain's ro8-only, 4-day Hotsix cup is somehow a tier-1 event. | ||
BisuDagger
Bisutopia19141 Posts
| ||
BongChambers
Canada591 Posts
Yo man I just had to quote that cause that was some fantastic fucking writing there man, legit felt pumped after reading that A+ Fantastic work and can't wait for part 3 | ||
fezvez
France3021 Posts
On April 20 2015 08:47 BisuDagger wrote: How can anyone argue against Polt after seeing his wiki page and realizing how good he has been for so long. Either this is a list made on peak performance or overall results. So far it has been the latter. Peak performances can't be as easily analyzed because patch player have really high peaks such as Puma before 1 1 1 patch. Polt's wiki page is ridiculous, the only one bigger is Taeja's, but it contains even less Korean tournaments. | ||
egernya
Canada352 Posts
| ||
stuchiu
Fiddler's Green42661 Posts
On April 20 2015 09:00 BongChambers wrote: "The easy choice would have been to move on. Nearing the age of 30, Nestea was already 5 years past the usual time when Korean BW players had given up the mouse. Players who had done more, who had shown more potential than him, had long given up. They told him he was too old, too slow, and his time was up. The smart choice would have been to move on, to let go. No one would have blamed him; in fact no one would have noticed. The only one who would have blamed Nestea was Nestea. And that was all it took and Nestea, completely incapable of giving up his dream, would take on the challenge one last time and the world would be his witness." Yo man I just had to quote that cause that was some fantastic fucking writing there man, legit felt pumped after reading that A+ Fantastic work and can't wait for part 3 Ir hurts that my morals wouldn't let me rig the PR to put him higher :[ | ||
lichter
1001 YEARS KESPAJAIL22272 Posts
| ||
Cricketer12
United States13949 Posts
On April 20 2015 11:48 lichter wrote: if it were up to me and stu then yugioh would be in this The wording of this leaves me feeling I am going to be very disappointed come part 3 | ||
JJH777
United States4373 Posts
On April 20 2015 11:47 stuchiu wrote: Ir hurts that my morals wouldn't let me rig the PR to put him higher :[ You could have justified it by pointing out that he ran into MVP 6 times in 2011 or he would most likely have another big tournament win. Plus Gainward could have been considered a high tier event. It was almost all played offline (top 32+ was offline) and for the time it was played it had pretty much all the good players. Only big omission was MC. Though Nestea's bracket in it was pretty easy. | ||
sharkie
Austria18272 Posts
This ranking becomes more and more random(not in a negative way!) and I am looking forward to stuchiu's initial ranking (prior his research!)! | ||
lichter
1001 YEARS KESPAJAIL22272 Posts
| ||
sharkie
Austria18272 Posts
On April 20 2015 16:21 lichter wrote: i don't agree with most of the rankings but this is about as far from random as possible. stu put at least 10x more research into this than any armchair analyst that has posted here or on reddit. Of course he put tons of research in it and I value his work of this rankings greatly. Random may be the wrong word and as I said I really don't mean it negatively! I don't know what word I need to describe it so I just put random in there. Please don't see it in a negative light, I've loved his readings so far. | ||
lichter
1001 YEARS KESPAJAIL22272 Posts
| ||
Circumstance
United States11403 Posts
On April 20 2015 16:36 lichter wrote: it's probably more like 'unexpected', since i was also surprised at how some of the tournaments ended up weighing with each other It's one of those instances where you truly have to consider the difference between a player's successes on paper and their importance in the context of the history of the game, and decide what's important in the end. Like that ranking that showed HongUn in the Top 15 earlier - he's a footnote at most in SC2 history. | ||
munch
Mute City2363 Posts
| ||
FaultyReDD
25 Posts
4. mc 3. polt 2. life 1. teaja EZ | ||
| ||