Yo get some fuckign patience please dude. You don't need to act like a total troll/nub just because you aren't used to long days. Stop voting not giving a shit who you vote for and play the game non shittily.
GSL Open Mini Mafia IV - Page 47
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
VIVAX420
556 Posts
Yo get some fuckign patience please dude. You don't need to act like a total troll/nub just because you aren't used to long days. Stop voting not giving a shit who you vote for and play the game non shittily. | ||
roundabound
Niue881 Posts
Hi Bum ! Whats the best way to do this you say? Make a meaningless fluff post about the threads last posts in order of time stamps, most recent @ top. 8 page filter On February 16 2014 21:44 roundabound wrote: + Show Spoiler + On February 13 2014 03:07 Blazinghand wrote: Day 1 Its almost 4 days since day1 started. just lynch someone already. ~moc 6 page filter On February 16 2014 20:52 VIVAX420 wrote: + Show Spoiler + Moc, why did you want to lynch Shiao again? 4 page filter On February 16 2014 19:50 thrawn2112 wrote: + Show Spoiler + kush can you explain the shiaopi meta stuff from earlier 6 page filter On February 16 2014 19:38 IAmRobik wrote: + Show Spoiler + On February 16 2014 19:15 VIVAX420 wrote: gumshoe actually looks pretty town from that megapost. -extended reasoning tryring to understand mocsta's scumclaim. -his reads have good reasons behind them no no no no no no no disagree with every single letter and symbol that you made in that post, down to the 2 "-"s Instead of basing his reads on what has happened so far, he just uses "roundabound is scum" to create reads on every other player. WTF? That's not town. That's mafia jumping on something and building fake reads based off of incorrect information. 2 page filter On February 16 2014 18:59 sidesprang wrote: + Show Spoiler + I dont see why this makes bum scum, please elaborate. 2 page filter - subbed in On February 16 2014 18:53 bumatlarge wrote: + Show Spoiler + Regardless of how this ends, it's going to end up with you looking like a jackass and an idiot. Good night. 1 page filter - late bloomer On February 16 2014 17:33 gumshoe wrote: + Show Spoiler + On February 16 2014 17:26 VIVAX420 wrote: it feels like he's fake claiming scum. If he's doing that, then I'm sicing geript after him. 1 page filter On February 14 2014 16:54 Mordanis wrote: + Show Spoiler + On February 14 2014 13:34 VIVAX420 wrote: thrawn timeline: lurk scumstyle start tryharding because vivax caught him continue to lurk when the pressure goes down As per my last post, could someone who knows thrawn let me know if this isa reasonable case or not? 2 page filter On February 16 2014 15:43 Mattchew wrote: yeah is this a joke? 4 page filter On February 16 2014 11:12 Grackaroni wrote: + Show Spoiler + On February 16 2014 11:04 bumatlarge wrote: ONLY I GET TO HAMMER. ME. NOT YOU. We should join forces for a more surprising hammer/ 1 page filter On February 16 2014 01:55 ShiaoPi wrote: + Show Spoiler + if you guys really lynch me based on this stuff you are terrible :D nobody even cares about my reads so looks like to you sillys d1 lynch is already decided. Why should I care about writing stuff out if you ignore it anyway. btw vivax gets moar scum points for rolefishing 2 page filter On February 15 2014 04:34 JarJarDrinks wrote: + Show Spoiler + Vivax, it really seems like you're trying to get me to move my vote off of Grack and onto Shiao. All I said about Shiao was I'd be fine lynching a lurker. What do you think of grack? 1 page filter On February 14 2014 04:42 QuantumPope wrote: + Show Spoiler + On February 13 2014 23:23 IAmRobik wrote: I think I've played less than a handful of games with QP. Only one memorable games where he mislynched me at f3 when both of us were town. I don't remember any other games that we've played. I wouldn't say that I'm able to read him well. In fact, if not for some stuff I picked up from his first post, I would not be clearing him and would say he's about as null a read as any others in here that I've never played with. I just got to work (in 8 inches of snow). No one is here, so I'm gonna take the opportunity to reread d1 so far. Ugh never forget lol. On [February 13 2014 11:57 roundabound wrote: @QP There is a knowledge triangle between yourself, Mattchew and IAR. Substantiated by: Note their opinions of you: Did you expect both of these players to "town read" you with so little analysis? Further, Mattchew is my achilles heel. What is the secret to reading him? ~moc I could see that little banter I had with Mattchew is something we both like doing. It could be looked at as town but strange to me that he would trust me so willingly after a few posts. As for IAmRobik I feel that he is able to read me pretty well. I've been pretty lackluster in this thread but it's better to have an early read on me than no read at all. Now to our thrilling conclusion. On February 14 2014 01:32 Mattchew wrote: rayn, my town read on QP was hastey and unwarrented. I do not have a read on him currently Almost as hasty and unwarranted as this post. I find it strange that both of them early on give "town reads" on me and then suddenly retract when absolutely no information was added other than my silence. Really strange reactions from both of them. No conclusions cos im a baller like that ~moc | ||
VIVAX420
556 Posts
| ||
VIVAX420
556 Posts
I'm not so sure, though. I think scum wouldn't be so cavalier in believing a claim they knew was a troll. On February 16 2014 17:20 gumshoe wrote: + Show Spoiler + Haro! So I've pretty much blitzed through the thread, but obviously the most recent event eclipses everything that came before it so I've reconfigured most of my reads in light of it. The only reason I can see Moc quitting like he has is if he feels like his scum team has completely failed him, which he straight up acknowledges in the case of Rayn. Gives me the sense that most of his scum team are incompetent and already under pressure. I also dont think hed reveal like this if there were one or two members of his team on at his time of confession, which would be a bit of a dick move, this tentatively clears Grack( who I had pinged as null) thrawn(his posting aggravates me a smidge just like in the last serius game we played, so probs town) and bum, all of whom had decent thread presence and posted within a couple hours of mocstas confession. Bum I especially consider townie because of how seemingly sincere hes been in his attempts to push discussion, case in point this post glows green to my eyes. "It seems like you have a stronger read on Vivax then you do QuantomPope. Can you respond to what he has said. I would appreciate if you two(three?) would hash out what you think of each other. I'm in the same boat with your scum list, but because you don't go into much detail, I can't benefit from what you think!" An attempt at getting a contribution out of a player whose likely to be lynched comes off as a weird scum play, unless that scum player is totally confident that the townie will provide misinformation. Something I dont think a scum bum would count on. Vivax also posted within range of the confession, but even disregarding that I honestly cant believe Mocsta would quit like this if he had Vivax on his team. Same reasoning applies to rob. Which leaves a pool of six within which lies the last two scum. 1:Shiapi: Has done extremely little for town, that much hasnt changed, Round hasnt really said much on him all game long, usually deflecting questions or arguments against him onto someone else, only once he became the clear lynch did Moc/rayn hop on the wagon faithfully. A shiapi scum partner would def fit the bad scum team narrative. 2:Mattchew: Posts a bunch of one liners, mostly comments on others reads, has a relative amount of heat on him, thread presence low to medium. I dont think hes scum with shiapi unless shiao called his mother a goat or something. Although that would explain Mocs exasperation with his team, meh. 3: Quantom Pope: Extremely low content, could definitely see Mocsta getting pissed about being with this guy. 4:Mordanis: His early posts look like they have some actual, albiet befuddled, thought to them but his targets are odd, and bieng reasonable more often than not does not translate to bieng townie. He goes after Rob and Vivax, two relatively green players at the time, strange choices even if you take into account the volatile nature of any games start. Another odd thing is Rounds hard defense of him. "I think Mordanis has about the best posts in thread. Yes they are worded a bit awkwardly and idk what that means. He can answer for himself about that. The "brb gonna go write a wall of text case against everyone" is an obvious joke and everyone should be able to realise it.." at the time Mordanis had done a decent amount of contribution, but it's odd just how far Round sticks his neck out for him, going so far as to call his posts the best thread... Not even sure if Rayn's the kinda player to do that if they were buddies. Could just as well be post flip posturing on a possible lynch target, a motive backed up by Rayns willingness to change his stance on Mord as scum got more desperate for a lynch. Definitely a frustrating scum partner to have, so Mord does fit the terrible scum team theory. 5: Sidesprang: Not much of a contributor, but reads townie to me . Him asking for my replacement seems like a pretty unscummy thing to do, scum would want my slot to stay inactive as long as possible, yet here he is pretty much begging for a real contributor. Also his asking for a townie certificate... Considering the dark green and bloody history of Coag's accursed emblem, seems pretty brazen. Oh and his first vote, although a light hearted one, was on Mocsta... yeah maybe hes scum? Extremely reckless if thats the case, doesn't ultimately read red to me. 6: Jar Jar: least scummy of the bunch, has his own thoughts, pushes his own reads, generally helps town, I can elaborate if anyone likes but if you read through his filter you can see that although sherlock he aint, hes certainly doing more for town than anyone else on this list,(admittedly not saying much.) Thats all for now, if anyone has any questions, I'll answer them tomorrow, it's been a long day, gl and good night town. Oh and regardless of all this, no reason to not vote round. Hurray for free lynch! | ||
VIVAX420
556 Posts
| ||
VIVAX420
556 Posts
1) ShiaoPi (filter) 3) JarJarDrinks (filter) 9) QuantumPope (filter) 10) Mattchew (filter) 12) sidesprang (filter) | ||
JarJarDrinks
United States1302 Posts
Glad to see votes move off ShiaoPi since he doesn't really seem scummy to me. Not crazy about the votes now on Mordanis since I feel the same about him. Can people tell me what they have against lynching Grack? Half his posts are trolling and the few reads he has seem pretty superficial. Right now he's voting for sidespring and here's basically all the reason he's given: On February 14 2014 01:57 Grackaroni wrote: Sheepin' it up. ##Vote: Sidesprang And he's left his vote there conveniently despite the fact that the people he was supposedly 'sheeping' have since changed. He hasn't really given an opinion on anyone this game. | ||
VIVAX420
556 Posts
On February 16 2014 23:05 JarJarDrinks wrote: He hasn't really given an opinion on anyone this game. False. | ||
roundabound
Niue881 Posts
On February 16 2014 22:44 VIVAX420 wrote: mordanis - TOWN He is a super noob. Yes his cases are bad but newb scum would not be able to make those cases. if the cases are bad, why is it beyond a newb scum? You lump and categorise players too hard. Mordanis has a small filter: read 1 page. Lets do a post by post: NOT SPOILERED for your Benefit On February 13 2014 03:31 Mordanis wrote: Red: Noob Card with insult to town thrown in for good measure -> (/sarcasm) cos thats how town likes to correct actions they do not likeIt's been quite a while since I've played, so I was going to say that I seem to remember that the correct action at the beginning of a game is to yell at people and vote for people just for the hell of it, but I see all of this has already been accomplished. Clearly this much shenanigans could only be scum. brb gonna go write a wall of text case against everyone. Blue: First promise of "mega contribution" On February 13 2014 06:28 Mordanis wrote: No conclusion fluffI'm a little confused... Robik, are you really voting for thrawn for posting "hmmm", or is there more behind it? On a side note, I think its looking a bit sketchy that it seems like we already have a vote on thrawn (for "hmm") and vivax building a meta case on him for lurking a few hours into the game, it feels like teamwork or opportunistic scum play... On February 13 2014 06:36 Mordanis wrote: Theory ramble. NullI'm not sure I follow that argument. Is scum inherently lazy in your view, or does actual evidence always support town, rather than scum? I think its certainly possible that scum could find a previous game that could be used to lynch a townie. On February 13 2014 08:30 Mordanis wrote: Second promise of "mega contribution"Rob, you're clearly reading my filter without context. I wrote that after like 5 posts, and it was a joke intended for the couple (I think) of people I've played with before. You see, I had a reputation (especially from my newbie games) of only posting novella-length cases, and basically letting those do all of my talking. On February 13 2014 09:06 Mordanis wrote: Red: He is a self-proclaimed "novella-case" maker, yet is only producing glimmers of thoughts with no concrete substance.I've got to go to class for a while, but before I go, I just wanted to elaborate on my previous feelings. I think the abortive case had some momentum for a second against thrawn is very suspicious. The way Rob voted for Thrawn for lurking, and then !Hey Presto!, vivax comes in showing that thrawn is apparently well known for being lurky as scum, well it all seems very wrong. vivax backed down almost immediately, and Rob stayed the course until thrawn started talking. Now vivax left without any more reads after that. Rob did the *exact* opposite, posting a lot and picking up a read (based on thrawn's thoughts and a joke). Essentially what I'm trying to say here is that the behavior between the two of these definitely warrants more investigation. On vivax I really don't like the way that vivax posted fluff, gave someone else evidence to start a case, and then left it all alone for everyone else to take care of, and then disappeared right afterwards. And then there's this post: vivax goes from one hell of a scum read on thrawn (without really pushing anything) to one hell of a town read on Robik (without telling us why). In short, vivax seems incredibly confident about being right but hasn't really done anything useful aside from helping another player make a case. That seems like as much of a scum mindset as you can get. Bold Red: If this is a proven scum mindset, where is the vote? On February 13 2014 09:16 Mordanis wrote: Ironic fluff; considering he has scum reads with no vote...so rayn, If you're not voting for anyone right now, what are your best scum reads? On February 13 2014 23:53 Mordanis wrote: Offers insight on post phrasing for something insignificant; yet, can't reach vote-worthy conclusions on his own reads.Quite reasonably because "do you talk this much as scum" implies that you meant Rob was a town read. Robik didn't say "I talk a lot as town", but rather "I like forum mafia because I can make a ton of content". On February 13 2014 23:58 Mordanis wrote: Red: Apparently now isn't chasing Robik; but doesnt clear him as town either.....I'm not going after Robik at present. I felt something was off between the two that warranted further investigation, which has led me to believe that vivax is the scummier of the two. Right now, I'm not exactly feeling incredibly rushed to get a lynch in the next few hours, so I'm curious to see the way kush plays vivax. Blue: Not rushed to get a lynch, because waiting for others to do things- -- yet wont produce the mega contributions promised either. On February 14 2014 14:10 Mordanis wrote: Another excuse to not fulfil his own promiseHey, I just got back. If anyone has any questions for me, I'll be reading through for the next while. On February 14 2014 15:28 Mordanis wrote: Red:The case on Vivax is time-stamp conjecture summarised by cherrypicking "STUFF" that isnt even fleshed out for us simpletonsThe more I look at the early game, the worse vivax looks. vivax's meta case on thrawn came 3 hours in. A few minutes later, Robik asks vivax for a game where thrawn is town, and vivax doesn't post for the next ~half hour. then 3 minutes after thrawn explains his little move, there's vivax.[red] To me, this comes across as vivax cherrypicking stuff to try to get a lynch early.[/erd] Hopefully more coming soon! Blue: 3rd promise of more contribution On February 14 2014 16:43 Mordanis wrote: An acceptable point of view. And a solid reason to be unsure of Mordanis alignment. Henceforth I treat this post as null until more flips are given.I thought this was apparent but I guess I have to explain this. The case on thrawn was the first case with anything to it. There were two people behind it, and it seemed like a mostly meta case (as I recall, Robik was much happier with his read after seeing the game vivax linked). The thing is, I don't know thrawn, or really anyone else well enough to make a meta case or even believe one without outside confirmation.So, I did what I can do, and thought about the posts and the order and such, to try to find scum through analysis. I thought (and still do) that, if there is a strong meta case against someone who has played many games on TL, there will be several games that will show this pattern, and multiple people will be able to verify that the meta case is reasonable. Why? Scum know who town is. Say Thrawn is town; its an entirely plausible contribution for scum to make (Against a weak/incorrect Vivax case). This is independant of Vivax alignment. On February 14 2014 16:54 Mordanis wrote: Why does this still matter. The game has progressed further; Vivax and his hydra buddy have made more content than pertains to just thrawn; yet mordanis is fixated here talking abotu absolutely nothing else YET NOT PROBING THEM TO ELUCIDATE MORE INFORMATION.As per my last post, could someone who knows thrawn let me know if this isa reasonable case or not? Vivax, mordanis is scum QED Please lynch, me falling asleep here. | ||
roundabound
Niue881 Posts
On February 16 2014 23:05 JarJarDrinks wrote: Firstly, the post above is mocSorry people, been crazy busy but caught up now. Glad to see votes move off ShiaoPi since he doesn't really seem scummy to me. Not crazy about the votes now on Mordanis since I feel the same about him. + Show Spoiler + Can people tell me what they have against lynching Grack? Half his posts are trolling and the few reads he has seem pretty superficial. Right now he's voting for sidespring and here's basically all the reason he's given: On February 14 2014 01:57 Grackaroni wrote: Sheepin' it up. ##Vote: Sidesprang And he's left his vote there conveniently despite the fact that the people he was supposedly 'sheeping' have since changed. He hasn't really given an opinion on anyone this game. Secondly, I could def swappo you with ShiaoPi for buds with Mordanis and QP ~moc | ||
roundabound
Niue881 Posts
~moc | ||
JarJarDrinks
United States1302 Posts
| ||
roundabound
Niue881 Posts
mordanis is after qp both posted feb14 last ~moc | ||
JarJarDrinks
United States1302 Posts
| ||
sidesprang
Norway1033 Posts
| ||
roundabound
Niue881 Posts
There is no reason to repreatedly try to make those people post, and they can't all be mafia. *sigh* Also i havn't been able to talk with Mocsta for the last 2 days because we're never online at the same time. Just lynch one of those people. They will just continue to say nothing. ~rayn | ||
roundabound
Niue881 Posts
~rayn | ||
VIVAX420
556 Posts
| ||
roundabound
Niue881 Posts
~rayn | ||
VIVAX420
556 Posts
On February 17 2014 00:03 roundabound wrote: wait, did we really have 5 votes on us? rofl ~rayn mocsta did some retarded fake claim while you were gone :\ | ||
| ||