rofl. Are you seriously trying to say you policy voted us for claiming mafia and when Mocsta retracted from the claim you just go "okay yeah doesn't mean anything"?? That's bullshit.

~rayn

sidesprang

Norway1033 Posts

February 16 2014 16:05 GMT

#962

Ok, go check who was the first, and also atm the only one to unvote. And check how many minutes it took for me to unvote.

gumshoe

Canada3602 Posts

February 16 2014 16:11 GMT

#963

Helop again, prior to my" train wreck " post I had a pretty generic catchup one in the works. Didn't have much to contribute in there except for a scum read on Mattchew, Who I feel has played pretty loosely and I still think is likely scum. I consider Mocsta a pretty serious player , so when he scum claims I tend to bilieve it, it was in fact a slow game, and I could easily see him getting fed up with a newb scum team, so I ran away with the idea and provided my own reads based off what I considered a likely fact instead of just repeating what other players have already said( been a slow game) If Mocsta is actually town, he's done something extremely cruel to his other head, especially considering how much work rayns put into the game. That said, if we're intent on not lynching him then I'm just going to ignore mocstas posts going forward, and I'll just consider Rayn as round, because I have no idea what Moc wants out of this game( clearly not to win) and if we're not lynching him then there's nothing to be done about a player whose not playing to his win con. As for side, again I don't read him as scummy, he's so brazenly bad ) : like he's proud of it, I can't justify his behaviour if he's scum, he's doing effectively nothing to upset town or prevent his own lynch.

Rob, any questions for me? Do you think Matt and Shias could be scum together?

gumshoe

Canada3602 Posts

February 16 2014 16:20 GMT

#964

Rayn, can you speak for your lesser half? Do you have any reasonable explanation for why he would claim?

Balla24

2322 Posts

February 16 2014 16:21 GMT

#965

VOTE COUNT:

thrawn2112 (0): ~~IAmRobik~~
VIVAX420 (0): ~~thrawn2112~~, ~~Grackaroni~~, ~~ShiaoPi~~
IAmRobik (0): ~~roundabound~~
DoNotPanic! (0): ~~roundabound~~
Grackaroni (2): IAmRobik, JarJarDrinks
sidesprang (2): ~~roundabound~~, ~~VIVAX420~~, Grackaroni, roundabound
ShiaoPi (1): ~~bumatlarge~~, ~~VIVAX420~~, ~~Mattchew~~, ~~roundabound~~, ~~sidesprang~~, ~~thrawn2112~~, VIVAX420
QuantumPope (2): ShiaoPi, sidesprang
roundabound (3): ~~roundabound~~,~~sidesprang~~, Mattchew, bumatlarge, gumshoe
bumatlarge (1): ~~roundabound~~
Mordanis (1): ~~roundabound~~, thrawn2112,

With 13 players alive it takes 7 votes to lynch. Only votes in the Voting Thread will be counted!

roundabound

Niue881 Posts

February 16 2014 16:23 GMT

#966

On February 17 2014 01:20 gumshoe wrote:
Rayn, can you speak for your lesser half? Do you have any reasonable explanation for why he would claim?

He was bored. What does it matter?

~rayn

Mattchew

United States5684 Posts

February 16 2014 16:23 GMT

#967

rayn i dont think sidesprang is mafia, in past games he is super serious as mafia and this game he seems pretty loose at the beginning willing to troll and joke around.

Also, that was some bullshit mocsta pulled, fucking awful play from either alignment and policy lynching you guys is what I want to do, but is not the way to lynch scum imo, cause i think your town

Gumshoe is interesting, I am trying to refrain from knee-jerk calling him scum

So far the people I am ok with dying are Shiaopi, Mordanis, Thrawn and maybe like Grack/Gum/QP

roundabound

Niue881 Posts

February 16 2014 16:29 GMT

#968

On February 17 2014 01:05 sidesprang wrote:
Ok, go check who was the first, and also atm the only one to unvote. And check how many minutes it took for me to unvote.

You are dodging the issue. It does not matter if you unvoted first or whatever. You unvoted after VIVAX, Rob and thrawn clearly disagreed with the lynch. lol.

You also clearly said "they are claiming mafia as mafia or deserve to be lynched even if they are town because of policy". It's a policy lynch and noone else's opinion should matter.

You are making shit up, you clearly unvoted because other people who look town disagreed with the lynch and in the first place it should not even matter. scum.

~rayn

roundabound

Niue881 Posts

February 16 2014 16:30 GMT

#969

On February 17 2014 01:23 Mattchew wrote:
rayn i dont think sidesprang is mafia, in past games he is super serious as mafia and this game he seems pretty loose at the beginning willing to troll and joke around.

Also, that was some bullshit mocsta pulled, fucking awful play from either alignment and policy lynching you guys is what I want to do, but is not the way to lynch scum imo, cause i think your town

Gumshoe is interesting, I am trying to refrain from knee-jerk calling him scum

So far the people I am ok with dying are Shiaopi, Mordanis, Thrawn and maybe like Grack/Gum/QP

sidesprang's explanations do not line up with his actions. He is mafia.

~rayn

roundabound

Niue881 Posts

February 16 2014 16:34 GMT

#970

So Mattchew in your opinion anyone who does not give a shit about the game and makes bullshit posts is town?

~rayn

roundabound

Niue881 Posts

February 16 2014 16:39 GMT

#971

Actually a serious question Mattchew; Do you even read what people's posts say and do you think why do they say what they do?

~rayn

Mattchew

United States5684 Posts

February 16 2014 16:42 GMT

#972

On February 17 2014 01:39 roundabound wrote:
Actually a serious question Mattchew; Do you even read what people's posts say and do you think why do they say what they do?

~rayn

i have my way of getting reads, you have yours, if you want to insult my reads you better be damn sure yours are correct

roundabound

Niue881 Posts

February 16 2014 16:47 GMT

#973

On February 13 2014 05:40 Mattchew wrote:

Show nested quote +

no fucks given attitude

iamrobik and quantum probably town too

bad reasoning, especially given the player is kush.
unexplained 2 reads.

On February 13 2014 06:27 Mattchew wrote:
Is lynch grack and not look back

unexplained

On February 14 2014 02:17 Mattchew wrote:
I don't think that grack and side are the same alignment

unexplained

On February 15 2014 16:10 Mattchew wrote:
re-read, shiapi best lynch today

sidesprang usually is super serious as mafia, this game he was willing to have funsies so maybe let him live

unexplained ShiaoPi.
bad reasoning for sidesprang, has nothing to do with this game and does not take account his town meta.

All lynchtargets unexplained.
Gumshoe is "interesting". That's not a read.

Now Mattchew, how in your opinion am i supposed to think you are town based on what you have said and how would you say you are doing in explaining why someone is mafia and why should we lynch them?

~rayn

sidesprang

Norway1033 Posts

February 16 2014 16:49 GMT

#974

@Rayn, go check newbie LI. There a guy votes himself, which makes me vote on him for that reason. I also leave the door open for unvoting if he instead will start fighting for himself instead of giving up. I was town.

So why do I have to be mafia for doing something simmilar this game?

roundabound

Niue881 Posts

February 16 2014 16:55 GMT

#975

On February 17 2014 01:49 sidesprang wrote:
@Rayn, go check newbie LI. There a guy votes himself, which makes me vote on him for that reason. I also leave the door open for unvoting if he instead will start fighting for himself instead of giving up. I was town.

So why do I have to be mafia for doing something simmilar this game?

Because your vote is on ShiaoPi before Mocsta's play (1).
Then you vote for us, and give reasoning which implicates you are voting us for policy. You literally say we deserve do die regardless of our alignment (2).
After three players who are amongst the strongest in this game disagree with the lynch you retract from the vote for no reasoning (2).
Then you say you are okay with QP/Mordanis dying and vote for QP (1).

1) Before and after voting for us your mind changes from ShiaoPi -> QP/Mordanis. None of those people have posted in this timeframe. This makes no sense because there is no reason for you to suddenly think QP/Mord are more likely mafia than ShisoPi is because none of those people have posted between when you changed your mind. You give no reasoning for this change of mind. It makes no sense from town perspective.

2) Your reasoning for voting us is in the first place bullshit because you do not even think about the motive behind Mocsta's actions. This means you are voting for us as policy, which in itself is fine. What's not fine is that you retract from the vote when you realize the lynch is not going through (after people disagree). This makes no sense from town perspective because policy lynch is a policy lynch and you keep your vote on the policy lynch if you do it in the first place.

sidesprang

Norway1033 Posts

February 16 2014 17:04 GMT

#976

1) Ok my reasoning is, its been 4 days now, I dont give a shit who gets lynched. I want the day to end, this is boring.

2) Your point here is clearly wrong as I policy vote in another game as town and I leave the option open for removing the vote.

roundabound

Niue881 Posts

February 16 2014 17:26 GMT

#977

Well if you don't give a shit who gets lynched then we lynch you.

~rayn

bumatlarge

United States4567 Posts

February 16 2014 18:07 GMT

#978

Next person to say the word boring needs a foot up their ass. I'll be back in a few hours

Mattchew

United States5684 Posts

February 16 2014 18:16 GMT

#979

On February 17 2014 02:26 roundabound wrote:
Well if you don't give a shit who gets lynched then we lynch you.

~rayn

then lynch me, this game is going no where

thrawn2112

United States6918 Posts

February 16 2014 19:23 GMT

#980

if you want the game to go somewhere then vote for who you want to lynch. you are currently voting for roundabound and you don't want to lynch him so you have no right to complain about anything being boring