EPT~rayn
GSL Open Mini Mafia IV - Page 49
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
roundabound
Niue881 Posts
~rayn | ||
|
sidesprang
Norway1033 Posts
| ||
|
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
Rob, any questions for me? Do you think Matt and Shias could be scum together? | ||
|
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
| ||
|
Balla24
2322 Posts
VOTE COUNT: thrawn2112 (0): VIVAX420 (0): IAmRobik (0): DoNotPanic! (0): Grackaroni (2): IAmRobik, JarJarDrinks sidesprang (2): ShiaoPi (1): QuantumPope (2): ShiaoPi, sidesprang roundabound (3): bumatlarge (1): Mordanis (1): With 13 players alive it takes 7 votes to lynch. Only votes in the Voting Thread will be counted! | ||
|
roundabound
Niue881 Posts
On February 17 2014 01:20 gumshoe wrote: Rayn, can you speak for your lesser half? Do you have any reasonable explanation for why he would claim? He was bored. What does it matter? ~rayn | ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
Also, that was some bullshit mocsta pulled, fucking awful play from either alignment and policy lynching you guys is what I want to do, but is not the way to lynch scum imo, cause i think your town Gumshoe is interesting, I am trying to refrain from knee-jerk calling him scum So far the people I am ok with dying are Shiaopi, Mordanis, Thrawn and maybe like Grack/Gum/QP | ||
|
roundabound
Niue881 Posts
On February 17 2014 01:05 sidesprang wrote: Ok, go check who was the first, and also atm the only one to unvote. And check how many minutes it took for me to unvote. You are dodging the issue. It does not matter if you unvoted first or whatever. You unvoted after VIVAX, Rob and thrawn clearly disagreed with the lynch. lol. You also clearly said "they are claiming mafia as mafia or deserve to be lynched even if they are town because of policy". It's a policy lynch and noone else's opinion should matter. You are making shit up, you clearly unvoted because other people who look town disagreed with the lynch and in the first place it should not even matter. scum. ~rayn | ||
|
roundabound
Niue881 Posts
On February 17 2014 01:23 Mattchew wrote: rayn i dont think sidesprang is mafia, in past games he is super serious as mafia and this game he seems pretty loose at the beginning willing to troll and joke around. Also, that was some bullshit mocsta pulled, fucking awful play from either alignment and policy lynching you guys is what I want to do, but is not the way to lynch scum imo, cause i think your town Gumshoe is interesting, I am trying to refrain from knee-jerk calling him scum So far the people I am ok with dying are Shiaopi, Mordanis, Thrawn and maybe like Grack/Gum/QP sidesprang's explanations do not line up with his actions. He is mafia. ~rayn | ||
|
roundabound
Niue881 Posts
~rayn | ||
|
roundabound
Niue881 Posts
~rayn | ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On February 17 2014 01:39 roundabound wrote: Actually a serious question Mattchew; Do you even read what people's posts say and do you think why do they say what they do? ~rayn i have my way of getting reads, you have yours, if you want to insult my reads you better be damn sure yours are correct | ||
|
roundabound
Niue881 Posts
On February 13 2014 05:40 Mattchew wrote: no fucks given attitude iamrobik and quantum probably town too bad reasoning, especially given the player is kush. unexplained 2 reads. On February 13 2014 06:27 Mattchew wrote: Is lynch grack and not look back unexplained On February 14 2014 02:17 Mattchew wrote: I don't think that grack and side are the same alignment unexplained On February 15 2014 16:10 Mattchew wrote: re-read, shiapi best lynch today sidesprang usually is super serious as mafia, this game he was willing to have funsies so maybe let him live unexplained ShiaoPi. bad reasoning for sidesprang, has nothing to do with this game and does not take account his town meta. On February 17 2014 01:23 Mattchew wrote: rayn i dont think sidesprang is mafia, in past games he is super serious as mafia and this game he seems pretty loose at the beginning willing to troll and joke around. Also, that was some bullshit mocsta pulled, fucking awful play from either alignment and policy lynching you guys is what I want to do, but is not the way to lynch scum imo, cause i think your town Gumshoe is interesting, I am trying to refrain from knee-jerk calling him scum So far the people I am ok with dying are Shiaopi, Mordanis, Thrawn and maybe like Grack/Gum/QP All lynchtargets unexplained. Gumshoe is "interesting". That's not a read. Now Mattchew, how in your opinion am i supposed to think you are town based on what you have said and how would you say you are doing in explaining why someone is mafia and why should we lynch them? ~rayn | ||
|
sidesprang
Norway1033 Posts
So why do I have to be mafia for doing something simmilar this game? | ||
|
roundabound
Niue881 Posts
On February 17 2014 01:49 sidesprang wrote: @Rayn, go check newbie LI. There a guy votes himself, which makes me vote on him for that reason. I also leave the door open for unvoting if he instead will start fighting for himself instead of giving up. I was town. So why do I have to be mafia for doing something simmilar this game? Because your vote is on ShiaoPi before Mocsta's play (1). Then you vote for us, and give reasoning which implicates you are voting us for policy. You literally say we deserve do die regardless of our alignment (2). After three players who are amongst the strongest in this game disagree with the lynch you retract from the vote for no reasoning (2). Then you say you are okay with QP/Mordanis dying and vote for QP (1). 1) Before and after voting for us your mind changes from ShiaoPi -> QP/Mordanis. None of those people have posted in this timeframe. This makes no sense because there is no reason for you to suddenly think QP/Mord are more likely mafia than ShisoPi is because none of those people have posted between when you changed your mind. You give no reasoning for this change of mind. It makes no sense from town perspective. 2) Your reasoning for voting us is in the first place bullshit because you do not even think about the motive behind Mocsta's actions. This means you are voting for us as policy, which in itself is fine. What's not fine is that you retract from the vote when you realize the lynch is not going through (after people disagree). This makes no sense from town perspective because policy lynch is a policy lynch and you keep your vote on the policy lynch if you do it in the first place. | ||
|
sidesprang
Norway1033 Posts
2) Your point here is clearly wrong as I policy vote in another game as town and I leave the option open for removing the vote. | ||
|
roundabound
Niue881 Posts
~rayn | ||
|
bumatlarge
United States4567 Posts
| ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On February 17 2014 02:26 roundabound wrote: Well if you don't give a shit who gets lynched then we lynch you. ~rayn then lynch me, this game is going no where | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
| ||
