Please post this in thread if I die (whoever is around first), if I don't die I'll post it myself.
Sharrant: Maybe reconsider if he lives till d5 or something. Obviously yamato already had a ton of pressure so it's possible that it was a bus.
Oberyn: Yes, there is scum motive in his fakeclaim if the 2nd person on xata turns out to be town jailkeeper. It's however pretty unlikely. Other than that he's totes town yo.
Oatsmaster: Kneejerk responses, natural flow. He's not playing his best but he's shining green all day erryday
iamperfection: I'm going off a year old meta but he reminds me of Mario Mini Mafia. Apparantly also very townie in pms.
raynpelikoneet: Shitting up the thread, convinced in his argument and shouting it non stop? Like deja vu or something (titanic mini)
Xatalos: His exchange with me early d2, trying to figure stuff out. It made me feel he was town. Turns out he apparantly felt the same. Only weird thing was him trying to convince me faking a roleblock is his scum meta, while telling rayn he was dumb for even thinking he might be faking a roleblock + Show Spoiler +On August 12 2013 21:12 Xatalos wrote:Show nested quote +On August 12 2013 21:00 raynpelikoneet wrote:On August 12 2013 20:17 Xatalos wrote:On August 12 2013 19:50 raynpelikoneet wrote: What in Ace´s posts makes him scum?
Back to the drawing board with Oberyn & Onegu i guess. O&O, why do you think the guy who assumably roleblocked Xatalos did not claim? What exactly do you mean with "assumably"? Because Oberyn and Onegu fakeclaimed. Don´t get me wrong, i think it´s likely that you were rb´d/jailed but it´s not sure. I would like to hear what Oberyn and Onegu were trying to achieve by this? Because given 2 roleblock claims it´s reasonable to assume one of them is a jailkeeper. In case mafia roleblocked Clarity (which seems to be the case here) they would know they did not roleblock you. That would give them a good reason to lure out a jailer claim. What would I achieve by fakeclaiming being roleblocked? The only reason I can think of is that game where I was scum and used our RB repeatedly on myself to gain townie points. Do you refer to that? If so, do you think I'm scum? There is really no other sensible reason to fakeclaim being roleblocked that I can think of. So why do you still doubt my claim? Also, do you think Oberyn and Onegu made a public alliance to lure out a jailer? That seems pretty far-fetched to say the least. If he's getting roleblocked all game or we suddenly miss a roleblock without a flip, it'll be time to look more closely to Xatalos.
Dandel Ion: Abrasive, put himself in the spotlight a lot d1. Has slowed down recently though. Only popping in to be quirky and make quick jabs d2. Probably still town, but less certain than I was d1.
Acrofales: Roleplaying aside, his d2 was miles above his day 1. Plus this exchange makes him look really town in my eyes+ Show Spoiler +On August 13 2013 05:06 Acrofales wrote:Show nested quote +On August 13 2013 05:06 Xatalos wrote:On August 13 2013 04:59 Acrofales wrote:On August 13 2013 04:56 Xatalos wrote:On August 13 2013 04:47 Risen wrote: I may not have written it in the case, but that would have simply weakened my case and distracted from it. I felt the interaction between you two was important. That's not very concrete so it didn't make the post.
Something that bothers me is that there wasn't really ever a response to my last case. Just a bunch of that's stupid posts along with he's crazy town now. People are now suspecting DI openly in thread. Why? Why now when you didn't respond to my case before? I don't even.. How can my connection with DI be your ONLY reason for suspecting him when you made a whole case against him without even mentioning me at all? Your thought patterns are so full of holes. The reason why nobody took your post seriously was because it was too bad to consider. There have been people suspecting DI all game for different (bad) reasons. The situation hasn't really changed to any direction. Acro isn't even really suspecting him now I think, just softpushing him in case he gets a chance to vote for him at some point. Oh, I'm suspecting him. There's just no point in jumping the gun and yelling HE'S A BLACKFYRE and waving my arms when there are still a minimum of 80 hours before we can do anything about it. You haven't taken any hard stances at any point though. You've only made weak lists and softpushed a lot of people. When are you going to start pushing things? Hello Pot, I'm Kettle! On August 13 2013 05:14 Acrofales wrote: Not only am I comparing myself to you, but I am claiming that I have been more transparent and have been pushing my scumspects harder than you have, consistently, throughout the game.
In fact, the only one I can be sure of that you suspect of being a Blackfyre is me, and I have felt zero pressure from you. On August 13 2013 05:43 Acrofales wrote:Show nested quote +On August 13 2013 05:21 Xatalos wrote:On August 13 2013 05:14 Acrofales wrote: Not only am I comparing myself to you, but I am claiming that I have been more transparent and have been pushing my scumspects harder than you have, consistently, throughout the game.
In fact, the only one I can be sure of that you suspect of being a Blackfyre is me, and I have felt zero pressure from you. .............. What have you done except throwing slight suspicion at most people in the game? What I have done: - Pressured grackaroni during N0 (for his passive attitude to the vote) - Pushed you for most of the game, ranging from slight suspicion to great suspicion - Pushed Risen starting earlier today - Softpushed several more people (every push can't be a hard push sadly) You haven't pushed me, I can attest to that. At best you are starting now, but your earlier suspicions can be summarized by you every now and then interjecting that you think I'm a Blackfyre, with no reasons or any useful pressure to speak of. I have been ignoring it until now because of the utter lack of conviction behind it and figure it is just the same as in PTP when you had nonsense reasons that just went away during the game. You started "pushing" Risen AFTER Strongandbig's case. I call that bandwagoning. You have not made an original case this entire game. I have no idea whether you pushed Grack or not, because it happened at night, in private missives. As for softpushing, if it was any softer than you pushed me, it must have had an adverse effect. In fact, it probably did, because I can't remember any of it. I remember some of your town reads, but that is it. Your liege seems to think you are a loyalist, and the happenings at night seem to indicate that also, but I find your claims to activity beyond preposterous. Now make that case on me or shut up about it. Doesn't matter that I don't believe it's true. He surely does.
Risen: So.... I really dunno what to make of his day 1, especially his opening post. His case on sharrant had some good points. Doesn't mean I think sharrant is scum but it makes risen more likely to be town. This is only a weak townread though. Hopefully he continues contributing stuff like his sharrant case.
strongandbig: I liked his n0. I liked that he pushed me in thread but then backed off to let me scumhunt and then concluded I'm more likely town. I just don't like any of the other stuff. d3 will determine my read on him. If he stays on course he's totally scum. Time to contribute or die snb...
Vivax: Not a single pm n2. snb actually made a good point to me in pms. He's seemed to jump from read to read with his reasoning being "well the lords won't go for this so I'll look elsewhere", when the town vivax I remember would get mad that his targets aren't getting pushed and yell at people. Doesn't seem involved or interested. His only saving grace is how much he pushed yamato in thread d1 and in pms n1.
S0lstice: Yeah, his d1 was weird and his defense was weird and stuff but that's not what makes him scum. This is + Show Spoiler +On August 13 2013 11:53 s0Lstice wrote:and ps, something that bothers me in particular about Acro is how he treated Oats Show nested quote +On August 09 2013 03:54 Acrofales wrote:On August 09 2013 02:50 Oatsmaster wrote: Ok so im REDACTED in SnB's conversation with clarity.
So events happened like this.
I was talking to clarity, and he told me SnB's rolename out of NOWHERE. Ok. So I asked him for his rolename. And he declined giving reasons like, 'scum can bluesnipe rolenames'. Which sounds like crap to me. But whatever. Eventually, I decided to fakeclaim 1 shot rolename alignment check because he wouldnt tell me his rolename. After I said that, he gave it up willingly. I then came back and pm'ed him that the result was that its a fake role name. Fakeclaim. Which means he is scum. He then said something along the lines of 'ok dude' And nothing else. So that makes me think he is town cause he doesnt have an overt reaction. I dunno. Thoughts guys? Wait what? YOU are Ser Redacted? And when asked if something interested happened in the confines of your house (Winterfell, apparently), you decided to keep this rather controversial situation to the thread, saying that everything was groovy? Explain yourself. Also, whatever gambit that was, it is atrocious. It doesn't sound indicative of Clarity's allegiance at all. It sounds like he gave you his real name and you derped it up, by claiming some nonsense name magic. I don't understand at all how you deduce that he is not a Blackfyre infiltrant from that, unless you were already privy to that information and were just dicking around. While I often find it hard to uncover your motivations for doing things, this seems like a particularly stupid gaff. At first my grievances were with your lord, but it's possible that your entire house is Blackfyre scum? Show nested quote +On August 09 2013 04:07 Acrofales wrote:On August 09 2013 03:59 Clarity_nl wrote:On August 09 2013 03:54 Acrofales wrote:On August 09 2013 02:50 Oatsmaster wrote: Ok so im REDACTED in SnB's conversation with clarity.
So events happened like this.
I was talking to clarity, and he told me SnB's rolename out of NOWHERE. Ok. So I asked him for his rolename. And he declined giving reasons like, 'scum can bluesnipe rolenames'. Which sounds like crap to me. But whatever. Eventually, I decided to fakeclaim 1 shot rolename alignment check because he wouldnt tell me his rolename. After I said that, he gave it up willingly. I then came back and pm'ed him that the result was that its a fake role name. Fakeclaim. Which means he is scum. He then said something along the lines of 'ok dude' And nothing else. So that makes me think he is town cause he doesnt have an overt reaction. I dunno. Thoughts guys? Wait what? YOU are Ser Redacted? And when asked if something interested happened in the confines of your house (Winterfell, apparently), you decided to keep this rather controversial situation to the thread, saying that everything was groovy? Explain yourself. Also, whatever gambit that was, it is atrocious. It doesn't sound indicative of Clarity's allegiance at all. It sounds like he gave you his real name and you derped it up, by claiming some nonsense name magic. I don't understand at all how you deduce that he is not a Blackfyre infiltrant from that, unless you were already privy to that information and were just dicking around. While I often find it hard to uncover your motivations for doing things, this seems like a particularly stupid gaff. At first my grievances were with your lord, but it's possible that your entire house is Blackfyre scum? Yes because obviously with that exchange between me and oats, the possibility that we're both scum somehow still remains? But yeah, whether I am town or scum I'd have reacted the same way, most likely. That said, do you think Oats as scum pushes me really hard for my rolename (he underemphasized this, it was like 5 pms each of him asking me rolename and me asking "why?") and then when I refuse to give it he makes up a role like that? Seems a bit farfetched for scum just to "dick around" Where do I say you're both Blackfyre pretenders? The exchange between you and Oats seems like intentional bad play by Oats, and his subsequent behaviour in this public hall has been to intentionally obscure information that would have been far more relevant at the time than his derpfest bickering with Yamato. Why would a loyal citizen intentionally derail the discussion, rather than presenting an interesting topic for discussion? I exaggerated with the "whole house" bit, but I have some serious suspicions of Oatsmaster and Strongandbig. His message here is pretty clear. Serious suspicion of Oats. He later qualifies this by saying that no in fact Oats is not scum, he just wanted to see more. Show nested quote +On August 09 2013 22:03 Acrofales wrote:On August 09 2013 14:50 Oatsmaster wrote:On August 09 2013 14:44 FirmTofu wrote:On August 09 2013 14:40 Oatsmaster wrote: Acro's first post felt way more constructed. Like not even close to being natural cause he was Roleplaying. So I dont think its alignment indicative. So you think the fact that it was more constructed makes it non-alignment indicative? Wouldn't scum be more worried about the content of their posts than town? Why would constructed flavor not be alignment indicative? Because both scum and town have to construct a roleplaying post. Its not natural either way so therefore the fact that its constructed is not alignment indicative. The content on the other hand, may be. I dunno. In case my earlier discourse was unclear, Ser Oatsmaster has clearly traveled in the Reach and caught onto my way of speaking immediately. Regarding the content: the young Tofu seems to think that I was afraid of calling Ser Oatsmaster a Blackfyre. Rest assured that if I had thought that, I would have called him a Blackfyre then and there. At the time, all I wanted was to hear more from him, and I said so. Here is the more that Oats gave him in between those two thread presences: + Show Spoiler +On August 09 2013 14:40 Oatsmaster wrote: Acro's first post felt way more constructed. Like not even close to being natural cause he was Roleplaying. So I dont think its alignment indicative. On August 09 2013 14:50 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On August 09 2013 14:44 FirmTofu wrote:On August 09 2013 14:40 Oatsmaster wrote: Acro's first post felt way more constructed. Like not even close to being natural cause he was Roleplaying. So I dont think its alignment indicative. So you think the fact that it was more constructed makes it non-alignment indicative? Wouldn't scum be more worried about the content of their posts than town? Why would constructed flavor not be alignment indicative? Because both scum and town have to construct a roleplaying post. Its not natural either way so therefore the fact that its constructed is not alignment indicative. The content on the other hand, may be. I dunno. Ok so I was looking through johnnywup's filter and I saw this Show nested quote +On August 09 2013 05:57 johnnywup wrote: i don't have any extra information and its the first thing that came to mind for a 3p wincon in a themed setup like this. robert barath trying to kill targs is like pretty big in lore so it came to mind pretty quickly. I posted the exact same thought in a PM to my housemates and none seemed to think it was scummy. And its really weird that his defence is 'none of my housemates think it was scummy'. Shows an attitude of caring about his appearance. Not that he was wrong about the 3p or whatever but that his suggestion did not look scummy to other people. Weird mindset. Thoughts? On August 09 2013 15:15 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On August 09 2013 14:58 johnnywup wrote: he said it was scummy that I had that thought and I said that others saw it and some thought the exact opposite. Maybe that doesn't even really matter but I thought it was worth pointing out. Why is it worth pointing out? Why didnt you explain why its not scummy to think that there is a 3p On August 09 2013 15:40 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On August 09 2013 15:19 johnnywup wrote: I dunno, I just thought it was. Does that bother you?
It's scummy to think there's a 3p? It bothers me that your defence is 'these guys think its not scummy' On August 09 2013 15:47 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On August 09 2013 15:44 johnnywup wrote: it's hardly a defense i'm sure you'll agree. i didn't really intend for it to be a defense. I was just pointing out a contrast. Do you think I'm scum? yes On August 09 2013 16:19 Oatsmaster wrote: So which lurker do you want to die Xata? On August 09 2013 16:38 Oatsmaster wrote: I feel that kush will show his alignment either way.
So you are basically suggesting a policy nk on lurkers right? Cause you dont have specific targets. I dont know if I agree. After this he returns, but nothing on Oats. We would be lead to believe that this is because Oats has satisfied whatever was bothering Acro about him. What in those quotes would set his suspicions to rest? Oats activity has actually dropped as the game has gone on, which would presumably ring some bells for Acro. More, in those quotes, Oats attacked johnnywup primarily. Show nested quote +On August 13 2013 06:15 Acrofales wrote: --snip In my humble opinion, johnnywup is the most obvious lynchbait in the thread Thats from his case on Rayn. One of his points is that Rayn attacked johnnywup. Again, we are at the mercy of PMs here, so I dunno what Acro was doing in regards to Oats in PM land. I'd like to know though Acro when you get the chance. Giant post against acro, asking him to explain. Not calling him scum or anything, he'd just "like to know what happened" Here is acro's response: On August 13 2013 12:47 Acrofales wrote:Show nested quote +On August 13 2013 11:53 s0Lstice wrote:and ps, something that bothers me in particular about Acro is how he treated Oats On August 09 2013 03:54 Acrofales wrote:On August 09 2013 02:50 Oatsmaster wrote: Ok so im REDACTED in SnB's conversation with clarity.
So events happened like this.
I was talking to clarity, and he told me SnB's rolename out of NOWHERE. Ok. So I asked him for his rolename. And he declined giving reasons like, 'scum can bluesnipe rolenames'. Which sounds like crap to me. But whatever. Eventually, I decided to fakeclaim 1 shot rolename alignment check because he wouldnt tell me his rolename. After I said that, he gave it up willingly. I then came back and pm'ed him that the result was that its a fake role name. Fakeclaim. Which means he is scum. He then said something along the lines of 'ok dude' And nothing else. So that makes me think he is town cause he doesnt have an overt reaction. I dunno. Thoughts guys? Wait what? YOU are Ser Redacted? And when asked if something interested happened in the confines of your house (Winterfell, apparently), you decided to keep this rather controversial situation to the thread, saying that everything was groovy? Explain yourself. Also, whatever gambit that was, it is atrocious. It doesn't sound indicative of Clarity's allegiance at all. It sounds like he gave you his real name and you derped it up, by claiming some nonsense name magic. I don't understand at all how you deduce that he is not a Blackfyre infiltrant from that, unless you were already privy to that information and were just dicking around. While I often find it hard to uncover your motivations for doing things, this seems like a particularly stupid gaff. At first my grievances were with your lord, but it's possible that your entire house is Blackfyre scum? On August 09 2013 04:07 Acrofales wrote:On August 09 2013 03:59 Clarity_nl wrote:On August 09 2013 03:54 Acrofales wrote:On August 09 2013 02:50 Oatsmaster wrote: Ok so im REDACTED in SnB's conversation with clarity.
So events happened like this.
I was talking to clarity, and he told me SnB's rolename out of NOWHERE. Ok. So I asked him for his rolename. And he declined giving reasons like, 'scum can bluesnipe rolenames'. Which sounds like crap to me. But whatever. Eventually, I decided to fakeclaim 1 shot rolename alignment check because he wouldnt tell me his rolename. After I said that, he gave it up willingly. I then came back and pm'ed him that the result was that its a fake role name. Fakeclaim. Which means he is scum. He then said something along the lines of 'ok dude' And nothing else. So that makes me think he is town cause he doesnt have an overt reaction. I dunno. Thoughts guys? Wait what? YOU are Ser Redacted? And when asked if something interested happened in the confines of your house (Winterfell, apparently), you decided to keep this rather controversial situation to the thread, saying that everything was groovy? Explain yourself. Also, whatever gambit that was, it is atrocious. It doesn't sound indicative of Clarity's allegiance at all. It sounds like he gave you his real name and you derped it up, by claiming some nonsense name magic. I don't understand at all how you deduce that he is not a Blackfyre infiltrant from that, unless you were already privy to that information and were just dicking around. While I often find it hard to uncover your motivations for doing things, this seems like a particularly stupid gaff. At first my grievances were with your lord, but it's possible that your entire house is Blackfyre scum? Yes because obviously with that exchange between me and oats, the possibility that we're both scum somehow still remains? But yeah, whether I am town or scum I'd have reacted the same way, most likely. That said, do you think Oats as scum pushes me really hard for my rolename (he underemphasized this, it was like 5 pms each of him asking me rolename and me asking "why?") and then when I refuse to give it he makes up a role like that? Seems a bit farfetched for scum just to "dick around" Where do I say you're both Blackfyre pretenders? The exchange between you and Oats seems like intentional bad play by Oats, and his subsequent behaviour in this public hall has been to intentionally obscure information that would have been far more relevant at the time than his derpfest bickering with Yamato. Why would a loyal citizen intentionally derail the discussion, rather than presenting an interesting topic for discussion? I exaggerated with the "whole house" bit, but I have some serious suspicions of Oatsmaster and Strongandbig. His message here is pretty clear. Serious suspicion of Oats. He later qualifies this by saying that no in fact Oats is not scum, he just wanted to see more. On August 09 2013 22:03 Acrofales wrote:On August 09 2013 14:50 Oatsmaster wrote:On August 09 2013 14:44 FirmTofu wrote:On August 09 2013 14:40 Oatsmaster wrote: Acro's first post felt way more constructed. Like not even close to being natural cause he was Roleplaying. So I dont think its alignment indicative. So you think the fact that it was more constructed makes it non-alignment indicative? Wouldn't scum be more worried about the content of their posts than town? Why would constructed flavor not be alignment indicative? Because both scum and town have to construct a roleplaying post. Its not natural either way so therefore the fact that its constructed is not alignment indicative. The content on the other hand, may be. I dunno. In case my earlier discourse was unclear, Ser Oatsmaster has clearly traveled in the Reach and caught onto my way of speaking immediately. Regarding the content: the young Tofu seems to think that I was afraid of calling Ser Oatsmaster a Blackfyre. Rest assured that if I had thought that, I would have called him a Blackfyre then and there. At the time, all I wanted was to hear more from him, and I said so. Here is the more that Oats gave him in between those two thread presences: + Show Spoiler +On August 09 2013 14:40 Oatsmaster wrote: Acro's first post felt way more constructed. Like not even close to being natural cause he was Roleplaying. So I dont think its alignment indicative. On August 09 2013 14:50 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On August 09 2013 14:44 FirmTofu wrote:On August 09 2013 14:40 Oatsmaster wrote: Acro's first post felt way more constructed. Like not even close to being natural cause he was Roleplaying. So I dont think its alignment indicative. So you think the fact that it was more constructed makes it non-alignment indicative? Wouldn't scum be more worried about the content of their posts than town? Why would constructed flavor not be alignment indicative? Because both scum and town have to construct a roleplaying post. Its not natural either way so therefore the fact that its constructed is not alignment indicative. The content on the other hand, may be. I dunno. Ok so I was looking through johnnywup's filter and I saw this Show nested quote +On August 09 2013 05:57 johnnywup wrote: i don't have any extra information and its the first thing that came to mind for a 3p wincon in a themed setup like this. robert barath trying to kill targs is like pretty big in lore so it came to mind pretty quickly. I posted the exact same thought in a PM to my housemates and none seemed to think it was scummy. And its really weird that his defence is 'none of my housemates think it was scummy'. Shows an attitude of caring about his appearance. Not that he was wrong about the 3p or whatever but that his suggestion did not look scummy to other people. Weird mindset. Thoughts? On August 09 2013 15:15 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On August 09 2013 14:58 johnnywup wrote: he said it was scummy that I had that thought and I said that others saw it and some thought the exact opposite. Maybe that doesn't even really matter but I thought it was worth pointing out. Why is it worth pointing out? Why didnt you explain why its not scummy to think that there is a 3p On August 09 2013 15:40 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On August 09 2013 15:19 johnnywup wrote: I dunno, I just thought it was. Does that bother you?
It's scummy to think there's a 3p? It bothers me that your defence is 'these guys think its not scummy' On August 09 2013 15:47 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On August 09 2013 15:44 johnnywup wrote: it's hardly a defense i'm sure you'll agree. i didn't really intend for it to be a defense. I was just pointing out a contrast. Do you think I'm scum? yes On August 09 2013 16:19 Oatsmaster wrote: So which lurker do you want to die Xata? On August 09 2013 16:38 Oatsmaster wrote: I feel that kush will show his alignment either way.
So you are basically suggesting a policy nk on lurkers right? Cause you dont have specific targets. I dont know if I agree. After this he returns, but nothing on Oats. We would be lead to believe that this is because Oats has satisfied whatever was bothering Acro about him. What in those quotes would set his suspicions to rest? Oats activity has actually dropped as the game has gone on, which would presumably ring some bells for Acro. More, in those quotes, Oats attacked johnnywup primarily. On August 13 2013 06:15 Acrofales wrote: --snip In my humble opinion, johnnywup is the most obvious lynchbait in the thread Thats from his case on Rayn. One of his points is that Rayn attacked johnnywup. Again, we are at the mercy of PMs here, so I dunno what Acro was doing in regards to Oats in PM land. I'd like to know though Acro when you get the chance. You quote (early) D1 stuff. On D1 I was clearly not in contact with Ser Oats, because Lord Strongandbig was lord of Winterfell. In D2 I have exchanged 1 PM with Ser Oats, in which I called him scum and he told me to fuck off. It was not very productive. The bit in the case against Rayn is also not for him just attacking lynch bait. It's that he calls lynchbait scum and then just forgets about it. HERE IS WHAT SOLSTICE REPLIES WITH: On August 13 2013 13:01 s0Lstice wrote: you've satisfied me Acro
I think you're crazy, but I believe that you believe that rayn and oats are scum WHAT??? HOW?!?! Acro just told you that he wasn't pming with oats and on d2 he sent him 1 pm telling oats that he's scum He didn't answer any of s0lstice's questions. Yet s0lstice is satisfied?? Clearly he just cared that he was answered. This implies he clearly did not care about finding scum, nor did he care about the content of the answer to his question. Why? Because he's scum and he already knows everyone's alignment, and the only reason he made a giant post was to appear active.
Onegu: Day 1: soft defends some people and does nothing Day 2: Other than co-operating with oberyn (which is null at best, scum at worst since no one claimed the roleblock) he does nothing
Here's the thing though..... he's not a lurker. He has 8 pages of filter. Yet he has done nothing. Notice how many questions he asks, how little he follows up, and how he doesn't appear to get reads off of the answers he gets. That is scum trying to appear active and trying to blend in. Also association: + Show Spoiler +On August 11 2013 22:31 Onegu wrote: I have been talking with yamato and some of his stances and thoughts on oberyn made me have a townie feeling on him. He said he was going to post a case on Acro but hasnt done it yet though.
Fuck knows category: johnnywup: apparantly he's lynchbait? I dunno, just looks like scum to me. Apparently isn't. Would love someone to explain this properly. kush: I can't read this guy. What snb said is correct though, if he's right about everything then he's scum. Total troll though. Shoot this guy. Koshi: I couldn't actually remember ANYTHING he did d2... then I checked his filter and yeah.... not so great. Starting to become another good vigi shot. Chromatically: Apparantly he's been scumhunting well in pms...? I really hate this. Scumhunt in the damn thread. From the thread alone he looks scummy to me. grack: I dunno
Everyone else: meh
|