Have a bad feeling about this
A very big change in KR SC2 scene will be announced(0403)…
Forum Index > SC2 General |
MateShade
Australia736 Posts
Have a bad feeling about this | ||
NicksonReyes
Philippines4431 Posts
Yeah, and about this too On March 25 2013 16:26 DoA wrote: The times, they are a-changing. You'll have more info pretty soon. I wish companies out here were a bit more prompt on delivering news, but this is how it is. | ||
Barbiero
Brazil5259 Posts
| ||
UnKooL
Korea (South)1667 Posts
| ||
Disengaged
United States6994 Posts
On March 25 2013 15:51 canikizu wrote: LAN coming? nah who am i kidding. Technology isn't there yet | ||
Scarecrow
Korea (South)9172 Posts
edit: though seeing as Blizzard's behind this move it's probably gonna be a shitstorm | ||
Fenrax
United States5018 Posts
On March 25 2013 20:19 Scarecrow wrote: I wish it'd be more like Gom becoming the MBC equivalent and GSL running alongside the OSL just like the MSL used to. Then bring the ESF teams in to form an expanded proleague with half of the games going to each studio. Yeah, that would have been the reasonable and smart thing to do. Would have also made everyone the most money. 3 years ago, 2 years ago, 1 year ago and now. But you forget about the egos... they HATE each other. Why do the obvious choice when you can hatch random nonsensical plots? | ||
blacksheepwall
China1530 Posts
Thanks for taking the time to translate, much appreciated as always. | ||
mprs
Canada2933 Posts
On March 25 2013 19:00 prabhbhambra13 wrote: all i have to say is that if PL or Kespa die then i will be very very sad. If Kespa dies, it's because of their own fault. If the market can sustain such an entity as Kespa, then some new organization will come up to take its place. I don't know the reason for the doom and gloom in this thread. We don't really know, in any detail, how this even concerns Kespa. It could be a few organizations trying to unify (which they have every right to), and Kespa sees this as losing power. Boo hoo. Obviously they won't be happy. It doesn't mean that the other organizations are bad or it will be bad for the scene. | ||
FeyFey
Germany10114 Posts
Hope it is more of an well planned agreement and not a Blizzard forces the others with License rights. | ||
Locke-
499 Posts
| ||
PVJ
Hungary5211 Posts
On March 25 2013 20:19 Scarecrow wrote: I wish it'd be more like Gom becoming the MBC equivalent and GSL running alongside the OSL just like the MSL used to. Then bring the ESF teams in to form an expanded proleague with half of the games going to each studio. we ve waited for this the whole last year too though ㅠㅠ I am so sad already. I feel like this is the last week I'm gonna able to enjoy starcraft and then all the fond memories will be tarnished by Morhaime. | ||
Nomzter
Sweden2802 Posts
| ||
suicideyear
Ivory Coast3016 Posts
| ||
Demicore
France503 Posts
| ||
NicksonReyes
Philippines4431 Posts
On March 25 2013 20:44 FeyFey wrote: bad date to announce something, 404 error day :o Much better that 0401. | ||
Daswollvieh
5553 Posts
| ||
JustPassingBy
10776 Posts
On March 25 2013 20:36 mprs wrote: If Kespa dies, it's because of their own fault. If the market can sustain such an entity as Kespa, then some new organization will come up to take its place. I don't know the reason for the doom and gloom in this thread. We don't really know, in any detail, how this even concerns Kespa. It could be a few organizations trying to unify (which they have every right to), and Kespa sees this as losing power. Boo hoo. Obviously they won't be happy. It doesn't mean that the other organizations are bad or it will be bad for the scene. Kespa will never die. They currently have such a stable financial backing that I don't think it will ever happen in near to mid future. | ||
JerseyDevil
Australia78 Posts
| ||
rasers
Sweden691 Posts
On March 25 2013 21:00 JustPassingBy wrote: Kespa will never die. They currently have such a stable financial backing that I don't think it will ever happen in near to mid future. they won't die. but they might decide to say fuck it and leave. | ||
| ||