|
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil.NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ |
your Country52796 Posts
On February 12 2013 12:25 Bibbit wrote:Show nested quote +On February 12 2013 12:25 MountainDewJunkie wrote:On February 12 2013 12:10 KadaverBB wrote: MY EYES! He even PM'ed me after the first one, asking what was wrong with it. I told him "everything" and he just writes another one 6 hours later. Some people -.-
Are you not allowed to write fan fiction about community figures/member or pros? If you haven't read these, do that and see if you feel the same way! I'm not even reading them. I have my limits... I read the first part of Scarlett/Suppy and immediately realized what I was on the edge of reading; I promptly scrolled up and closed the spoiler tag. Edit: I have my limits on incorrect grammar too.
|
I don't know why, but I read that....Obviously he was going to get banned.
|
I read it, and I thought it was a-okay. It was more amusing that graphic. I mean, it was a collection of sc2-related sexual euphemisms and slang. Sex, sc2, and pros. What could be more TL than that?
Vote MDJ 2014.
|
On February 12 2013 12:27 The_Templar wrote:Show nested quote +On February 12 2013 12:25 Bibbit wrote:On February 12 2013 12:25 MountainDewJunkie wrote:On February 12 2013 12:10 KadaverBB wrote: MY EYES! He even PM'ed me after the first one, asking what was wrong with it. I told him "everything" and he just writes another one 6 hours later. Some people -.-
Are you not allowed to write fan fiction about community figures/member or pros? If you haven't read these, do that and see if you feel the same way! I'm not even reading them. I have my limits... I read the first part of Scarlett/Suppy and immediately realized what I was on the edge of reading; I promptly scrolled up and closed the spoiler tag. Edit: I have my limits on incorrect grammar too. Yea I read one of the last paragraphs of each, even that's regrettable. >_>
|
On February 12 2013 12:30 MountainDewJunkie wrote: I read it, and I thought it was a-okay. It was more amusing that graphic. I mean, it was a collection of sc2-related sexual euphemisms and slang. Sex, sc2, and pros. What could be more TL than that?
Vote MDJ 2014.
Sounds a darn awful lot like Rule 34 if you ask me. Had no clue someone could make Rule 34 apply to TL, but xAria did it.
Impressive in its own way, but horribly disgusting nonetheless. >_<
|
On February 12 2013 13:28 cLAN.Anax wrote:Show nested quote +On February 12 2013 12:30 MountainDewJunkie wrote: I read it, and I thought it was a-okay. It was more amusing that graphic. I mean, it was a collection of sc2-related sexual euphemisms and slang. Sex, sc2, and pros. What could be more TL than that?
Vote MDJ 2014. Sounds a darn awful lot like Rule 34 if you ask me. Had no clue someone could make Rule 34 apply to TL, but xAria did it. Impressive in its own way, but horribly disgusting nonetheless. >_< He could have done it a little more tastefully, but it was fine imo, especially compared to FakeSteve's thread where he drew dicks on everything. That thread was fucking hilarious though.
|
On February 12 2013 12:30 MountainDewJunkie wrote: I read it, and I thought it was a-okay. It was more amusing that graphic. I mean, it was a collection of sc2-related sexual euphemisms and slang. Sex, sc2, and pros. What could be more TL than that?
Vote MDJ 2014. Honestly I thought it was meant to be funny more than anything else, but what did you guys expect when you read it?
Edit at below:I never said tasteful, I said funny. When have those been synonymous on the Internet?
|
On February 12 2013 13:50 Jaaaaasper wrote:Show nested quote +On February 12 2013 12:30 MountainDewJunkie wrote: I read it, and I thought it was a-okay. It was more amusing that graphic. I mean, it was a collection of sc2-related sexual euphemisms and slang. Sex, sc2, and pros. What could be more TL than that?
Vote MDJ 2014. Honestly I thought it was meant to be funny more than anything else, but what did you guys expect when you read it? I gotta disagree, it was not tasteful whatsoever. Funny and Creepy to the point where I want to punch myself in various parts of my body for reading something are different .
|
On February 12 2013 12:10 KadaverBB wrote: MY EYES! He even PM'ed me after the first one, asking what was wrong with it. I told him "everything" and he just writes another one 6 hours later. Some people -.-
LOL hahaha
|
On February 12 2013 12:30 Bibbit wrote:Show nested quote +On February 12 2013 12:27 The_Templar wrote:On February 12 2013 12:25 Bibbit wrote:On February 12 2013 12:25 MountainDewJunkie wrote:On February 12 2013 12:10 KadaverBB wrote: MY EYES! He even PM'ed me after the first one, asking what was wrong with it. I told him "everything" and he just writes another one 6 hours later. Some people -.-
Are you not allowed to write fan fiction about community figures/member or pros? If you haven't read these, do that and see if you feel the same way! I'm not even reading them. I have my limits... I read the first part of Scarlett/Suppy and immediately realized what I was on the edge of reading; I promptly scrolled up and closed the spoiler tag. Edit: I have my limits on incorrect grammar too. Yea I read one of the last paragraphs of each, even that's regrettable. >_>
The curiosity got the better of me. It has been a long while since I last have regretted doing anything on the internet this much.
|
suppy x scarlett was a lot more lewd than what i had expected.
|
I guess my real question is why Incontrol and CombatEX? I would have understood two years ago, but I am attempting to rationalize fan fiction so I think my energy is best spent elsewhere.
this video SUCKED dick. every tournament featured and won was a ZERG. only the first introduction of MKP, who is terran, was the exception.
MicroTastiC was just temp banned for 30 days by zatic.
That account was created on 2011-01-24 10:45:55 and had 330 posts.
Reason: Continuous trash posting. Post better or don't bother coming back.
Sigh.
|
\o/ The Kwark hater might disagree, but in those moments I'm happy that he is a moderator on this website.
|
I am surprised he would even bother with this internet fad, we all know it has a liberal bias. Fox News proved it. On a semi related note, I would have no issue imagining Gnarly sending politicians letters in all caps under the misguided assumption it would somehow add weight to his, "argument."
|
On February 13 2013 02:07 corumjhaelen wrote:\o/The Kwark hater might disagree, but in those moments I'm happy that he is a moderator on this website.
It was starting to get out of hand tbh. As disgusting as feminism has become lately, that guy did nothing at all to help the issue, since he basically brought up some real problems and then took a shit on them by not knowing how to form proper arguments and counter-arguments. It's sad really, that topic could've been so much more and maybe people wouldn't have been so quick to dismiss him if he actually knew how to present his position without sounding like an idiot. Oh well...
|
|
United States41470 Posts
On February 13 2013 03:04 MasterOfPuppets wrote:Show nested quote +On February 13 2013 02:07 corumjhaelen wrote:\o/The Kwark hater might disagree, but in those moments I'm happy that he is a moderator on this website. It was starting to get out of hand tbh. As disgusting as feminism has become lately, that guy did nothing at all to help the issue, since he basically brought up some real problems and then took a shit on them by not knowing how to form proper arguments and counter-arguments. It's sad really, that topic could've been so much more and maybe people wouldn't have been so quick to dismiss him if he actually knew how to present his position without sounding like an idiot. Oh well... Pretty much. It does nobody any favours if all you do is shout "baby killers" at everyone until they give up on rational debate with you.
|
On February 13 2013 02:07 corumjhaelen wrote:\o/The Kwark hater might disagree, but in those moments I'm happy that he is a moderator on this website. Sometimes I think KwarK should be promoted to Bastion of Common Sense in the General Forum, because he is what the General Forum needs when all common sense is no longer welcome in a thread. There are plenty of other posters with common sense, I am not saying KwarK is the only one, but he is a ban-ling and does seem to be the one who cleans up such threads when it is obviously going nowhere.
Edit: And my favourite genetically modified ban-ling was the one to ban Gnarly.
|
|
On February 13 2013 03:17 KwarK wrote:Show nested quote +On February 13 2013 03:04 MasterOfPuppets wrote:On February 13 2013 02:07 corumjhaelen wrote:\o/The Kwark hater might disagree, but in those moments I'm happy that he is a moderator on this website. It was starting to get out of hand tbh. As disgusting as feminism has become lately, that guy did nothing at all to help the issue, since he basically brought up some real problems and then took a shit on them by not knowing how to form proper arguments and counter-arguments. It's sad really, that topic could've been so much more and maybe people wouldn't have been so quick to dismiss him if he actually knew how to present his position without sounding like an idiot. Oh well... Pretty much. It does nobody any favours if all you do is shout "baby killers" at everyone until they give up on rational debate with you.
i think most topics can be discussed / most opinions can be voiced without fearing the violence inherent in the system (ban) as long as you're wording yourself with care.
like MoP calling feminism disgusting, i'm thinking he doesn't mean feminism as a whole, but probably some specific aspect of it. they way he words it though is open for interpretation and could destabilize the discussion and cause major shit storms if it was posted in some discussion topic.
edit: my pokemon evolved into something.
|
|
|
|