and funny at times
unskilled and unaware of it - Page 5
Forum Index > General Forum |
oddeye
Canada716 Posts
and funny at times | ||
QuietIdiot
7004 Posts
I did some research, this guy is for real o_O http://www.bulletballgames.com/ | ||
Sadist
United States7091 Posts
On April 14 2007 20:25 QuietIdiot wrote: I did some research, this guy is for real o_O http://www.bulletballgames.com/ ROFL @ Him trying to sell the tables for $399 | ||
Hollow
Canada2174 Posts
| ||
Hippopotamus
1914 Posts
| ||
pyrogenetix
United Arab Emirates5090 Posts
| ||
Vin{MBL}
5185 Posts
| ||
Loveletter
United States543 Posts
| ||
bearnet2001
Argentina335 Posts
| ||
Klogon
MURICA15980 Posts
| ||
daz
Canada643 Posts
On April 11 2007 17:44 pzeta wrote: I have read an interesting article called 'unskilled and unaware of it'; Essentially, one has to be at a certain threshold of skill just to realize how much one doesn't know. At the same time, the highest levels of proficiency can often create a sense of humility as one really gets one's arms around the vastness of a subject. In more detail: People tend to hold overly favorable views of their abilities in many social and intellectual domains. The authors suggest that this overestimation occurs, in part, because people who are unskilled in these domains suffer a dual burden: Not only do these people reach erroneous conclusions and make unfortunate choices, but their incompetence robs them of the metacognitive ability to realize it. Across 4 studies, the authors found that participants scoring in the bottom quartile on tests of humor, grammar, and logic grossly overestimated their test performance and ability. Although their test scores put them in the 12th percentile, they estimated themselves to be in the 62nd. Several analyses linked this miscalibration to deficits in metacognitive skill, or the capacity to distinguish accuracy from error. Paradoxically, improving the skills of participants, and thus increasing their metacognitive competence, helped them recognize the limitations of their abilities. Poll: Do you agree with unskilled people overstimated theirself (Vote): Yes (Vote): No The article I don't agree with this article, because a lot of skilled players are arrogant and in my environment the bigger part of people 'unskilled' in some area is usually humild and low-confindence. im sure someone posted this already but because i dont have time to read the thread and just in case they didnt: How can you play starcraft and disagree with this? Bnet is just one giant example of these results. Ask any random shitty newb on bnet and they will all tell you how good they are | ||
Psyonic_Reaver
United States4329 Posts
| ||
daz
Canada643 Posts
| ||
tentaclemonster
United States118 Posts
1: don't know what you don't know 2: know what you don't know 3: know what you know 4: don't know what you know | ||
Yurebis
United States1452 Posts
Oh shit. Old post. Interesting though. | ||
floor exercise
Canada5847 Posts
On May 31 2009 14:06 daz wrote: im sure someone posted this already but because i dont have time to read the thread and just in case they didnt: How can you play starcraft and disagree with this? Bnet is just one giant example of these results. Ask any random shitty newb on bnet and they will all tell you how good they are old thread and unaware of it | ||
GeneralStan
United States4789 Posts
On April 11 2007 17:44 OP wrote: tests of humor. This is the part that boggles me. How do you test for humor exactly? | ||
professorjoak
318 Posts
| ||
s_side
United States700 Posts
On June 01 2009 09:28 GeneralStan wrote: This is the part that boggles me. How do you test for humor exactly? It's like testing for proper taste in film. Asinine. | ||
| ||