|
Ok time to post for me, i finally finished reading it all.
First of all i'm against lurker lynching day 1 cause in my opinion it doesnt give any useful information.
Now my take on some of the prime targets:
Sn0: I think he tried to play aggressive town, got targeted hard for it and couldnt quite cope with the pressure, which would explain his silence, i wouldnt vote for him right now.
laguerta: States in post 1 that he is against NL, votes for no lynch. That and describing himself as being lazy town i really dont like.
Mandalor: Pushing against laguerta and trotske acoording to his thinking. Then votes for branig, whos post i really didnt like either. Votes for laguerta after his very weird no lynch thingie. He does get emotional while defending himself, so much that with the first read i instantly thought "scum" in my head. After going through his filter though, i'm quite uncertain.
##Vote: laguerta
For the time being i'll vote for him, there really is no excuse for lying as town.
I'll also try to be more active now, weekend is over so i got more time.
|
Can we get a vote count please?
|
Ye Old Vote Count
If your vote is not properly formatted it will not be counted. Everyone is required to vote.
Laguerta (3) - Mandalor, OmniEulogy, Glurio
Sn0_Man (2) - Zebezt, Trotske, Mocsta
Mandalor (2) - Mocsta, Oatsmaster
Acid~ (1) - Zarepath, OmniEulogy
zebezt (1) - Acid~
bringaniga (0) - shz, Oatsmaster, Mandalor, Laguerta
Mocsta (0) - Oatsmaster
Oatsmaster (0) - Mocsta
shz (0) - OmniEulogy
No-Lynch (1) - Laguerta
Not Voting - Sn0_man
Currently Laguerta is set to be lynched! If you see that your vote is incorrect then pm me. You have about 3.5 hours left to vote! Deadline is at 04:00 GMT (+00:00).
|
On January 14 2013 07:01 laguerta wrote:
Umm bringaniga voted for me and then I voted for him to defend myself and also because vote thing is running out and i dont know who to vote for yet.
I think this post is of a really really bad town player who thinks he needs to defend himself with votes on other people and I think that Mandalor is trying to kill a bad townie. So for that and the post Macosta made stating the reasons for lynching him I am going to change my vote.
##Unvote
##Vote Mandalor
|
Germany2686 Posts
Acid made some good points, and I don't understand Mocstas reaction.
glurio still lurking hardcore. But there are better, active, lynches around at the moment.
Sno is a interesting case. He was very active before the game and aks so many questions about possibilities, also seemed very eager to start. After the game started he stirred shit up and left. What the fuck? But with three hours to lynch, and still lurking he is another candidate for a modkill. Will refrain from voting him for now.
Oats actually stepped up a bit. This is not a town read, but at least he is contributing.
Mandalors defense is actually pretty reasonable, and I don't think Mocsta's case sticks for now. I'm willing to see what the next night and day will bring before lynching him.
Laguerta is very suspicous. He contributed nothing, just asked random questions, OMGUS voting and then voting for a no-lynch. How does this help? Also his votes are baseless at the moment.
##Vote: Laguerta
I think this is the best lynch at the moment. No defense, no explanation. If nothing changes in the next three hours (or aslong as I'm awake) I'll stick with that.
You still have time to defend yourself properly.
|
Germany2686 Posts
I would also invite some more people to write down their thoughts on Mocsta. Because if we want it or not, he is the most active and the one that comes closest to a major of our veggieland.
Oh, and welcome Glurio...
|
Germany2686 Posts
|
I dont think lynching Mocsta is a good idea today.
##Unvote
##Vote: laguerta
Mandalor, you get a pass today but you better start scumhunting. Since that you dont need to defend yourself anymore.
|
Good evening shz.
I found the Mocsta vs. Oats stuff to be pretty stupid, but then again i never had time to think about it and could just read it all.
I do like what he did with Mandalor, though. He might be on to something. While i don't think the case is foolproof, i do think the reaction he got out of Mandalor is pretty valuable.
|
Ok guys, its less than 3 hours to lynch, we NEED to consolidate.
If you think the leading candidate which is laguerta is scummy, vote for him.
If you think someone else is scummier, PUSH FOR THEIR LYNCH.
|
If Laguerta is scum, I must admit there is a lack of anybody trying to save him... would scum bus themselves D1? That's suicidal. The fact that nobody has even tried to push strongly for another lynch worries me a little bit...
|
I don't think laguerta is scum you guys are pushing a lynch claiming scum when he looks a lot more like a bad townie with no experience and is lazy.
what is with this bandwagon on someone who might as well be a lurker In fact a lurker would be a better lynch. I am going to keep my vote on the person who started this ridiculous vote.
|
Germany2686 Posts
On January 14 2013 10:36 Trotske wrote:
I don't think laguerta is scum you guys are pushing a lynch claiming scum when he looks a lot more like a bad townie with no experience and is lazy.
what is with this bandwagon on someone who might as well be a lurker In fact a lurker would be a better lynch. I am going to keep my vote on the person who started this ridiculous vote.
I can understand that, but what if Sno is actually gonna get modkilled? Could also be a bad town who lost interest in this game very quickly.
|
Guys im back.. farkn hell, being promoted 
Umm.. look.. i had a read through just then and cant believe I missed out on La Guerta lying about the no lynch. I first thought it was just a scared newbie play, but that he answered before he was against it.. clear scared SCUM play.
Good work guys
##Unvote: Manlador (I still question aspects of your play.. but we cant let a participant lie openly, so will follow up with you Night 1/Day 2)
##Vote: La Guerta - Lying is not acceptable as a townie or SCUM. This in itself is grounds for lynch.
Acid, I had a think about my post to you. I admit it was venomous and not constructive.
You have to realise at the time, noone was consolidating votes, I think at least 5 people had votes on them and when you came in, it just made things even more confusing.
Now that I have had a breather (and a pay rise ), I am going to answer your questions in my following post.
I welcome all contributions, and certainly do not want to deter yours.
|
On January 14 2013 10:38 shz wrote:Show nested quote +On January 14 2013 10:36 Trotske wrote:
I don't think laguerta is scum you guys are pushing a lynch claiming scum when he looks a lot more like a bad townie with no experience and is lazy.
what is with this bandwagon on someone who might as well be a lurker In fact a lurker would be a better lynch. I am going to keep my vote on the person who started this ridiculous vote. I can understand that, but what if Sno is actually gonna get modkilled? Could also be a bad town who lost interest in this game very quickly.
What does sn0 getting modkilled have to do with laguerta being a bad lynch. you say you understand but didn't change your vote?
|
Germany2686 Posts
On January 14 2013 10:43 Trotske wrote:Show nested quote +On January 14 2013 10:38 shz wrote:On January 14 2013 10:36 Trotske wrote:
I don't think laguerta is scum you guys are pushing a lynch claiming scum when he looks a lot more like a bad townie with no experience and is lazy.
what is with this bandwagon on someone who might as well be a lurker In fact a lurker would be a better lynch. I am going to keep my vote on the person who started this ridiculous vote. I can understand that, but what if Sno is actually gonna get modkilled? Could also be a bad town who lost interest in this game very quickly. What does sn0 getting modkilled have to do with laguerta being a bad lynch. you say you understand but didn't change your vote?
For me laguarta is up there with sno on my scum-scala. So I go with the one I know is not getting modkilled.
Of course bad town is a probability, it always is.
|
I agree he does look very much like bad town, I've said it multiple times myself, at the same time I've had much worse scum players in both of my games.
|
On January 14 2013 10:41 Mocsta wrote:Guys im back.. farkn hell, being promoted
Umm.. look.. i had a read through just then and cant believe I missed out on La Guerta lying about the no lynch. I first thought it was just a scared newbie play, but that he answered before he was against it.. clear scared SCUM play. Good work guys ##Unvote: Manlador (I still question aspects of your play.. but we cant let a participant lie openly, so will follow up with you Night 1/Day 2) ##Vote: La Guerta - Lying is not acceptable as a townie or SCUM. This in itself is grounds for lynch.
Acid, I had a think about my post to you. I admit it was venomous and not constructive. You have to realise at the time, noone was consolidating votes, I think at least 5 people had votes on them and when you came in, it just made things even more confusing. Now that I have had a breather (and a pay rise ), I am going to answer your questions in my following post. I welcome all contributions, and certainly do not want to deter yours.
Can you quote the lie I don't see it on the filter please.
|
I've already made a mention of it.
On January 12 2013 13:36 laguerta wrote:Show nested quote +On January 12 2013 13:09 Mocsta wrote:
Hi All.
From other games, it seems the best 3 questions to ask are:
1) Stance on Lurkers: i.e. Do you policy lynch?
2) How do you think scum would try to get influence with us?
3) [fluff] DONT BUY A POOL. I wasted all my time today with pools and hate it !
I won't be around for the next 6 to 8 hrs (DAMN POOL!)
1) If I dont have a strong mafia read on someone by the end of the day, I will feel compelled to policy lynch and not waste a day with a NL. 2) I think scum would try to get influence by offering bits of analysis but not taking a strong lead on lynching someone until someone else does first, and then supporting that lynch and bandwagonning. 3) I know dude, we have an open pool with no screen around it and I have to skim it every day, and vacuum every other day. Such a bitch.
and then proceeds to vote no-lynch.
|
alright thanks I would like to point out that he didn't post any reasons behind the no lynch and is looking more and more like a not interested any more townie and would be a waste of a D1 lynch when I feel we have better people to lynch.
My main reason for wanting to lynch Mandalor is because he started this ridiculous vote on a bad townie who seems like he doesn't want to play and it apparently easy to get votes for and won't defend himself.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
