|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
OH WAIT, I just thought of an alternative theory for what happened:
1) I was RBed by scum, or maybe a town RB/JK 2) Hyaach was RBed or JKed by a town RB/JK 3) Scum shot an SK who took the "extra night life" option
This is a way Hyaach and I could both be town, but it means there's an SK in the game and Scum shot him last night.
|
There is also a reason why scum would claim them getting roleblocked even though it might make them look bad.
Imagine you are a JK who just jked say scummy player X and there was no NK. You probably suspect that X is scum and u blocked his kill, and this will be amplified especially if X doesnt claim the rb as it would show that he has something to hide. Well claiming the RB makes X look a *little* better.
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
Actually, I'm beginning to wonder if scum didn't shoot a JKed me and RBed Hyaach, or the SK theory is true. I don't think the town RBer should claim any more, since it's possible that Hyaach isn't scum.
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
On June 08 2012 20:11 zelblade wrote: There is also a reason why scum would claim them getting roleblocked even though it might make them look bad.
Imagine you are a JK who just jked say scummy player X and there was no NK. You probably suspect that X is scum and u blocked his kill, and this will be amplified especially if X doesnt claim the rb as it would show that he has something to hide. Well claiming the RB makes X look a *little* better.
Oh, I hadn't thought about that. So in this case, a JK JKed Hyaach, who was delivering the NK, and Hyaach HAS to claim it, since as scum, he knows it was a town JK that JKed him. If he doesn't claim it, he's obviously scum hiding it.
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
Oh damn I'm getting helpful advice from zelblade, what has become of me
|
On June 08 2012 19:59 zelblade wrote: Since snarfs asked here are my thoughts on ghost.
I dont think that ghost is scum for now. He has been making (what I feel are valid) accusations against both furekip and zentor. I am somewhat certain furekip is scum from the no. of mafia thing, and whilst it is possible, dont think that ghost would push furekip that early and dump some suspision on him when most of the thread felt he was probably town. Of course this read is a little weak due to furekip's alignment being in question in itself but I am quite certain that furekip will flip scum.
Regarding hyaach I found his first post coming off as a little off, which is primilarly why I questioned it. Might have been due to the fact the post was somewhat unclear, but I did find him saying that claiming miller (optimal move imo) took "balls" a littler wierd. Its wierd that he tries to push attention onto me + furekip when snarfs calls him out of lurking. I also highly doubt scum would RB him and its actually more likely that hyaach got JK'd.
You post about me ask relatively safe questions without committing to a stance. You post with BH talks about night kill actions without contributing a read.
I have address snarf's suspicion of me and at the same thing ask him why tunnel me over the likes of you.
In all your replies to me JK RB argument with BH. you have not once thought of me as town. Not even the slightest scenario that I could turn out town not pro-town at all. Why? because you know I am not scum and want to use this mess to lynch me off?
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
Ok I'm going to bed. I'm leaving my vote parked on Hyaach for now, but it's POSSIBLE he's innocent-- either in the even of the town RBer being a JKer, or if there is an SK in the game. I'm also down for a Furerkip lynch if people don't want to pick between me and Hyaach, or if the RBer wants to claim at the end of N2 or something.
Weigh in! Let me know what you think!
|
Anyway. I think BH's SK theory could be true
##UNVOTE ##VOTE : Zelblade
Not very pro-town in your analysis. Why so negative?
|
btw i claimed RBed from phone 7 hours ago
On June 08 2012 13:37 Hyaach wrote: Ive only skimp the first post and these last post. Its mainly about rb and claim. If it meant anything i would like to point iut i was rbed too. Btw i said i will give read i ard 5 hour. Why so eagar to drive attention away from the thread? U could always do it when i didnt fullfill my claim
But no one gave a read on as to why so I had to point it out again.
|
I'm on my phone so I can't do anything big but bh I think the sk is very unlikely as that would require for the sk to have ALSO missed their shot somehow or for them to have held it for some reason.
Also in general we don't know if there is a jk an if there is who they jailed and we don't know about any possible sk, we do know about 2 RBs and frankly I think it's much more likely that one of the RBed people were the scum shot as if they were they're forced to claim or look like they're hiding it, than some possible way they were both RBed then a shotmissed for some separate reason. I'm on my phone so can't do much analysis but I'll probably vote hyaach when I get home for a combination of this and my past reasons for seeing him as scum.
|
I don't buy Blazinghand's claim.
Compare and contrast the Blazinghand from this game with the blazinghand from TL Mafia LIV. In LIV, he actually was a vigilante, and he was the aggressive protown blazinghand I've seen in most of his games. His first post in that game is voting someone for a scumslip. This is completely different from his play here.
At no point did anyone write: But Ghost! He changed his play after he got modkilled in iGrok's game!
That modkill happened in TLM LIII. Last I checked, LIII < LIV.
|
##Unvote Furerkip ##Vote Blazinghand
|
On June 08 2012 21:07 Navillus wrote: I'm on my phone so I can't do anything big but bh I think the sk is very unlikely as that would require for the sk to have ALSO missed their shot somehow or for them to have held it for some reason.
Also in general we don't know if there is a jk an if there is who they jailed and we don't know about any possible sk, we do know about 2 RBs and frankly I think it's much more likely that one of the RBed people were the scum shot as if they were they're forced to claim or look like they're hiding it, than some possible way they were both RBed then a shotmissed for some separate reason. I'm on my phone so can't do much analysis but I'll probably vote hyaach when I get home for a combination of this and my past reasons for seeing him as scum. I kind of agree with this. The most likely explanation is that one of them is scum. I think the vote should be between BH/Hyaach today, and I am on the BH side. ##Vote Hyaach
|
On June 08 2012 23:02 VisceraEyes wrote: ##Unvote Furerkip ##Vote Blazinghand
?
|
Why is no one seeing my side of the story? Just because BH claim first doesnt mean he cant be the mafia who got RBed. BH's claim now is sketchy at best. Zelblade is red.
|
On June 08 2012 23:17 Hyaach wrote: Why is no one seeing my side of the story? Just because BH claim first doesnt mean he cant be the mafia who got RBed. BH's claim now is sketchy at best. Zelblade is red. 1. BH's reaction to Pandain's claim can be explained with BH being a vigilante. 2. You are a shady lurker.
|
@shraft: Then why did it take so long for Blazinghand to vote to lynch Pandain?
On June 06 2012 11:18 Blazinghand wrote: lol wut
On June 06 2012 12:15 Blazinghand wrote:+ Show Spoiler +On June 06 2012 12:10 Pandain wrote: I actually agree that this is getting off topic, and its just me and BH arguing semantics based on different perspectives of the principle I mentioned earlier.
To address VE shortly, however, you can refer to my earlier posts to see where I slipped my role, its even been quoted and pointed out. You can try to lynch me, though.
To commence, from this little barrage of posts I've analyzed more people. I think VE is more likely town. Navillus has attempted to(rightfully) steer discussion back onto owhere we should be discussing, which was definitely the town thing to do. Mafia would either want to take a stand on the mason issue, or simply not post. Navillus acting as such strikes me as town.
I'm also very suspicious of Zellblade, as he's hardly posted at all. In fact, hilariously enough, he's just asked interogative questions. Which I find hilarious and will do one day. How interesting scummy that you like to slip in something about Navi here but have still ignored my pointing out your contradictions. Saying that we have different perspectives about the mason claim is like saying that bullets and massages have different perspectives about touching people. Your accidental claim is crap, your asking masons to claim is crap, and your discussions and non-discussions are crap. ##unvote MrZentor##vote Pandain
|
Probably because he couldn't just say "Hey, I'm the vigilante, you're a fake!" if he wanted to avoid claiming, so he needed something else to base his vote on. Besides, one hour isn't that long, is it?
|
Hmm took a look at the filters and it does seem to be quite a huge change. Originally brushed it off as him toning down after the modkill incident but guess not.
The primary problem with this is that I dont think hyaach is town at this point and unless this is LI all over again (very unlikely) they cant be both scum.
I am going to sleep, will sleep on it.
VE care to grace us with your thoughts?
|
@shraft: Why would he wait? You think that he purposefully waited to vote to lynch the guy that he knew was lying in order to hide the fact that he might have been the real vigilante? That seems kind of far fetched to me. In addition, if you think that's what actually happened, you have to find some kind of justification for a post like this:
On June 06 2012 11:23 Blazinghand wrote: Alright, if we believe Pandain's claim, then why don't we follow up with my course of action: We lynch MrZ (or maybe Navi if he seems scummier). If MrZ flips town, sure, shoot me. But I think he's gonna flip scum. Blazinghand knows Pandain is lying, so why would he be willing accept lynching someone else? Blazinghand is a good player, and I've never seen him back down, even when he doesn't know he's right. Why would he be willing to back down here, when he's so sure that Pandain is lying?
|
|
|
|