On April 30 2012 03:59 Ylrahc wrote: You mean Stephano didn't want to play this map so tried a T3 rush w/o baneling nest, or any real defense for that matters ?
On April 30 2012 03:59 Ylrahc wrote: You mean Stephano didn't want to play this map so tried a T3 rush w/o baneling nest, or any real defense for that matters ?
On April 30 2012 03:59 Ylrahc wrote: You mean Stephano didn't want to play this map so tried a T3 rush w/o baneling nest, or any real defense for that matters ?
Or you could give Luci some fucking credit. He hit a good 2/2 timing when Stephano was just getting infestors out. Not enough fungal against bio means you're going to have a bad day.
On April 30 2012 03:59 Ylrahc wrote: You mean Stephano didn't want to play this map so tried a T3 rush w/o baneling nest, or any real defense for that matters ?
Or you could give Luci some fucking credit. He hit a good 2/2 timing when Stephano was just getting infestors out. Not enough fungal against bio means you're going to have a bad day.
Fact is, Stephano played a style he knows is not safe because he probably thinks he is a lot better than his opponent. Map 4 & 5 may prove me wrong though, let's see.
On April 30 2012 03:59 Ylrahc wrote: You mean Stephano didn't want to play this map so tried a T3 rush w/o baneling nest, or any real defense for that matters ?
Or you could give Luci some fucking credit. He hit a good 2/2 timing when Stephano was just getting infestors out. Not enough fungal against bio means you're going to have a bad day.
Fact is, Stephano played a style he knows is not safe because he probably thinks he is a lot better than his opponent. Map 4 & 5 may prove me wrong though, let's see.
If you think you are a lot better you usually play more safe.
On April 30 2012 03:59 Ylrahc wrote: You mean Stephano didn't want to play this map so tried a T3 rush w/o baneling nest, or any real defense for that matters ?
Or you could give Luci some fucking credit. He hit a good 2/2 timing when Stephano was just getting infestors out. Not enough fungal against bio means you're going to have a bad day.
Fact is, Stephano played a style he knows is not safe because he probably thinks he is a lot better than his opponent. Map 4 & 5 may prove me wrong though, let's see.
If you think you are a lot better you usually play more safe.
No, you play cheesy (or greedy which is a form of economical cheese) so you can end the match faster. You play safe when there is a lot on the line and you don't want to get "cheesed" or time-attacked. At least that's why I observed usually, however I agree there may be a lot to discuss on this subject, feel free to explain to me your way to see things (no joke or troll here, there may have been some in some of my previous comments ).
Weird choice of map from Stephano btw, I saw him getting raped a lot on this map because his army wasn't mobile enough and he could protect his bases successfully.
Edit : betting on broodlords, if Luci is able to manage his marines like Polt, he can do it.
On April 30 2012 04:07 Ylrahc wrote: No, you play cheesy (or greedy which is a form of economical cheese) so you can end the match faster. You play safe when there is a lot on the line and you don't want to get "cheesed" or time-attacked.
well, if it's not an important game, sure. otherwise you'll generally want to play in a way that'll reduce variance, obviously chucking in occasional cheese to be less exploitable