Balance is not only about win rates - Page 2
Blogs > Random() |
DYEAlabaster
Canada1009 Posts
| ||
Zato-1
Chile4253 Posts
On February 24 2012 01:46 Random() wrote: HotS is 2 years away, WoL is 2 years old and there are simply too many units/abilities that are broken or just don't fit for a mature game. In my opinion, this makes breaking the balance somewhat worth it to deal with the stagnation. As far as we know, HotS will be a 2012 release, meaning at most 10 months away. | ||
oBlade
United States5132 Posts
On February 24 2012 03:08 DYEAlabaster wrote: At the end of the day, when there are millions of dollars flowing through the competitive aspect of Starcraft, the only pertinent figure is a nice 50% bottom-line. In the long run, if you focus on the wrong things, your mediocre game will stagnate and fall apart as the tenuous community gets bored and moves on to other games with different philosophies. | ||
Doriboi
United States181 Posts
On February 24 2012 03:04 Demonhunter04 wrote: That is true, but terran is the race that people call OP the most, often because of racial representations in tournaments, etc. How many Terrans have been winning lately? I don't think its bad play. 5/5 for this OP. One of the best I've read in a long time. | ||
| ||