EPTWerewolves Invade Teamliquid II - Page 10
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
froggynoddy
United Kingdom452 Posts
| ||
|
Paperscraps
United States639 Posts
A town full of sheep is just waiting to get eaten by werewolves. Current inactives/lurkers: Hufy rgTheSchworz zeurg mderg | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
hey+ Show Spoiler + frogg+ Show Spoiler + Blazinghand+ Show Spoiler + hates unnecessary+ Show Spoiler + spoilers Has anybody found anything interesting that they would like to share? | ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
On February 13 2012 14:00 Blazinghand wrote: Oh uh if you're gonna be in like multiple channels, how do you stop someone from /whois ing you and like finding what other channels you're in? Can this be done with the webIRC client? Um... wow the only thing I have to say here is that you're literally retarded. Like, you rode the short bus to school and there are special classes for you. But that's okay! I don't discriminate. .................... anyway, if you're on a channel and you're OP then you can use: /mode #channelname +s to make the channel secret, it will not show up on /whois for anybody who isn't also on that same channel with you. This does not stay if there is a period when nobody on the channel so make sure you set it again if you're the first one in there again later. Didn't you say you were not going to act this way in this game? What made you decide to act this way anyway? Crusading forumer (vigilante) shouldn't shoot tonight if that wasn't obvious. | ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
inactivity is the bane of town existence, if we want to win people need to post and irc more | ||
|
Grackaroni
United States9832 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
On February 13 2012 22:41 prplhz wrote: Didn't you say you were not going to act this way in this game? What made you decide to act this way anyway? Act what way? thanks for the help by the way On February 13 2012 23:39 Grackaroni wrote: I don't think Blazinghand is stupid enough to ask in the thread how to create secret channels on irc if he was intending on using it to communicate with scum. Ah thank you for the stirring defense | ||
|
mderg
Germany1739 Posts
 On the rabid fanboy topic: I think it´s best to not use it at all, if there´s nothing crazy like 1 scum and 1 town remaining. Also I don´t understand why Palmar wants sinani206 and prplhz killed. I can´t see this helping town in any way. A town player (even a useless one) at least counts as townie. So why should we kill someone, if we don´t gain anything? On February 13 2012 21:48 Palmar wrote: Now that I'm confirmed town you should probably all claim to me. This also doesn´t make sense at all, I can´t imagine him being serious with this. And not playing seriously or joking doesn´t give information. It also creates a strange image of you, so I´d like you to give reasons for your statements in the thread. | ||
|
froggynoddy
United Kingdom452 Posts
Also I don´t understand why Palmar wants sinani206 and prplhz killed. I can´t see this helping town in any way. A town player (even a useless one) at least counts as townie. So why should we kill someone, if we don´t gain anything? From my reading of other games its worthwhile, particularly at this relatively random stage of early game, to get rid of anyone harming toen, confrimed scum or not (unless obv there is a better/scumier alternative) as that 'useless townie' is causing confusion and therefore aiding scum agenda. At leasts thats my understanding, any vets wish to confirm/deny/shove my head in dung for being stupid? PS: this ones just for you layabout: + Show Spoiler + + Show Spoiler + + Show Spoiler + + Show Spoiler + HAH! GOT YOU! | ||
|
froggynoddy
United Kingdom452 Posts
| ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On February 14 2012 00:43 froggynoddy wrote: From my reading of other games its worthwhile, particularly at this relatively random stage of early game, to get rid of anyone harming toen, confrimed scum or not (unless obv there is a better/scumier alternative) as that 'useless townie' is causing confusion and therefore aiding scum agenda. At leasts thats my understanding, any vets wish to confirm/deny/shove my head in dung for being stupid? PS: this ones just for you layabout: + Show Spoiler + + Show Spoiler + + Show Spoiler + + Show Spoiler + HAH! GOT YOU! soft defense of palmar, yall scum buddies? | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
On February 14 2012 00:43 froggynoddy wrote: From my reading of other games its worthwhile, particularly at this relatively random stage of early game, to get rid of anyone harming toen, confrimed scum or not (unless obv there is a better/scumier alternative) as that 'useless townie' is causing confusion and therefore aiding scum agenda. At leasts thats my understanding, any vets wish to confirm/deny/shove my head in dung for being stupid? There's also the fact that if someone's legitimately not posting or PMing, it's hard to pin them down / get reads on them right? So if we can lynch a hard-to-read townie or scum player, we enter D2 with substantially less confusion. If someone has a solid and traceable voting/posting history you can get some serious talking going on. | ||
|
froggynoddy
United Kingdom452 Posts
On February 14 2012 00:46 Mattchew wrote: soft defense of palmar, yall scum buddies? No, just reasoning out the potential justification for town to lynch disruptive/chaos inducing posters. as my second post suggests I don't see any evidence to justify Palmar's conclusion. Though I find Palmar's talk of killing players so early (particularly at night) quite odd I don't know if that has any bearing on his alignment. I don't know, not enough has been said yet, but we still have plenty of time till we get voting. Once I get home though I wanna check Palmar and BH's previous games as they both have been acting quite aggressive. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
On February 14 2012 00:54 froggynoddy wrote: Once I get home though I wanna check Palmar and BH's previous games as they both have been acting quite aggressive. LOLLLLLLLLLLLL | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
Here's games I've completed: XLVII: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=285690&user=133498 Student: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=291067&user=133498 Resistance: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=297525&user=133498&user=133498 Purgatory: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=298603&user=133498 Enjoy | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22630 Posts
| ||
|
froggynoddy
United Kingdom452 Posts
On February 14 2012 01:04 Blazinghand wrote: Ok let me be a little more clear since just posting "LOLLLLLL" is unhelpful. I would accurately characterize my play as unusually aggressive and-or dickish (especially in my first few games here on TL). Here's games I've completed: XLVII: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=285690&user=133498 Student: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=291067&user=133498 Resistance: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=297525&user=133498&user=133498 Purgatory: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=298603&user=133498 Enjoy Thank you that is more useful than LOLLLLLL. TBH I'm only doing this to practice information gathering and analysis, I think there's no evidence to make any kind of read atm. | ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On February 09 2012 01:52 Blazinghand wrote: Just as a pre-emptive meta note, I'm deliberately going to work on not spamming this game. I'm still going to be highly active, but having 30 pages of filter in a 150 page game with 18 players is not gonna happen this time around. I consider this important to improving my game. So if someone's like "Blazinghand isn't spamming, he must be scum" I want you to bear in mind that I'm not spamming either way this game. *everyone breathes a sigh of relief* | ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
fuck im wrong prob beat you to it. | ||
|
Ciryandor
United States3735 Posts
| ||
| ||
