|
On January 23 2012 03:09 Harrad wrote:Show nested quote +On January 23 2012 02:42 Rinny wrote:
Final Formula
[Make worker] 2 * [Spend 50] 2 * [3 minute mark] * 2 [zealot v ling] * 4 [spam roach off 3 base + macro hatch for teh win (5s + r * 32)] : 32 = [Total] 0
LOLOL ZERG TAKES ZERO SKILL MATHEMATICALLY PROVEN AM I DOING IT RIGHT? ...is there some competition for the most brainless/useless blog of the month going on im not aware of?
wow someone needs a hug. 5/5 funny blog
|
lol kinda funy but ridiculously useless
|
On January 23 2012 03:09 Harrad wrote:Show nested quote +On January 23 2012 02:42 Rinny wrote:
Final Formula
[Make worker] 2 * [Spend 50] 2 * [3 minute mark] * 2 [zealot v ling] * 4 [spam roach off 3 base + macro hatch for teh win (5s + r * 32)] : 32 = [Total] 0
LOLOL ZERG TAKES ZERO SKILL MATHEMATICALLY PROVEN AM I DOING IT RIGHT? ...is there some competition for the most brainless/useless blog of the month going on im not aware of? If you think you see a flaw in the proof, please point it out and we can discuss it together. The mathematics are pretty involved, so it is important we make the proof transparent for as many as possible to spot subtle flaws.
|
|
On January 23 2012 03:09 Harrad wrote:Show nested quote +On January 23 2012 02:42 Rinny wrote:
Final Formula
[Make worker] 2 * [Spend 50] 2 * [3 minute mark] * 2 [zealot v ling] * 4 [spam roach off 3 base + macro hatch for teh win (5s + r * 32)] : 32 = [Total] 0
LOLOL ZERG TAKES ZERO SKILL MATHEMATICALLY PROVEN AM I DOING IT RIGHT? ...is there some competition for the most brainless/useless blog of the month going on im not aware of? The competition also has a "best reply to a joke" competition, you should sign up I reckon you have a chance to win
|
All those times I got into fist fights with zerg players....
I'm sorry, I can see it now.
|
I laughed at the wikipedia article link as your reference.
|
On January 23 2012 03:09 Harrad wrote:Show nested quote +On January 23 2012 02:42 Rinny wrote:
Final Formula
[Make worker] 2 * [Spend 50] 2 * [3 minute mark] * 2 [zealot v ling] * 4 [spam roach off 3 base + macro hatch for teh win (5s + r * 32)] : 32 = [Total] 0
LOLOL ZERG TAKES ZERO SKILL MATHEMATICALLY PROVEN AM I DOING IT RIGHT? ...is there some competition for the most brainless/useless blog of the month going on im not aware of?
Nope but if there was one for most brainless/useless comment, congratulations, you won!
|
On January 23 2012 03:09 Harrad wrote:Show nested quote +On January 23 2012 02:42 Rinny wrote:
Final Formula
[Make worker] 2 * [Spend 50] 2 * [3 minute mark] * 2 [zealot v ling] * 4 [spam roach off 3 base + macro hatch for teh win (5s + r * 32)] : 32 = [Total] 0
LOLOL ZERG TAKES ZERO SKILL MATHEMATICALLY PROVEN AM I DOING IT RIGHT? ...is there some competition for the most brainless/useless blog of the month going on im not aware of?
hmm i think you math is faulty. you didn't account for the "5s" in 5s+r*32". what does the variable s stand for???
|
|
Make one about Terran being OP
|
What the hell did I just read. 5/5.
|
On January 23 2012 03:38 Cascade wrote:Show nested quote +On January 23 2012 03:09 Harrad wrote:On January 23 2012 02:42 Rinny wrote:
Final Formula
[Make worker] 2 * [Spend 50] 2 * [3 minute mark] * 2 [zealot v ling] * 4 [spam roach off 3 base + macro hatch for teh win (5s + r * 32)] : 32 = [Total] 0
LOLOL ZERG TAKES ZERO SKILL MATHEMATICALLY PROVEN AM I DOING IT RIGHT? ...is there some competition for the most brainless/useless blog of the month going on im not aware of? If you think you see a flaw in the proof, please point it out and we can discuss it together. The mathematics are pretty involved, so it is important we make the proof transparent for as many as possible to spot subtle flaws.
I'm not saying there is a flaw. I'm saying it's really stupid and random. Nothing to discuss, really.
|
wtf is this. zerg is not twice as hard.
|
On January 23 2012 04:23 Spray wrote: wtf is this. zerg is not twice as hard.
right it is 32 times as hard
|
I approve of this blog. Zerg is 32 times as hard. It is known
|
Blizzard has to adress this in HotS.
|
The reference had me giggling.
|
I think there's a flaw in your math. Let's take the worst case scenario: you want to make eight zerglings to combat two zealots:
Zerg: 0sz9s*click*z is 7 clicks; Protoss: 0z9z is 4
So your 2x factor may not be entirely applicable to all scenarios, and you may have to look at the overall formula based on the variations. Terran is even closer to Zerg here, too.
|
On January 23 2012 04:17 Harrad wrote:Show nested quote +On January 23 2012 03:38 Cascade wrote:On January 23 2012 03:09 Harrad wrote:On January 23 2012 02:42 Rinny wrote:
Final Formula
[Make worker] 2 * [Spend 50] 2 * [3 minute mark] * 2 [zealot v ling] * 4 [spam roach off 3 base + macro hatch for teh win (5s + r * 32)] : 32 = [Total] 0
LOLOL ZERG TAKES ZERO SKILL MATHEMATICALLY PROVEN AM I DOING IT RIGHT? ...is there some competition for the most brainless/useless blog of the month going on im not aware of? If you think you see a flaw in the proof, please point it out and we can discuss it together. The mathematics are pretty involved, so it is important we make the proof transparent for as many as possible to spot subtle flaws. I'm not saying there is a flaw. I'm saying it's really stupid and random. Nothing to discuss, really. So you agree that the proof is solid, good. We agree on the scientific merit of Rinny's proof. Indeed little to discuss.
But then I may not understand why you find it stupid. Surely you recognize that zerg being 32 times harder than the other two races is an important result. Imagine what this would imply for coming expansion to the Starcraft 2 series!
I can see how the start of the proof can seem a bit random, but in the end the pieces fit together beautifully. Truly an amazing proof, and if I may say so about hard science like this, a piece of Art. Maybe you did not grasp the last step? That would explain your sceptic standpoint. Try to read up a bit more on this link, and dont feel ashamed to ask questions if you don't understand.
best of luck.
|
|
|
|