On July 17 2011 12:28 TOloseGT wrote:
Zero tolerance is such a bullshit excuse. I feel sorry for Reed, the guy didn't deserve that one bit.
Zero tolerance is such a bullshit excuse. I feel sorry for Reed, the guy didn't deserve that one bit.
One thing to keep in mind is that there's a Federal law in the U.S., which has been in place since the early 90s, that says that universities that do not actively work to prevent underage drinking can lose all (that is, 100%) of their Federal funding, including research grants and all other assistance.
Harvard University receives many millions of dollars per year from the Federal government in the form of research grants, educational grants, and graduate student fellowships. So, they put policies in place to protect that, by making sure that their students (including summer students) know that underage drinking is not acceptable.
Different schools respond to this requirement in different ways, but there's a lot at stake for a school that doesn't set strict rules, and enforce them, particularly one as prominent as Harvard University.
Edit: I'm sure the people who made this decision wish they could have had more flexibility.