Shooting of Trayvon Martin

The Trayvon Martin shooting in Sanford, Florida, will likely be one of the most important domestic civil rights / criminal law issues in the United States this decade. It raises issues of alleged racism, alleged police incompetence / indifference to the rights of African-Americans, the appropriateness of recent criminal legislation regarding self-defense (specifically the “Stand Your Ground” law that was enacted in Florida in 2005), alleged media bias / misreporting and numerous other issues.

These are important issues that must be discussed. Such issues make or break politicians, lead to social policy changes and lead to changes in criminal law and procedure. However, please discuss these issues civilly and inform yourself of the issues before making knee-jerk reactions. The previous thread was closed due to circular arguments and country bashing. Please don’t allow this thread to go the same route. If you would like to say the United States sucks, please PM me instead, and I will file your important complaint in the appropriate trash receptacle.

If you feel that any of the information in this OP is inaccurate or any information is missing, please feel free to point it out in the thread and/or send me a PM. I will attempt to include as much information as possible in the OP. Include the source for your information or I will not consider it. I will attempt to add new information as it is released to the media, etc. However, there is an updated Wikipedia article (link below) that is likely updated more regularly.

December 6 Update

Trayvon Martin's killer sues NBC over racist "myth"

http://news.yahoo.com/trayvon-martins-killer-sues-nbc-over-racist-myth-004028150.html

December 3 Update

Bloody new photo of Trayvon Martin's killer released

http://news.yahoo.com/bloody-photo-trayvon-martins-killer-released-200804168.html

Photo Below:

November 7 Update

Trial date: June 10, 2013

George Zimmerman Trial Date: Judge Sets Trayvon Martin Murder Trial for June 10

http://www.lawyerherald.com/articles/2269/20121017/george-zimmerman-trial-date-judge-sets-trayvon.htm

George Zimmerman Presents Witness: Defense to Keep Witness Names in Trayvon Martin Case Anonymous

http://www.lawyerherald.com/articles/2387/20121107/george-zimmerman-presents-witness-defense-keep-names.htm

Judge in Trayvon Martin Case Denies Request for Silence

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/30/us/judge-in-trayvon-martin-case-denies-request-for-silence.html

July 19 Update:

Trayvon Martin’s parents reject George Zimmerman’s apology

http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/lookout/trayvon-martin-parents-reject-george-zimmerman-apology-130326614.html

July 18 Update:



Zimmerman 'sorry' for Trayvon killing, prays for his parents [PLAY BY PLAY OF THE INTERVIEW]

http://content.usatoday.com/communities/ondeadline/post/2012/07/george-zimmerman-to-appear-on-hannity-tonight/1#.UAdvQ6OBp64

INTERVIEW TONIGHT at 9 p.m. EST, 6 p.m. PST

George Zimmerman to appear on Fox News' Sean Hannity program at 9 p.m. Wednesday

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504083_162-57474922-504083/george-zimmerman-to-appear-on-fox-news-sean-hannity-program-at-9-p.m-wednesday/

Sean Hannity George Zimmerman Interview: Fox News Host Gets First Sitdown With Trayvon Martin Shooter

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/18/sean-hannity-george-zimmerman-interview_n_1683300.html

George Zimmerman Trayvon Martin case: Zimmerman talked Black Panther fear, hoodie joke in jail calls

http://www.wptv.com/dpp/news/state/george-zimmerman-trayvon-martin-case-zimmerman-talked-black-panther-fear-hoodie-joke-in-jail-calls

July 17 Update:

Trayvon Martin case’s mystery man: George Zimmerman’s cop connection

http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Justice/2012/0714/Trayvon-Martin-case-s-mystery-man-George-Zimmerman-s-cop-connection

Trayvon Martin's killer accused of molestation by relative

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/07/16/us-usa-florida-shooting-idUSBRE86F0YV20120716

Zimmerman's bail set at $1M in Trayvon Martin case

http://www.fox11online.com/dpps/news/national/south/decision-on-zimmermans-bond-expected-thursday-nt12-jgr_4229367

FBI records: agents found no evidence that Zimmerman was racist

http://www.thenewstribune.com/2012/07/12/2212467/more-evidence-released-in-trayvon.html

Trayvon Martin's killer seeks new judge in murder trial

http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2012-07-13/business/sns-rt-usa-floridashootingl2e8idii5-20120713_1_trayvon-martin-new-judge-circuit-judge-kenneth-lester

Poll: Most Floridians want no changes to Stand Your Ground law

http://www.miamiherald.com/2012/07/16/2897263/poll-most-floridians-want-no-changes.html

Prosecutors Release New Evidence In Trayvon Martin Case

http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2012/07/12/156669208/prosecutors-release-new-evidence-in-trayvon-martin-case

June 26 Update:

Sanford detective: Trayvon Martin never used deadly force

http://www.miamiherald.com/2012/06/26/2869077/sanford-detective-trayvon-martin.html

June 21 Update:

George Zimmerman: Trayvon Martin threatened my life

http://www.cnn.com/2012/06/21/justice/florida-teen-shooting/index.html

Here is the .pdf of the written statement given by Zimmerman

http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2012/images/06/21/written_statement_0226.pdf

CNN article also has a video of Zimmerman explaining the whole situation at the scene.

More videos:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2162597/George-Zimmerman-recounts-moment-shot-Trayvon-Martin-day-killing.html#ixzz1yQudqpmK

June 20 Update:

Police chief in Trayvon Martin case fired

http://news.yahoo.com/trayvon-martin-case-police-chief-bill-lee-permanently-022700840--abc-news-topstories.html

June 18 Update:

Trayvon Martin Case: Jailhouse Calls From Zimmerman To Wife Released

http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2012/06/18/155287395/trayvon-martin-case-jailhouse-calls-from-zimmerman-to-wife-released

Here is the link to the transcripts:

http://www.scribd.com/producermatthew

June 13 Update:

George Zimmerman Fears for Wife's Safety After Mug Shot Publicized

http://gma.yahoo.com/george-zimmerman-fears-wifes-safety-mug-shot-publicized-135421671--abc-news-topstories.html

June 12 Update:

Shellie Zimmerman, wife of Trayvon Martin killer, arrested on perjury charge

http://usnews.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/06/12/12189381-shellie-zimmerman-wife-of-trayvon-martin-killer-arrested-on-perjury-charge?lite

June 4 Update:

Trayvon Martin's killer to ask for new release from jail

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/06/04/us-usa-florida-shooting-idUSBRE85207Q20120604

June 1 Update:

Zimmerman must surrender; bond revoked

http://www.miamiherald.com/2012/06/01/2827147/media-argues-against-sealing-zimmerman.html

May 31 Update:

Were Trayvon Martin Witnesses Coached to Change Their Stories?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bennett-l-gershman/trayvon-martin-witnesses_b_1549128.html

May 24 Update:

Year before Trayvon Martin shooting, George Zimmerman criticized Sanford police as lazy, 'disgusting'

http://usnews.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/05/24/11860887-year-before-trayvon-martin-shooting-george-zimmerman-criticized-sanford-police-as-lazy-disgusting?lite

Trayvon Martin case: Witnesses now changing their stories

http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/regions/americas/united-states/120524/trayvon-martin-case-witnesses-now-changing-their

May 23 Update:

Trayvon Martin shooting: Witnesses change stories ahead of Zimmerman trial

http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/lookout/trayvon-martin-shooting-witnesses-change-stories-ahead-zimmerman-133743219.html

May 22 Update:

What the Trayvon evidence doesn’t show--Records released last week show little evidence that George Zimmerman acted with malice when he shot Trayvon Martin. That could pose a problem for prosecutors.

http://www.miamiherald.com/2012/05/19/2806555/evidence-against-zimmerman-lacking.html

May 18 Update:

Trayvon Martin Case Shadowed by Series of Police Missteps

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/17/us/trayvon-martin-case-shadowed-by-police-missteps.html

More details emerge in Trayvon Martin investigation

http://www.cnn.com/2012/05/18/justice/florida-teen-shooting/index.html

Trayvon evidence fails to answer who screamed for help

http://news.yahoo.com/trayvon-martin-had-traces-marijuana-system-002214340.html

Cops, Witnesses Back Up George Zimmerman's Version of Trayvon Martin Shooting

http://abcnews.go.com/US/trayvon-martin-documents-released-shooting-george-zimmerman/story?id=16371852#.T7X85cWwWAP

George Zimmerman photos released from night of Trayvon Martin shooting







http://photoblog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/05/17/11748829-george-zimmerman-photos-released-from-night-of-trayvon-martin-shooting?lite

May 17 Update:

Trayvon Martin family lawyers: Stop the leaks–release all the records in Zimmerman case

http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/lookout/trayvon-martin-family-lawyers-stop-leaks-release-records-152333240.html

May 15 Update:

Autopsy results show Trayvon Martin had injuries to his knuckles

http://www.wftv.com/news/news/local/autopsy-results-show-trayvon-martin-had-injuries-h/nN6gs/

ABC News Exclusive: Zimmerman Medical Report Shows Broken Nose, Lacerations After Trayvon Martin Shooting

http://abcnews.go.com/US/george-zimmerman-medical-report-sheds-light-injuries-trayvon/story?id=16353532#.T7LW5FKTnNl

FBI may charge George Zimmerman with hate crime

http://www.wftv.com/news/news/local/fbi-seeks-charge-george-zimmerman-hate-crime/nN5pR/

May 8 Update:

Trayvon Martin case: George Zimmerman waives right to speedy trial

http://www.latimes.com/news/nation/nationnow/la-na-nn-zimmerman-waives-speedy-trial-20120508,0,4573513.story

May 3 Update:

NBC News Fires Third Employee Over Doctored 911 Call in Trayvon Martin Controversy

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/trayvon-martin-nbc-news-fires-third-employee-319991

Source: Zimmerman says Trayvon circled his SUV, frightened him

http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/2012-05-03/news/os-trayvon-martin-circles-george-zimmerman-20120503_1_special-prosecutor-angela-corey-source-police-department

May 2 Update:

Zimmerman’s attorney: Trayvon’s social media posts fair game

http://www.miamiherald.com/2012/05/02/2779667/zimmermans-attorney-trayvons-social.html

May 1 Update:

George Zimmerman's Attorney Opens a Website Related to this Case

http://gzlegalcase.com/

The shooting of Trayvon Martin took place on February 26, 2012, in Sanford, Florida. Trayvon Martin was an African American teenager who was shot and killed by 28-year-old George Zimmerman, a man of mixed ethnicity (Latino and white American). Martin, who was unarmed, had been walking to his father's girlfriend's home from a convenience store when Zimmerman followed him after calling the Sanford Police Department, saying he witnessed what he described as "suspicious" behavior. Soon afterward, he fatally shot Martin.

Zimmerman described the shooting to the police who arrived on the scene as self-defense. The responding officers did not arrest Zimmerman, saying on March 12 that they did not find evidence to contradict his claim of self-defense. Both Martin and Zimmerman made phone calls during the incident, some of which were recorded.

The People

Trayvon Martin

+ Show Spoiler +

George Zimmerman

+ Show Spoiler +

Neighborhood Watch

+ Show Spoiler +

Location

+ Show Spoiler +

The Shooting

Interaction

+ Show Spoiler +

Zimmerman police call

+ Show Spoiler +

Police Arrival

+ Show Spoiler +

Aftermath

+ Show Spoiler +

Missing persons report

+ Show Spoiler +

Investigation and Other Official Statements

+ Show Spoiler +

Sanford city commission

+ Show Spoiler +

Legal Issues

+ Show Spoiler +

7.4 MURDER—SECOND DEGREE

To prove the crime of Second Degree Murder, the State must prove the following three elements beyond a reasonable doubt:

1. (Victim) is dead.
2. The death was caused by the criminal act of (defendant).
3. There was an unlawful killing of (victim) by an act imminently dangerous to another and demonstrating a depraved mind without regard for human life.

Definitions.

An ―act includes a series of related actions arising from and performed pursuant to a single design or purpose.
An act is ―imminently dangerous to another and demonstrating a depraved mind‖ if it is an act or series of acts that:
1. a person of ordinary judgment would know is reasonably certain to kill or do serious bodily injury to another, and
2. is done from ill will, hatred, spite, or an evil intent, and
3. is of such a nature that the act itself indicates an indifference to human life.
In order to convict of Second Degree Murder, it is not necessary for the State to prove the defendant had an intent to cause death.

7.7 MANSLAUGHTER
§ 782.07, Fla. Stat.

To prove the crime of Manslaughter, the State must prove the following two elements beyond a reasonable doubt:

1. (Victim) is dead.

Give 2a, 2b, or 2c depending upon allegations and proof.

2. a. (Defendant) intentionally committed an act or acts that
caused the death of (victim).

b. (Defendant) intentionally procured an act that caused
the death of (victim).

c. The death of (victim) was caused by the culpable negligence of (defendant).

The defendant cannot be guilty of manslaughter by committing a merely negligent act or if the killing was either justifiable or excusable homicide:

Negligence:

Each of us has a duty to act reasonably toward others. If there is a violation of that duty, without any conscious intention to harm, that violation is negligence.

Justifiable Homicide:

The killing of a human being is justifiable homicide and lawful if necessarily done while resisting an attempt to murder or commit a felony upon the defendant, or to commit a felony in any dwelling house in which the defendant was at the time of the killing. § 782.02, Fla. Stat.

Excusable Homicide:

The killing of a human being is excusable, and therefore lawful, under any one of the following three circumstances:

1. When the killing is committed by accident and misfortune in doing any lawful act by lawful means with usual ordinary caution and without any unlawful intent, or

2. When the killing occurs by accident and misfortune in the heat of passion, upon any sudden and sufficient provocation, or

3. When the killing is committed by accident and misfortune resulting from a sudden combat, if a dangerous weapon is not used and the killing is not done in a cruel or unusual manner.

§ 782.03, Fla. Stat.

Give only if 2a alleged and proved.

In order to convict of manslaughter by act, it is not necessary for the State to prove that the defendant had an intent to cause death, only an intent to commit an act that was not merely negligent, justified, or excusable and which caused death.

Give only if 2b alleged and proved.

To “procure” means to persuade, induce, prevail upon or cause a person to do something.
128

Give only if 2c alleged and proved.

I will now define “culpable negligence” for you. Each of us has a duty to act reasonably toward others. If there is a violation of that duty, without any conscious intention to harm, that violation is negligence. But culpable negligence is more than a failure to use ordinary care toward others. In order for negligence to be culpable, it must be gross and flagrant. Culpable negligence is a course of conduct showing reckless disregard of human life, or of the safety of persons exposed to its dangerous effects, or such an entire want of care as to raise a presumption of a conscious indifference to consequences, or which shows wantonness or recklessness, or a grossly careless disregard for the safety and welfare of the public, or such an indifference to the rights of others as is equivalent to an intentional violation of such rights.

The negligent act or omission must have been committed with an utter disregard for the safety of others. Culpable negligence is consciously doing an act or following a course of conduct that the defendant must have known, or reasonably should have known, was likely to cause death or great bodily injury.

A person is justified in using deadly force if [he] [she] reasonably believes that such force is necessary to prevent
1. imminent death or great bodily harm to [himself] [herself] or another, or
2. the imminent commission of (applicable forcible felony) against [himself] [herself] or another.

However, the use of deadly force is not justifiable if you find:
1. (Defendant) was attempting to commit, committing, or escaping after the commission of (applicable forcible felony); or
2. (Defendant) initially provoked the use of force against [himself] [herself], unless:
a. The force asserted toward the defendant was so great that [he] [she] reasonably believed that [he] [she] was in imminent danger of death or great 63 bodily harm and had exhausted every reasonable means to escape the danger, other than using deadly force on (assailant).
b. In good faith, the defendant withdrew from physical contact with (assailant) and clearly indicated to (assailant) that [he] [she] wanted to withdraw and stop the use of deadly force, but (assailant) continued or resumed the use of force.

In deciding whether defendant was justified in the use of deadly force, you must judge [him] [her] by the circumstances by which [he] [she] was surrounded at the time the force was used. The danger facing the defendant need not have been actual; however, to justify the use of deadly force, the appearance of danger must have been so real that a reasonably cautious and prudent person under the same circumstances would have believed that the danger could be avoided only through the use of that force. Based upon appearances, the defendant must have actually believed that the danger was real.

If the defendant [was not engaged in an unlawful activity and] was attacked in any place where [he] [she] had a right to be, [he] [she] had no duty to retreat and had the right to stand [his] [her] ground and meet force with force, including deadly force, if [he] [she] reasonably believed that it was necessary to do so to prevent death or great bodily harm to [himself] [herself] [another] or to prevent the commission of a forcible felony.

In considering the issue of self-defense, you may take into account the relative physical abilities and capacities of the defendant and (victim).

If in your consideration of the issue of self-defense you have a reasonable doubt on the question of whether the defendant was justified in the use of deadly force, you should find the defendant not guilty.
However, if from the evidence you are convinced that the defendant was not justified in the use of deadly force, you should find [him] [her] guilty if all the elements of the charge have been proved.

3.6(f) JUSTIFIABLE USE OF DEADLY FORCE
Because there are many defenses applicable to self-defense, give only those parts of the instructions that are required by the evidence.
Read in all cases.
An issue in this case is whether the defendant acted in self-defense. It is a defense to the offense with which (defendant) is charged if the [death of] [injury to] (victim) resulted from the justifiable use of deadly force.
Definition.
“Deadly force” means force likely to cause death or great bodily harm.
Give if applicable. § 782.02, Fla. Stat.
The use of deadly force is justifiable only if the defendant reasonably believes that the force is necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to [himself] [herself] while resisting:
1. another’s attempt to murder [him] [her], or
2. any attempt to commit (applicable felony) upon [him] [her], or
3. any attempt to commit (applicable felony) upon or in any dwelling, residence, or vehicle occupied by [him] [her].
Insert and define applicable felony that defendant alleges victim attempted to commit.
Give if applicable. §§ 776.012, 776.031, Fla. Stat.
A person is justified in using deadly force if [he] [she] reasonably believes that such force is necessary to prevent
1. imminent death or great bodily harm to [himself] [herself] or another, or
2. the imminent commission of (applicable forcible felony) against [himself] [herself] or another.
Insert and define applicable forcible felony that defendant alleges victim was about to commit. Forcible felonies are listed in § 776.08, Fla. Stat.
Aggressor. § 776.041, Fla. Stat.
However, the use of deadly force is not justifiable if you find:
Give only if the defendant is charged with an independent forcible felony. See Giles v. State, 831 So. 2d 1263 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002).
1. (Defendant) was attempting to commit, committing, or escaping after the commission of (applicable forcible felony); or
Define applicable forcible felony. Define after paragraph 2 if both paragraphs 1 and 2 are given. Forcible felonies are listed in § 776.08, Fla. Stat.
2. (Defendant) initially provoked the use of force against [himself] [herself], unless:
a. The force asserted toward the defendant was so great that [he] [she] reasonably believed that [he] [she] was in imminent danger of death or great 63 bodily harm and had exhausted every reasonable means to escape the danger, other than using deadly force on (assailant).
b. In good faith, the defendant withdrew from physical contact with (assailant) and clearly indicated to (assailant) that [he] [she] wanted to withdraw and stop the use of deadly force, but (assailant) continued or resumed the use of force.
Force in resisting a law enforcement officer § 776.051(1), Fla. Stat.
A person is not justified in using force to resist an arrest by a law enforcement officer, or to resist a law enforcement officer who is engaged in the execution of a legal duty, if the law enforcement officer was acting in good faith and he or she is known, or reasonably appears, to be a law enforcement officer.
Give if applicable.
However, if an officer uses excessive force to make an arrest, then a person is justified in the use of reasonable force to defend [himself] [herself] (or another), but only to the extent [he] [she] reasonably believes such force is necessary. See § 776.012, Fla. Stat.; Ivester v. State, 398 So. 2d 926 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); Jackson v. State, 463 So. 2d 372 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985).
In some instances, the instructions applicable to §§ 776.012, 776.031, or 776.041, Fla. Stat., may need to be given in connection with this instruction.
Read in all cases.
In deciding whether defendant was justified in the use of deadly force, you must judge [him] [her] by the circumstances by which [he] [she] was surrounded at the time the force was used. The danger facing the defendant need not have been actual; however, to justify the use of deadly force, the appearance of danger must have been so real that a reasonably cautious and prudent person under the same circumstances would have believed that the danger could be avoided only through the use of that force. Based upon appearances, the defendant must have actually believed that the danger was real.
No duty to retreat. § 776.013(3), Fla. Stat. See Novak v. State 974 So. 2d 520 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) regarding unlawful activity. There is no duty to retreat where the defendant was not engaged in any unlawful activity other than the crime(s) for which the defendant asserts the justification.
If the defendant [was not engaged in an unlawful activity and] was attacked in any place where [he] [she] had a right to be, [he] [she] had no duty to retreat and had the right to stand [his] [her] ground and meet force with force, including deadly force, if [he] [she] reasonably believed that it was necessary to do so to prevent death or great bodily harm to [himself] [herself] [another] or to prevent the commission of a forcible felony.
Define applicable forcible felony from list in § 776.08, Fla. Stat. that defendant alleges victim was about to commit.
Presumption of Fear (dwelling, residence, or occupied vehicle). Give if applicable. § 776.013(2)(a)-(d), Fla. Stat.
If the defendant was in a(n)[dwelling] [residence] [occupied vehicle] where [he] [she] had a right to be, [he] [she] is presumed to have had a reasonable fear of imminent death or great bodily harm to [himself] [herself] [another] if (victim) had [unlawfully and forcibly entered] [removed or attempted to remove another person against that person’s will from] that [dwelling] [residence] 64 [occupied vehicle] and the defendant had reason to believe that had occurred. The defendant had no duty to retreat under such circumstances.
Exceptions to Presumption of Fear. § 776.013(2)(a)-(d), Fla. Stat. Give as applicable.
The presumption of reasonable fear of imminent death or great bodily harm does not apply if:
a. the person against whom the defensive force is used has the right to be in [or is a lawful resident of the [dwelling] [residence]] [the vehicle], such as an owner,
lessee, or titleholder, and there is not an injunction for protection from domestic violence or a written pretrial supervision order of no contact against that person; or
b. the person or persons sought to be removed is a child or grandchild, or is otherwise in the lawful custody or under the lawful guardianship of, the person against whom the defensive force is used; or
c. the person who uses defensive force is engaged in an unlawful activity or is using the [dwelling] [residence] [occupied vehicle] to further an unlawful activity; or
d. the person against whom the defensive force is used is a law enforcement officer, who enters or attempts to enter a [dwelling] [residence] [vehicle] in the performance of [his] [her] official duties and the officer identified [himself] [herself] in accordance with any applicable law or the person using the force knew or reasonably should have known that the person entering or attempting to enter was a law enforcement officer.
If requested, give definition of “law enforcement officer” from § 943.10(14), Fla. Stat.,
§ 776.013(4), Fla. Stat.
A person who unlawfully and by force enters or attempts to enter another’s [dwelling] [residence] [occupied vehicle] is presumed to be doing so with the intent to commit an unlawful act involving force or violence.
Definitions. Give if applicable. § 776.013(5), Fla. Stat.
As used with regard to self defense:
“Dwelling” means a building or conveyance of any kind, including any attached porch, whether the building or conveyance is temporary or permanent or mobile or immobile, which has a roof over it, including a tent, and is designed to be occupied by people lodging therein at night.
“Residence” means a dwelling in which a person resides either temporarily or permanently or is visiting as an invited guest.
“Vehicle” means a conveyance of any kind, whether or not motorized, which is designed to transport people or property.
Prior threats. Give if applicable.
If you find that the defendant who because of threats or prior difficulties with (victim) had reasonable grounds to believe that [he] [she] was in danger of death or great bodily harm at the hands of (victim), then the defendant had the right to arm [himself] [herself]. However, the defendant cannot justify the use of deadly force, if after arming [himself] [herself] [he] [she] renewed [his] [her] difficulty with (victim) when [he] [she] could have avoided the difficulty, 65 although as previously explained if the defendant was not engaged in an unlawful activity and was attacked in any place where [he] [she] had a right to be, [he] [she] had no duty to retreat.
Reputation of victim. Give if applicable.
If you find that (victim) had a reputation of being a violent and dangerous person and that [his] [her] reputation was known to the defendant, you may consider this fact in determining whether the actions of the defendant were those of a reasonable person in dealing with an individual of that reputation.
Physical abilities. Read in all cases.
In considering the issue of self-defense, you may take into account the relative physical abilities and capacities of the defendant and (victim).
Read in all cases.
If in your consideration of the issue of self-defense you have a reasonable doubt on the question of whether the defendant was justified in the use of deadly force, you should find the defendant not guilty.
However, if from the evidence you are convinced that the defendant was not justified in the use of deadly force, you should find [him] [her] guilty if all the elements of the charge have been proved.
Comment