|
Disclaimer: This is not about un-ranked ladders. Thank you.
The recent active player-base has been dwindling for 1v1 and this has been a major concern for me. Recently, I looked at my own situation to see if there could be some solutions.
I played a fair bit of 1v1s in the past but stopped due to the amount of stress they caused me. At the start of each new season, I would play 1 game to be placed and would then stop there. I wanted my 1v1 rank to be my 'serious' ranking. I considered my team ranks to be my fun ones where I would try builds and play the random race.
Lately I started a small dedicated team rank (3v3) that we have taken seriously (playing 1 race only, after warm-ups and learning from mistakes). We have had some success and fun doing this and I realized that this could become my new "serious" ranking. I then decided, after much deliberation, that I would stop caring about my 1v1 rank and play the random race on it for fun only. This has been a great success and I have started playing a lot more 1v1s lately.
I then thought: could something like this be the solution to increase (or at least maintain) the active player base on the 1v1 SC2 ladder? I know a lot of people want to keep their 1v1 ranking as their 'serious' ranking so I decided it would be a great idea to allow an account to have multiple 1v1 rankings. I have created a poll below to see whether people would like this idea and see how many 1v1 rankings would be preferable. I understand that having unlimited (or just too many) 1v1 rankings would lead to a lot of smurfing and abuse so I have limited the options to 1 through 4 (explained in the poll).
Poll: How many 1v1 ranks should an account have?4 (1 for each race) (1458) 56% 2 (1 main and 1 fun) (474) 18% 1 (stay as is) (393) 15% 3 (1 for each race - no random) (297) 11% 2622 total votes Your vote: How many 1v1 ranks should an account have? (Vote): 1 (stay as is) (Vote): 2 (1 main and 1 fun) (Vote): 3 (1 for each race - no random) (Vote): 4 (1 for each race)
Personally, I would like to see 2 1v1 rankings (in my case: 1 main, 1 fun).
Happy polling! Please post if you have further ideas or comments!
(Clarification: You can think of these seperate 1v1 rankings as "teams" as posted by a very helpful liquidee)
(More Clarification: It's not just about the points, achievements or the rank you are in but more importantly about what MMR you have which affects how well you get matched up with an opponent)
Also, before you start saying I'm a noob or post something moronic like that, I used to be in 1v1 Diamond, now in Platinum. I have ranges of Diamond and Master in team league. Cheers.
-- UPDATE - October 18th, 2011 ---
56% of players (1438) wanted 4 rankings (1 for each race). 18% of players (468) wanted 2 rankings (1 main and 1 fun/off-race). 15% of players (387) wanted it to stay at 1 ranking. 11% of players (294) wanted 3 rankings (1 for each race - no random).
Here are the summarized results and some interesting points from the conclusion of the first poll (October 18th, 2011) and discussion:
- A seperate ranking for each race option on the 1v1 ladder stream would make the most sense if multiple rankings would be implemented. This would simplify ladder rankings in that each player could potentially have a zerg, protoss, terran and random ranking and MMR. Perhaps the Grandmaster league would let in the top race ranking per player only.
- A practice ladder was proposed and some details of how people would like it to work were ironed out: the ladder would not affect your ranking or MMR but would use your MMR to match opponents. I am not keen on having a practice ladder as this would surely curtail the use of the real ladder.
- Very few players seemed adamant about keeping only 1 ranking per player for 1v1. The reasons were usually concerns over smurfing. I must state, however, that I do not think this is valid as the match-making system should match people up correctly shortlfy after starting a new ranking (as it currently does).
- Adding multiple rankings should keep the flux of active players on the ladder the same or increase the amount of active players (fear of off-racing ruining your ladder rank would be gone thus encouraging people to play more 1v1 ladder).
I have continued this discussion on the SC2 Battle.net forums: http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/forum/topic/3413401490#1
|
There should just be an unranked 1v1 "ladder" period.
|
I think it should be unlimited like it was in brood war, I don't see the point in limiting it other then putting money in the pockets of blizzard
|
i like that idea. it would allow me to offrace better
On October 13 2011 07:24 Hoodlum wrote:I think it should be unlimited like it was in brood war, I don't see the point in limiting it other then putting money in the pockets of blizzard 
what if you were just trying to get back into the game after some time off, and realized you'd only be playing masters+ players who just wanted some easy wins?
|
I often wish I could offrace on the ladder, but I'd get absolutely destroyed if I played in the bracket I play in on my main race, so I'd prefer 3 or 4 ranks.
|
|
i would love an unranked ladder like in LoL where there are no downsides, being able to play some games and warm up/decide if u want to play a stressful game in the normal ladder would be good, doubt they will impliment this tho
|
1 for each race obviously. 1 main and 1 for fun? lol
|
An unranked ladder and a ranked ladder is all that is needed.
|
On October 13 2011 07:27 MonkSEA wrote: An unranked ladder and a ranked ladder is all that is needed.
What if you want to know how well you are doing (ranking wise) with an off-race?
|
It would be nice to have an unranked 1v1 option that works with your current MMR. It would be much better warm-up/practice than resorting to random custom games where the skill variance is waaaaay too varied.
|
United States9232 Posts
On October 13 2011 07:24 blagoonga123 wrote:i like that idea. it would allow me to offrace better Show nested quote +On October 13 2011 07:24 Hoodlum wrote:I think it should be unlimited like it was in brood war, I don't see the point in limiting it other then putting money in the pockets of blizzard  what if you were just trying to get back into the game after some time off, and realized you'd only be playing masters+ players who just wanted some easy wins?
So, like BW? The system worked fine, really. Then you'll get smashed a few games? BW was brutal, but had a better system. With iccup, at least.
|
Preferably 5 - one for each race, including random, and one unranked.
A bit unrealistic I admit, that's a lot of 1v1 ladders.
|
Custom games?
Doesn't that cover what you are talking about?
|
I like the idea of a serious and a casual.
Especially as someone who isn't very good to start with, when I have a few beers in the evening I never let myself play 1v1 because I know it'll just hurt my ranking, even though sometimes I really want to.
And nothing is worse than being drunk and having to do random team games sometimes with allies who are still worse than you when you're playing at like 50%.
|
United States9232 Posts
On October 13 2011 07:36 IamBoIt wrote: Custom games?
Doesn't that cover what you are talking about?
Not even remotely. Just try to think about it. That's all it takes.
|
1. You don't need a "fun" one, play custom games or join a group and practice together.
|
On October 13 2011 07:29 Zurachi wrote: It would be nice to have an unranked 1v1 option that works with your current MMR. It would be much better warm-up/practice than resorting to random custom games where the skill variance is waaaaay too varied.
Single ladder games matter absolutely zero, along with your ladder points. There is no need for a unranked ladder as if you don't care about rank then simply ignore it. Unranked ladder would split the community and provide less people to play against which is not a good thing and why I hope it'll never happen
Having a ladder for each race has its values and that would be what I'd support most although I have no problems with the current system at all. Having a ranking for each race would encourage more play and off-racing.
|
Honestly, I think the reason the player base is dwindling cuz the game makes you feel so shitty when you lose. BW it was hard as hell to get from D to C and a loss didnt mean as much. In sc2-Blizzard's horrible ladder- one loss can make or break your league standing.
Another factor could also be the mass marketing of sc2, many people bought it cuz there was a whole bunch of commercials and hype etc, and they turned out to not be fit for an RTS kinda game.
This whole multiple acc thing would just screw people up honestly
One for "fun"-as in what? stupid builds? or is "fun" just a word for "excuse to play badly"
Everyone knows the ladder will turn into-OH HELL NO EVEN THOUGH I LOST I HAVE A GM ACC-It'll just make BM even worse....and Blizzard doesn't care about BM...lol
|
If there is a ladder which doesnt count points. I will play in it . Also it doesnt matter for me whether there is 1 account for each race, since i am just gold and looking to have fun. I just fear the ladder dunno y!
|
|
|
|