| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Boonbag
France3318 Posts
I mean, not only it's slow with an utterly ugly and failed unit animation, but moreover, it doesn't even graphically looks decent. I mean this ? in 2009 ? wtf -_- Even early War3 looked 10x better. Not even talking about the gameplay since we had 2 retards playing and 2 other retards babbling about it. Jesus. How can you guys with any slight passion for the greatness starcraft is, get thrilled about this? | ||
|
Kletus
Canada580 Posts
On April 17 2009 04:07 AdunToridas wrote: I thought they would include the new infestor model... Ohh thank god someone said this. I was about to ask if they are still working on that new model or not. Well at least we got to see the mountain with 3 mouths. | ||
|
Eury
Sweden1126 Posts
On April 17 2009 04:25 Zoler wrote: It's even better when you play it, I hate how everyone bitched like shit about this when the problem was just bad quality video... geez Well to be fair it is kinda important to be able to tell easily how many units of what a player got just by a glance even at low quality streams. It is vital if you want things like GomTV. To my (pleasant) surprise that have already been sorted almost completely. | ||
|
.gypsy
Canada689 Posts
On April 17 2009 04:30 Boonbag wrote: its just like someone had a starcraft nightmare, a bad one, and this thing came out of it. I mean, not only it's slow with an utterly ugly and failed unit animation, but moreover, it doesn't even graphically looks decent. I mean this ? in 2009 ? wtf -_- Even early War3 looked 10x better. Not even talking about the gameplay since we had 2 retards playing and 2 other retards babbling about it. Jesus. How can you guys with any slight passion for the greatness starcraft is, get thrilled about this? Calm the fuck down? | ||
|
Hammy
France828 Posts
| ||
|
Ozarugold
2716 Posts
And also...exploding hatchery!! | ||
|
ManWithCheese
Canada246 Posts
On April 17 2009 04:30 Boonbag wrote: its just like someone had a starcraft nightmare, a bad one, and this thing came out of it. I mean, not only it's slow with an utterly ugly and failed unit animation, but moreover, it doesn't even graphically looks decent. I mean this ? in 2009 ? wtf -_- Even early War3 looked 10x better. Not even talking about the gameplay since we had 2 retards playing and 2 other retards babbling about it. Jesus. How can you guys with any slight passion for the greatness starcraft is, get thrilled about this? I'm sorry but you're just an idiot, get your eyes checked out because you're blind. | ||
|
freelander
Hungary4707 Posts
On April 17 2009 04:30 Boonbag wrote: its just like someone had a starcraft nightmare, a bad one, and this thing came out of it. I mean, not only it's slow with an utterly ugly and failed unit animation, but moreover, it doesn't even graphically looks decent. I mean this ? in 2009 ? wtf -_- Even early War3 looked 10x better. Not even talking about the gameplay since we had 2 retards playing and 2 other retards babbling about it. Jesus. How can you guys with any slight passion for the greatness starcraft is, get thrilled about this? idiot | ||
|
GunsofthePatriots
South Africa991 Posts
| ||
|
chobopeon
United States7342 Posts
| ||
|
Kletus
Canada580 Posts
| ||
|
Daniri
387 Posts
On April 17 2009 04:12 Klive5ive wrote: Oh it does make a brief appearance. It looks pretty hilarious. For a start it's MASSIVE compared to other Zerg units and it has this huge shiny ass. That wasn't the new model. | ||
|
Tsagacity
United States2124 Posts
On April 17 2009 04:20 GinNtoniC wrote: Hunter-Seeker missiles are clearly the new reverted psi storm, as in, no damage over time, but still the deal of "storm dodge!" or get smashed. I thought the exact same thing when I first saw it. | ||
|
Kletus
Canada580 Posts
On April 17 2009 05:00 Tsagacity wrote: I thought the exact same thing when I first saw it. I try to ignore the english commentary in these BRs and replace it with MBCGame commentators. I can see it now, "Ahhhh~~!!! HUNTAH SEEKAAAAAAAAH HUNTAAA SEEEKKAAAAAH!!!" | ||
|
ven
Germany332 Posts
I already didn't like the zergling movement in the first gamplay video but now it actually seems worse. Well, I guess they're going to do a lot of work on the whole thing anyway so it might turn ot alright in the end. | ||
|
r0kamo
Canada34 Posts
On April 17 2009 05:08 ven_ wrote: Didn't anybody else think the zergling running animation looked odd? It's not a smooth motion. It's like they jump a bit and then just wait before they do another leap. I already didn't like the zergling movement in the first gamplay video but now it actually seems worse. Well, I guess they're going to do a lot of work on the whole thing anyway so it might turn ot alright in the end. I found the zergling animations to be a bit too in sync... to me, anyway. I found it just made them seem in-organic, artificial or something. Although I think alot of different models act in this manner, it just seems most noticeable and irksome with the zerglings | ||
|
kerr0r
Norway319 Posts
On April 17 2009 04:30 Boonbag wrote: its just like someone had a starcraft nightmare, a bad one, and this thing came out of it. I mean, not only it's slow with an utterly ugly and failed unit animation, but moreover, it doesn't even graphically looks decent. I mean this ? in 2009 ? wtf -_- Even early War3 looked 10x better. Not even talking about the gameplay since we had 2 retards playing and 2 other retards babbling about it. Jesus. How can you guys with any slight passion for the greatness starcraft is, get thrilled about this? I know this has been posted before, but: http://www.somethingawful.com/d/news/diablo-hate-internet.php FFS! | ||
|
Osmoses
Sweden5302 Posts
| ||
|
scwizard
United States1195 Posts
Seriously though, like before the players sucked (ok zerg, you have him "contained", now how about BUILDING A THIRD FFS). I mean did the zerg ever have more than two hatcheries? What I was most impressed by was the looks. It's certainly a step above warcraft III. The sounds are still recycled though, but that should eventually change. I still think it has a long long way to go in terms of balance, but the premises are reasonably sound. The tech tree could use some shuffling, maybe a new unit or two. But it should be reasonably balanced by the time the first game comes out, and perfectly balanced by the time the second expansion pack (the third game) comes out. If "terrible terrible damage" isn't a cheat in Starcraft II I'm going to be very upset. | ||
|
Mr.E
United States434 Posts
On April 17 2009 04:30 Boonbag wrote: its just like someone had a starcraft nightmare, a bad one, and this thing came out of it. I mean, not only it's slow with an utterly ugly and failed unit animation, but moreover, it doesn't even graphically looks decent. I mean this ? in 2009 ? wtf -_- Even early War3 looked 10x better. Not even talking about the gameplay since we had 2 retards playing and 2 other retards babbling about it. Jesus. How can you guys with any slight passion for the greatness starcraft is, get thrilled about this? I think it looks beautiful... but then again I think Brood War looks fine. | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 League of Legends Counter-Strike Other Games |
|
Replay Cast
The PondCast
OSC
INu's Battles
Percival vs Cure
Classic vs Clem
Replay Cast
Escore
IntoTheTV X SOOP
RSL Revival
herO vs SHIN
Clem vs Solar
Serral vs Rogue
RSL Revival
WardiTV Weekly
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
