Thoughts on auto-matchmaking - Page 5

On June 04 2007 04:49 Heen wrote:

You need to be banned for pure stupidity. I don't care how much heart this guy has, because this is crossing the line

On June 04 2007 10:30 lololol wrote:


Banning people for posting the truth is typical around here, so he'll be banned for sure, don't worry!

On June 04 2007 13:10 SoleSteeler wrote:


No not really. I've probably played about 2000 ladder games on War3's AMM and have been disconnected maybe 5 times ever, maybe he needs a better connection? And you don't know the maps? Boo fucking hoo, learn them you idiot, there's only like 8 or so... how hard is it to learn 8 maps?

On June 04 2007 13:46 Dendra wrote:

the point is wc3 ladder counts a 0.000000001sec long game as a loss which is absolutely ridiculous.
maps - they keep adding&removing maps+i'm not into wc3 so much i'll go and learn some chobo 6player map and analyse what every critter drops.

think best time for a draw would be like 1:30 or so since you can do manner gas/pylon or something like that below 2min and people alt-q-q, kinda lame. that was especially on paranoid androide.

On June 04 2007 15:14 Heen wrote:
Dendra, you listed a bunch of problems that are totally unrelated to the ladder system.

You lost 5 games in a row? That's most likely your problem alone. Even if it were BNet lagging at the time, it has nothing to do with the ladder system which is the discussion at hand.

The map pool sucks, really? Most people have been content with it from what I've seen. Again, this has more to do with person preferences than with the ladder system.

Then you complain about someone winning because he knows where to creep. Boo hoo. That's a big part of the game. Your dislike of WC3 holds no grounds for bashing its 'brilliant' ladder system.

The problem with BW ladder is that it's a 10-year-old game, not that Blizzard is stupid. I'll take a guess and say that the reason that Blizzard hasn't changed the BW ladder is because they can't or it'll take too much effort.

You need to make logical arguments that somehow contribute to the discussion.

On June 04 2007 13:46 Dendra wrote:

the point is wc3 ladder counts a 0.000000001sec long game as a loss which is absolutely ridiculous.

On June 04 2007 17:41 Dendra wrote:

you didn't read my post, did you?
counting a 1sec game in wc3 as a win/loss is not logical, you keep mentioning 5losses in a row, who cares if it was 1, or if it was 5 wins in a row, fact is 1sec game is not what we would call a ladder game in sc.

as for the 2nd - don't take guesses. the issue i mentioned is well-known to the community and should be solved like mentioned - with the help of an admin.

Next time you decide to comment something read it carefully.

On June 04 2007 18:11 Heen wrote:

You're the one lacking reading comprehension skills.

Counting a 1 sec game as a win/loss is illogical? Says who? Only you apparently. It may be a different case in BW where the games are found by hand, but in AMM, of course all disconnects/early quits should be counted as losses. If not, then every time I got matchuped against someone really good or a matchup that I suck at, I could quit for a 100% loss prevention. It would be as gay as someone who just left the game early on because he messed up his BO or scouted 2 gate. Deal with it.

As for the 2nd part, you can't just make all the changes you want with patches. Blizzard introduced right-click rallying from WC3 to BW. However, Blizzard can't one day decide to implement the same ladder system as WC3 into BW.