EPTThoughts on auto-matchmaking - Page 12
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Aphelion
United States2720 Posts
| ||
|
Manit0u
Poland17778 Posts
On June 13 2007 15:37 Dendra wrote: useless debating why amm would suck in sc unless it was implemented as optional, no use explaining good sides of our ladder since we dont have so big prize money and even if we did i doubt coaches of progaming teams would allow their players to play on those ladders before tournaments and stuff like that, progaming is on a "bit" higher level in sc than in wc3, problem is wc3 is big in europe and a disaster in korea so you know more about wc3 progaming and very little about korean progaming. players like grubby wouldn't stand a chance in bw, europeans have good knowledge of the game, can be very smart players, but pure hardcore training 24/7 makes it impssible to be a pro in sc, the things you can improve in sc go beyond a mere "list", hence the difference is so big. wc3 amm - good, sc2 amm - good, sc amm - only as optional because ppl are used to playing this way, just like it's impossible to explain to a wc3 gamer that sc is superior in every aspect so is impossible to explain that cs 1.6 is superior to css, you dont get it until you understand it. amm is a good thing but we dont need it in sc ladder - it would be more useful to put it in public games. -end?- You still don't get it, do you? | ||
|
SoleSteeler
Canada5468 Posts
sc2 amm - good case closed! | ||
|
Dariush
Romania330 Posts
| ||
|
Dendra
Croatia801 Posts
On June 13 2007 18:13 SoleSteeler wrote: Look Dendra, I've been playing BW longer than you have. I am not a 'war3 player', I am a RTSer. I know perfectly well all about BW and how popular it is and how it's on a higher level than War3. I also clearly recognize that BW is a better game overall than War3. case closed! then i guess you know sc is more popular than ever before? with latin leagues opening, etc., the e-sports plague is spreading across the world, since like last 6months or more the sc community is growing, etc. a bit strange for a 10yr old game, even more strange considering we lost both of our major ladders (not counting nG- which died long ago), that just proves how strong our community is and i strongly believe it got so strong thanks to wgtour, pgtour and the quality of game itself. since no game can repeat the same quality the community needs something else to keep it together - amm. geegee | ||
|
silynxer
Germany439 Posts
| ||
|
XythOs
Germany520 Posts
| ||
|
Dendra
Croatia801 Posts
On June 14 2007 12:43 XythOs wrote: Dendra, u know we are talking about SC II AMM do you? yeh, someone mentioned amm in sc so i switched subject since it's obvius amm in sc2 will be good. -btw i dont count sc2 under sc, that "thing" doesnt deserve to wear that name, maybe command spacecraft 40 000 would be appropriate name. | ||
Carnac
Germany / USA16648 Posts
| ||
|
[X]Ken~D
377 Posts
On June 14 2007 18:15 Carnac wrote: shut the fuck up with your retarded whining about sc2 already  A rematch option would be interesting. After the match, a player can choose to rematch and the other player can either accept or decline. It can be a best of 3 games, including win/lose from the original game. Best of 3 would be good and a small enough number to limit potential abuse. | ||
|
SoleSteeler
Canada5468 Posts
On June 14 2007 18:04 Dendra wrote: \yeh, someone mentioned amm in sc so i switched subject since it's obvius amm in sc2 will be good. -btw i dont count sc2 under sc, that "thing" doesnt deserve to wear that name, maybe command spacecraft 40 000 would be appropriate name. what? who the fuck mentioned AMM in sc... i have never even considered that, this whole topic of discussion is amm in sc2... | ||
|
Manit0u
Poland17778 Posts
On June 14 2007 23:43 SoleSteeler wrote: \ what? who the fuck mentioned AMM in sc... i have never even considered that, this whole topic of discussion is amm in sc2... I mentioned it around page 10-11 of this thread, after bazillion of his posts. | ||
|
SoleSteeler
Canada5468 Posts
| ||
|
jacen
Austria3644 Posts
On June 14 2007 03:09 Dendra wrote: then i guess you know sc is more popular than ever before? war3 is popular too. with millions (no kidding) of games per day played on all 4 servers combined, i think it can at least somewhat rival sc in popularity. | ||
|
prOxi.swAMi
Australia3091 Posts
| ||
|
lololol
5198 Posts
On June 16 2007 13:22 jacen wrote: war3 is popular too. with millions (no kidding) of games per day played on all 4 servers combined, i think it can at least somewhat rival sc in popularity. Yeah, you're not kidding, you're outright lying. | ||
|
Manit0u
Poland17778 Posts
On June 21 2007 02:11 lololol wrote: Yeah, you're not kidding, you're outright lying. 80249 people, 2047 games upon logging in to Northrend. That's what it shows to me, so it's a bit far from millions indeed  | ||
|
Dariush
Romania330 Posts
On June 21 2007 02:36 Manit0u wrote: 80249 people, 2047 games upon logging in to Northrend. That's what it shows to me, so it's a bit far from millions indeed Most of them play dota and other custom games | ||
|
Gokey
United States2722 Posts
| ||
|
lololol
5198 Posts
On June 21 2007 03:25 Gokey wrote: i love automatch... beats trying to find a game for fucking 20 minutes at the moment... Not when the search times are longer... In war3 higher level players smurf, because they can't find opponents for hours... hope they fix this for SC2  On June 21 2007 02:51 Dariush wrote: Most of them play dota and other custom games Most of them actually idle in a channel Just for comparison one private server has 8000+ players at peak hours and 1200+ games going, which is a 5-6 times higher ratio of games/players. | ||
| ||
