• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 09:19
CEST 15:19
KST 22:19
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Serral wins EWC 202516Tournament Spotlight: FEL Cracow 20259Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202580RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15
Community News
[BSL 2025] H2 - Team Wars, Weeklies & SB Ladder2EWC 2025 - Replay Pack2Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced28BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams10Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0
StarCraft 2
General
Greatest Players of All Time: 2025 Update #1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time Serral wins EWC 2025 Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 EWC 2025 - Replay Pack
Tourneys
Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $10,000 live event TaeJa vs Creator Bo7 SC Evo Showmatch Esports World Cup 2025 $25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 484 Magnetic Pull Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune
Brood War
General
Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced Shield Battery Server New Patch BW General Discussion [BSL 2025] H2 - Team Wars, Weeklies & SB Ladder BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China CSL Xiamen International Invitational [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance
Strategy
Does 1 second matter in StarCraft? Simple Questions, Simple Answers Muta micro map competition [G] Mineral Boosting
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Total Annihilation Server - TAForever [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread UK Politics Mega-thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine
Fan Clubs
INnoVation Fan Club SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Gtx660 graphics card replacement Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
TeamLiquid Team Shirt On Sale The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Eight Anniversary as a TL…
Mizenhauer
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 717 users

Blizzard statement and ruling on WCS win-trading - Page 8

Forum Index > SC2 General
309 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 6 7 8 9 10 16 Next All
ZigguratOfUr
Profile Blog Joined April 2012
Iraq16955 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-04-14 23:34:26
April 14 2016 23:31 GMT
#141
On April 15 2016 08:03 Hier wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 15 2016 06:59 Elentos wrote:
On April 15 2016 06:56 Hier wrote:
Wait how do they know Major and MarineLord had both had access to the account in question?

Aside from both of them admitting to it, well, you can compare hotkey setups and spamming patterns to identify players.

Them admitting to it is fine, the other stuff absolutely cannot be used as evidence.
Show nested quote +
On April 15 2016 07:01 ZigguratOfUr wrote:
On April 15 2016 06:56 Hier wrote:
Wait how do they know Major and MarineLord had both had access to the account in question?


That's very easy to establish. I don't think either player denied it either.

That's the thing, it's NOT easy to establish definitively.


It often is. If the person is using the account normally (and not trying to conceal the fact that they are using that account) it's trivial to establish. They can compare the IP, MAC address and all the data they have about the computer you use for your main account with the other account. If you argue that someone else was using your computer (which isn't a possibility in this case) they can look at the replays and try to see if it's you from the hotkey patterns, build orders etc.

Besides in this case MarineLord has said that they were sharing accounts.

On April 15 2016 08:31 wiileeyum wrote:
While I don't mind some form of punishment, retroactive punishment seems way too harsh. ex post facto must be discussed since Blizzard themselves just issued one.


What do you mean by retroactive punishment? The rules were in place before they broke them. If you mean the fact that they removed the WCS points they'd won so far that doesn't have anything to do with ex post facto.
trada
Profile Joined August 2012
Germany347 Posts
April 14 2016 23:34 GMT
#142
I dont find this harsh at all.
Its not just about those 3 players and enforcing the rules. Its about sending a message to those players who couldnt (yet) be caught and prevention of abusive behaviour. Blizzard suspected there would be more players involved in win trading and by increasing the punishment when caught this could have a deterrent effect on those players. It could also make win trading or other forms of cheating less appealing to players who think about abusing the system but havent actually done anything yet.
~
Caihead
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
Canada8550 Posts
April 14 2016 23:49 GMT
#143
So Marinelord admits to awarding wins. Wins that were awarded were done on a barcode account that Marinelord and Major account shares. Major admits to account sharing said account. Note that Blizzard does NOT name Lambo, Zanster or Botvinik.

What more proof do you actually need? Even if the verdict is a bad one you can't blame the jury. Suppose everything MajOr said was true and nothing was omitted by Marinelord:

1) MajOr and Marinelord account shared.
2) The account MajOr and Marinelord account shared was used by one or both of them (Marinelord confesses to this) to matchfix to qualify DnS.
3) MajOr left games vs Lambo / Zanster / Botvinik prematurely during a ladder qualifier, because he was sick and taking medication at the time.

Best case scenario for MajOr: MajOr was associated with a matchfixer by account sharing an account that would be used in the matchfixing, he never intended to matchfix any matches nor was he on the barcode account at the time when it lost matches to DnS. Wrong place at the wrong time with the wrong company. If anything MajOr should be angry at Marinelord for matchfixing with an account that would implicate him.
"If you're not living in the US or are a US Citizen, please do not tell us how to vote or how you want our country to be governed." - Serpest, American Hero
Fran_
Profile Joined June 2010
United States1024 Posts
April 14 2016 23:53 GMT
#144
Very reasonable. And I'm not being ironic. Sucks for Major, I like the guy.
aQuaSC
Profile Joined August 2011
717 Posts
April 14 2016 23:53 GMT
#145
On April 15 2016 08:34 trada wrote:
I dont find this harsh at all.
Its not just about those 3 players and enforcing the rules. Its about sending a message to those players who couldnt (yet) be caught and prevention of abusive behaviour. Blizzard suspected there would be more players involved in win trading and by increasing the punishment when caught this could have a deterrent effect on those players. It could also make win trading or other forms of cheating less appealing to players who think about abusing the system but havent actually done anything yet.

Exactly, now when they're going to try to do something of that sort this case is going to be a confirmation and reassurance for swift action towards them.
TL+ Member
suddendeathTV
Profile Joined January 2012
Sweden388 Posts
April 14 2016 23:53 GMT
#146
On April 15 2016 07:09 Kerence wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 15 2016 06:57 BronzeKnee wrote:
On April 15 2016 06:46 ddayzy wrote:
Two out of three have admited to the charge so in the absolute worst case scenario they got it 66,6% right.


You don't apply a percentage score to justice as if it was a test.

Major being wrongly charged is wrong. It'd be better for all three to go free than for one of them to be wrongly punished.


Didn't they already say why they punished Major but no one else?

A number of other replays were examined, and along with the chat in those games, the records indicate MajOr was deliberately awarding wins. Though suspicious queuing behavior occurred, we cannot prove that any of the players that received free wins directly requested them from MajOr, so we have decided not to list the suspect matches publicly.

Also:
Rule-breaking or other malfeasance that occurs on shared accounts will be taken as evidence against all parties with access to the account, regardless of who directly took the action in question.

I don't see why this is unclear or needs further explaining at all?


It seems you can type this same post a million times in this thread and people will still not read or understand it.
Information is everything
Fran_
Profile Joined June 2010
United States1024 Posts
April 14 2016 23:55 GMT
#147
On April 15 2016 08:49 Caihead wrote:
Best case scenario for MajOr: MajOr was associated with a matchfixer by account sharing an account that would be used in the matchfixing, he never intended to matchfix any matches nor was he on the barcode account at the time when it lost matches to DnS. Wrong place at the wrong time with the wrong company. If anything MajOr should be angry at Marinelord for matchfixing with an account that would implicate him.



Yes. Unfortunately even if he's "morally" innocent, he deserves the punishment cause he still broke the rules.
imre
Profile Blog Joined November 2011
France9263 Posts
April 15 2016 00:03 GMT
#148
On April 15 2016 08:55 Fran_ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 15 2016 08:49 Caihead wrote:
Best case scenario for MajOr: MajOr was associated with a matchfixer by account sharing an account that would be used in the matchfixing, he never intended to matchfix any matches nor was he on the barcode account at the time when it lost matches to DnS. Wrong place at the wrong time with the wrong company. If anything MajOr should be angry at Marinelord for matchfixing with an account that would implicate him.



Yes. Unfortunately even if he's "morally" innocent, he deserves the punishment cause he still broke the rules.


almost every pro share accounts, so every pro should be suspended.
Zest fanboy.
Fran_
Profile Joined June 2010
United States1024 Posts
April 15 2016 00:05 GMT
#149
On April 15 2016 09:03 sAsImre wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 15 2016 08:55 Fran_ wrote:
On April 15 2016 08:49 Caihead wrote:
Best case scenario for MajOr: MajOr was associated with a matchfixer by account sharing an account that would be used in the matchfixing, he never intended to matchfix any matches nor was he on the barcode account at the time when it lost matches to DnS. Wrong place at the wrong time with the wrong company. If anything MajOr should be angry at Marinelord for matchfixing with an account that would implicate him.



Yes. Unfortunately even if he's "morally" innocent, he deserves the punishment cause he still broke the rules.


almost every pro share accounts, so every pro should be suspended.


Fair enough. If they catch them, suspend them. It's against the Terms.
imre
Profile Blog Joined November 2011
France9263 Posts
April 15 2016 00:08 GMT
#150
On April 15 2016 09:05 Fran_ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 15 2016 09:03 sAsImre wrote:
On April 15 2016 08:55 Fran_ wrote:
On April 15 2016 08:49 Caihead wrote:
Best case scenario for MajOr: MajOr was associated with a matchfixer by account sharing an account that would be used in the matchfixing, he never intended to matchfix any matches nor was he on the barcode account at the time when it lost matches to DnS. Wrong place at the wrong time with the wrong company. If anything MajOr should be angry at Marinelord for matchfixing with an account that would implicate him.



Yes. Unfortunately even if he's "morally" innocent, he deserves the punishment cause he still broke the rules.


almost every pro share accounts, so every pro should be suspended.


Fair enough. If they catch them, suspend them. It's against the Terms.


so we delete wcs, gsl, pl and we move on to hots since everyone is doing it?
Zest fanboy.
Shuffleblade
Profile Joined February 2012
Sweden1903 Posts
April 15 2016 00:15 GMT
#151
On April 15 2016 08:55 Fran_ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 15 2016 08:49 Caihead wrote:
Best case scenario for MajOr: MajOr was associated with a matchfixer by account sharing an account that would be used in the matchfixing, he never intended to matchfix any matches nor was he on the barcode account at the time when it lost matches to DnS. Wrong place at the wrong time with the wrong company. If anything MajOr should be angry at Marinelord for matchfixing with an account that would implicate him.



Yes. Unfortunately even if he's "morally" innocent, he deserves the punishment cause he still broke the rules.

He doesn't deserve the punishment because he broke the rules, he actually doesn't deserve the punishment at all. Yet the punishment is just, if you share account with a win-trader you are implicated in the crimes associated with said shared account. That is why he is punished, because the account he shared win-traded and not because he shared account.

Just like the person you replied to said, Major should blame Marinelord. This is also why Marinelords tweet says Major is innocent and takes all the blame, because he feels bad for pulling Major down with him.

Now stop arguing about nit-picky things like accountsharing that actually doesn't really have anything to do with this. Share your bank account with whoever you want but once said bankaccount can be directly linked to illegal activity you are fucked. Totally fair actually.
Maru, Bomber, TY, Dear, Classic, DeParture and Rogue!
Gwavajuice
Profile Joined June 2014
France1810 Posts
April 15 2016 00:16 GMT
#152
On April 15 2016 09:08 sAsImre wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 15 2016 09:05 Fran_ wrote:
On April 15 2016 09:03 sAsImre wrote:
On April 15 2016 08:55 Fran_ wrote:
On April 15 2016 08:49 Caihead wrote:
Best case scenario for MajOr: MajOr was associated with a matchfixer by account sharing an account that would be used in the matchfixing, he never intended to matchfix any matches nor was he on the barcode account at the time when it lost matches to DnS. Wrong place at the wrong time with the wrong company. If anything MajOr should be angry at Marinelord for matchfixing with an account that would implicate him.



Yes. Unfortunately even if he's "morally" innocent, he deserves the punishment cause he still broke the rules.


almost every pro share accounts, so every pro should be suspended.


Fair enough. If they catch them, suspend them. It's against the Terms.


so we delete wcs, gsl, pl and we move on to hots since everyone is doing it?


re-read what they say :

We identified a significant number of matches by MajOr in which he immediately forfeited the match. A number of other replays were examined, and along with the chat in those games, the records indicate MajOr was deliberately awarding wins

It's not just sharing accounts, don't act as if you don't see it.
Dear INno and all the former STX boys.
Djzapz
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
Canada10681 Posts
April 15 2016 00:26 GMT
#153
On April 15 2016 09:05 Fran_ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 15 2016 09:03 sAsImre wrote:
On April 15 2016 08:55 Fran_ wrote:
On April 15 2016 08:49 Caihead wrote:
Best case scenario for MajOr: MajOr was associated with a matchfixer by account sharing an account that would be used in the matchfixing, he never intended to matchfix any matches nor was he on the barcode account at the time when it lost matches to DnS. Wrong place at the wrong time with the wrong company. If anything MajOr should be angry at Marinelord for matchfixing with an account that would implicate him.



Yes. Unfortunately even if he's "morally" innocent, he deserves the punishment cause he still broke the rules.


almost every pro share accounts, so every pro should be suspended.


Fair enough. If they catch them, suspend them. It's against the Terms.

Unreasonable rules should be changed.
"My incompetence with power tools had been increasing exponentially over the course of 20 years spent inhaling experimental oven cleaners"
imre
Profile Blog Joined November 2011
France9263 Posts
April 15 2016 00:26 GMT
#154
On April 15 2016 09:16 Gwavajuice wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 15 2016 09:08 sAsImre wrote:
On April 15 2016 09:05 Fran_ wrote:
On April 15 2016 09:03 sAsImre wrote:
On April 15 2016 08:55 Fran_ wrote:
On April 15 2016 08:49 Caihead wrote:
Best case scenario for MajOr: MajOr was associated with a matchfixer by account sharing an account that would be used in the matchfixing, he never intended to matchfix any matches nor was he on the barcode account at the time when it lost matches to DnS. Wrong place at the wrong time with the wrong company. If anything MajOr should be angry at Marinelord for matchfixing with an account that would implicate him.



Yes. Unfortunately even if he's "morally" innocent, he deserves the punishment cause he still broke the rules.


almost every pro share accounts, so every pro should be suspended.


Fair enough. If they catch them, suspend them. It's against the Terms.


so we delete wcs, gsl, pl and we move on to hots since everyone is doing it?


re-read what they say :

We identified a significant number of matches by MajOr in which he immediately forfeited the match. A number of other replays were examined, and along with the chat in those games, the records indicate MajOr was deliberately awarding wins

It's not just sharing accounts, don't act as if you don't see it.


Shadown did exactly what major did, giving win to someone without actual collusion with this person (bunny) and nothing happened.
The inconsistency is almost as bad as the fact they're using the ladder to qualify for a qualifier.
Zest fanboy.
Waxangel
Profile Blog Joined September 2002
United States33388 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-04-15 00:28:56
April 15 2016 00:28 GMT
#155
On principle, it seems MajOr's connection to the shared accounts is enough reason to punish him.

However, regarding the issue of losing ladder games with malicious intent -- that's still his word against Blizzard's at this point. It may not matter for the sake of punishment (he's getting punished for account-sharing already), but it's still a relevant point regarding MajOr's character and Blizzard's competence.
AdministratorHey HP can you redo everything youve ever done because i have a small complaint?
wiileeyum
Profile Joined February 2015
Canada12 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-04-15 00:34:41
April 15 2016 00:28 GMT
#156
On April 15 2016 08:31 ZigguratOfUr wrote:
What do you mean by retroactive punishment? The rules were in place before they broke them. If you mean the fact that they removed the WCS points they'd won so far that doesn't have anything to do with ex post facto.


It was definitely my mistake for not being clear and misunderstanding the "retroactively disqualified from the French National qualifier of DreamHack ZOWIE Open: Tours". I meant it to be more of a general discussion and observation rather than specifying on this case.

The removal of WCS points and the participation in other tournaments are both, alongside other punishments, in the rule book and may be issed under Blizzard's discretion. What I meant was how far back would Blizzard go to retroactively punish other players should any evidence of player conducts would appear or is being addressed. Because under Player Conduct you can speculate several other players that fall under that category and can potentially have their behavior from a year ago compounded onto recent evidences. With retroactive punishment, to me, it seems that other players are at risk of being penalized.
Silvana
Profile Blog Joined September 2013
3713 Posts
April 15 2016 00:29 GMT
#157
Guys it's written right there...

the records indicate MajOr was deliberately awarding wins
imre
Profile Blog Joined November 2011
France9263 Posts
April 15 2016 00:31 GMT
#158
On April 15 2016 09:29 Silvana wrote:
Guys it's written right there...

the records indicate MajOr was deliberately awarding wins


he's not the only one who did that.
Zest fanboy.
Fran_
Profile Joined June 2010
United States1024 Posts
April 15 2016 00:33 GMT
#159
On April 15 2016 09:08 sAsImre wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 15 2016 09:05 Fran_ wrote:
On April 15 2016 09:03 sAsImre wrote:
On April 15 2016 08:55 Fran_ wrote:
On April 15 2016 08:49 Caihead wrote:
Best case scenario for MajOr: MajOr was associated with a matchfixer by account sharing an account that would be used in the matchfixing, he never intended to matchfix any matches nor was he on the barcode account at the time when it lost matches to DnS. Wrong place at the wrong time with the wrong company. If anything MajOr should be angry at Marinelord for matchfixing with an account that would implicate him.



Yes. Unfortunately even if he's "morally" innocent, he deserves the punishment cause he still broke the rules.


almost every pro share accounts, so every pro should be suspended.


Fair enough. If they catch them, suspend them. It's against the Terms.


so we delete wcs, gsl, pl and we move on to hots since everyone is doing it?


If EVERYONE is involved yes. If the pro community can't follow the Terms of Contract, it doesn't deserve to be a pro community.
But I'm sure this is not the case.
Silvana
Profile Blog Joined September 2013
3713 Posts
April 15 2016 00:33 GMT
#160
On April 15 2016 09:31 sAsImre wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 15 2016 09:29 Silvana wrote:
Guys it's written right there...

the records indicate MajOr was deliberately awarding wins


he's not the only one who did that.


But Blizzard couldn't prove it for others...
Prev 1 6 7 8 9 10 16 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Sparkling Tuna Cup
10:00
Weekly #99
ByuN vs KrystianerLIVE!
CranKy Ducklings196
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Harstem 557
Hui .231
StarCraft: Brood War
Horang2 5839
Bisu 2313
Shuttle 2297
Flash 1845
EffOrt 910
BeSt 865
Jaedong 833
Zeus 603
Mini 595
Larva 499
[ Show more ]
ggaemo 289
Soma 262
actioN 234
Hyun 221
Snow 199
sSak 166
ZerO 145
Mind 127
Soulkey 126
Killer 120
ToSsGirL 93
Rush 89
Sharp 81
soO 77
Sea.KH 45
PianO 44
Shine 41
Aegong 41
Movie 36
Backho 35
JYJ27
sorry 26
scan(afreeca) 26
Icarus 25
Free 25
Shinee 19
Terrorterran 17
Noble 15
Sacsri 15
JulyZerg 13
IntoTheRainbow 8
ivOry 4
[sc1f]eonzerg 1
Stormgate
RushiSC10
Dota 2
Gorgc4388
qojqva1299
XcaliburYe177
Counter-Strike
fl0m2466
sgares221
oskar170
Super Smash Bros
amsayoshi78
Other Games
singsing2000
B2W.Neo1045
DeMusliM495
crisheroes391
Fuzer 373
XaKoH 269
Lowko248
QueenE34
ZerO(Twitch)21
Organizations
StarCraft: Brood War
UltimateBattle 1292
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• davetesta30
• intothetv
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 2734
• WagamamaTV415
League of Legends
• Nemesis3718
• Jankos919
Upcoming Events
WardiTV European League
2h 42m
PiGosaur Monday
10h 42m
OSC
23h 12m
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
1d 2h
The PondCast
1d 20h
Online Event
2 days
Korean StarCraft League
3 days
CranKy Ducklings
3 days
Online Event
4 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL 20 Non-Korean Championship
FEL Cracow 2025
Underdog Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL 20 Team Wars
CC Div. A S7
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

BSL 21 Qualifiers
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
WardiTV Summer 2025
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
HCC Europe
Yuqilin POB S2
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.