| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
swissman777
1106 Posts
On February 17 2016 09:43 Seeker wrote: We're discussing that now. But it's not looking too good. Maybe give news in a more darker tone and away from "We would like to wish YP the best and hope that they get their investment's worth by getting people to watch more porn"  | ||
|
pure.Wasted
Canada4701 Posts
On February 17 2016 09:43 Seeker wrote: We're discussing that now. But it's not looking too good. Because pornography is unsavory or because a lot of SC2 gamers are minors? If the former, that sets a potentially dangerous precedent. If the latter, would TL display the same caution if Budweiser decided to sponsor a player? Murky ground. | ||
|
chipmonklord17
United States11944 Posts
On February 17 2016 10:24 pure.Wasted wrote: Because pornography is unsavory or because a lot of SC2 gamers are minors? If the former, that sets a potentially dangerous precedent. If the latter, would TL display the same caution if Budweiser decided to sponsor a player? Murky ground. But not allowing it is perpetuating the thing we've spent most of this thread discussing, the ROI of a pornsite sponsoring an esports team. In my opinion if Dragon is allowed to be featured as a streamer then this thread should be featured. Featuring Dragon but not this thread would still advertise porn to the people on TL via dragon streaming. Now if he's no longer featured because his channel would advertise YP to potentially minors that's a whole different conversation. but as long as he's a featured streamer the end result is still the same. EDIT: I realize I use "advertise porn" and "advertise YP" interchangeably, as they're basically the same for all intents and purposes | ||
|
aRyuujin
United States5049 Posts
On February 17 2016 10:24 pure.Wasted wrote: Because pornography is unsavory or because a lot of SC2 gamers are minors? If the former, that sets a potentially dangerous precedent. If the latter, would TL display the same caution if Budweiser decided to sponsor a player? Murky ground. There might also be a problem with the type of ads that this discussion makes likely to pop up | ||
|
geokilla
Canada8255 Posts
| ||
|
Joedaddy
United States1948 Posts
On February 17 2016 08:44 Weavel wrote: Why isn't this on community news? Usually new teams show up there. The same reason that all cheaters aren't on sc2 news | ||
|
Scarlett`
Korea (South)2435 Posts
On February 17 2016 07:56 LemOn wrote: nothing dirty, fapping to porn is just super bad for ya so I quit. But it'll be fun when the youporn dragon will stick it to other players like Scarlett etc  what @_@? | ||
|
BreAKerTV
Taiwan1658 Posts
On February 17 2016 04:51 TurboMaN wrote: Is this the YP I think it is? And Dragon "69 cents" is in :D yes. I've had to talk business with them before. | ||
|
BronzeKnee
United States5226 Posts
If E-Sports wants to be legitimate, pornography sponsors are exactly what it doesn't need. What a step in the wrong direction. Back in 2011, I really thought I'd be watching SC2 games on TV by now, with teams sponsored by Budweiser and stuff. Instead, I'm still watching games on streams with viewership that has declined, and teams sponsored by pornographers. How could SC2 have been managed so poorly? | ||
|
pure.Wasted
Canada4701 Posts
Hahaha you're not the only one who's curious. | ||
|
Richasliodo
18 Posts
| ||
digmouse
China6331 Posts
| ||
|
chipmonklord17
United States11944 Posts
On February 17 2016 15:49 digmouse wrote: Before someone asks, this means he probably can't play in any WCS event due to porn being a banned sponsor from WCS. Does that include GSL/SSL? Is he even in Korea, I had no idea until today he was even still trying to be a player as opposed to just a streamer | ||
|
digmouse
China6331 Posts
On February 17 2016 15:55 chipmonklord17 wrote: Does that include GSL/SSL? Is he even in Korea, I had no idea until today he was even still trying to be a player as opposed to just a streamer I believe the WCS rulebook covers Korean events as well, but yeah I doubt this will matter as Dragon isn't exactly playing very competitively anyway. | ||
|
Lazare1969
United States318 Posts
| ||
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?37117 Posts
On February 17 2016 16:18 Lazare1969 wrote: Still sounds better than KT Fingerboom. Debatable. | ||
|
deacon.frost
Czech Republic12133 Posts
| ||
|
Steelo_Rivers
United States1968 Posts
On February 17 2016 14:06 BronzeKnee wrote: Pornography is a sideshow. Always has been, always will be. If E-Sports wants to be legitimate, pornography sponsors are exactly what it doesn't need. What a step in the wrong direction. Back in 2011, I really thought I'd be watching SC2 games on TV by now, with teams sponsored by Budweiser and stuff. Instead, I'm still watching games on streams with viewership that has declined, and teams sponsored by pornographers. How could SC2 have been managed so poorly? lol, you're a perfect example of the type of people that cause sponsors to not want anything to do with the scene. whenever anyone decided they wanted to step in and help, they had to be judged by the TL community first and the only ones to talk would be people like you who wanted to complain, start witch hunts, and chase the sponsors/players off with your illogical thinking. How exactly is a beer company sponsoring a team any different than a porn company? If anything, porn would be more accepted right? I don't remember porn causing accidents, unruly behavior, and other problems that break up families. Also, the legal age for viewing porn in most states is 18 (lower in some others). The legal age for drinking is 21 and you're concerned about the minors who watch and see the letters "YP"? Sounds hypocritical to me. Maybe I'm not being logical here because my jimmies have been rustled a bit, but don't you think you're part of the problem with your way of thinking? | ||
|
deacon.frost
Czech Republic12133 Posts
On February 17 2016 17:41 Steelo_Rivers wrote: lol, you're a perfect example of the type of people that cause sponsors to not want anything to do with the scene. whenever anyone decided they wanted to step in and help, they had to be judged by the TL community first and the only ones to talk would be people like you who wanted to complain, start witch hunts, and chase the sponsors/players off with your illogical thinking. How exactly is a beer company sponsoring a team any different than a porn company? If anything, porn would be more accepted right? I don't remember porn causing accidents, unruly behavior, and other problems that break up families. Also, the legal age for viewing porn in most states is 18 (lower in some others). The legal age for drinking is 21 and you're concerned about the minors who watch and see the letters "YP"? Sounds hypocritical to me. Maybe I'm not being logical here because my jimmies have been rustled a bit, but don't you think you're part of the problem with your way of thinking? I've never understand what's so wrong with pornography. It's a legitimate business. | ||
|
OtherWorld
France17333 Posts
On February 17 2016 15:49 digmouse wrote: Before someone asks, this means he probably can't play in any WCS event due to porn being a banned sponsor from WCS. But this team isn't sponsored by YouPorn : their logo doesn't appear anywhere and no advertisement of YP is made. It is funded by YP, which should be an important difference. | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 League of Legends Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Other Games |
|
Afreeca Starleague
Soma vs Jaedong
WardiTV Weekly
Monday Night Weeklies
Sparkling Tuna Cup
Afreeca Starleague
Leta vs Soulkey
PiGosaur Cup
Kung Fu Cup
The PondCast
Replay Cast
CranKy Ducklings
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
